Epimerismi in Psalmos
it comes from the lessons being imprinted like wax, or from it being mixed from cold and hot, or from receiving the blow at the right time, or from *k
in the case of theotokos theētokos, elaphobolos elaphēbolos. MAKARIOS, of what type of those falling under the category of noun? Adjective. Define.An
to a master in skill, as a student to a teacher in choice, as a friend to a friend. But if it signifies one having the age of a man, of which kind o
numbers, cases. Of what gender is ο῾`ς (hos)? Masculine. Of what number? Singular. Of what case? Nominative and upright of the singulars. What is it
with nouns, and they begin with them, then verbs are derived from nouns, for example horse, I ride a horse, chariot, I drive a chariot apart from tho
How are the prepositions divided? Into two into monosyllables and into disyllables. What is the reciprocal relationship between the monosyllables and
it means two things: the preposition, as in not somehow now from an oak nor from a rock, and in place of from afar, as in for the washing-places
zaea for those from the verb α᾿´ω are oxytone, for example α᾿κραής and 18 all those in ΗΣ that have ΖΑ ζαμενὴς, ζαχρειής. It has been noted that αυ
We are accustomed to use when in doubt and they are these: ara, kâta, môn. Syllogistic are those which are well-suited for the inferences and summari
the future has the Η or the Ε. And it ought to have the Ε and not the Η but whenever the present of the first conjugation of the perispomena verbs, e
STE E, why? Of those in -MI, the first and the second conjugation end in E, the 3rd in O, and the 4th in a lengthened doubtful vowel. And why do the f
are found, I do not understand, I free, I give Therefore, the verbs in -MI are not Aeolic from the breathing, because the Aeolians are psilotic but
double. Is it a primary word or a derivative? and from where is it derived? From the preposition *kata* and the verb *hizō*. And are compound words fi
is oxytone, except for *etoi* but following, it is barytone. The disjunctive conjunction *e*, being unaspirated and superfluous. How many things does
What? The written law, which God gave to Moses and the coin .... indeed among the Egyptians the land and the law of grace, which is the gospel it
the passive perfect is ispsyllabic with the active, with the rule stating that every passive or middle having an M is declined, having one syllable mo
yours from οὗ, ὁ ὅς, ἡ ἥ, τὸ ὅν in the dual, νῶι, σφῶι, σφῶε. From νῶι comes ὁ νωΐτερος, ἡ νωιτέρα, τὸ νωΐτερον from σφῶι, ὁ σφωΐτερος, ἡ σφωιτέρα,
I thresh and two of them have the future with H, I will shout and I will bewail and the other two with A, I will hear and I will be foolish, (for it
having a monosyllable in the genitive, sometimes the consonant of the perfect, sometimes that of the future. And what is the consonant of the perfect?
Phaeacians, that they might be the most skilled of all men (like) the little ear, which alone is unaspirated (made smooth) of all the others being as
the shortened analogical, the lengthened poetic. How is water declined? Of water. The rule: neuters in -OR are declined through -ROS, and keep the OME
being in the middle of a word, the one beginning the middle syllable is aspirated, but the one ending the same [syllable] is unaspirated, for example
And why is it marked? Because there is a rule that says that monosyllabic words ending in ΕΣ, declined imparisyllabically, have this order (declension
lesser than the ending of the neuter, which is absurd, the penult was found to be long by position, but the A before two consonants never wishes to be
I was making prosper but verbs beginning from the particle EU and DYS do not augment the beginning of the imperfect 54 externally, but have the infle
ending in the penult, able to receive contraction in the second and third person, the Y is added in the future, I flow you flow you flow (I will flow)
I see, straight, hollow, form, and the like. And otherwise: verbs beginning with O are written with a small O, except for ὠθῶ, ὠφελῶ, ὠχριῶ, ὠρύω, ὠδύ
is
a combination of two consonants, of which the second is a liquid, for example μέμβλω, ο᾿´φλω, ε᾿´γρω, δάκνω, and the pure verbs in -Ω ending in the di
has the doubtful vowel shortened, for example megas mega, brachys brachy, tis ti. Tis of what kind of those falling under the noun?Of the interrogativ
a
megá[l]os for the genitive megálou is heteroclitic, as if from the nominative megálos. And why did the nominative megálos fall out of use? Beca
How many genitives does basileus admit? Six: basileus, genitive basileos with epsilon and omicron, commonly basileus, genitive basileos, wi
should have been *Zeos*. Therefore, with the two rules conflicting, the Doric dialect entered, and it became *Zeus, Dios* for the Dorians turn Δ into
having a single origin before the T, the ST is oxytone, for example, istos, pistos, christos, and anything similar. LET US BREAK, of the subjunctive m
A word participating in the property of verbs and of nouns. What does it participate in of the noun and of the verb? Of the noun, genders and cases o
it may be formed in the feminine gender, for example, stephanos, geranos the word ouranos, Sikanos, is noted, which is a place in Iberia. HE WILL LAU
THYMOS from `thyo` meaning to rush, the future `thyso`, the perfect `tethyca`, the passive `tethumai`, and from it `thymos` for things from the passi
falsehood, form, wall, and the like, are properispomenon but the paroxytones and the proparoxytones and the properispomena, are in effect (barytone.)
