hearing that He was begotten of the Father before all ages, and having the word “alone” understood and implied with that which is from the Father, just as you yourself would agree with us, yet no one ever added the word “alone” there, so that your doctrine that the Spirit proceeds also from the Son, even if it were acknowledged and seemed right to us and simply to the whole Church of Christ, not even so should it have been added by you to the symbol of faith.

It would, therefore, be most just not even to deem you worthy of discussion, unless you cease from adding to the holy symbol; and with the addition from us having been first cast out by you, then to inquire whether the Holy Spirit is also from the Son or not also from the Son, and to ratify what appears to be the common opinion of the God-bearers; but not even so to add it to the symbol of faith, just as our predecessors have done, well and piously, concerning the two natures and wills and energies of the one Christ, and of the hypostatic union and of the title of the Virgin Mother, as ones who lay claim to piety and common peace, although often gathered together afterwards in common, (p.86) with those who from time to time presided hierarchically over old Rome also assembling or consenting. Therefore one cannot take into account the high standing of the present pope; for it is not on account of this one or those after them that we should reject those so many and so great who concluded a sanctified and divinely witnessed life in many ways with a blessed end.

But not only the symbol of the orthodox faith—for it is necessary to speak for the sake of those who will listen with good judgment—not only, then, the symbol of faith, but also almost every theological tongue, proclaiming the Son begotten of the Father and the Holy Spirit proceeding from the same Father, does not add the word “alone”; as, even if it is not added, it is necessarily implied, and this you will know by unrolling and going through the theological books themselves. For your sake, however, let us also bring forward a few things written in brief. The great Athanasius, at any rate, says, “What is God? The beginning of all things according to the Apostle, who says, 'one God the Father, from whom are all things,' for indeed the Word is from Him by generation and the Spirit is from Him by procession.” Do you see “from Him” alike in both cases and nowhere the word “alone” added to the expression? You, therefore, will likewise either take your addition for both, or you will understand “alone” as necessarily implied.

And what of the one immediately after him in time but not after him in majesty before God, the royal priesthood who bears his name, will he not agree and be of the same mind? But listen and learn: “The Son is properly from God, since the Son came forth from the Father and the Spirit proceeds from the Father; but the one is from the Father by generation, while the other is ineffably from God.” Behold, he has placed “from (p. 88) the Father” many times alike for both; can you then still say at all that the Holy Spirit is not from the Father alone, because the word “alone” is not added?

Do you wish then to hear also from the great theologian Gregory, who sums up the whole matter in brief and, as if with some chisel, carves away your addition and applies “from alone” to both? And the more wonderful thing is not that he adds it, but that it is not added. “To us there is one God,” he says, “because there is one Godhead, and the things that are from Him have their reference to one, even if three are believed in.” Have you heard? He said both are from Him. Shall we not then understand and add that both proceed from the Father and from some other, because “alone” is not added, and of the one God of the most high Trinity through

Πατρός ἀκούοντες γεννηθέντα πρό πάντων τῶν αἰώνων καί τῷ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός συννοούμενόν τε καί συνυπακουόμενον ἔχοντες τό «μόνου», καθάπερ ἄν καί αὐτός ἡμῖν συμφήσαις, ὅμως οὐδείς οὐδέποτε τό «μόνου» προσέθηκεν ἐκεῖ, ὥστε καί τήν σήν δόξαν ὅτι καί ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τό Πνεῦμα ἐκπορεύεται, εἰ καί ἀνωμολογημένον ἦν, καί ἡμῖν καί ἁπλῶς πάσῃ τῇ τοῦ Χριστοῦ Ἐκκλησίᾳ συνδοκοῦν, οὐδ᾿ οὕτως ἐχρῆν ἐν τῷ τῆς πίστεως συμβόλῳ προστεθῆναι παρ᾿ ὑμῶν.

Ἦν οὖν ἄρα τῶν δικαιοτάτων μηδέ λόγου ἀξιοῦν ὑμᾶς, εἰ μή τοῦ προστιθέναι τῷ ἱερῷ συμβόλῳ παύσησθε˙ τῆς δέ παρ᾿ ἡμῶν προσθήκης παρ᾿ ὑμῶν ἐκβεβλημένης πρότερον, ἔπειτα ζητεῖν, εἰ καί ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ ἤ οὐχί καί ἐκ τοῦ Υἱοῦ τό Πνεῦμα τό ἅγιον, καί τό ἀναφανέν τοῖς θεοφόροις συνδοκοῦν κυροῦν˙ ἀλλ᾿ οὐδ᾿ οὕτω προστιθέναι τῷ συμβόλῳ τῆς πίστεως, καθάπερ ἐπί τῶν δύο τοῦ ἑνός Χριστοῦ φύσεων καί θελημάτων καί ἐνεργειῶν, τῆς τε καθ᾿ ὑπόστασιν ἑνώσεως καί τοῦ ἐπωνύμου τῆς παρθενομήτορος, οἱ πρό ἡμῶν πεπράχασι καλῶς τε καί φιλευσεβῶς, ὡς μετά τῆς εὐσεβείας καί τῆς κοινῆς εἰρήνης ἀντιποιούμενοι, καίτοι πολλάκις ἔπειτα κοινῇ συνειλεγμένοι, (σελ.86) συνεκκλησιαζόντων ἤ συνευδοκούντων καί τῶν κατά καιρούς τῆς παλαιᾶς Ρώμης ἀρχιερατικῶς προϊσταμένων. Οὔκουν ἔχει τις ὑπολογίζεσθαι τήν τοῦ περιόντος πάπα περιωπήν˙ οὐ γάρ διά τοῦτον ἤ τούτους τούς μετ᾿ ἐκείνους ἀποστερκτέον τούς τοσούτους καί τηλικούτους καί μακαρίῳ τέλει τήν ἡγιασμένην καί πολυειδῶς παρά Θεοῦ μεμαρτυρημένην κατακλείσαντας ζωήν.

