ΤΟΥ ΕΝ ΑΓΙΟΙΣ ΠΑΤΡΟΣ ΗΜΩΝ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΟΥ Ἀρχιεπισκόπου Καισαρείας Καππαδοκίας ΠΕΡΙ ΤΟΥ ΑΓΙΟΥ ΠΝΕΥΜΑΤΟΣ πρὸς τὸν ἐν ἁγίοις Ἀμφιλόχιον ἐπίσκοπον Ἰκονίου.   

 [1] Ἐπῄνεσα τὸ φιλομαθές σου καὶ φιλόπονον τοῦ τρόπου, καὶ ἥσθην γε ὑπερφυῶς τῷ ἐπιστατικῷ καὶ νηφαλίῳ τῆς διανοίας, δι' ἣν οὐδεμίαν ἀδιερεύνητον οἴει

 [2] Εἰ δὲ τῷ «ἀνοήτῳ ἐπερωτήσαντι σοφία λογισθήσεται», τὸν συνετὸν ἀκροατήν, τὸν ὑπὸ τοῦ προφήτου «τῷ θαυμαστῷ συμβούλῳ» παραζευχθέντα, πόσου ἄξιον λο

 [3] Προσευχομένῳ μοι πρῴην μετὰ τοῦ λαοῦ, καὶ ἀμφοτέρως τὴν δοξολογίαν ἀποπληροῦντι τῷ Θεῷ καὶ Πατρί, νῦν μὲν μετὰ τοῦ Υἱοῦ σὺν τῷ Πνεύματι τῷ ἁγίῳ, ν

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Βʹ   Ποίαν ἔσχεν ἀρχὴν ἡ περὶ τὰς συλλαβὰς τῶν αἱρετικῶν παρατήρησις. 

 [4] Ἡ περὶ τὰς συλλαβὰς καὶ τὰς λέξεις τῶν ἀνδρῶν τούτων μικρολογία οὐχ ἁπλῆ τίς ἐστιν, ὡς ἄν τῳ δόξαι, οὐδὲ εἰς μικρὸν τοῦ κακοῦ φέρουσα, ἀλλὰ βαθεῖα

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Γʹ   Ὅτι ἐκ τῆς ἔξωθεν σοφίας ἡ περὶ τῶν συλλαβῶν τεχνολογία. 

 [5] Ὑπηγάγετο μέντοι αὐτοὺς πρὸς τὴν ἀπάτην ταύτην καὶ ἡ τῶν ἔξωθεν παρατήρησις, οἳ τὸ ἐξ οὗ καὶ τὸ δι' οὗ κεχωρισμένοις κατὰ τὴν φύσιν πράγμασι προσδ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Δʹ   Ὅτι ἀπαρατήρητος τῇ Γραφῇ τῶν συλλαβῶν τούτων ἡ χρῆσις. 

 [6] Ἡμεῖς δὲ κεχρῆσθαι μὲν πολλαχοῦ ταῖς φωναῖς ταύταις καὶ τὸν τῆς ἀληθείας λόγον ὁμολογοῦμεν: οὐ μὴν τήν γε τοῦ Πνεύματος ἐλευθερίαν δουλεύειν πάντω

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Εʹ   Ὅτι καὶ ἐπὶ Πατρὸς λέγεται τὸ δι' οὗ, καὶ ἐπὶ Υἱοῦ τὸ ἐξ οὗ, καὶ ἐπὶ Πνεύματος. 

 [7] Τὰ μὲν δὴ ἐκείνων, τοιαῦτα: ἡμεῖς δὲ δείξομεν ὃ προεθέμεθα, ὅτι οὔτε ὁ Πατὴρ τὸ ἐξ οὗ λαβὼν τῷ Υἱῷ προσέρριψε τὸ δι' οὗ, οὔτε ὁ Υἱὸς πάλιν τὸ Πνεῦ

 [8] Εἰ δὲ πρὸς ταύτην ἡμῶν τὴν ἐκδοχὴν ἐνίστανται, τίς αὐτοὺς ἐξαιρήσεται λόγος τοῦ μὴ οὐχὶ φανερῶς ἑαυτοῖς περιπίπτειν Εἰ γὰρ μὴ ἐπὶ τοῦ Κυρίου δώσο

 [9] Γράφων ὁ ἀπόστολος πρὸς Ἐφεσίους, φησίν: «Ἀληθεύοντες δὲ ἐν ἀγάπῃ, αὐξήσωμεν εἰς αὐτὸν τὰ πάντα, ὅς ἐστιν ἡ κεφαλὴ Χριστός, ἐξ οὗ πᾶν τὸ σῶμα συνα

 [10] Ὅτι δὲ τὴν δι' οὗ φωνὴν ὁμοίως ἐπί τε Πατρὸς καὶ Υἱοῦ καὶ ἁγίου Πνεύματος ἡ Γραφὴ παραδέχεται, ἤδη δεικτέον. Ἐπὶ μὲν δὴ τοῦ Υἱοῦ παρέλκον ἂν εἴη

 [11] Τὰ αὐτὰ δὲ ταῦτα καὶ περὶ τῆς ἐν συλλαβῆς εἰπεῖν ἔχομεν, ὅτι καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Πατρὸς τὴν χρῆσιν αὐτῆς ἡ Γραφὴ παραδέδεκται, ὡς ἐπὶ μὲν Παλαιᾶ

 [12] Οὐ μόνον δὲ ἐπὶ τῆς θεολογίας αἱ χρήσεις τῶν φωνῶν ἐπαλλάττονται, ἀλλ' ἤδη καὶ πρὸς τὰ ὑπ' ἀλλήλων σημαινόμενα πολλάκις ἀντιμεθίστανται, ὅταν ἑτέ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Ϛʹ   Ἀπάντησις πρὸς τοὺς ἀποφαινομένους, μὴ μετὰ Πατρὸς εἶναι τὸν Υἱόν, ἀλλὰ μετὰ τὸν Πατέρα, ἐν ᾧ τὰ περὶ τῆς ὁμοτίμου δόξης. 