consonants, of which the second is unchangeable. The passive perfect is πεπρόσταγμαι and from it, πρόσταγμα. Why is it proparoxytone? Neuter nouns end
are declined without hindrance both into the participles and into the other moods but etheka, edoka, heka, ought to have been with a Sigma, but were
on the same day a derivative, which is a participle. I HAVE BEGOTTEN YOU, a verb, indicative, simple, derivative, of the second conjugation of the per
is written with an I, except for verbs in -ΕΥΩ, as in λαγνεύω λαγνεία, and those from words in -ΥΣ, as in ταχὺς, ταχεῖα and those from words with a c
Otherwise: verbs ending in ΑΊΝΩ are written with the diphthong ΑΙ, for example βαμβαίνω, ξηραίνω, μιαίνω noted are σθένω, μένω, πένω, στένω. 94 ῬΆΒ
from *agallō*, this from *aglaon*, this from *aiglē*, this from *aissō* which means *hormō*. Why is *LI* with an iota? Words with a circumflex on -IŌ
I tread, I pour, I moisten. The THLI is long, why? Disyllabic verbs ending in BŌ, whose penultimate syllable has an I, are lengthened. EPANISTANTAI, a
first, third person of the singulars, of the compound form. And from where was it compounded? From the preposition *epi* and the verb *akouō*. And *ak
second, you struck. THOSE WHO HATE, where does it come from? From I hate, this from enemy, this from hatred, the hatred, this from I hold, I control.
by a change of A to H, I seek the plural, we seek, we seek, the second person, you seek, you seek. PSEUDOS, whence does it come? From I flee, flight
107 {1FIFTH PSALM.} 1 Where does it come from? From pempō for it sends us to the tenth number.
second aorist from ἐντέλλω, the future ἐντελῶ, the first aorist ἔτειλα, the middle ἐτειλάμην, the second ἐτείλω. BEHOLD, a deictic adverb, why is it o
From `opizo`, which means to pursue behind this from `opis`, not regarding the vengeance of the gods, this from `hepo` meaning to follow. Why PI I?
of actives only is written with the EI diphthong but in the case of passives and the rest with I. It means six things: `eidô` to make like, from whic
a monosyllable is circumflexed, and it becomes to set on fire every syllable ending in N ... IS TAKEN, from lēbō, [meaning] to take, and with the pre
r ai g i a n
1ELEVENTH PSALM.} another one and with the number ten, eleventh.
a ,
1PSALM 17.} from *stereō* this from *histēmi*, *stēsō*, second aorist
a
1PSALM 18.} omega, why? Because every simple Greek word with an acute accent on the last syllable
You have favored, Lord, your land. REDEEMER, from I redeem, this from ransom, this from I loose.
Nothing is said in a universal sense, as when we say, nothing new in the world the form with Theta is taken from οὐδέν, and by changing Delta t
1 I AM WELL-PLEASING from *aretô*, and with the addition of S *arestô* and *euarestô* this from *aretê* (virtue) but that which is from *erô*, 'I de
{1[Psalm 29.]} 1 EVENING (HESPERA), from to bring inward (eso pherein), being a sort of in-bringer (esophera), and by syncope, hespera,
second. The first person plural eipaiēmen the third eipaiēsan, and by syncope eipaisan.
