12

9 But up to this point, perhaps, he who looks to what is consistent will agree with the argument, because what has been said does not seem to be anything outside the conception befitting God; but he will not be of the same mind towards what follows, through which the mystery of the truth is especially confirmed: a human birth and the growth from infancy to perfection, eating and drinking, and weariness, and sleep, and grief, and a tear, and slander, and a tribunal, and a cross, and death, and the placing in a tomb; for these things, when taken together with the mystery, somehow blunt the faith of the more faint-hearted, so that they do not even accept what follows in what is said because of what has been said before. For they do not accept what is befitting God in the resurrection from the dead because of what is unseemly about the death. But I think we must first set our reasoning a little apart from carnal grossness, and consider what is good in itself and what is not so, and by what marks each of these is apprehended. For I think no one who is rational will deny that of all things only one by nature is shameful: the passion associated with evil, but what is apart from evil is foreign to all shame; and that with which nothing shameful is mingled is certainly apprehended in the portion of the good, and the truly good is unmixed with its opposite. But everything whatsoever that is seen in the realm of the good befits God. Therefore, let them either show that birth, upbringing, growth, the progression to the perfection of nature, the experience of death, the return from death, are evil; or if they agree that the aforementioned things are apart from evil, they will of necessity confess that what is foreign to evil is in no way shameful. And since that which is free from all shamefulness and evil is shown to be good in every way, how are those not pitiable for their irrationality who dogmatize that the good does not befit God?

10 But, one says, human nature is small and circumscribed, while the Godhead is infinite, and how could the infinite be contained in the atom? And who says this, that the infinity of the Godhead was contained in the circumscription of the flesh as in some vessel? For not even in our own life is the intellectual nature shut up within the limits of the flesh. But while the bulk of the body is circumscribed by its own parts, the soul, by the movements of its thought, spreads out at will over all creation, both ascending to the heavens, and treading upon the abysses, and traversing the breadth of the inhabited world, and entering into the things under the earth through its curiosity, and often it is in contemplation even of the wonders of the heavens, not at all weighed down by the appendage of the body. If, then, the soul of a man, though mingled with the body according to the necessity of nature, is everywhere at will, what necessity is there to say that the Godhead is confined by the nature of the flesh, and not to get some fitting conception of the divine economy through examples comprehensible to us? For as fire on a lamp is seen to have laid hold of the underlying material, and reason distinguishes both the fire upon the material and the material that ignites the fire, but in reality it is not possible to separate these from one another and show the flame by itself, separated from the material, but the two together become one, so also in this case; and let no one take along with the example the destructiveness of fire, but having accepted only what is fitting in the image, let him reject what is unfitting; in the same way, then, as we see the flame both attached to the substrate and not enclosed in the material, what prevents us, when we conceive of some union and approach of the divine nature to the human, from preserving the thought befitting of God even in the approach, believing the divine to be beyond all circumscription, even if it be in a man?

11 But if you seek how the Godhead is mingled with the human, it is time for you first to seek what is the union of the soul with the flesh. And if the manner in which your own soul is united to the body is unknown, do not think that that other matter must by all means come within your comprehension; but just as in this case, also that there is something other than the body, the