 [13] Καὶ μὴν οὐδὲ πρὸς τὴν ἐξ ἀγνοίας συγγνώμην δυνατὸν αὐτοὺς καταφυγεῖν, οὕτω τεχνικῶς καὶ κακοήθως τὸν λόγον ὑπολαμβάνοντας. Οἵγε προδήλως ἡμῖν χαλ

 [14] Ἡμεῖς δὲ ἐκεῖνο πρῶτον αὐτοὺς ἐρωτήσωμεν, τὸ μετὰ τὸν Πατέρα πῶς τὸν Υἱὸν λέγουσιν ὡς χρόνῳ νεώτερον, ἢ ὡς τάξει, ἢ ὡς ἀξίᾳ Ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ μέν, οὐδ

 [15] Εἰ δ' ὡς ἐν τόπῳ ὑποκειμένῳ ὑπόβασίν τινα τοῦ Υἱοῦ νοοῦσι πρὸς τὸν Πατέρα, ὥστε ὑπεράνω μὲν τὸν Πατέρα καθῆσθαι, πρὸς δὲ τὸ ἐφεξῆς εἰς τὸ κάτω τὸ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Ζʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας μὴ ἁρμόζειν ἐπὶ Υἱοῦ λέγεσθαι τὸ μεθ' οὗ, ἀλλὰ τὸ δι' οὗ. 

 [16] Ἀλλὰ τὸ μετ' αὐτοῦ λέγειν, φασίν, ἀπεξενωμένον παντελῶς καὶ ἀσύνηθες: τὸ δὲ δι' αὐτοῦ, τῷ τε λόγῳ τῆς Γραφῆς οἰκειότατον, καὶ ἐν τῇ χρήσει τῆς ἀδ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Ηʹ   Ποσαχῶς τὸ δι' οὗ, καὶ ἐπὶ ποίας ἐννοίας ἁρμοδιώτερον τὸ μεθ' οὗ: ἐν ᾧ καὶ ἐξήγησις, πῶς ἐντολὴν λαμβάνει ὁ Υἱὸς καὶ πῶς ἀποστέλλεται.

 [17] Ὅταν οὖν ὁ ἀπόστολος εὐχαριστῇ «τῷ Θεῷ διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ», καὶ πάλιν δι' αὐτοῦ λέγῃ τὴν χάριν εἰληφέναι «καὶ τὴν ἀποστολὴν εἰς ὑπακοὴν πίστεως ἐν

 [18] Δι' αὐτοῦ γὰρ πᾶσα βοήθεια τῶν ψυχῶν, καὶ καθ' ἕκαστον εἶδος ἐπιμελείας ἰδιάζουσά τις προσηγορία ἐπινενόηται. Ὅταν μὲν γὰρ τὴν ἄμωμον ψυχήν, τὴν

 [19] Ὁποία δὲ πάλιν καὶ ἡ παρὰ τοῦ Πατρὸς εἰς ἡμᾶς δι' αὐτοῦ χορηγία τῶν ἀγαθῶν, ἑξῆς ἂν εἴη λέγειν. Ὅτι πάσης τῆς φύσεως, τῆς ἐν τῇ κτίσει, τῇ τε ὁρω

 [20] Ὅταν οὖν λέγῃ: «Ἐγὼ ἐξ ἐμαυτοῦ οὐκ ἐλάλησα», καὶ πάλιν: «Καθὼς εἴρηκέ μοι ὁ Πατήρ, οὕτω λαλῶ», καί: «Ὁ λόγος ὃν ἀκούετε, οὐκ ἔστιν ἐμός, ἀλλὰ τοῦ

 [21] «Ὁ ἑωρακὼς ἐμέ, ἑώρακε τὸν Πατέρα», οὐ τὸν χαρακτῆρα, οὐδὲ τὴν μορφήν: καθαρὰ γὰρ συνθέσεως ἡ θεία φύσις: ἀλλὰ τὸ ἀγαθὸν τοῦ θελήματος, ὅπερ σύνδ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Θʹ   Ἀφοριστικαὶ ἔννοιαι περὶ τοῦ Πνεύματος τῇ τῶν Γραφῶν ἀκολουθοῦσαι διδασκαλίᾳ. 

 [22] Ἤδη δὲ καὶ περὶ τοῦ Πνεύματος τὰς κοινὰς ἡμῶν ἐννοίας ὁποῖαί τινές εἰσιν ἐξετάσωμεν, τάς τε ἐκ τῶν Γραφῶν περὶ αὐτοῦ συναχθείσας ἡμῖν καὶ ἃς ἐκ τ

 [23] Οἰκείωσις δὲ Πνεύματος πρὸς ψυχὴν οὐχ ὁ διὰ τόπου προσεγγισμὸς_πῶς γὰρ ἂν πλησιάσαι τῷ ἀσωμάτῳ σωματικῶς _ἀλλ' ὁ χωρισμὸς τῶν παθῶν, ἅπερ ἀπὸ τῆ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Ιʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας μὴ χρῆναι συντάσσειν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ τὸ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα. 

 [24] Οὐ χρή, φασί, Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ συντετάχθαι τὸ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, διά τε τὸ τῆς φύσεως ἀλλότριον καὶ τὸ τῆς ἀξίας καταδεές. Πρὸς οὓς δίκαιον τὴν τῶν ἀποστ

 [25] Ἀλλ' ἡ μὲν παρασκευὴ τοῦ καθ' ἡμῶν πολέμου ἐξήρτυται καὶ πᾶσα διάνοια πρὸς ἡμᾶς τέταται, καὶ γλῶσσαι βλασφήμων ὧδε τοξεύουσι σφοδρότερον βάλλουσα

 [26] Χριστιανοὶ πόθεν ἡμεῖς Διὰ τῆς πίστεως, πᾶς τις ἂν εἴποι. Σῳζόμεθα δὲ τίνα τρόπον Ἀναγεννηθέντες δηλονότι διὰ τῆς ἐν τῷ βαπτίσματι χάριτος. Πόθ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΑʹ   Ὅτι παραβάται οἱ τὸ Πνεῦμα ἀρνούμενοι. 