I have been shaken, and from it palm, by which the hand is moved, and from this comes I wrestle the passive perfect is I have been wrestled, the thir
.The rule: Proper nouns in NES, not compounded from the neuter, have the genitive in OU, Meriones, Merionou, Iordanes, Iordanou. HERMONIEIM: Names end
⇔
I was calling, I was judging, those things, when falling out, have the E the word *ekpoma* comes from *EK*. {1[PSALM 54.]}1 I WAS HARBORING ANGER is
playing.Of a fox the rule: simple words ending in Ξ of more than one syllable, except for those in Ξ, are all declined through Κ. {1[PSALM 63.]}1 I C
i
π δ μ Ι ὸ ί
, 10
,
t
T
e {
of a strap for just as the I turns into E, it is necessary for the E also to turn into I, a strap, of a strap, and from it, garment. YOU WILL ROLL UP
1[PSALM 110]}1 o in kratō, with the addition of S. For when the E adds two
e ma
130.]}1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from *meteōrizō*. Why were they not humble-minded like the weaned child now its mother, but I raised my voice
equal,
PSALM 140.]} (INCENSE) this from `thuma` (sacrifice), for through the burning of sacrifices
̀Σ ΡΝʹ.]} IN POWERS, the nominative, power, from to rule, this from
o
SYNIŌN (coming together), from iō, to go forward, iōn (going) and syniōn (coming together). ARRŌSTIA (sickness), from rhō, rhōsō, rhōstos . 144 APOTHA
ON from *pleon*, and by a pleonasm of I, but it is written with a diphthong, since they write it with an H, and otherwise the disyllabic comparatives
t
ACEDIA, from *akedio* (I am despondent), this from *aedio* (I am displeased), and this from *hedys* (sweet) and after *edes* (sweet), and with the ad
84
I will support, I have supported, I have been supported, I was supported and this from 'I stand', 'I will cause to stand'. SHELTERER, from 'I shelter
n n
. P
L
P
K
ISIN, the nominative is mercy, it comes from helō, which means to take, elos e
29 T
1[PSALM 110.]} I have *kratô* [I hold], with the addition of S. For when the E is added
,
1 THEY WERE LIFTED UP, from `meteorizo`. Why were they not humble-minded as the
t ,
EIAS, the nominative, dominion, from I rule, this from ruler, this from I am able. ENECHOI, en is a preposition, ēchōi is a noun, and ēchos from movin
has 3 solutions, Moses of Moses, Moses of Moses, and Moses of Moses. LET HIM BE EXPECTED, I expect from the second conjugation of the perispomenon. TH
from casting the ω᾿῀πας. OATH, from fence, and being a little wall for the one swearing, against transgressing the agreements. TO SERVE, from I serve,