12

9 Ἀλλὰ μέχρι μὲν τούτων συνθήσεται τυχὸν τῷ λόγῳ ὁ πρὸς τὸ ἀκόλουθον βλέπων διὰ τὸ μὴ δοκεῖν ἔξω τι τῆς θεοπρεποῦς ἐννοίας τῶν εἰρημένων εἶναι· πρὸς δὲ τὰ ἐφεξῆς οὐχ ὁμοίως ἕξει, δι' ὧν μάλιστα τὸ μυστήριον τῆς ἀληθείας κρατύνεται· γένεσις ἀνθρωπίνη καὶ ἡ ἐκ νηπίου πρὸς τελείωσιν αὔξησις, βρῶσίς τε καὶ πόσις, καὶ κόπος, καὶ ὕπνος, καὶ λύπη, καὶ δάκρυον, συκοφαντία τε καὶ δικα στήριον, καὶ σταυρός, καὶ θάνατος, καὶ ἡ ἐν μνημείῳ θέσις· ταῦτα γὰρ συμπαραλαμβανόμενα τῷ μυστηρίῳ ἀμβλύνει πως τῶν μικροψυχοτέρων τὴν πίστιν, ὡς μηδὲ τὸ ἐφεξῆς τῶν λεγομένων διὰ τὰ προειρημένα συμπαραδέχεσθαι. τὸ γὰρ θεοπρεπὲς τῆς ἐκ νεκρῶν ἀναστάσεως διὰ τὸ περὶ τὸν θάνατον ἀπρεπὲς οὐ προσίενται. ἐγὼ δὲ πρότερον οἶμαι δεῖν μικρὸν τῆς σαρκικῆς παχύτητος τὸν λογισμὸν ἀποστήσαντας, αὐτὸ τὸ καλὸν ἐφ' ἑαυτοῦ καὶ τὸ μὴ τοιοῦτον κατανοῆσαι, ποίοις γνωρίσμασιν ἑκάτερον τούτων καταλαμβάνεται. οὐδένα γὰρ ἀντερεῖν οἶμαι τῶν λελογισμένων, ὅτι ἓν κατὰ φύσιν μόνον τῶν πάντων ἐστὶν αἰσχρὸν τὸ κατὰ κακίαν πάθος, τὸ δὲ κακίας ἐκτὸς παντὸς αἴσχους ἐστὶν ἀλλότριον· ᾧ δὲ μηδὲν αἰσχρὸν καταμέ μικται, τοῦτο πάντως ἐν τῇ τοῦ καλοῦ μοίρᾳ καταλαμβά νεται, τὸ δὲ ἀληθῶς καλὸν ἀμιγές ἐστι τοῦ ἐναντίου. πρέπει δὲ θεῷ πᾶν ὅ τι περ ἐν τῇ τοῦ καλοῦ θεωρεῖται χώρᾳ. ἢ τοίνυν δειξάτωσαν κακίαν εἶναι τὴν γέννησιν, τὴν ἀνατροφήν, τὴν αὔξησιν, τὴν πρὸς τὸ τέλειον τῆς φύσεως πρόοδον, τὴν τοῦ θανάτου πεῖραν, τὴν ἐκ τοῦ θανάτου ἐπάνοδον· ἢ εἰ ἔξω κακίας εἶναι τὰ εἰρημένα συντίθενται, οὐδὲν αἰσχρὸν εἶναι τὸ κακίας ἀλλότριον ἐξ ἀνάγκης ὁμολογήσουσι. καλοῦ δὲ πάντως ἀναδεικνυμένου τοῦ πάσης αἰσχρότητος καὶ κακίας ἀπηλλαγμένου, πῶς οὐκ ἐλεεινοὶ τῆς ἀλογίας οἱ τὸ καλὸν μὴ πρέπειν ἐπὶ θεοῦ δογματίζοντες;

