Epimerismi in Psalmos

 it comes from the lessons being imprinted like wax, or from it being mixed from cold and hot, or from receiving the blow at the right time, or from *k

 in the case of theotokos theētokos, elaphobolos elaphēbolos. MAKARIOS, of what type of those falling under the category of noun? Adjective. Define.An

 to a master in skill, as a student to a teacher in choice, as a friend to a friend. But if it signifies one having the age of a man, of which kind o

 numbers, cases. Of what gender is ο῾`ς (hos)? Masculine. Of what number? Singular. Of what case? Nominative and upright of the singulars. What is it

 with nouns, and they begin with them, then verbs are derived from nouns, for example horse, I ride a horse, chariot, I drive a chariot apart from tho

 How are the prepositions divided? Into two into monosyllables and into disyllables. What is the reciprocal relationship between the monosyllables and

 it means two things: the preposition, as in not somehow now from an oak nor from a rock, and in place of from afar, as in for the washing-places

 zaea for those from the verb α᾿´ω are oxytone, for example α᾿κραής and 18 all those in ΗΣ that have ΖΑ ζαμενὴς, ζαχρειής. It has been noted that αυ

 We are accustomed to use when in doubt and they are these: ara, kâta, môn. Syllogistic are those which are well-suited for the inferences and summari

 the future has the Η or the Ε. And it ought to have the Ε and not the Η but whenever the present of the first conjugation of the perispomena verbs, e

 STE E, why? Of those in -MI, the first and the second conjugation end in E, the 3rd in O, and the 4th in a lengthened doubtful vowel. And why do the f

 are found, I do not understand, I free, I give Therefore, the verbs in -MI are not Aeolic from the breathing, because the Aeolians are psilotic but

 double. Is it a primary word or a derivative? and from where is it derived? From the preposition *kata* and the verb *hizō*. And are compound words fi

 is oxytone, except for *etoi* but following, it is barytone. The disjunctive conjunction *e*, being unaspirated and superfluous. How many things does

 What? The written law, which God gave to Moses and the coin .... indeed among the Egyptians the land and the law of grace, which is the gospel it

 the passive perfect is ispsyllabic with the active, with the rule stating that every passive or middle having an M is declined, having one syllable mo

 yours from οὗ, ὁ ὅς, ἡ ἥ, τὸ ὅν in the dual, νῶι, σφῶι, σφῶε. From νῶι comes ὁ νωΐτερος, ἡ νωιτέρα, τὸ νωΐτερον from σφῶι, ὁ σφωΐτερος, ἡ σφωιτέρα,

 I thresh and two of them have the future with H, I will shout and I will bewail and the other two with A, I will hear and I will be foolish, (for it

 having a monosyllable in the genitive, sometimes the consonant of the perfect, sometimes that of the future. And what is the consonant of the perfect?

 Phaeacians, that they might be the most skilled of all men (like) the little ear, which alone is unaspirated (made smooth) of all the others being as

 the shortened analogical, the lengthened poetic. How is water declined? Of water. The rule: neuters in -OR are declined through -ROS, and keep the OME

 being in the middle of a word, the one beginning the middle syllable is aspirated, but the one ending the same [syllable] is unaspirated, for example

 And why is it marked? Because there is a rule that says that monosyllabic words ending in ΕΣ, declined imparisyllabically, have this order (declension

 lesser than the ending of the neuter, which is absurd, the penult was found to be long by position, but the A before two consonants never wishes to be

 I was making prosper but verbs beginning from the particle EU and DYS do not augment the beginning of the imperfect 54 externally, but have the infle

 ending in the penult, able to receive contraction in the second and third person, the Y is added in the future, I flow you flow you flow (I will flow)

 I see, straight, hollow, form, and the like. And otherwise: verbs beginning with O are written with a small O, except for ὠθῶ, ὠφελῶ, ὠχριῶ, ὠρύω, ὠδύ

 is

 a combination of two consonants, of which the second is a liquid, for example μέμβλω, ο᾿´φλω, ε᾿´γρω, δάκνω, and the pure verbs in -Ω ending in the di

 has the doubtful vowel shortened, for example megas mega, brachys brachy, tis ti. Tis of what kind of those falling under the noun?Of the interrogativ

 a

 megá[l]os for the genitive megálou is heteroclitic, as if from the nominative megálos. And why did the nominative megálos fall out of use? Beca