 [27] Τίνι οὐαί τίνι θλῖψις τίνι ἀπορία καὶ σκότος τίνι αἰωνία κατάκρισις Οὐ τοῖς παραβάταις οὐ τοῖς τὴν πίστιν ἀρνησαμένοις Τίς δὲ τῆς ἀρνήσεως

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΒʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας ἐξαρκεῖν καὶ μόνον τὸ εἰς τὸν Κύριον βάπτισμα. 

 [28] Καὶ μηδένα παρακρουέσθω τὸ τοῦ ἀποστόλου, ὡς τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ Πατρὸς καὶ τοῦ ἁγίου Πνεύματος, ἐπὶ τῆς τοῦ βαπτίσματος μνήμης πολλάκις παραλιμπάνοντος

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΓʹ   Αἰτίας ἀπόδοσις διὰ τὶ οἱ ἄγγελοι Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ παρὰ τῷ Παύλῳ συμπαρελήφθησαν. 

 [29] Ἀλλὰ καὶ ἕτερα, φησί, συναριθμούμενα Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ, οὐχὶ καὶ συνδοξάζεται πάντως. Ὡς ὁ ἀπόστολος ἀγγέλους συμπαρελάβετο, εἰς τὴν διαμαρτυρίαν τὴν

 [30] Καὶ οὐχ οὗτος μόνον, ἀλλὰ καὶ πάντες ἁπλῶς οἱ λόγου τινὰ διακονίαν πεπιστευμένοι, οὐδένα χρόνον διαμαρτυρόμενοι παύονται, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸν οὐρανὸν κα

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΔʹ   Ἔνστασις, ὅτι καὶ εἰς Μωϋσῆν τινες ἐβαπτίσθησαν, καὶ ἐπίστευσαν εἰς αὐτόν, καὶ πρὸς ταύτην ἀπάντησις, ἐν οἷς καὶ τὰ περὶ τύπων. 

 [31] Ἀλλ' οὐδὲ εἰ βαπτιζόμεθα, φησίν, εἰς αὐτό, οὐδ' οὕτω δίκαιον μετὰ Θεοῦ τετάχθαι. Καὶ γὰρ «καὶ εἰς τὸν Μωϋσῆν τινες ἐβαπτίσθησαν, ἐν τῇ νεφέλῃ καὶ

 [32] Τί οὖν ἐπειδὴ τυπικῶς εἰς Μωϋσῆν ἐβαπτίσθησαν, διὰ τοῦτο μικρὰ ἡ τοῦ βαπτίσματος χάρις Οὕτω μὲν οὖν οὐδ' ἂν ἄλλο τι μέγα εἴη τῶν ἡμετέρων, εἴπε

 [33] Ἀλλὰ καὶ ἡ εἰς τὸν Μωϋσέα πίστις οὐ τὴν εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα πίστιν ὀλίγου τινὸς ἀξίαν δείκνυσιν: ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὸν τούτων λόγον, μᾶλλον τὴν εἰς τὸν Θεὸν τῶ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΕʹ   Ἀπάντησις πρὸς ἀνθυποφορὰν ὅτι καὶ εἰς ὕδωρ βαπτιζόμεθα: ἐν ᾧ καὶ τὰ περὶ βαπτίσματος. 

 [34] Τί οὖν πρὸς τούτοις ἔτι Πολλῶν γὰρ διαλύσεων εὐποροῦσιν. Καὶ εἰς ὕδωρ, φασί, βαπτιζόμεθα, καὶ οὐ δήπου τὸ ὕδωρ πάσης ὁμοῦ τῆς κτίσεως προτιμήσομ

 [35] Ἡ τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ Σωτῆρος ἡμῶν περὶ τὸν ἄνθρωπον οἰκονομία ἀνάκλησίς ἐστιν ἀπὸ τῆς ἐκπτώσεως, καὶ ἐπάνοδος εἰς οἰκείωσιν Θεοῦ ἀπὸ τῆς διὰ τὴν παρακο

 [36] Διὰ Πνεύματος ἁγίου ἡ εἰς παράδεισον ἀποκατάστασις: ἡ εἰς βασιλείαν οὐρανῶν ἄνοδος: ἡ εἰς υἱοθεσίαν ἐπάνοδος: ἡ παρρησία τοῦ καλεῖν ἑαυτῶν Πατέρα

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙϚʹ   Ὅτι ἀχώριστον ἐπὶ πάσης ἐννοίας, Πατρὸς καὶ Υἱοῦ τὸ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, ἐπί τε τῆς τῶν νοητῶν δημιουργίας καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς τῶν ἀνθρώπων οἰκονομί

 [37] Ἐπὶ οὖν τὸ ἐξ ἀρχῆς ἐπανίωμεν, ὅπως ἐν πᾶσιν ἀχώριστόν ἐστι καὶ ἀδιάστατον παντελῶς Πατρὸς καὶ Υἱοῦ τὸ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα. Ἐν τῷ περὶ τοῦ χαρίσματος τῶ

 [38] Μάθοις δ' ἂν τὴν πρὸς Πατέρα καὶ Υἱὸν τοῦ Πνεύματος κοινωνίαν καὶ ἐκ τῶν δημιουργημάτων τῶν ἐξ ἀρχῆς. Αἱ γὰρ καθαραὶ καὶ νοεραὶ καὶ ὑπερκόσμιοι δ

 [39] Τὰς δὲ περὶ τὸν ἄνθρωπον οἰκονομίας, τὰς ὑπὸ «τοῦ μεγάλου Θεοῦ καὶ Σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ» κατὰ τὴν ἀγαθότητα τοῦ Θεοῦ γενομένας, τίς ἀντερεῖ

 [40] Εὕροι δὲ ἄν τις ἀκριβῶς λογιζόμενος, καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ καιροῦ τῆς προσδοκωμένης ἐπιφανείας τῆς ἐξ οὐρανῶν τοῦ Κυρίου, μὴ ἀσυντελὲς τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον,

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΖʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας μὴ συναριθμεῖσθαι Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ τὸ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα, ἀλλ' ὑπαριθμεῖσθαι: ἐν ᾧ καὶ περὶ τῆς εὐσεβοῦς συναριθμήσεως κεφα

