I may say that those who conceived this causeless hatred for us seemed to be acting very much on the principle of Æsop’s fable. For just as he makes his wolf bring some charges against the lamb (feeling ashamed, I suppose, of seeming to destroy, without just pretext, one who had done him no hurt), and then, when the lamb easily swept away all the slanderous charges brought against him, makes the wolf by no means slacken his attack, but carry the day with his teeth when he is vanquished by justice; so those who were as keen for hatred against us as if it were something good (feeling perhaps some shame of seeming to hate without cause), make up charges and complaints against us, while they do not abide consistently by any of the things they say, but allege, now that one thing, after a little while that another, and then again that something else is the cause of their hostility to us. Their malice does not take a stand on any ground, but when they are dislodged from one charge they cling to another, and from that again they seize upon a third, and if all their charges are refuted they do not give up their hate. They charge us with preaching three Gods, and din into the ears of the multitude this slander, which they never rest from maintaining persuasively. Then truth fights on our side, for we show both publicly to all men, and privately to those who converse with us, that we anathematize any man who says that there are three Gods, and hold him to be not even a Christian. Then, as soon as they hear this, they find Sabellius a handy weapon against us, and the plague that he spread is the subject of continual attacks upon us. Once more, we oppose to this assault our wonted armour of truth, and show that we abhor this form of heresy just as much as Judaism. What then? are they weary after such efforts, and content to rest? Not at all. Now they charge us with innovation, and frame their complaint against us in this way:—They allege that while we confess2    Reading ὁμολογοῦντας with Oehler. The Paris Edit. reads ὁμολογούντων, and so also the Benedictine S. Basil. The Latin translator of 1615, however, renders as if he had read ὁμολογοῦντας three Persons we say that there is one goodness, and one power, and one Godhead. And in this assertion they do not go beyond the truth; for we do say so. But the ground of their complaint is that their custom does not admit this, and Scripture does not support it. What then is our reply? We do not think that it is right to make their prevailing custom the law and rule of sound doctrine. For if custom is to avail for3    Reading εἰς ὀρθότητος ἀπόδειξιν, with Oehler and the Benedictine S. Basil. The Paris Edit. of 1615 reads εἰς ὀρθότητα λόγου. proof of soundness, we too, surely, may advance our prevailing custom; and if they reject this, we are surely not bound to follow theirs. Let the inspired Scripture, then, be our umpire, and the vote of truth will surely be given to those whose dogmas are found to agree with the Divine words.

Ἔδοξαν οὖν μοι παραπλήσιόν τι ποιεῖν τῷ Αἰσωπείῳ μύθῳ οἱ τὸ ἀπροφάσιστον καθ' ἡμῶν ἀναλαβόντες μῖσος. ὡς γὰρ ἐκεῖνος ἐγκλήματά τινα τῷ ἀρνίῳ τὸν λύκον προφέρειν ἐποίησεν, αἰσχυνόμενον δῆθεν τὸ δοκεῖν ἄνευ δικαίας προφάσεως ἀναιρεῖν τὸν μηδὲν προλυπήσαντα, τοῦ δὲ ἀρνίου πᾶσαν τὴν ἐκ συκοφαντίας ἐπαγομένην αἰτίαν εὐχερῶς διαλύοντος μηδὲν μᾶλλον ὑφίεσθαι τῆς ὁρμῆς τὸν λύκον, ἀλλὰ τοῖς μὲν δικαίοις ἡττᾶσθαι, τοῖς δὲ ὀδοῦσι νικᾶν: οὕτως οἷς τὸ καθ' ἡμῶν μῖσος ὥς τι τῶν ἀγαθῶν ἐσπουδάσθη, ἐρυθριῶντες τάχα τὸ δοκεῖν ἄνευ αἰτίας μισεῖν αἰτίας πλάττουσι καθ' ἡμῶν καὶ ἐγκλήματα καὶ οὐδενὶ τῶν λεγομένων μέχρι παντὸς ἐπιμένουσιν, ἀλλὰ νῦν μὲν τοῦτο, μετ' ὀλίγον δὲ ἄλλο καὶ αὖθις ἕτερον τῆς καθ' ἡμῶν δυσμενείας τὸ αἴτιον λέγουσιν. βέβηκε δὲ αὐτοῖς ἐπ' οὐδενὸς ἡ κακία, ἀλλ' ὅταν τούτου τοῦ ἐγκλήματος ἀποσεισθῶσιν, ἑτέρῳ προσφύονται καὶ ἀπ' ἐκείνου πάλιν καταλαμβάνουσιν ἕτερον: κἂν πάντα διαλυθῇ τὰ ἐγκλήματα, τοῦ μισεῖν οὐκ ἀφίστανται. τρεῖς θεοὺς πρεσβεύεσθαι παρ' ἡμῶν αἰτιῶνται καὶ περιηχοῦσι τὰς ἀκοὰς τῶν πολλῶν καὶ πιθανῶς κατασκευάζοντες τὴν διαβολὴν ταύτην οὐ παύονται. ἀλλ' ὑπερμάχεται ἡμῶν ἡ ἀλήθεια καὶ ἐν κοινῷ πρὸς πάντας καὶ ἰδίᾳ πρὸς τοὺς ἐντυγχάνοντας δεικνύντων ἡμῶν ὅτι ἀναθεματίζεται παρ' ἡμῶν πᾶς ὁ τρεῖς λέγων θεοὺς καὶ οὐδὲ Χριστιανὸς εἶναι κρίνεται. ἀλλ' ὅταν τοῦτο ἀκούσωσι, πρόχειρος αὐτοῖς καθ' ἡμῶν ὁ Σαβέλλιος καὶ ἡ ἐξ ἐκείνου νόσος ἐπιθρυλλεῖται τῷ ἡμετέρῳ λόγῳ. καὶ πάλιν καὶ πρὸς τοῦτο ἡμεῖς τὸ σύνηθες ὅπλον, τὴν ἀλήθειαν, προβαλλόμεθα δεικνύντες, ὅτι ἐπίσης τῷ Ἰουδαϊσμῷ καὶ τὴν τοιαύτην αἵρεσιν φρίττομεν.