 How many genitives does basileus admit? Six: basileus, genitive basileos with epsilon and omicron, commonly basileus, genitive basileos, wi

 should have been *Zeos*. Therefore, with the two rules conflicting, the Doric dialect entered, and it became *Zeus, Dios* for the Dorians turn Δ into

 having a single origin before the T, the ST is oxytone, for example, istos, pistos, christos, and anything similar. LET US BREAK, of the subjunctive m

 A word participating in the property of verbs and of nouns. What does it participate in of the noun and of the verb? Of the noun, genders and cases o

 it may be formed in the feminine gender, for example, stephanos, geranos the word ouranos, Sikanos, is noted, which is a place in Iberia. HE WILL LAU

 THYMOS from `thyo` meaning to rush, the future `thyso`, the perfect `tethyca`, the passive `tethumai`, and from it `thymos` for things from the passi

 falsehood, form, wall, and the like, are properispomenon but the paroxytones and the proparoxytones and the properispomena, are in effect (barytone.)

 consonants, of which the second is unchangeable. The passive perfect is πεπρόσταγμαι and from it, πρόσταγμα. Why is it proparoxytone? Neuter nouns end

 are declined without hindrance both into the participles and into the other moods but etheka, edoka, heka, ought to have been with a Sigma, but were

 on the same day a derivative, which is a participle. I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU, a verb, indicative, simple, derivative, of the second conjugation of the per

 is written with an I, except for verbs in -ΕΥΩ, as in λαγνεύω λαγνεία, and those from words in -ΥΣ, as in ταχὺς, ταχεῖα and those from words with a c

 Otherwise: verbs ending in ΑΊΝΩ are written with the diphthong ΑΙ, for example βαμβαίνω, ξηραίνω, μιαίνω noted are σθένω, μένω, πένω, στένω. 94 ῬΆΒ

 from *agallō*, this from *aglaon*, this from *aiglē*, this from *aissō* which means *hormō*. Why is *LI* with an iota? Words with a circumflex on -IŌ

 I tread, I pour, I moisten. The THLI is long, why? Disyllabic verbs ending in BŌ, whose penultimate syllable has an I, are lengthened. EPANISTANTAI, a

 first, third person of the singulars, of the compound form. And from where was it compounded? From the preposition *epi* and the verb *akouō*. And *ak

 second, you struck. THOSE WHO HATE, where does it come from? From I hate, this from enemy, this from hatred, the hatred, this from I hold, I control.

 by a change of A to H, I seek the plural, we seek, we seek, the second person, you seek, you seek. PSEUDOS, whence does it come? From I flee, flight

 107 {1FIFTH PSALM.} 1 Where does it come from? From pempō for it sends us to the tenth number.

 second aorist from ἐντέλλω, the future ἐντελῶ, the first aorist ἔτειλα, the middle ἐτειλάμην, the second ἐτείλω. BEHOLD, a deictic adverb, why is it o

 From `opizo`, which means to pursue behind this from `opis`, not regarding the vengeance of the gods, this from `hepo` meaning to follow. Why PI I?

 of actives only is written with the EI diphthong but in the case of passives and the rest with I. It means six things: `eidô` to make like, from whic

 a monosyllable is circumflexed, and it becomes to set on fire every syllable ending in N ... IS TAKEN, from lēbō, [meaning] to take, and with the pre

 r ai g i a n

 1ELEVENTH PSALM.} another one and with the number ten, eleventh.

 a ,

 1PSALM 17.} from *stereō* this from *histēmi*, *stēsō*, second aorist

 a

 1PSALM 18.} omega, why? Because every simple Greek word with an acute accent on the last syllable

 You have favored, Lord, your land. REDEEMER, from I redeem, this from ransom, this from I loose.