double. Is it a primary word or a derivative? and from where is it derived? From the preposition *kata* and the verb *hizō*. And are compound words first compounded and then inflected, or are they first inflected and then compounded? Words compounded with a preposition are inflected before they are compounded, for example, *agō*, *synagō*; but those not compounded with a preposition are not inflected before they are compounded, for example *philosophō*, *ephilosophoun*. *Kathizō*, the *thi* has an iota. Why? Verbs in *-izō* are written with an iota, except for *daneizō* and *chrēizō*. *Daneizō* comes from *daneion*, *daneiazō*, and by syncope *daneizō*; and *daneion* from *danos*. For neuters derived from neuters in -os by means of -eion, of a single gender, are written with the diphthong EI, for example *genos geneion*, *brenthos brentheion*, so thus also *danos daneion*. And *chrēizō* from *chreos*, *chreizō*, and by change of E to H, *chrēizō*, and by contraction *chrēizō*, and with the iota subscript. *Kathizō*, the future, *kathisō*. From where does it have the sigma? The fourth [conjugation] is variable, *phrasō*, *paixō*; and it ought to have the xi, and not the sigma; but verbs ending in -zō, if they are disyllabic, are sometimes pronounced with zeta in the future, for example *krazō*, *kraxō*, and sometimes with sigma, for example, *ktizō*, *ktisō*; but if they are more than two syllables, always with sigma, except for *aiazō aiaxō*, *oimōzō oimōxō*, *ololuzō ololuxō*, *thryllizō thryllixō*, *alapazō alapaxō*, *stērizō stērixō*, but *bastazō* and *nystazō* and similar words are Doric, by a change of the second sigma to zeta, 29 but of *stenazō* the present is variable; for *stenachō* is also found, from which also come *stenachos* and *stonachē*. *Kathizō*, and the future *kathisō*, the Attic future *kathō*. The rule: in verbs in -izō of more than two syllables that are written with iota, the Attics, by removing the sigma of the future and adding a circumflex, make their own future; for example *hybrizō hybrisō hybriō*, *laktizō laktisō laktiō*. Why did he say "in verbs in -izō"? Because in verbs in -azō or -ozō or -uzō they do not do this. For in these, if the future should drop the sigma, for example, *despozō desposō despoō*, *kraugazō kraugasō kraugaō*; but the Attics, finding consecutive vowels, again make a crasis, and it becomes *despō* and *kraugō*, which is improper. And how is it improper? For the future is found to have fewer syllables than the present, which is impossible; for every future is isosyllabic with the present, or has an extra syllable, but never has fewer. Why did he say "of more than two syllables"? Because there are some that are homophonous with the futures of the sixth conjugation, like *ktizō ktisō*, and *ktiō ktisō*. Therefore, so that it may not become ambiguous which conjugation it