 [41] Τὴν δὲ ὑπαρίθμησιν ὃ καὶ λέγουσι, καὶ κατὰ τίνος σημαινομένου τὴν φωνὴν ταύτην ἄγουσιν, οὐδὲ ἐπινοῆσαι ῥᾴδιον. Ὅτι μὲν γὰρ ἐκ τῆς τοῦ κόσμου σοφί

 [42] Τί γὰρ λέγουσιν Ὁρᾶτε αὐτῶν τῆς ἀλαζονείας τὰ ῥήματα. Ἡμεῖς τοῖς μὲν ὁμοτίμοις φαμὲν τὴν συναρίθμησιν πρέπειν: τοῖς δὲ πρὸς τὸ χεῖρον παρηλλαγμέ

 [43] Καὶ τὸν Υἱὸν ὑπαριθμεῖσθαι τῷ Πατρὶ λέγετε, καὶ τὸ Πνεῦμα τῷ Υἱῷ, ἢ τῷ Πνεύματι μόνῳ τὴν ὑπαρίθμησιν ἀφορίζετε Εἰ μὲν γὰρ καὶ τὸν Υἱὸν ὑπαριθμεῖ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΗʹ   Πῶς ἐν τῇ ὁμολογίᾳ τῶν τριῶν ὑποστάσεων τὸ εὐσεβὲς τῆς μοναρχίας δόγμα διατηροῦμεν, ἐν ᾧ καὶ ὁ κατὰ τῶν τὸ Πνεῦμα ὑπαριθμεῖσθαι φασκό

 [44] Πατέρα καὶ Υἱὸν καὶ ἅγιον Πνεῦμα παραδιδοὺς ὁ Κύριος, οὐ μετὰ τοῦ ἀριθμοῦ συνεξέδωκεν. Οὐ γὰρ εἶπεν ὅτι εἰς πρῶτον καὶ δεύτερον καὶ τρίτον: οὐδὲ

 [45] Οὐ γὰρ κατὰ σύνθεσιν ἀριθμοῦμεν, ἀφ' ἑνὸς εἰς πλῆθος ποιούμενοι τὴν παραύξησιν, ἓν καὶ δύο καὶ τρία λέγοντες, οὐδὲ πρῶτον καὶ δεύτερον καὶ τρίτον

 [46] Καὶ οὐκ ἐντεῦθεν μόνον τῆς κατὰ τὴν φύσιν κοινωνίας αἱ ἀποδείξεις, ἀλλ' ὅτι καὶ ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ εἶναι λέγεται: οὐχ ὡς τὰ πάντα ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ, ἀλλ' ὡς ἐ

 [47] Ἐπειδὴ δὲ διὰ δυνάμεως φωτιστικῆς τῷ κάλλει τῆς τοῦ Θεοῦ τοῦ ἀοράτου εἰκόνος ἐνατενίζομεν, καὶ δι' αὐτῆς ἀναγόμεθα ἐπὶ τὸ ὑπέρκαλον τοῦ ἀρχετύπου

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΙΘʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας μὴ εἶναι δοξαστὸν τὸ Πνεῦμα. 

 [48] Ἔστω ταῦτα, φησίν, ἀλλ' οὐχὶ καὶ δόξα πάντως ὀφειλομένη ἐστὶ τῷ Πνεύματι, ὥστε δοξολογίαις ἀνυψοῦσθαι παρ' ἡμῶν. Πόθεν ἂν οὖν τῆς ὑπερεχούσης πάν

 [49] Αἱ δὲ ἐνέργειαι τίνες Ἄρρητοι μὲν διὰ τὸ μέγεθος, ἀνεξαρίθμητοι δὲ διὰ τὸ πλῆθος. Πῶς μὲν γὰρ νοήσομεν τὰ τῶν αἰώνων ἐπέκεινα τίνες ἦσαν αὐτοῦ

 [50] Ἀλλὰ «καὶ ἐντυγχάνει, φησίν, ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν». Ὥστε ὅσον ἱκέτης τοῦ εὐεργέτου λείπεται, τοσοῦτον τὸ Πνεῦμα κατὰ τὴν ἀξίαν ἀποπέπτωκε τοῦ Θεοῦ. Σὺ δὲ οὔ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Κʹ   Πρὸς τοὺς λέγοντας μήτε ἐν δουλικῇ τάξει μήτε ἐν δεσποτικῇ εἶναι τὸ Πνεῦμα, ἀλλ' ἐν τῇ τῶν ἐλευθέρων. 

 [51] Οὔτε δοῦλόν φησιν, οὔτε δεσπότην, ἀλλ' ἐλεύθερον. Ὢ τῆς δεινῆς ἀναλγησίας, ὢ τῆς ἐλεεινῆς ἀφοβίας τῶν ταῦτα λεγόντων. Τί πλέον αὐτῶν ὀδύρωμαι τὸ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΑʹ   Μαρτυρίαι ἐκ τῶν Γραφῶν τοῦ κυριολογεῖσθαι τὸ Πνεῦμα. 

 [52] Καὶ τί δεῖ ἐκ τῶν ταπεινῶν ἀπομαχομένους, αἰσχρῶς τὴν νίκην κατακτᾶσθαι τῷ λόγῳ, ἐξὸν τῇ παραθέσει τῶν σεμνοτέρων ἀναντίρρητον τὴν ὑπερβολὴν τῆς

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΒʹ   Σύστασις τῆς κατὰ τὴν φύσιν κοινωνίας τοῦ Πνεύματος, ἐκ τοῦ ὁμοίως εἶναι Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ πρὸς θεωρίαν δυσέφικτον. 

 [53] Οὐ μόνον δὲ ἐξ ὧν τὰς αὐτὰς προσηγορίας ἔχει καὶ κοινωνόν ἐστι τῶν ἐνεργειῶν Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ, τὸ ὑπερέχον αὐτοῦ τῆς φύσεως γνώριμον, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐξ ὧν

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΓʹ   Ὅτι δοξολογία Πνεύματός ἐστιν ἡ τῶν προσόντων αὐτῷ ἀπαρίθμησις. 

