TO THE FELLOW PRESBYTER TIMOTHY, DIONYSIUS

 being illuminated super-cosmically by them for the hymns of the Godhead and being conformed to the sacred hymnologies, so as to see the divine lights

 For all knowledges are of things that are and have their limit in things that are, but It is beyond all essence and is removed from all knowledge. <5>

 <7> Thus, therefore, to the Cause of all and which is above all, both the nameless will apply and all the names of the things that are, so that it may

 the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will, and that It is the Spirit that gives life? That the ent

 to the one-principled Trinity also is common the super-essential existence, the super-divine divinity, the super-good goodness, the identity beyond al

 has partaken of the Word, unless someone might say according to the good-pleasing and man-loving common will and according to all the transcendent and

 Jesus, he says in his compiled Theological Outlines: <10> The all-causing and fulfilling Godhead of the Son, which preserves the parts in harmony with

 <III.> <1> And first, if you please, let us investigate the name Good, which reveals the whole procession of God's emanations, invoking the Good-Pri

 to the hierarchs, when we too, as you know, both yourself and many of our sacred brethren, had gathered for the sight of the life-originating and God-

 communions, the unconfused distinctions, the powers of the subordinate that lead up to the superior, the providences of the senior for the secondary,

 moves and nourishes and increases and perfects and purifies and renews. And light is the measure and number of hours, of days, and of all our time. Fo

 impartations and as calling all things to itself, whence it is also called Beauty, and as gathering all in all into one, and Beautiful as being All-Be

 the beautiful and the good is that which is beyond all rest and motion. Wherefore every rest and motion and that from which and in which and to which

 <12> And yet it has seemed to some of our sacred writers that the name 'eros' is even more divine than that of 'agape'. And the divine Ignatius also w

 an eternal circle through the Good, from the Good and in the Good and to the Good, moving about in an unerring convolution and in the same and accordi

 Whence then is evil? one might say. For if evil does not exist, virtue and vice are the same thing, and the whole is the same as the whole, and the pa

 irrational desire, in this it neither exists nor desires existing things, but it nevertheless partakes of the good by virtue of the faint echo itself

 simply nor in respect to time. <22> But neither is evil in angels. For if the good-like angel proclaims the divine goodness, being secondarily by part

 <24> But would someone say that souls are evil? If, because they associate with evil things providentially and for salvation, this is not evil, but go

 <30> To speak concisely The good is from one and the whole cause, but the evil from many and partial deficiencies. God knows evil, insofar as it is g

 goodnesses. <34> Therefore evil is not a being, nor is evil in beings. For evil, as evil, is nowhere. And the coming-to-be of evil is not according to

 manifestation of the all-perfect providence of the one God, and those of the more universal and the more particular things of the same. <3> And yet on

 <6> Therefore, the Essential Super-Goodness, putting forth the first gift, that of being itself, is praised by the first and most ancient of participa

 For if our sun, although the substances and qualities of sensible things are many and various, yet it, being one and shining a uniform light, renews a

 godlike and unchangeable immortality and the unwavering and unswerving perpetual motion, extending through an abundance of goodness even to the life o

 and is the cause of being of Wisdom itself, both of the whole and of each particular. <2> From it the intelligible and intellectual powers of the ange

 the cause of all things. Therefore God is known both in all things and apart from all things. And God is known through knowledge and through unknowing

 to be power-in-itself, both by being beyond-power and by bringing forth other powers, infinitely many times the infinite number of existing powers, an

 of the age, as having fallen away from none of the things that are, but rather both surpassing and pre-eminent over all beings according to a supra-es

 is defined and all inequality, which is a privation of the equality in each of them, is banished. For if anyone were to take inequality to mean the di

 We said the neck was opinion, as between the rational and irrational the breast, spirit the belly, desire the legs and feet, nature, using the name

 the return to him of those who have proceeded from him. <10> But if one should take the divine name 'Same' from the Oracles, or 'Justice,' in the sens

 beings, inasmuch as He is both before eternity and above eternity and His kingdom is a kingdom of all the ages. Amen. <ΧI.> <1> Come now, let us c

 and would never willingly wish to be at rest. And if he who says these things says that otherness and distinction are the particularity of each of the

 self-deification, of which beings, partaking according to their own nature, both are and live and are divine, and are and are called, and the others l