is, they do not do it in disyllabic verbs. And why did he say "of those written with iota"? Because in *daneizō* and *chrēizō* they do not do this, since every future is barytone, except for the second conjugation, or it wants to have the same penultimate syllable as the present, for example *typtō typsō*, or a longer one, for example *legō lexō*, but never a shorter one, except for *pnigō pnixō*, and *psychō psychxō*, and *erykō eryxō*. For these in the present have the doubtful vowel long by nature, but in the future, by position; therefore, so that they may avoid the impropriety, in the second conjugation of barytones they drop the sigma of the future and add a circumflex, so that the future may no longer be barytone. Since, therefore, in *daneizō daneisō* and *chrēizō chrēsō* the same penultimate syllable is preserved, the Attics no longer make a special future, because it has a long penult. *Kathizō*, the iota is short. Why? Verbs in -izō 30 shorten the iota, for example *andrizō*, *badizō*, *laktizō*, *kathizō* and the future, *kathisō*; the aorist *ekathisa*, the 2nd person, *ekathisas*, the 3rd, *ekathise*; and the nu is ephelcystic in the third persons, when a vowel follows, but no longer when consonants follow; and with the negation OU and the pleonasm of the kappa, *ouk ekathisen*. BUT OR, *alla* is a copulative conjunction; *ē* is a disjunctive one. On the smooth A; why? All conjunctions are smooth, except for the causal ones. It is oxytone; every copulative conjunction
διπλοῦ. Πρωτότυπόν ε᾿στιν η᾿` παράγωγον· καὶ πόθεν παράγεται; Ἐκ τῆς κατὰ προθέσεως καὶ τοῦ ι῾´ζω ῥήματος. Καὶ αἱ συντι θέμεναι
λέξεις πρῶτον συντίθενται καὶ ου῾´τω κλίνονται, η᾿` πρῶτον κλίνονται, καὶ ου῾´τω συντίθενται; Αἱ μετὰ προθέ σεως συντιθέμεναι
λέξεις πρὶν η᾿` συντεθῶσι κλίνονται, οι῾῀ον, α᾿´γω, συνάγω· αἱ δὲ μὴ μετὰ προθέσεως συντιθέμεναι ου᾿ κλίνονται πρὶν η᾿` συντεθῶσιν,
οι῾῀ον φιλοσοφῶ, ε᾿φιλοσόφουν. Καθίζω, τὸ ΘΙ, Ι. ∆ιατί; Τὰ διὰ τοῦ ι῾´ζω ῥηματικὰ διὰ τοῦ Ι γράφεται, πλὴν τοῦ δανείζω καὶ
χρῄζω. Τὸ μὲν δανείζω γέγονε παρὰ τὸ δάνειον, δανειάζω, καὶ ἐν συγκοπῇ δανείζω· τὸ δὲ δάνειον παρὰ τὸ δάνος. Τὰ γὰρ α᾿πο`
τῶν ει᾿ς ΟΣ ου᾿δετέρων διὰ τοῦ ΕΙΟΝ γινόμενα ου᾿δε´τερα μονογενῆ, διὰ τῆς ΕΙ διφθόγγου γράφεται, οι῾῀ον γένος γένειον, βρένθος
βρένθειον, ου῾´τως ου᾿῀ν καὶ δάνος δάνειον. Τὸ δὲ χρῄζω α᾿πο` τοῦ χρέος, χρεΐζω, καὶ τροπῇ τοῦ Ε ει᾿ς Η χρηΐζω, καὶ ἐν συναιρέσει
χρῄζω, καὶ μετὰ τοῦ Ι προσγεγραμμένου. Καθίζω, ὁ μέλλων, καθίσω. Πόθεν ε᾿´χει τὸ Σ;Ἡ δὲ τετάρτη διφο ρεῖται, φράσω, παίξω·
καὶ ω᾿´φειλεν ε᾿´χειν τὸ Ξ, καὶ μὴ τὸ Σ· α᾿λλὰ τὰ ει᾿ς ΖΩ λήγοντα ῥήματα, ει᾿ μέν ει᾿σι δισύλλαβα, πῆ μὲν διὰ τοῦ Ζ ε᾿κφερόμενα
ε᾿πι` τῷ μέλλοντι, οι῾῀ον κράζω, κράξω, πῆ δὲ διὰ τοῦ Σ, οι῾῀ον, κτίζω, κτίσω· ει᾿ δέ ει᾿σιν ὑπὲρ δύο συλλαβὰς, α᾿ει` διὰ