Ἀλλά γάρ οὐ μόνον τό τῆς ὀρθοδόξου πίστεως σύμβολον, δεῖ γάρ τῶν εὐγνωμόνως ἀκουσομένων ἕνεκα λέγειν˙μή μόνον οὖν τό τῆς πίστεως σύμβολον, ἀλλά καί πᾶσα σχεδόν γλῶσσα θεολόγος ἐκ Πατρός γεννηθέντα τόν Υἱόν κηρύττουσα καί παρά τοῦ αὐτοῦ Πατρός τό Πνεῦμα τό ἅγιον ἐκπορευόμενον, οὐ προστίθησι τό «μόνου»˙ ὡς κἄν μή προσκέηται, ἐξ ἀνάγκης συνυπακουόμενον, καί τοῦτ᾿ εἴσῃ ἀνελίττων καί διεξιών αὐτάς τάς θεολόγους βίβλους. Σήν δ᾿ ὅμως χάριν, καί ἡμεῖς ὀλίγ᾿ ἄττα προενέγκωμεν καί διά βραχέων γεγραμμένα. Ὁ γοῦν μέγας Ἀθανάσιος, «τί ἐστι», φησί, «Θεός; Ἡ πάντων ἀρχή κατά τόν Ἀπόστολον, λέγοντα, "εἷς Θεός ὁ Πατήρ, ἐξ οὗ τά πάντα", καί γάρ ὁ λόγος ἐξ αὐτοῦ γεννητῶς καί τό Πνεῦμα ἐξ αὐτοῦ ἐκπορευτῶς». Ὁρᾷς ὁμοίως ἐπ᾿ ἀμφοῖν τό ἐξ αὐτοῦ καί οὐδαμοῦ ρήματι προσκείμενον τό «μόνου»; Καί σύ τοίνυν ὁμοίως ἐπ᾿ ἀμφοῖν ἤ τήν σήν προσθήκην λήψῃ ἤ τό μόνου ἐξ ἀνάγκης συνυπακουόμενον νοήσεις.

Τί δέ ὁ μετ᾿ αὐτόν εὐθύς τῷ χρόνῳ καί οὐ μετ᾿ αὐτόν τῇ μεγαλειότητι παρά Θεῷ, τό φερωνύμως βασίλειον ἱεράτευμα, ἆρ᾿ οὐ συμφωνήσει τε καί συμφρονήσει; Ἀλλ᾿ ἄκουε καί μάνθανε˙ «κυρίως ὁ Υἱός ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ, ἐπειδή ὁ Υἱός ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός ἐξῆλθε καί τό Πνεῦμα ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός ἐκπορεύεται˙ ἀλλ᾿ ὁ μέν ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός γεννητῶς, τό δέ ἀρρήτως ἐκ τοῦ Θεοῦ». Ἰδού πολυπλασίως ὁμοίως ἐπ᾿ ἀμφοῖν τέθεικε τό ἐκ (σελ. 88) τοῦ Πατρός˙ ἔχεις οὖν ὅλως λέγειν ἔτι, ὡς οὐκ ἐκ μόνου τοῦ Πατρός τό Πνεῦμα τό ἅγιον, ὅτι μή πρόσκειται τό «μόνου»;

Βούλει δή καί τοῦ μεγάλου θεολόγου ἀκοῦσαι Γρηγορίου, ἐν βραχεῖ τό πᾶν συνάγοντος καί τήν σήν ὥσπερ τινί σμιλίῳ ἀποσμιλεύοντος προσθήκην καί ἀμφοτέροις τό ἐκ μόνου ἐφαρμόζοντος; καί τό θαυμασιώτερον, οὐχ ὅτι προστίθησιν, ἀλλ᾿ ὅτι μή προστήθησιν. «Ἡμῖν εἷς Θεός», φησίν, «ὅτι μία θεότης, καί πρός ἕν τά ἐξ αὐτοῦ τήν ἀναφοράν ἔχει, κἄν τρία πιστεύηται». Ἀκήκοας; Ἐξ αὐτοῦ εἶπεν ἄμφω. Ἆρ᾿ οὖν οὐ νοήσομεν καί προσθήσομεν, ὅτι ἐκ τοῦ Πατρός καί ἐξ ἑτέρου τινός προέρχεται ἀμφότερα, ὅτι μή πρόσκειται τό «μόνου», καί τοῦ μόνου Θεοῦ τῆς ἀνωτάτω Τριάδος διά