10 Ἀλλὰ μικρόν, φησί, καὶ εὐπερίγραπτον ἡ ἀνθρω πίνη φύσις, ἄπειρον δὲ ἡ θεότης, καὶ πῶς ἂν περιελήφθη τῷ ἀτόμῳ τὸ ἄπειρον; καὶ τίς τοῦτό φησιν, ὅτι τῇ περι γραφῇ τῆς σαρκὸς καθάπερ ἀγγείῳ τινὶ ἡ ἀπειρία τῆς θεότητος περιελήφθη; οὐδὲ γὰρ ἐπὶ τῆς ἡμετέρας ζωῆς ἐντὸς κατακλείεται τῶν τῆς σαρκὸς ὅρων ἡ νοερὰ φύσις. ἀλλ' ὁ μὲν ὄγκος τοῦ σώματος τοῖς οἰκείοις μέρεσι περι γράφεται, ἡ δὲ ψυχὴ τοῖς τῆς διανοίας κινήμασι πάσῃ κατ' ἐξουσίαν ἐφαπλοῦται τῇ κτίσει, καὶ μέχρις οὐρανῶν ἀνιοῦσα, καὶ τῶν ἀβύσσων ἐπιβατεύουσα, καὶ τῷ πλάτει τῆς οἰκουμένης ἐπερχομένη, καὶ πρὸς τὰ καταχθόνια διὰ τῆς πολυπραγμοσύνης εἰσδύνουσα, πολλάκις δὲ καὶ τῶν οὐρανίων θαυμάτων ἐν περινοίᾳ γίνεται, οὐδὲν βαρυνομένη τῷ ἐφολκίῳ τοῦ σώματος. εἰ δὲ ἀνθρώπου ψυχὴ κατὰ τὴν τῆς φύσεως ἀνάγκην συγκεκραμένη τῷ σώματι παν ταχοῦ κατ' ἐξουσίαν γίνεται, τίς ἀνάγκη τῇ φύσει τῆς σαρκὸς τὴν θεότητα λέγειν ἐμπεριείργεσθαι καὶ μὴ διὰ τῶν χωρητῶν ἡμῖν ὑποδειγμάτων στοχασμόν τινα πρέ ποντα περὶ τῆς θείας οἰκονομίας λαβεῖν; ὡς γὰρ τὸ πῦρ ἐπὶ τῆς λαμπάδος ὁρᾶται τῆς ὑποκειμένης περιδεδραγ μένον ὕλης, καὶ λόγος μὲν διακρίνει τό τε ἐπὶ τῆς ὕλης πῦρ καὶ τὴν τὸ πῦρ ἐξάπτουσαν ὕλην, ἔργῳ δὲ οὐκ ἔστιν ἀπ' ἀλλήλων ταῦτα διατεμόντας, ἐφ' ἑαυτῆς δεῖξαι τὴν φλόγα διεζευγμένην τῆς ὕλης, ἀλλ' ἓν τὰ συναμφότερα γίνεται, οὕτω καὶ ἐπὶ τούτου· καί μοι μηδεὶς τὸ φθαρτικὸν τοῦ πυρὸς συμπαραλαμβανέτω τῷ ὑποδείγματι, ἀλλ' ὅσον εὐπρεπές ἐστι μόνον ἐν τῇ εἰκόνι δεξάμενος, τὸ ἀπεμφαῖνον ἀποποι είσθω· τὸν αὐτὸν οὖν τρόπον, ὡς ὁρῶμεν καὶ ἐξημμένην τοῦ ὑποκειμένου τὴν φλόγα καὶ οὐκ ἐναποκλειομένην τῇ ὕλῃ, τί κωλύει θείας φύσεως ἕνωσίν τινα καὶ προσεγγισμὸν κατα νοήσαντας πρὸς τὸ ἀνθρώπινον, τὴν θεοπρεπῆ διάνοιαν καὶ ἐν τῷ προσεγγισμῷ διασώσασθαι, πάσης περιγραφῆς ἐκτὸς εἶναι τὸ θεῖον πιστεύοντας, κἂν ἐν ἀνθρώπῳ ᾖ;

11 Εἰ δὲ ζητεῖς πῶς κατακιρνᾶται θεότης πρὸς τὸ ἀν θρώπινον, ὥρα σοι πρὸ τούτου ζητεῖν τί πρὸς τὴν σάρκα τῆς ψυχῆς ἡ συμφυία. εἰ δὲ τῆς σῆς ἀγνοεῖται ψυχῆς ὁ τρόπος, καθ' ὃν ἑνοῦται τῷ σώματι, μηδὲ ἐκεῖνο πάντως οἴου δεῖν ἐντὸς γενέσθαι τῆς σῆς καταλήψεως· ἀλλ' ὥσπερ ἐνταῦθα καὶ ἕτερον εἶναί τι παρὰ τὸ σῶμα τὴν