τοῦ Σ, πλὴν τοῦ αἰάζω αἰάξω, οι᾿μω´ζω οι᾿μω´ξω, ο᾿λολύζω ο᾿λολύξω, θρυλλίζω θρυλλίξω, α᾿λαπάζω α᾿λαπάξω, στηρίζω στηρίξω,
τὸ δὲ βαστάζω καὶ νυστάζω καὶ τὰ ο῾´μοια ∆ωρικά ει᾿σι, κατὰ τροπὴν τοῦ δευτέρου Σ ει᾿ς Ζ, 29 τοῦ δὲ στενάζω ὁ ἐνεστὼς διφορεῖται·
ευ῾´ρηται γὰρ καὶ στενάχω, α᾿φ' ου῾῀ καὶ στέναχος καὶ στοναχή. Καθίζω, καὶ ὁ μέλλων καθίσω, ὁἈττικὸς μέλλων καθῶ.Ὁ κανών·
ε᾿πι` τῶν διὰ τοῦ ίζω ῥημάτων τῶν ὑπὲρ δύο συλλαβῶν (ὰς) τῶν διὰ τοῦ Ι γραφομένων, οἱἈττικοὶ ἐκβάλλοντες τὸ Σ τοῦ μέλ λοντος,
καὶ περισπῶντες, ι᾿´διον μέλλοντα ποιοῦσιν· οι῾῀ον ὑβρίζω ὑβρίσω ὑβριῶ, λακτίζω λακτίσω λακτιῶ. ∆ιατί ει᾿῀πεν ε᾿πι` τῶν διὰ
τοῦ ίζω; ∆ιότι ε᾿πι` τῶν διὰ τοῦ άζω η᾿` ο´ζω η᾿` υ´ζω τοῦτο ου᾿ ποιοῦσιν.Ἐπὶ τούτων γὰρ ὁ μέλλων ἐὰν α᾿ποβάλλῃ τὸ Σ, οι῾῀ον,
δεσπόζω δεσπόσω δεσποῶ, κραυγάζω κραυγάσω κραυγαῶ· εὑρίσκοντες δὲ οἱ Ἀττικοὶ ἀλλεπάλληλα τὰ φωνήεντα πάλιν ποιοῦσι κράσιν,
καὶ γίνεται δεσπῶ καὶ κραυγῶ, ο῾´περ ε᾿στὶν α᾿´τοπον. Καὶ πῶς ε᾿στιν α᾿´τοπον; Εὑρίσκεται γὰρ ὁ μέλλων ε᾿λα´ττονας συλλαβὰς
ε᾿´χειν τοῦ ἐνεστῶτος, ο῾´περ α᾿δυ´νατον· πᾶς γὰρ μέλλων ι᾿σοσύλλαβός ε᾿στι τῷ ἐνεστῶτι, η᾿` περιττοσύλλαβος, ου᾿δε´πω δὲ
ἐνδεῖ. ∆ιατί ει᾿῀πεν ε᾿πι` τῶν ὑπὲρ δύο συλλαβάς; ∆ιότι ει᾿σι´ τινα α῾´τινα ὁμοφωνεῖ τοῖς μέλλουσι τῆς ϛ συζυγίας, ὡς τὸ κτίζω
κτίσω, καὶ κτίω κτίσω.Ἵνα ου᾿῀ν μὴ ἀμφίβολα γένηται ποίας ε᾿στι συζυγίας, ε᾿πι` τῶν δισυλλάβων ου᾿ ποιοῦσι. Καὶ διατί ει᾿῀πε
τῶν διὰ τοῦ Ι γραφομένων; ∆ιότι ε᾿πι` τοῦ δανείζω καὶ χρῄζω τοῦτο ου᾿ ποιοῦσιν, ε᾿πειδὴ πᾶς μέλλων βαρύτονος, πλὴν τῆς δευτέρας
συζυγίας, η᾿` τὴν ι᾿´σην παραλή γουσαν θέλει ε᾿´χειν τῷ ἐνεστῶτι, οι῾῀ον τύπτω τύψω, η᾿` μεί ζονα, οι῾῀ον λέγω λέξω, ου᾿δε´πω
δὲ ἐλάττονα, πλὴν τοῦ πνίγω πνίξω, καὶ ψύχω ψύξω, καὶ ἐρύκω ε᾿ρυ´ξω. Ταῦτα γὰρ ε᾿ν μὲν τῷ ἐνεστῶτι ε᾿´χουσι φύσει μακρὸν τὸν
δίχρονον, ε᾿ν δὲ τῷ μέλλοντι, θέσει· ι῾´να ου᾿῀ν τὸ α᾿´τοπον α᾿ποφύγωσι, ε᾿πι` τῆς δευτέρας συζυγίας τῶν βαρυτόνων α᾿ποβάλλουσι
τὸ Σ τοῦ μέλλοντος, καὶ περισπῶσιν, ι῾´να μηκέτι ει᾿´η βαρύτονος ὁ μέλλων.Ἐπεὶ ου᾿῀ν τοῦ δανείζω δανείσω καὶ χρῄζω χρήσω ἡ
αυ᾿τη` παραλήγουσα πεφύλακται, ου᾿κε´τι ποιοῦσιν οἱἈτ τικοὶ ι᾿´διον μέλλοντα, διὰ τὸ μακρᾷ παραλήγεσθαι. Καθίζω, τὸ Ι βραχύ.
∆ιατί; Τὰ διὰ τοῦ ΙΖΩ ῥήματα 30 συστέλλουσι τὸ Ι, οι῾῀ον α᾿νδρίζω, βαδίζω, λακτίζω, καθίζω καὶ ὁ μέλλων, καθίσω· ὁ ἀόριστος
ε᾿κα´θισα, τὸ βʹ, ε᾿κα´θισας, τὸ γʹ, ε᾿κα´θισε· καὶ τὸ Ν ε᾿φελκυστικόν ε᾿στιν ε᾿ν τοῖς τρίτοις προσώποις, φωνήεντος ε᾿πιφερομένου,
συμφώνων δ' ου᾿κε´τι· καὶ μετὰ τῆς ΟΥ α᾿ρνήσεως καὶ πλεονασμοῦ τοῦ Κ, ου᾿κ ε᾿κα´θισεν. ἈΛΛ'Ἢ, τὸ ἀλλὰ σύνδεσμος συμπλεκτικός·
τὸ η᾿` διαζευ κτικός. Ει᾿ς τὸ Α ψιλόν· διατί; Οἱ σύνδεσμοι πάντες ψιλοῦν ται, πλὴν τῶν αι᾿τιολογικῶν.Ὀξύνεται· πᾶς σύνδεσμος
συμ πλεκτικὸς