 It is therefore Perfect not only as being self-complete and defined in itself by itself in a single form and most perfect whole through whole, but als

 And not even the name of Goodness do we offer to It as being applicable, but from a yearning to conceive and speak something about that ineffable Natu

the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will," and that "It is the Spirit that gives life"? That the entire Godhead holds lordship over all things, regarding the God-begetting Godhead or that of the Son, it is not possible to say, I think, how often in theology the term "Lord" is proclaimed concerning the Father and the Son. But also "the Spirit is Lord." And the beautiful and the wise are hymned concerning the entire Godhead, and the light and the deifying and the causal and all things which belong to the whole Thearchy, the oracles refer the whole Thearchic hymnody to all, comprehensively indeed, as when it says: "All things are from God," but in detail, as when it says: "All things were created through him and for him," and "In him all things hold together," and "You will send forth your Spirit, and they will be created." And that one might speak concisely, the Thearchic Word himself said: "I and the Father are one," and "All that the Father has is mine," and "All mine are yours, and yours are mine." And again, whatever belongs to the Father and to himself, he attributes in common and in unity to the Thearchic Spirit the divine works, the veneration, the fontal and unfailing cause and distribution of the goodly gifts. And I think that no one nurtured in the unperverted meanings of the divine oracles would gainsay this, that all things befitting God belong to the whole Thearchy according to the divinely perfect Word. Therefore, since these things have been demonstrated and defined by us—briefly and partially in this work, but sufficiently from the oracles in others—we shall undertake to unfold a comprehensive divine name, which must be understood as applying to the whole Godhead. <2> But if someone should say that in this we are introducing confusion against the God-befitting distinction, we think that such an argument is not even sufficient to persuade him that it is true. For if there is anyone at all who opposes the oracles, he will surely be far removed also from our philosophy, and if he does not care for the divine wisdom from the oracles, how should we care for his guidance to theological knowledge? But if he looks to the truth of the oracles, we too, using this as a rule and a light for our defense, shall proceed unswervingly as we are able, asserting that theology hands down some things in a unified way, others in a distinct way, and it is lawful neither to divide the unified things nor to confuse the distinct things, but, following it according to our ability, to lift our gaze to the divine splendors. For having received from there the divine manifestations as a most beautiful rule of truth, we hasten to guard within ourselves what is laid down there, unmultiplied and undiminished and unalterable, being guarded in the guarding of the oracles and empowered by them so that in guarding them we are guarded. <3> The unified attributes of the whole Godhead, then, are, as we have demonstrated from many examples from the oracles in the *Theological Outlines*, the supremely-good, the supremely-divine, the supra-essential, the supra-vital, the supremely-wise, and whatever belongs to transcendent abstraction, along with which are all the causal attributes: the good, the beautiful, the existent, the life-creating, the wise, and all the names by which the cause of all good things is named from its goodly gifts. The distinct attributes are the supra-essential name and reality of Father and of Son and of Spirit, with no interchange or community at all being introduced among these. And again, besides this, the complete and unchangeable existence of Jesus in our nature is distinct, and all the essential mysteries of the loving-kindness related to it. <4> But it is necessary, I think, for us rather to take up and set forth the complete manner of the divine union and distinction, so that the whole account may become clear to us, refusing all that is varied and obscure, and defining its own properties distinctly, clearly, and in an orderly way, according to our ability. For, as I have said in other places, the sacred initiates of our theological tradition call the divine unions the hidden and unproceeding super-establishments of the super-ineffable and super-unknown permanence, but the distinctions they call the goodly processions and manifestations of the Thearchy. And, following the sacred oracles, they say that there are certain specific unions and distinctions proper to the aforesaid union and again to the distinction. For example, in the case of the divine union, that is, the supra-essentiality, what is united is