 [54] Τῶν μὲν οὖν ἄλλων ἑκάστη δυνάμεων ἐν περιγραπτῷ τόπῳ τυγχάνειν πεπίστευται. Ὁ γὰρ τῷ Κορνηλίῳ ἐπιστὰς ἄγγελος, οὐκ ἦν ἐν ταὐτῷ καὶ παρὰ τῷ Φιλίππ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΔʹ   Ἔλεγχος τῆς ἀτοπίας τῶν μὴ δοξαζόντων τὸ Πνεῦμα ἐκ τῆς πρὸς τὰ ἐν τῇ κτίσει δοξαστὰ παραθέσεως. 

 [55] Εἶτα «δόξῃ μὲν καὶ τιμῇ ἐστεφάνωται» ὁ κοινὸς ἄνθρωπος, καὶ «δόξα καὶ τιμὴ καὶ εἰρήνη παντὶ τῷ ποιοῦντι τὸ ἀγαθὸν» ἐν ἐπαγγελίαις ἀπόκειται. Ἔστι

 [56] Σκεψώμεθα οὖν τὰ καθέκαστον. Φύσει ἐστὶν ἀγαθόν, ὡς ἀγαθὸς ὁ Πατὴρ καὶ ἀγαθὸς ὁ Υἱός. Ἡ κτίσις δὲ ἐν τῇ ἐκλογῇ τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ μέτοχός ἐστι τῆς ἀγαθότ

 [57] Ἐν ἡμῖν, φησί, τὸ Πνεῦμα ὡς δῶρόν ἐστι παρὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ. Οὐ δήπου δὲ τὸ δῶρον ταῖς ἴσαις τιμαῖς τῷ δεδωκότι σεμνύνεται. Δῶρον μὲν οὖν Θεοῦ τὸ Πνεῦμα

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΕʹ   Ὅτι τῇ ἐν συλλαβῇ ἀντὶ τῆς σὺν ἡ Γραφὴ κέχρηται, ἐν ᾧ καὶ ὅτι ἡ καὶ ἰσοδυναμεῖ τῇ σύν. 

 [58] Πῶς οὖν, φησίν, ἡ Γραφὴ οὐδαμοῦ συνδοξαζόμενον Πατρὶ καὶ Υἱῷ τὸ Πνεῦμα παρέδωκεν, ἀλλὰ πεφυλαγμένως ἐξέκλινε τὸ ‘σὺν τῷ Πνεύματι’ εἰπεῖν πανταχο

 [59] Ἡμεῖς γὰρ ἀμφοτέρας ἐν τῇ τῶν πιστῶν χρήσει καταλαμβάνοντες τὰς ῥήσεις, ἀμφοτέραις κεχρήμεθα: τὴν μὲν δόξαν τῷ Πνεύματι ὁμοίως ἀφ' ἑκατέρας πληρο

 [60] Πρὸς δὲ τὴν ἐν συλλαβὴν ἐκεῖνο μάλιστα τὸ διάφορον ἔχει, ὅτι ἡ μὲν σὺν τὴν πρὸς ἀλλήλους συνάφειαν τῶν κοινωνούντων παρίστησιν, οἷον τῶν συμπλεόν

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚϚʹ   Ὅτι ὁσαχῶς λέγεται τὸ ἐν, τοσαυταχῶς καὶ ἐπὶ τοῦ Πνεύματος λαμβάνεται. 

 [61] Ἐμοὶ τοίνυν σκοπουμένῳ δοκεῖ, ἁπλῆς καὶ συντόμου τῆς ἐκφωνήσεως οὔσης, πολλὰ καὶ ποικίλα εἶναι τὰ δι' αὐτῆς σημαινόμενα. Ὁσαχῶς γὰρ λέγεται τὸ ἐν

 [62] Ὃ δὲ παράδοξον μὲν εἰπεῖν, ἀληθὲς δὲ οὐδενὸς ἔλαττον, ὅτι καὶ ὡς χώρα τῶν ἁγιαζομένων πολλάκις τὸ Πνεῦμα λέγεται. Καὶ φανήσεται οὐδὲ οὗτος ὁ τρόπ

 [63] Ἐν μὲν οὖν τοῖς γεννητοῖς οὕτω πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως ἐνεῖναι λέγεται τὸ Πνεῦμα: Πατρὶ δὲ καὶ Υἱῷ οὐχὶ ἐνεῖναι μᾶλλον, ἀλλὰ συνεῖναι εἰπεῖν εὐσ

 [64] Δεύτερος δὲ νοῦς, οὐδὲ αὐτὸς ἀπόβλητος: ὅτι ὥσπερ ἐν τῷ Υἱῷ ὁρᾶται ὁ Πατήρ, οὕτως ὁ Υἱὸς ἐν τῷ Πνεύματι. Ἡ τοίνυν ἐν τῷ Πνεύματι προσκύνησις, τὴν

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΖʹ   Πόθεν ἡ σὺν ἤρξατο συλλαβὴ καὶ ποίαν δύναμιν ἔχει, ἐν ᾧ καὶ τὰ περὶ τῶν ἀγράφων τῆς Ἐκκλησίας νομίμων. 

 [65] Τίνος οὖν ἕνεκεν, φασίν, ἰδίως προσηκούσης τῷ Πνεύματι τῆς ἐν συλλαβῆς, καὶ εἰς πᾶσαν ἡμῖν τὴν περὶ αὐτοῦ ἔννοιαν ἐξαρκούσης, τὴν καινὴν ταύτην ὑ

 [66] Τῶν ἐν τῇ Ἐκκλησίᾳ πεφυλαγμένων δογμάτων καὶ κηρυγμάτων, τὰ μὲν ἐκ τῆς ἐγγράφου διδασκαλίας ἔχομεν, τὰ δὲ ἐκ τῆς τῶν ἀποστόλων παραδόσεως διαδοθέ

 [67] Ἐπιλείψει με ἡ ἡμέρα, τὰ ἄγραφα τῆς Ἐκκλησίας μυστήρια διηγούμενον. Ἐῶ τἄλλα: αὐτὴν δὲ τὴν ὁμολογίαν τῆς πίστεως εἰς Πατέρα καὶ Υἱὸν καὶ ἅγιον Πν

 [68] Εἴρηται μὲν οὖν τίς ἡ δύναμις ἑκατέρας τῆς ἐκφωνήσεως. Εἰρήσεται δὲ καὶ πάλιν, ὅπη τε συμφωνοῦσιν ἀλλήλαις καὶ ὅπη διίστανται: οὐκ ἀπομαχόμεναι π

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΗʹ   Ὅτι ἃ περὶ τῶν ἀνθρώπων λέγει ἡ Γραφὴ ὡς συμβασιλευόντων Χριστῷ, ταῦτα περὶ τοῦ Πνεύματος οὐ συγχωροῦσιν οἱ ἀντιλέγοντες. 