 Nothing is said in a universal sense, as when we say, nothing new in the world the form with Theta is taken from οὐδέν, and by changing Delta t

 1 I AM WELL-PLEASING from *aretô*, and with the addition of S *arestô* and *euarestô* this from *aretê* (virtue) but that which is from *erô*, 'I de

 {1[Psalm 29.]} 1 EVENING (HESPERA), from to bring inward (eso pherein), being a sort of in-bringer (esophera), and by syncope, hespera,

 second. The first person plural eipaiēmen the third eipaiēsan, and by syncope eipaisan.

 I have been shaken, and from it palm, by which the hand is moved, and from this comes I wrestle the passive perfect is I have been wrestled, the thir

 .The rule: Proper nouns in NES, not compounded from the neuter, have the genitive in OU, Meriones, Merionou, Iordanes, Iordanou. HERMONIEIM: Names end

 

 I was calling, I was judging, those things, when falling out, have the E the word *ekpoma* comes from *EK*. {1[PSALM 54.]}1 I WAS HARBORING ANGER is

 playing.Of a fox the rule: simple words ending in Ξ of more than one syllable, except for those in Ξ, are all declined through Κ. {1[PSALM 63.]}1 I C

 i

 π δ μ Ι ὸ ί

 , 10

 ,

 t

 T

 e {

 of a strap for just as the I turns into E, it is necessary for the E also to turn into I, a strap, of a strap, and from it, garment. YOU WILL ROLL UP

 1[PSALM 110]}1 o in kratō, with the addition of S. For when the E adds two

 e ma

 130.]}1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from *meteōrizō*. Why were they not humble-minded like the weaned child now its mother, but I raised my voice

 equal,

 PSALM 140.]} (INCENSE) this from `thuma` (sacrifice), for through the burning of sacrifices

 ̀Σ ΡΝʹ.]} IN POWERS, the nominative, power, from to rule, this from

 o

 SYNIŌN (coming together), from iō, to go forward, iōn (going) and syniōn (coming together). ARRŌSTIA (sickness), from rhō, rhōsō, rhōstos . 144 APOTHA

 ON from *pleon*, and by a pleonasm of I, but it is written with a diphthong, since they write it with an H, and otherwise the disyllabic comparatives

 t

 ACEDIA, from *akedio* (I am despondent), this from *aedio* (I am displeased), and this from *hedys* (sweet) and after *edes* (sweet), and with the ad

 84

 I will support, I have supported, I have been supported, I was supported and this from 'I stand', 'I will cause to stand'. SHELTERER, from 'I shelter

 n n

 . P

 L

 P

 K

 ISIN, the nominative is mercy, it comes from helō, which means to take, elos e

 29 T

 1[PSALM 110.]} I have *kratô* [I hold], with the addition of S. For when the E is added

 ,

 1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from `meteorizo`. Why were they not humble-minded as the

 t ,

 EIAS, the nominative, dominion, from I rule, this from ruler, this from I am able. ENECHOI, en is a preposition, ēchōi is a noun, and ēchos from movin

 has 3 solutions, Moses of Moses, Moses of Moses, and Moses of Moses. LET HIM BE EXPECTED, I expect from the second conjugation of the perispomenon. TH

 from casting the ω᾿῀πας. OATH, from fence, and being a little wall for the one swearing, against transgressing the agreements. TO SERVE, from I serve,