πατὴρ ἐγείρει τοὺς νεκροὺς καὶ ζωοποιεῖ, οὕτως καὶ ὁ υἱός, οὓς θέλει, ζωοποιεῖ» καὶ ὅτι «Τὸ πνεῦμά ἐστι τὸ ζωοποιοῦν»; Ὅτι δὲ καὶ τὴν κυρείαν ἔχει τῶν ὅλων ἡ ὅλη θεότης, περὶ μὲν τῆς θεογόνου θεότητος ἢ τῆς υἱικῆς οὐδὲ εἰπεῖν ἔστιν, ὡς οἶμαι, ποσαχῆ τῆς θεολογίας ἐπὶ πατρὸς καὶ υἱοῦ διαθρυλεῖται τὸ «κύριος». Ἀλλὰ καὶ «κύριος τὸ πνεῦμά ἐστιν». Καὶ τὸ καλὸν δὲ καὶ τὸ σοφὸν ἐπὶ τῆς ὅλης θεότητος ὑμνεῖται, καὶ τὸ φῶς καὶ τὸ θεοποιὸν καὶ τὸ αἴτιον καὶ πάντα, ὅσα τῆς ὅλης θεαρχίας ἐστίν, εἰς πᾶσαν ἀνάγει τὰ λόγια τὴν θεαρχικὴν ὑμνῳδίαν περιληπτικῶς μέν, ὡς ὅταν λέγει· «Τὰ πάντα ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ», διεξοδικῶς δέ, ὡς ὅταν φαίη· «Τὰ πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν ἔκτισται» καί «Τὰ πάντα ἐν αὐτῷ συνέστηκε» καί «Ἐξαποστελεῖς τὸ πνεῦμά σου, καὶ κτισθήσονται». Καὶ ἵνα συλλήβδην φαίη τις, αὐτὸς ὁ θεαρχικὸς ἔφη λόγος· «Ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν» καὶ «Πάντα, ὅσα ἔχει ὁ πατήρ, ἐμά ἐστι» καὶ «Πάντα τὰ ἐμὰ σά ἐστι καὶ τὰ σὰ ἐμά». Καὶ αὖθις, ὅσα ἐστὶ τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ αὑτοῦ, τῷ θεαρχικῷ πνεύματι κοινωνικῶς καὶ ἡνωμένως ἀνατίθησι τὰς θεουργίας, τὸ σέβας, τὴν πηγαίαν καὶ ἀνέκλειπτον αἰτίαν καὶ διανομὴν τῶν ἀγαθοπρεπῶν δώρων. Καὶ οὐδένα τῶν ἐν τοῖς θείοις λογίοις ἀδιαστρόφοις ἐννοίαις ἐντεθραμμένων οἶμαι πρὸς τοῦτο ἀντερεῖν, ὅτι τὰ θεοπρεπῆ πάντα τῇ ὅλῃ θεαρχίᾳ πρόσεστι κατὰ τὸν θεοτελῆ λόγον. Τούτων οὖν ἡμῖν βραχέως μὲν ἐν τούτοις καὶ μερικῶς, ἐν ἄλλοις δὲ ἱκανῶς ἐκ τῶν λογίων ἀποδεδειγμένων τε καὶ διωρισμένων ὁποίαν ἀναπτύξαι θεωνυμίαν ὁλικὴν ἐγχειρήσομεν ἐπὶ τῆς ὅλης αὐτὴν θεότητος ἐκληπτέον. <2> Eἰ δέ τις φαίη σύγχυσιν ἡμᾶς ἐν τούτῳ κατὰ τῆς θεοπρεποῦς διαιρέσεως εἰσάγειν, τὸν τοιόνδε λόγον ἡμεῖς οὐδὲ αὐτὸν οἰόμεθα πείθειν ἱκανόν, ὡς ἔστιν ἀληθές. Eἰ μὲν γάρ ἐστί τις ὅλως ὁ τοῖς λογίοις ἀντανιστάμενος, πόρρω που πάντως ἔσται καὶ τῆς καθ' ἡμᾶς φιλοσοφίας, καὶ εἰ μὴ τῆς ἐκ τῶν λογίων αὐτῷ θεοσοφίας μέλει, πῶς ἂν ἡμῖν μελήσῃ τῆς ἐπὶ τὴν θεολογικὴν ἐπιστήμην αὐτοῦ χειραγωγίας; Eἰ δὲ εἰς τὴν τῶν λογίων ἀλήθειαν