4

to save the insolent one, you who for this reason despise the Godhead because He accepted your grossness, speaking to the flesh through the medium of the mind and becoming man, the God below, since He was blended with God and became one, the stronger prevailing, that I might become God to the same extent that He became man. "

For this One, He says, who is now despised by you, existed when He was also above you, of all

age, that is, and existing beyond all nature on account of Himself, even if He has now willingly become under both for your sake. The one who is now man was also uncompounded, simple in nature and in hypostasis, since He was only God, bare of body and all that belongs to a body, even if now, by the assumption of flesh having a rational soul, He has become what He was not, composite in hypostasis, while remaining what He was, simple in nature, that He might save you, man. For this was the only cause of His birth in the flesh, the salvation of our nature, which He entered, as a kind of grossness, He spoke to the flesh through the passible medium of the mind, becoming man, the God below, becoming for all everything that we are, apart from sin, body, soul, mind, through all the means by which death comes, the common thing from these, man, being seen as God through that which is understood.

Therefore the Logos Himself, being emptied without change properly towards that which is passible by nature according to us, and having truly come under natural sensation through the incarnation, was called visible God and God below, making manifest His infinite power through flesh that is passible by nature, since the flesh was manifestly blended with God and became one, the stronger prevailing, with the Logos who assumed it properly deifying it by hypostatic identity. But He became one person, not one thing, the teacher said, showing (14∆_024> that even in the identity of the one hypostasis the natural otherness of the united parts has remained unconfused; since the one indicates hypostasis, and the other, nature. For the phrase, "that I might become God to the same extent that He became man," it is not mine to say, I who have been defiled by sin and am completely without appetite for the life that truly is, but yours, you who are known only by grace through the perfect reception of the nature, and who are destined to be shown by it to have as much power as God by nature shared in our weakness when He was incarnate, the deification of those saved by grace being counter-measured, as He Himself knows, by His emptying, who are wholly godlike and capable of receiving the whole of God, and will become His alone. For this is the perfection towards which they hasten who have believed that this promise will truly be.

4. BY THE SAME ... "FOR AS LOGOS, HE WAS NEITHER OBEDIENT ..».

1041 From the same author, from the second discourse On the Son, on the passage: "For as Logos, He was neither obedient nor disobedient; for these are traits of those under authority and of secondary rank; the one of the more well-disposed, the other of those deserving punishment. But as the form of a servant, He condescends to His fellow servants and slaves, and takes on the form of what is other, bearing all of me in Himself with my attributes, that in Himself He might consume the worse part, as fire consumes wax, or the sun, the vapor of the earth, and that I might partake of what is His through the blending. For this reason He honors obedience by deed and learns it by what He suffered. For disposition is not sufficient, just as it is not for us, unless we also proceed through actions. For a deed is the proof of a disposition. And perhaps it is not amiss to suppose also this, that He tests our obedience, and measures all our experiences by His own sufferings, an art of philanthropy, so as to be able to know (14∆_026> our state by His own, and how much is required of us, and how much is forgiven, taking into account weakness along with suffering».

4

σωθῆναι τόν ὑβριστήν, ὅς διά τοῦτο περιφρονεῖς θεότητα ὅτι τήν σήν παχύτητα κατεδέξατο, διά μέσου νοός ὁμιλήσας σαρκί καί γενόμενος ἄνθρωπος ὁ κάτω Θεός, ἐπειδή συνακεκράθη Θεῷ καί γέγονεν εἷς, τοῦ κρείττονος ἐκνικήσαντος, ἵνα γένωμαι τοσοῦτον Θεός ὅσον ἐκεῖνος ἄνθρωπος. "

Οὗτος γάρ ὁ νῦν σοι καταφρονούμενος, φησίν, ἦν ὅτε καί ὑπέρ σέ ἦν, παντός

αἰῶνος δηλονότι καί πάσης δι᾿ ἑαυτόν ὑπάρχων ἐπέκεινα φύσεως, κἄν ὑπ᾿ ἄμφω νῦν διά σέ γεγένηται θέλων. Ὁ νῦν ἄνθρωπος καί ἀσύνθετος ἦν, τήν τε φύσιν ἁπλοῦς καί τήν ὑπόστασιν, ἅτε δή μόνον Θεός, γυμνός σώματος καί τῶν ὅσα σώματος, κἄν νῦν προσλήψει σαρκός ψυχήν ἐχούσης νοεράν, ὅπερ οὐκ ἦν γέγονε, τήν ὑπόστασιν σύνθετος, διαμείνας ὅπερ ἦν, τήν φύσιν ἁπλοῦς, ἵνα σέ σώσῃ τόν ἄνθρωπον. Ταύτην γάρ τῆς σαρκικῆς αὐτοῦ μόνην αἰτίαν ἔσχε γεννήσεως, τήν σωτηρίαν τῆς φύσεως, ἧς ὑπελθών, καθάπερ τι πᾶχος, τό παθητόν διά μέσου νοός ὡμίλησε σαρκί, γενόμενος ἄνθρωπος ὁ κάτω Θεός, πάντα ὑπέρ πάντων γενόμενος ὅσα ἡμεῖς, πλήν τῆς ἁμαρτίας, σῶμα, ψυχή, νοῦς, δι᾿ ὅσων ὁ θάνατος, τό κοινόν ἐκ τούτων, ἄνθρωπος, Θεός ὁρώμενος διά τό νοούμενον.