to a master; in skill, as a student to a teacher; in choice, as a friend to a friend. But if it signifies one having the age of a man, of which kind of the things that fall under the name? Of the quasi-relatives. Define it. A quasi-relative is that which is spoken in relation to another, but in opposition, destructively, as night day, death life. And in how many ways are quasi-relatives taken? In four ways: according to quality, as sweet to bitter; according to quantity, as small to great, and man to youth; according to an intermediate, as sinner to righteous; for it is possible for the sinner to partake of righteousness, and the righteous of sin; according to an intermediate, (immediate marg.) as night day, death life. And what is the difference between relatives and quasi-relatives? The difference is that relatives are correlative; for a father is not spoken of without a son, nor a son without a father; but quasi-relatives are destructive of one another; for when the day is destroyed the night comes, and when life is destroyed death comes. How is it declined? Of the man. The rule: of the oxytones in -ER, as many as have the T in the nominative are declined through the Eta, of a kamptēr to -atēros (elatēros), with pateros, asteros being noted; but as many as do not have the T in the nominative are declined through the Epsilon, aeros, daeros, aneros, and in syncope andros. The rule: syncopated genitives also wish to imitate oxytone nominatives. And how? And andros comes about by a pleonasm of the Delta. And why was the Delta pleonastic? Because the N cannot be before the R, neither in the same syllable, nor in a separate one; in the same syllable, except for M from N as in mneia and amnos; in a separate one, because every syllable beginning with R wants to have the one before it ending in R for the most part, for example arrhen, myrrhinē, arrōstos; for this reason the Delta is pleonastic, and it becomes andros. And why was no other consonant pleonastic, but the Delta? Because syncopated genitives wish to imitate oxytone nominatives; andros imitates amydros, patros and thygatros imitate iatros. And in how many ways is the Delta pleonastic? In four. In what and what? In declension, as anēr, aneros, and in syncope andros; in writing, as hyō meaning I wet, hyōr, and with pleonasm of the Delta hydōr; in poetic license, as [ ∴Il. i 33 ]. the old man was afraid and obeyed the word; in necessary syntax, as cheir, cheiros, acheros, and with pleonasm of the Delta acherdos; it is a thorny plant, which a hand cannot touch. And the accusative, ton andra. The accent? However, disyllabic accusatives in A are only barytoned, chēna, paida, andra. The vocative, Ō aner. The rule: those ending in immutable long syllables, casting off the final OS from the genitive, make the vocative. That it is an error both in accent and in declension. And otherwise: aner, pater, sōter, daer are noted for raising the accent in the vocative. And why is it noted? Because there is a rule that says that those ending in R with a short final syllable, of more than one syllable, throw back the acute accent, except for the preposition hyper and the conjunction autar. HOS is a relative article. How is it clear? And HO is the prepositive, while HOS is the relative. And what is the difference between prepositives and relatives? The difference is that prepositives admit [either] breathings or (not) accents, while relatives admit both breathings and accents.

9 What is an article? A declinable part of speech, placed before the cases of nouns and also placed after. And from where does "article" come? From arō, meaning I join. For arthra are properly called the joinings of the limbs. And why is it called an article? From being joined with the declinable words, and never being found without them. What is the property of an article? To signify the second knowledge; for if you say ... came, I do not know of what sort; but if with the article I am led to knowledge of the underlying substance of the thing. How many properties belong to the article? Three. What and what? Genders,