ἀποσκοπεῖ, τούτῳ καὶ ἡμεῖς κανόνι καὶ φωτὶ χρώμενοι πρὸς τὴν ἀπολογίαν, ὡς οἷοί τέ ἐσμεν, ἀκλινῶς βαδιούμεθα φάσκοντες, ὡς ἡ θεολογία τὰ μὲν ἡνωμένως παραδίδωσι, τὰ δὲ διακεκριμένως, καὶ οὔτε τὰ ἡνωμένα διαιρεῖν θεμιτὸν οὔτε τὰ διακεκριμένα συγχεῖν, ἀλλ' ἑπομένους αὐτῇ κατὰ δύναμιν ἐπὶ τὰς θείας μαρμαρυγὰς ἀνανεύειν. Καὶ γὰρ ἐκεῖθεν τὰς θείας ἐκφαντορίας παραλαβόντες ὥσπέρ τινα κανόνα κάλλιστον ἀληθείας τὰ ἐκεῖ κείμενα φρουρεῖν ἐν ἑαυτοῖς ἀπλήθυντα καὶ ἀμείωτα καὶ ἀπαράτρεπτα σπεύδομεν ἐν τῇ φρουρᾷ τῶν λογίων φρουρούμενοι καὶ πρὸς αὐτῶν εἰς τὸ φρουροῦντας αὐτὰ φρουρεῖσθαι δυναμούμενοι. <3> Τὰ μὲν οὖν ἡνωμένα τῆς ὅλης θεότητός ἐστιν, ὡς ἐν ταῖς Θεολογικαῖς ὑποτυπώσεσι διὰ πλειόνων ἐκ τῶν λογίων ἀπεδείξαμεν, τὸ ὑπεράγαθον, τὸ ὑπέρθεον, τὸ ὑπερούσιον, τὸ ὑπέρζωον, τὸ ὑπέρσοφον καὶ ὅσα τῆς ὑπεροχικῆς ἐστιν ἀφαιρέσεως, μεθ' ὧν καὶ τὰ αἰτιολογικὰ πάντα, τὸ ἀγαθόν, τὸ καλόν, τὸ ὄν, τὸ ζωογόνον, τὸ σοφὸν καὶ ὅσα ἐκ τῶν ἀγαθοπρεπῶν αὐτῆς δωρεῶν ἡ πάντων ἀγαθῶν αἰτία κατονομάζεται. Τὰ δὲ διακεκριμένα τὸ πατρὸς ὑπερούσιον ὄνομα καὶ χρῆμα καὶ υἱοῦ καὶ πνεύματος οὐδεμιᾶς ἐν τούτοις ἀντιστροφῆς ἢ ὅλως κοινότητος ἐπεισαγομένης. Ἔστι δὲ αὖθις πρὸς τούτῳ διακεκριμένον ἡ καθ' ἡμᾶς Ἰησοῦ παντελὴς καὶ ἀναλλοίωτος ὕπαρξις καὶ ὅσα τῆς κατ' αὐτήν ἐστι φιλανθρωπίας οὐσιώδη μυστήρια. <4> Χρὴ δέ, ὡς οἶμαι, μᾶλλον ἀναλαβόντας ἡμᾶς τὸν παντελῆ τῆς θείας ἑνώσεώς τε καὶ διακρίσεως ἐκθέσθαι τρόπον, ὅπως ἂν ἡμῖν εὐσύνοπτος ὁ πᾶς ἐγγένηται λόγος τὸ μὲν ποικίλον ἅπαν καὶ ἀσαφὲς ἀπαναινόμενος, εὐδιακρίτως δὲ καὶ σαφῶς καὶ εὐτάκτως τὰ οἰκεῖα κατὰ δύναμιν ὁροθετῶν. Καλοῦσι γάρ, ὅπερ καὶ ἐν ἑτέροις ἔφην, οἱ τῆς καθ' ἡμᾶς θεολογικῆς παραδόσεως ἱερομύσται τὰς μὲν ἑνώσεις τὰς θείας τὰς τῆς ὑπεραῤῥήτου καὶ ὑπεραγνώστου μονιμότητος κρυφίας καὶ ἀνεκφοιτήτους ὑπεριδρύσεις, τὰς διακρίσεις δὲ τὰς ἀγαθοπρεπεῖς τῆς θεαρχίας προόδους τε καὶ ἐκφάνσεις. Καί φασι τοῖς ἱεροῖς λογίοις ἑπόμενοι καὶ τῆς εἰρημένης ἑνώσεως ἴδια καὶ αὖθις τῆς διακρίσεως εἶναί τινας ἰδικὰς καὶ ἑνώσεις καὶ διακρίσεις. Oἷον ἐπὶ τῆς ἑνώσεως τῆς θείας ἤτοι τῆς ὑπερουσιότητος ἡνωμένον μέν ἐστι τῇ