25

of them being baptized every day, as if the hope of yesterday has died among them, both their faith and their purification. For if they held to one baptism, then they would have confidence in it as living and immortal forever; but since today they washed, not for the sake of washing the body or of filth, but for the sake of sins, then according to them it was purified; but again washing on the next day, they declared that the past baptism of yesterday had died 1.215. For if the one of the day before had not died, they would not have needed another on the next day for the purification of sins. And if they do not abstain from sinning at all, thinking that water will purify those who continually sin every day, their supposition is vain and their practice is futile and stale. For neither Oceanus nor all the streams and seas, both ever-flowing rivers and springs and all of rain-bearing nature, coming together, can make sins disappear, since it is done neither according to reason nor from a command of God; for repentance purifies, and the one baptism through the naming of the mysteries. But I will pass over this too, having considered it sufficient to have shown in brief the refutation of their madness, as it has been arranged here for those who encounter it. Against the Nasaraeans, from Judaism heresy ˉε, and in the sequence ˉιˉη.

1. Next I shall attempt to narrate the matters concerning the heresy after the Hemerobaptists, called that of the Nasaraeans, who are Jews by race, originating from Galaaditis and Basanitis and the regions beyond the Jordan, as the account that has come down to us contains, and being from Israel itself, which Judaized in all things, thinking almost nothing beyond the aforesaid. For it likewise had circumcision, it kept the same sabbath, it attended to the same feasts, but it did not introduce fate or astronomy. And it accepted the fathers in the Pentateuch from Adam to Moses, those who were distinguished in the excellence of piety, I mean Adam and Seth and Enoch and Methuselah and Noah and Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, Levi and Aaron and Moses and Jesus the son of 1.216 Nun, but it did not accept the Pentateuch itself, but it confessed Moses and believed that he had received legislation, but not this one, it says, but another; whence, being Jews, they observe all things of the Jews, but they did not offer sacrifice nor partake of living things, but it was unlawful among them to partake of meat or to sacrifice to them. For they said that these books were fabricated and that none of these things had been done by the fathers. This was the difference of the Nasaraeans from the others, so that the refutation against them is manifest not in one place, but in many. 2. First, in that they confess the fathers and patriarchs and Moses; for since no other scripture speaks of these things, from where is their knowledge of the names and excellence of the fathers, if not from the scriptures of the Pentateuch itself? And how is it possible for truth and falsehood to be in the same thing and for the scripture to be true in part, and false in part, when the Savior says, "Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or the tree rotten and its fruit rotten"; "for a good tree cannot bear rotten fruit, nor a rotten tree bear good fruit." Vain therefore is their thought and their teaching, which has its refutation from many sources, as up to this day not only are the things in the scriptures sung, but also the places of the miracles are preserved; first, where Abraham offered the ram to God,

25

αὐτῶν καθ' ἑκάστην ἡμέραν βαπτιζομένων, ὡς ὅτι ἡ ἐλπὶς τῆς χθὲς ἡμέρας παρ' αὐτοῖς τέθνηκεν, ἡ πίστις τε καὶ ὁ ἁγνισμός. εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἑνὶ βαπτίσματι ἐστοίχουν, ἄρα ἐθάρρουν τούτῳ ὡς ζῶντι καὶ ἀθανάτῳ ὄντι εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα· ὁπότε δὲ σήμερον μὲν ἐλούσαντο, οὐχ ἕνεκεν πλύσεως σώματος ἢ ῥύπου, ἀλλ' ἕνεκεν ἁμαρτημάτων, ἄρα κατ' αὐτοὺς ἐκαθαρίσθη· αὖθις δὲ τῇ ἑξῆς πάλιν λουόμενοι ἀπεφήναντο τὸ παρελθὸν ἐν τῇ χθὲς τεθνάναι 1.215 βάπτισμα. εἰ μὴ γὰρ τὸ πρὸ μιᾶς ἐτεθνήκει, οὐκ ἂν εἰς τὴν ἑξῆς ἑτέρου ἐπεδέοντο πρὸς καθαρισμὸν ἁμαρτημάτων. καὶ εἰ ὅλως οὐκ ἀπέχονται τοῦ ἁμαρτάνειν, νομίζοντες ὅτι τὸ ὕδωρ καθαρίσει τοὺς ἐνδελεχῶς καθ' ἑκάστην ἁμαρτάνοντας, μάταιος αὐτῶν ἡ ὑπόνοια καὶ τὸ ἐπιτήδευμα φροῦδον καὶ ἕωλον. οὔτε γὰρ Ὠκεανὸς οὔτε πάντα τὰ ῥεῖθρα καὶ πελάγη, ποταμοί τε ἀένναοι καὶ πηγαὶ πᾶσά τε ἡ ὀμβροτόκος φύσις συνελθοῦσαι δύνανται ἁμαρτήματα ἀφανίσαι, ἐπειδήπερ οὐ κατὰ λόγον οὐδὲ ἐκ προστάγματος θεοῦ γίνεται· μετάνοια γὰρ καθαρίζει καὶ τὸ ἓν βάπτισμα διὰ τῆς τῶν μυστηρίων ὀνομασίας. παρελεύσομαι δὲ καὶ ταύτην, αὐτάρκως ἡγησάμενος τὸ ἐν ὀλίγῳ τὸ ἀλέξημα τῆς αὐτῶν φρενοβλαβείας ὑποδείξας, ὡς ἐνταῦθα τοῖς ἐντυγχάνουσι συντέτακται. Κατὰ Νασαραίων, ἀπὸ Ἰουδαϊσμοῦ αἱρέσεως ˉε, τῆς δὲ ἀκολουθίας ˉιˉη.