 [69] Ἴδωμεν δὲ καὶ εἴ τινα ἀπολογίαν τοῖς πατράσιν ἡμῶν τῆς χρήσεως ταύτης ἐπινοήσομεν. Οἱ γὰρ τὴν ἀρχὴν παρασχόντες τῷ λόγῳ, μᾶλλον ἡμῶν ὑπόκεινται τ

 [70] Αἰσχύνομαι ἐπαγαγεῖν τὰ λειπόμενα, ὅτι σὺ μὲν συνδοξασθήσεσθαι Χριστῷ προσδοκᾷς_«εἴπερ γὰρ συμπάσχομεν ἵνα καὶ συνδοξασθῶμεν»_, τὸ δὲ Πνεῦμα τῆς

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ ΚΘʹ   Ἀπαρίθμησις τῶν ἐν τῇ Ἐκκλησίᾳ διαφανῶν, ὅσοι ἐχρήσαντο ἐν τοῖς συγγράμμασιν ἑαυτῶν τῇ φωνῇ σύν. 

 [71] Πρός γε μὴν τὸ ἀμάρτυρον καὶ ἄγραφον εἶναι τὴν σὺν τῷ Πνεύματι δοξολογίαν, ἐκεῖνο λέγομεν: ὅτι εἰ μὲν μηδὲν ἕτερον ἄγραφον, μηδὲ τοῦτο παραδεχθήτ

 [72] Εἰρηναῖος ἐκεῖνος, καὶ Κλήμης ὁ Ῥωμαῖος, καὶ Διονύσιος ὁ Ῥωμαῖος, καὶ ὁ Ἀλεξανδρεὺς Διονύσιος, ὃ καὶ παράδοξον ἀκοῦσαι, ἐν τῇ δευτέρᾳ πρὸς τὸν ὁμ

 [73] Ἤδη δὲ καὶ Ὠριγένην ἐν πολλαῖς τῶν εἰς τοὺς ψαλμοὺς διαλέξεων εὕρομεν, σὺν τῷ ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι τὴν δόξαν ἀποδιδόντα, ἄνδρα οὐδὲ πάνυ τι ὑγιεῖς περὶ

 [74] Γρηγόριον δὲ τὸν μέγαν καὶ τὰς ἐκείνου φωνὰς ποῦ θήσομεν ἆρ' οὐχὶ μετὰ τῶν ἀποστόλων καὶ προφητῶν ἄνδρα τῷ αὐτῷ πνεύματι ἐκείνοις περιπατήσαντα

 [75] Πῶς οὖν καινοτόμος ἐγώ, καὶ νεωτέρων ῥημάτων δημιουργός, ἔθνη ὅλα καὶ πόλεις, καὶ ἔθος πάσης μνήμης ἀνθρωπίνης πρεσβύτερον, καὶ ἄνδρας στύλους τῆ

  ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟΝ Λʹ   Διήγησις τῆς παρούσης τῶν ἐκκλησιῶν καταστάσεως. 

 [76] Τίνι οὖν ὁμοιώσομεν τὴν παροῦσαν κατάστασιν Ἦ που ὁμοία ἐστὶ πολέμῳ τινὶ ναυτικῷ, ὃν ἐκ παλαιῶν προσκρουσμάτων, πολὺν κατ' ἀλλήλων τὸν θυμὸν θρέ

 [77] Μετάβα δή μοι ἀπὸ τῆς εἰκόνος ἐπ' αὐτὸ τοῦ κακοῦ τὸ ἀρχέτυπον. Οὐχὶ πάλαι μέν πως ἐδόκει τὸ Ἀρειανὸν σχίσμα εἰς ἀντίπαλον μοῖραν ἀποκριθὲν τῇ Ἐκκ

 [78] Διὰ ταῦτα λυσιτελεστέραν τοῦ λόγου τὴν σιωπὴν ἐτιθέμην, ὡς οὐ δυναμένης φωνῆς ἀνθρώπου διὰ τοσούτων θορύβων εἰσακουσθῆναι. Εἰ γὰρ ἀληθῆ τὰ τοῦ Ἐκ

 [79] Τούτων μὲν οὖν πάντων ἕνεκεν σιωπᾶν ἔδει, ἀλλ' ἀνθεῖλκε γὰρ ἑτέρωθεν ἡ ἀγάπη, οὐ ζητοῦσα τὸ ἑαυτῆς, καὶ νικᾶν ἀξιοῦσα πᾶσαν καιρῶν καὶ πραγμάτων