πρὸς δεσπότην· τέχνῃ, ὡς μαθητὴς πρὸς διδάσκαλον· προαιρέσει, ὡς φίλος πρὸς φίλον. Ει᾿ δὲ σημαίνει τὸν α᾿νδρὸς ἡλικίαν ε᾿´χοντα, ποίου ει᾿´δους τῶν ὑποπεπτωκότων τῷ ὀνόματι; Τῶν ὡς πρός τι. ∆ιόρισον. Τῶν ὡς πρός τι ε᾿´χον δέ ἐστι, τὸ πρὸς ε῾´τερον μὲν λεγόμενον, κατ' ε᾿ναντιότητα δὲ, φθαρτικὸν, ὡς νὺξ ἡμέρα, θάνατος ζωή. Καὶ ποσαχῶς λαμβάνονται τὰ ὡς πρός τι; Τετραχῶς· κατὰ ποιὸν, ὡς τὸ γλυκὺ πρὸς πικρόν· κατὰ ποσὸν, ὡς τὸ μικρὸς πρὸς μέγας, καὶ ἀνὴρ πρὸς μειράκιον· κατὰ ε᾿´μμεσον, ὡς τὸ ἁμαρτωλὸς πρὸς δίκαιον· ε᾿νδέχεται γὰρ καὶ τὸν ἁμαρτωλὸν μετέχειν δικαιοσύνης, καὶ τὸν δίκαιον ἁμαρτίας· κατὰ ε᾿´μμεσον, (α᾿´μεσον marg.) ὡς τὸ νὺξ ἡμέρα, θάνατος ζωή. Καὶ τί διαφέρει τὰ πρός τι τῶν ὡς πρός τι; ∆ιαφέρει ο῾´τι τὰ μὲν πρός τι σωματικά ει᾿σιν· ου᾿ γὰρ ει᾿´ρηται πατὴρ χωρὶς υἱοῦ, ου᾿δε` υἱὸς χωρὶς πατρός· τὰ δὲ ὡς πρός τι α᾿ναιρετικά ει᾿σιν α᾿λλήλων· α᾿ναιρουμένης γὰρ τῆς ἡμέρας ε᾿´ρχεται ἡ νὺξ, καὶ ἀναιρουμένης τῆς ζωῆς ε᾿´ρχεται ὁ θάνατος. Πῶς κλίνεται; Τοῦ ἀνέρος.Ὁ κανών· τῶν ει᾿ς ΗΡ ο᾿ξυτόνων ο῾´σα μὲν ε᾿´χει τὸ Τ ε᾿π' ευ᾿θείας διὰ τοῦ Η κλίνεται, καμπτῆρος ει᾿ς ατῆρος (ε᾿λατῆρος,) σεσημειωμένου τοῦ πατέρος α᾿στέρος· ο῾´σα δὲ μὴ ε᾿´χει τὸ Τ ε᾿π' ευ᾿θείας διὰ τοῦ Ε κλίνεται, ἀέρος, δαέρος, α᾿νε´ρος, καὶ ἐν συγκοπῇ ἀνδρός. Ὁ κανών· αἱ συγκοπτόμεναι γενικαὶ καὶ μιμεῖσθαι θέλουσι τὰς ο᾿ξυτόνους ευ᾿θείας. Καὶ πῶς; Γίνεται δ' α᾿νδρὸς κατὰ πλεονασμὸν τοῦ ∆. Καὶ διατί ἐπλεόνασε τὸ ∆; ∆ιότι τὸ Ν 8 ου᾿ δύναται ει᾿῀ναι πρὸ τοῦ Ρ, ου᾿´τε κατὰ σύλληψιν, ου᾿´τε κατὰ διάστασιν· κατὰ σύλληψιν, πλὴν τοῦ Μ τοῦ Ν ὡς ε᾿ν τῷ μνεία καὶ ἀμνός· κατὰ διάστασιν, ο῾´τι πᾶσα συλλαβὴ ἀπὸ τοῦ Ρ α᾿ρχομένη θέλει ε᾿´χειν τὴν πρὸ αυ᾿τη῀ς ει᾿ς Ρ λήγουσαν ὡς ε᾿πι` τὸ πλεῖστον, οι῾῀ον α᾿´ρρεν, μυρρίνη, α᾿´ρρωστος· διὰ τοῦτο πλεονάζει τὸ ∆, καὶ γίνεται α᾿νδρός. Καὶ διατί ου᾿κ ἐπλεόνασεν α᾿´λλο σύμφωνον, α᾿λλὰ τὸ ∆; Ἐπειδὴ αἱ συγκοπτόμεναι γενικαὶ μιμεῖσθαι θέλουσι τὰς ο᾿ξυτόνους ευ᾿θείας· ἡ ἀνδρὸς, τὴν α᾿μυδρὸς, ἡ πατρὸς καὶ θυγα τρὸς, τὴν ι᾿ατρός. Καὶ κατὰ πόσους τρόπους πλεονάζει τὸ ∆; Κατὰ τέσ σαρας. Κατὰ τὶ καὶ τί; Κατὰ κλίσιν, ὡς τὸ ἀνὴρ, α᾿νε´ρος, καὶ ἐν συγκοπῇ ἀνδρός· κατὰ γραφὴν, ὡς τὸ υ῾´ω τὸ βρέχω, υ῾´ωρ, καὶ πλεονασμῷ τοῦ ∆ υ῾´δωρ· κατὰ ποιητικὴν α᾿´δειαν, ὡς το[ ∴Il. .♣α 33 ].ε᾿´δδεισε δ' ὁ γέρων καὶ ἐπείθετο μύθῳ. κατὰ ἀναγκαίαν σύνταξιν, ὡς τὸ χεὶρ, χειρὸς, α᾿´χερος, καὶ πλεονασμῷ τοῦ ∆ α᾿´χερδος· ε᾿´στι δὲ βοτάνη α᾿κανθώδης, μὴ δυναμένης χειρὸς ψαῦσαι ταύτης. Καὶ αι᾿τιατικὴ, τὸν α᾿´νδρα. Ὁ τόνος; Αἱ μέντοι ει᾿ς Α αι᾿τιατικαὶ δισύλλαβοι μόνως βαρύνονται, χῆνα, παῖδα, α᾿´νδρα.Ἡ κλητικὴ, ω᾿῀ α᾿´νερ.Ὁ κανών· τὰ ει᾿ς ἀμετάβολα λήγοντα μακροκατάληκτα, α᾿πο βάλλοντα τῆς γενικῆς τὴν ε᾿σχάτην τὸ ΟΣ, ποιεῖ τὴν κλητικήν. Ὅτι ἡμάρτηται καὶ κατὰ τὸν τόνον καὶ κατὰ τὴν κλίσιν. Καὶ α᾿´λλως· σεσημείωται τὸ α᾿´νερ, πάτερ, σῶτερ, δᾶερ, α᾿ναβιβάζοντα τὸν τόνον ε᾿πι` τῆς κλητικῆς. Καὶ διατί σεση μείωται; ∆ιότι κανών ε᾿στιν ὁ λέγων, ο῾´τι τὰ ει᾿ς Ρ βραχυ κατάληκτα ὑπὲρ μίαν συλλαβὴν α᾿ναστρέφονται τὴν ο᾿ξεῖαν τάσιν, πλὴν τῆς ὑπὲρ προθέσεως καὶ τοῦ αυ᾿τα`ρ συν δέσμου. ὋΣ α᾿´ρθρον ε᾿στὶν ὑποτακτικόν. Πόθεν δῆλον; Καὶ ε᾿´στι προτακτικὸν μὲν ὁ, ὑποτακτικὸν δὲ ο῾´ς. Καὶ τί διαφέρει τὰ προτακτικὰ τῶν ὑποτακτικῶν; ∆ιαφέρει, ο῾´τι τὰ μὲν προ τακτικὰ [η᾿`] πνεύματα η᾿` (ου᾿) τόνους ε᾿πιδέχονται, τὰ δὲ ὑποτακτικὰ καὶ πνεύματα καὶ τόνους.