1. Ἑξῆς δὲ ἐπιβαλοῦμαι διηγεῖσθαι τὰ κατὰ τὴν αἵρεσιν τὴν μετὰ τοὺς Ἡμεροβαπτιστὰς καλουμένην τῶν Νασαραίων, οἵτινες Ἰουδαῖοί εἰσι τὸ γένος, ἀπὸ τῆς Γαλααδίτιδος καὶ Βασανίτιδος καὶ τῶν ἐπέκεινα τοῦ Ἰορδάνου ὁρμώμενοι, ὡς ὁ εἰς ἡμᾶς ἐλθὼν περιέχει λόγος, ἐξ αὐτοῦ δὲ τοῦ Ἰσραὴλ οὖσα, ἥτις τὰ πάντα ἰουδάϊζεν, μηδὲν περαιτέρω φρονοῦσα σχεδὸν τῶν προειρημένων. περιτομὴν γὰρ ὡσαύτως ἐκέκτητο, σάββατον τὸ αὐτὸ ἐφύλαττεν, ἑορταῖς ταῖς αὐταῖς προσανεῖχεν, οὐ μὴν εἱμαρμένην παρεισῆγεν οὔτε ἀστρονομίαν. καὶ πατέρας μὲν ἐδέχετο τοὺς ἐν τῇ πεντατεύχῳ ἀπὸ τοῦ Ἀδὰμ μέχρι Μωυσέως, τοὺς ἐν ἀριστείᾳ θεοσεβείας διαφανεῖς ὑπάρξαντας, φημὶ δὲ Ἀδὰμ καὶ Σὴθ καὶ Ἐνὼχ καὶ Μαθουσάλα καὶ Νῶε καὶ Ἀβραὰμ καὶ Ἰσαὰκκαὶ Ἰακώβ, Λευί τε καὶ Ἀαρὼν καὶ Μωυσέα καὶ Ἰησοῦν τὸν τοῦ 1.216 Ναυῆ, αὐτὴν δὲ οὐ παρεδέχετο τὴν πεντάτευχον, ἀλλὰ ὡμολόγει μὲν τὸν Μωυσέα καὶ ὅτι ἐδέξατο νομοθεσίαν ἐπίστευεν, οὐ ταύτην δέ, φησίν, ἀλλ' ἑτέραν· ὅθεν τὰ μὲν πάντα φυλάττουσι τῶν Ἰουδαίων Ἰουδαῖοι ὄντες, θυσίαν δὲ οὐκ ἔθυον οὐδὲ ἐμψύχων μετεῖχον, ἀλλὰ ἀθέμιτον ἦν παρ' αὐτοῖς τὸ κρεῶν μεταλαμβάνειν ἢ θυσιάζειν αὐτοῖς. ἔφασκον γὰρ πεπλάσθαι ταῦτα τὰ βιβλία καὶ μηδὲν τούτων ὑπὸ τῶν πατέρων γεγενῆσθαι. αὕτη ἦν ἡ τῶν Νασαραίων διαφορὰ πρὸς τὰς ἄλλας, ὡς καὶ πρὸς αὐτοὺς ὁ ἔλεγχος οὐκ ἐν ἑνὶ τόπῳ, ἀλλὰ ἐν πολλοῖς ἐστι φανερός. 2. Πρῶτον μὲν ἐν τῷ ὁμολογεῖν αὐτοὺς τοὺς πατέρας καὶ πατριάρχας καὶ Μωυσέα· ἄλλης γραφῆς γὰρ περὶ τούτων μὴ λεγούσης, πόθεν αὐτοῖς ἡ γνῶσις τῆς τῶν πατέρων ὀνομασίας καὶ ἀριστείας, εἰ μὴ ἐξ αὐτῶν τῶν γραφῶν τῆς πεντατεύχου; καὶ πῶς οἷόν τε ἐν ταὐτῷ εἶναι ἀληθὲς καὶ ψεῦδος καὶ ἐν μέρει τὴν γραφὴν ἀληθεύειν, ἐν μέρει δὲ ψεύδεσθαι, τοῦ σωτῆρος λέγοντος «ἢ ποιήσατε τὸ δένδρον ἀγαθὸν καὶ τοὺς καρποὺς ἀγαθοὺς ἢ τὸ δένδρον σαπρὸν καὶ τοὺς καρποὺς σαπρούς»· «οὐ δύναται γὰρ δένδρον ἀγαθὸν καρποὺς σαπροὺς ποιῆσαι, οὐδὲ δένδρον σαπρὸν καρποὺς ἀγαθοὺς ποιῆσαι». μάταιος τοίνυν αὐτῶν ἡ διάνοια καὶ ἡ εἰσήγησις, ἐκ πολλῶν ἔχουσα τὴν ἀνατροπήν, ὡς ἄχρι τῆς δεῦρο οὐ μόνον τὰ ἐν ταῖς γραφαῖς ᾄδεται, ἀλλὰ καὶ οἱ τόποι τῶν παραδοξοποιιῶν σῴζονται· πρῶτον ὅπου τὸ πρόβατον Ἀβραὰμ προσέφερε τῷ θεῷ,