4. The petty exactitude of these men about syllables and words is not, as might be supposed, simple and straightforward; nor is the mischief to which it tends a small one. There is involved a deep and covert design against true religion. Their pertinacious contention is to show that the mention of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is unlike, as though they will thence find it easy to demonstrate that there is a variation in nature. They have an old sophism, invented by Aetius, the champion of this heresy, in one of whose Letters there is a passage to the effect that things naturally unlike are expressed in unlike terms, and, conversely, that things expressed in unlike terms are naturally unlike. In proof of this statement he drags in the words of the Apostle, “One God and Father of whom are all things,…and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things.”  1  1 Cor. viii. 6. “Whatever, then,” he goes on, “is the relation of these terms to one another, such will be the relation of the natures indicated by them; and as the term ‘of whom’ is unlike the term ‘by whom,’ so is the Father unlike the Son.”  2  The story as told by Theodoret (Ecc. Hist. ii. 23) is as follows: “Constantius, on his return from the west, passed some time at Constantinople” (i.e. in 360, when the synod at Constantinople was held, shortly after that of the Isaurian Seleucia, “substance” and “hypostasis” being declared inadmissible terms, and the Son pronounced like the Father according to the Scriptures). The Emperor was urged that “Eudoxius should be convicted of blasphemy and lawlessness. Constantius however…replied that a decision must first be come to on matters concerning the faith, and that afterwards the case of Eudoxius should be enquired into. Basilius (of Ancyra), relying on his former intimacy, ventured boldly to object to the Emperor that he was attacking the apostolic decrees; but Constantius took this ill, and told Basilius to hold his tongue, for to you, said he, the disturbance of the churches is due. When Basilius was silenced, Eustathius (of Sebasteia) intervened and said, Since, sir, you wish a decision to be come to on what concerns the faith, consider the blasphemies uttered against the Only Begotten by Eudoxius; and, as he spoke, he produced the exposition of faith, wherein, besides many other impieties, were found the following expressions: Things that are spoken of in unlike terms are unlike in substance; there is one God the Father of Whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ by Whom are all things. Now the term ‘of Whom’ is unlike the term ‘by Whom;’ so the Son is unlike God the Father. Constantius ordered this exposition of the faith to be read, and was displeased with the blasphemy which it involved. He therefore asked Eudoxius if he had drawn it up. Eudoxius instantly repudiated the authorship, and said that it was written by Aetius. Now Aetius…at the present time was associated with Eunomius and Eudoxius, and, as he found Eudoxius to be, like himself, a sybarite in luxury as well as a heretic in faith, he chose Antioch as the most congenial place of abode, and both he and Eunomius were fast fixtures at the couches of Eudoxius.…The Emperor had been told all this, and now ordered Aetius to be brought before him. On his appearance, Constantius shewed him the document in question, and proceeded to enquire if he was the author of its language. Aetius, totally ignorant of what had taken place, and unaware of the drift of the enquiry, expected that he should win praise by confession, and owned that he was the author of the phrases in question. Then the Emperor perceived the greatness of his iniquity, and forthwith condemned him to exile and to be deported to a place in Phrygia.” St. Basil accompanied Eustathius and his namesake to Constantinople on this occasion, being then only in deacon’s orders. (Philost. iv. 12.) Basil of Ancyra and Eustathius in their turn suffered banishment. Basil, the deacon, returned to the Cappadocian Cæsarea. On this heresy depends the idle subtilty of these men about the phrases in question. They accordingly assign to God the Father, as though it were His distinctive portion and lot, the phrase “of Whom;” to God the Son they confine the phrase “by Whom;” to the Holy Spirit that of “in Whom,” and say that this use of the syllables is never interchanged, in order that, as I have already said, the variation of language may indicate the variation of nature.  3  cf. the form of the Arian Creed as given by Eunomius in his ᾽Απολογία (Migne, xxx. 840. “We believe in one God, Father Almighty, of whom are all things; and in one only begotten Son of God, God the word, our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things; and in one Holy Ghost, the Comforter, in whom distribution of all grace in proportion as may be most expedient is made to each of the Saints.” Verily it is sufficiently obvious that in their quibbling about the words they are endeavouring to maintain the force of their impious argument.

By the term “  of whom” they wish to indicate the Creator; by the term “  through whom,” the subordinate agent  4  cf. Eunomius, Liber. Apol. § 27, where of the Son he says ὑπουργός. or instrument;  5  On the word ὄργανον, a tool, as used of the Word of God, cf. Nestorius in Marius Merc. Migne, p. 761 & Cyr. Alex. Ep. 1. Migne, x. 37. “The creature did not give birth to the uncreated, but gave birth to man, organ of Godhead.” cf. Thomasius, Christ. Dog. i. 336. Mr. Johnston quotes Philo (de Cher. § 35; i. 162. n.) as speaking of ὄργανον δὲ λόγον Θεοῦ δι᾽ οὗ κατεσκευάσθη (sc. ὁ κόσμος). by the term “  in whom,” or “  in which,” they mean to shew the time or place. The object of all this is that the Creator of the universe  6  Here of course the Son is meant. may be regarded as of no higher dignity than an instrument, and that the Holy Spirit may appear to be adding to existing things nothing more than the contribution derived from place or time.