9 Τί ἐστιν α᾿´ρθρον; Μέρος λόγου πτωτικὸν, προτασσό μενον ταῖς κλίσεσι τῶν ο᾿νομάτων καὶ ὑποτασσόμενον. Καὶ πόθεν γίνεται α᾿´ρθρον; Παρὰ τὸ ἀρῶ τὸ ἁρμόζω.Ἄρθρα γὰρ κυρίως λέγονται αἱ τῶν μελῶν ἁρμονίαι. Καὶ πόθεν ει᾿´ρηται α᾿´ρθρον; Παρὰ τὸ συναρτᾶσθαι τοῖς πτωτικοῖς, καὶ μηδέπω δίχα αυ᾿τω῀ν εὑρίσκεσθαι. Τί ἐστι ι᾿´διον α᾿´ρθρου; Τὸ τὴν δευτέραν γνῶσιν σημαί νειν· ἐὰν γὰρ ει᾿´πῃς ... η᾿῀λθεν, α᾿γνοῶ ποίας· ἐὰν δὲ σὺν τῷ α᾿´ρθρῳ ει᾿ς γνῶσιν α᾿να´γομαι τῇ ὑποκειμένῃ ου᾿σι´ᾳ τοῦ πράγμα τος. Πόσα παρέπεται τῷ α᾿´ρθρῳ; Τρία. Τὶ καὶ τὶ; Γένη,