Αὐτός οὖν δίχα τροπῆς κυρίως πρός τό καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς φύσει παθητόν κενωθείς ὁ Λόγος, καί ὑπό τήν φυσικήν ἀληθῶς διά σαρκώσεως γενόμενος αἴσθησιν, Θεός ὁρατός καί κάτω Θεός προσηγορεύθη, διά σαρκός φύσει παθητῆς τήν ὑπεράπειρον ἐμφανῆ ποιησάμενος δύναμιν, ἐπειδή συνανεκράθη Θεῷ προδήλως ἡ σάρξ καί γέγονεν εἷς, τοῦ κρείττονος ἐκνικήσαντος, ὑποστατικῇ ταυτότητι κυρίως αὐτήν τοῦ προσλαβόντος Λόγου θεώσαντος. Εἷς δέ γέγονεν, ἀλλ᾿ οὐχ ἕν, ὁ διδάσκαλος εἶπεν, δεικνύς (14∆_024> ὅτι κἄν τῇ ταυτότητι τῆς μιᾶς ὑποστάσεως μεμένηκεν ἡ φυσική τῶν ἡνωμένων ἑτερότης ἀσύγχυτος· εἴπερ τό μέν ὑποστάσεως, τό δέ φύσεως ὑπάρχει δηλωτικόν. Τό γάρ, " Ἵνα γένωμαι τοσοῦτον θεός ὅσον ἐκεῖνος ἄνθρωπος», οὐκ ἐμόν λέγειν, τοῦ ῥυπωθέντος τῇ ἁμαρτίᾳ καί τελείως τῆς ὄντως οὔσης ἀνορεκτοῦντος ζωῆς, ἀλλ᾿ ὑμῶν, τῶν ἀπολήψει τελείᾳ τῆς φύσεως ἐκ μόνης γνωριζομένων τῆς χάριτος, καί μελλόντων ἐκ τῆς κατ᾿ αὐτήν τοσοῦτον διαδειχθῆναι δυνάμεως ὅσον ὁ φύσει Θεός τῆς ἡμῶν σαρκωθείς ἀσθενείας μετείληφεν, ἀντιμετρουμένης, ὡς οἶδεν αὐτός, τῇ αὐτοῦ κενώσει, τῆς τῶν χάριτι σωζομένων θεώσεως, ὅλων θεοειδῶν καί ὅλου Θεοῦ χωρητικῶν, καί μόνου γενησομένων. Τοῦτο γάρ ἡ τελείωσις πρός ἥν σπεύδουσιν οἱ ταύτην ἀληθῶς ἔσεσθαι τήν ἐπαγγελίαν πιστεύσαντες.

∆' ΤΟΥ ΑΥΤΟΥ ... "ΩΣ ΜΕΝ ΓΑΡ ΛΟΓΟΣ, ΟΥΤΕ ΥΠΗΚΟΟΣ ΗΝ ..».

1041 Τοῦ αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ δευτέρου περί Υἱοῦ Λόγου, εἰς τό· " Ὡς μέν γάρ Λόγος, οὔτε ὑπήκοος ἦν, οὔτε ἀνήκοος· τῶν γάρ ὑπό χεῖρα ταῦτα καί τῶν δευτέρων· τό μέν τῶν εὐγνωμονεστέρων, τό δέ τῶν ἀξίων κολάσεως. Ὡς δέ δούλου μορφή, συγκαταβαίνει τοῖς ὁμοδούλοις καί δούλοις, καί μορφοῦται τό ἀλλότριον, ὅλον ἐν ἑαυτῷ φέρων μετά τῶν ἐμῶν, ἵνα ἐν ἑαυτῷ δαπανήσῃ τό χεῖρον, ὡς κηρόν πῦρ, ἤ ὡς ἀτμίδα γῆς ἥλιος, κἀγώ μεταλάβω τῶν ἐκείνου διά τήν σύγκρασιν. ∆ιά τοῦτο ἔργῳ τιμᾷ τήν ὑπακοήν καί πειρᾶται ταύτης ἐκ τοῦ παθεῖν. Οὐ γάρ ἱκανόν ἡ διάθεσις, ὥσπερ οὐδέ ἡμῖν, εἰ μή καί διά τῶν πραγμάτων χωρήσαιμεν. Ἔργον γάρ ἀπόδειξις διαθέσεως. Οὐ χεῖρον δέ ἴσως κἀκεῖνο ὑπολαβεῖν, ὅτι δοκιμάζει τήν ἡμετέραν ὑπακοήν, καί πάντα μετρεῖ τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ πάθεσι τά ἡμέτερα, τέχνη φιλανθρωπίας, ὥστε ἔχειν εἰδέναι (14∆_026> τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ τά ἡμέτερα, καί πόσον μέν ἀπαιτούμεθα, πόσον δέ συγχωρούμεθα, λογιζομένης μετά τοῦ πάσχειν καί τῆς ἀσθενείας».