1 1 Cor. viii. 6.
2 The story as told by Theodoret (Ecc. Hist. ii. 23) is as follows: “Constantius, on his return from the west, passed some time at Constantinople” (i.e. in 360, when the synod at Constantinople was held, shortly after that of the Isaurian Seleucia, “substance” and “hypostasis” being declared inadmissible terms, and the Son pronounced like the Father according to the Scriptures). The Emperor was urged that “Eudoxius should be convicted of blasphemy and lawlessness. Constantius however…replied that a decision must first be come to on matters concerning the faith, and that afterwards the case of Eudoxius should be enquired into. Basilius (of Ancyra), relying on his former intimacy, ventured boldly to object to the Emperor that he was attacking the apostolic decrees; but Constantius took this ill, and told Basilius to hold his tongue, for to you, said he, the disturbance of the churches is due. When Basilius was silenced, Eustathius (of Sebasteia) intervened and said, Since, sir, you wish a decision to be come to on what concerns the faith, consider the blasphemies uttered against the Only Begotten by Eudoxius; and, as he spoke, he produced the exposition of faith, wherein, besides many other impieties, were found the following expressions: Things that are spoken of in unlike terms are unlike in substance; there is one God the Father of Whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ by Whom are all things. Now the term ‘of Whom’ is unlike the term ‘by Whom;’ so the Son is unlike God the Father. Constantius ordered this exposition of the faith to be read, and was displeased with the blasphemy which it involved. He therefore asked Eudoxius if he had drawn it up. Eudoxius instantly repudiated the authorship, and said that it was written by Aetius. Now Aetius…at the present time was associated with Eunomius and Eudoxius, and, as he found Eudoxius to be, like himself, a sybarite in luxury as well as a heretic in faith, he chose Antioch as the most congenial place of abode, and both he and Eunomius were fast fixtures at the couches of Eudoxius.…The Emperor had been told all this, and now ordered Aetius to be brought before him. On his appearance, Constantius shewed him the document in question, and proceeded to enquire if he was the author of its language. Aetius, totally ignorant of what had taken place, and unaware of the drift of the enquiry, expected that he should win praise by confession, and owned that he was the author of the phrases in question. Then the Emperor perceived the greatness of his iniquity, and forthwith condemned him to exile and to be deported to a place in Phrygia.” St. Basil accompanied Eustathius and his namesake to Constantinople on this occasion, being then only in deacon’s orders. (Philost. iv. 12.) Basil of Ancyra and Eustathius in their turn suffered banishment. Basil, the deacon, returned to the Cappadocian Cæsarea.
3 cf. the form of the Arian Creed as given by Eunomius in his ᾽Απολογία (Migne, xxx. 840. “We believe in one God, Father Almighty, of whom are all things; and in one only begotten Son of God, God the word, our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things; and in one Holy Ghost, the Comforter, in whom distribution of all grace in proportion as may be most expedient is made to each of the Saints.”
4 cf. Eunomius, Liber. Apol. § 27, where of the Son he says ὑπουργός.
5 On the word ὄργανον, a tool, as used of the Word of God, cf. Nestorius in Marius Merc. Migne, p. 761 & Cyr. Alex. Ep. 1. Migne, x. 37. “The creature did not give birth to the uncreated, but gave birth to man, organ of Godhead.” cf. Thomasius, Christ. Dog. i. 336. Mr. Johnston quotes Philo (de Cher. § 35; i. 162. n.) as speaking of ὄργανον δὲ λόγον Θεοῦ δι᾽ οὗ κατεσκευάσθη (sc. ὁ κόσμος).
6 Here of course the Son is meant.

[4] Ἡ περὶ τὰς συλλαβὰς καὶ τὰς λέξεις τῶν ἀνδρῶν τούτων μικρολογία οὐχ ἁπλῆ τίς ἐστιν, ὡς ἄν τῳ δόξαι, οὐδὲ εἰς μικρὸν τοῦ κακοῦ φέρουσα, ἀλλὰ βαθεῖαν ἔχει καὶ συνεσκιασμένην βουλὴν κατὰ τῆς εὐσεβείας. Φιλονεικοῦσι γὰρ ἀνομοίαν Πατρὸς καὶ Υἱοῦ καὶ ἁγίου Πνεύματος ἐπιδεικνύναι τὴν προφοράν, ὡς ἐκ τούτου ῥᾳδίαν ἕξοντες καὶ τῆς κατὰ τὴν φύσιν παραλλαγῆς τὴν ἀπόδειξιν. Ἔστι γάρ τι αὐτοῖς παλαιὸν σόφισμα, ὑπὸ Ἀετίου τοῦ προστάτου τῆς αἱρέσεως ταύτης ἐξευρεθέν, ὃς ἔγραψέ που τῶν ἑαυτοῦ ἐπιστολῶν, λέγων: τὰ ἀνόμοια κατὰ τὴν φύσιν, ἀνομοίως προφέρεσθαι: καὶ ἀνάπαλιν: τὰ ἀνομοίως προφερόμενα, ἀνόμοια εἶναι κατὰ τὴν φύσιν. Καὶ εἰς μαρτυρίαν τοῦ λόγου τὸν ἀπόστολον ἐπεσπάσατο λέγοντα: «Εἷς Θεὸς καὶ Πατήρ, ἐξ οὗ τὰ πάντα: καὶ εἷς Κύριος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, δι' οὗ τὰ πάντα.» Ὡς οὖν ἔχουσιν αἱ φωναὶ πρὸς ἀλλήλας, οὕτως ἕξουσι, φησί, καὶ αἱ δι' αὐτῶν σημαινόμεναι φύσεις: ἀνόμοιον δὲ τῷ ἐξ οὗ τὸ δι' οὗ: ἀνόμοιος ἄρα καὶ τῷ Πατρὶ ὁ Υἱός. Ταύτης τοίνυν τῆς νόσου καὶ ἡ περὶ τὰς προκειμένας λέξεις ἀδολεσχία τῶν ἀνδρῶν τούτων ἤρτηται. Ὅθεν τῷ μὲν Θεῷ καὶ Πατρί, ὥσπερ τινὰ κλῆρον ἐξαίρετον, προσνέμουσι τὸ ἐξ οὗ: τῷ δὲ Υἱῷ καὶ Θεῷ ἀφώρισαν τὸ δι' οὗ: τῷ δὲ ἁγίῳ Πνεύματι, τὸ ἐν ᾧ: καὶ φασὶ μηδέποτε τὴν χρῆσιν ταύτην τῶν συλλαβῶν ἐπαμείβεσθαι: ἵνα, ὅπερ ἔφην, τῷ παρηλλαγμένῳ τῆς ἐκφωνήσεως καὶ ἡ τῆς φύσεως παραλλαγὴ συνεκφαίνηται. Ἀλλὰ γὰρ οὐ λελήθασιν, ἐν τῇ περὶ τὰς λέξεις λεπτολογίᾳ, τῷ ἀσεβεῖ λόγῳ τὴν ἰσχὺν διασῴζοντες. Τὸ μὲν γὰρ ἐξ οὗ, τὸν δημιουργὸν σημαίνειν βούλονται: τὸ δὲ δι' οὗ, τὸν ὑπουργὸν ἢ τὸ ὄργανον: τὸ δὲ ἐν ᾧ, τὸν χρόνον δηλοῦν ἢ τὸν τόπον: ἵνα μηδὲν μὲν ὀργάνου σεμνότερος ὁ δημιουργὸς τῶν ὅλων νοῆται, μηδὲν δὲ τῆς ἀπὸ τόπου ἢ χρόνου συνεισφορᾶς εἰς τὰ ὄντα, πλεῖον φαίνηται τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον παρεχόμενον.