25

shone then on his face, and showing how it has just now appeared to the souls of those who have loved God in truth, "Just as the eyes," he says, "of sensible sight see the sensible sun, so do they, through the eyes of the soul, see the intelligible light, which at the (p. 156) time of the resurrection, having emerged and been poured out upon the bodies, will show them also to be beautified by the eternal light." For one would never say that the light of knowledge is intellectual, but that light at times acts as intellectual and is seen as intelligible by the intellect through an intellectual sense, and coming into rational souls, it delivers them from the ignorance of disposition, turning them from many opinions to a uniform knowledge. Wherefore also that hymnist of the divine names, undertaking to hymn the light-bearing appellation of the Good, says it must be said that "the Good is called intelligible light because it fills every supercelestial intellect with intelligible light, and drives out all ignorance and error from all souls in which it might be." Therefore, knowledge, which comes about when ignorance is driven away, is one thing, and the intelligible light, which is productive of it, is another. And for this reason the intelligible light appears manifestly in the supercelestial intellect, that is, in that which has ascended above itself. How could it be called knowledge, unless metaphorically, that supercelestial and supranoetic light? But the cleansing from the ignorance of disposition, which this great one called ignorance and error, is naturally accomplished in the rational soul alone.

But not only an angelic, but also a human intellect ascends above itself, having become angel-like through dispassion; therefore it will attain that light and be deemed worthy of a supernatural theophany, not seeing the essence of God, but seeing God through a God-befitting manifestation analogous to itself; according to negation, not (for it sees something) but better than according to negation, God being not only beyond knowledge but also beyond unknowing, and truly hidden and having the manifestation (p. 158), the most divine and newest of all things, since even the God-like visions, even if they are symbolic, eminently possess the unknowable; for they appear by another ordinance beyond both the divine and human nature and, so to speak, according to us yet beyond us, so that there is not even a name properly indicative of them. And this He showed to Manoah who asked, "What is your name?" Saying that it too is wonderful, as the vision was no less wonderful and in addition to being incomprehensible, was also unnameable.

But even if the vision is better than according to negation, still the word that interprets it falls short of the ascent according to negation, being brought forth paradigmatically or by analogy, for which reason also the word "as," bearing the meaning of similitude, is for the most part joined to the names, since the vision is ineffable and above all names. But when holy men behold that God-befitting light within themselves, and they see it when they attain the deifying communion of the Spirit according to the ineffable visitation of the perfecting illuminations, they see the garment of their own deification, the intellect being glorified and being filled with exceedingly beautiful splendor by the grace of the Word, just as the body united to him on the mountain was glorified by the divinity of the Word with a God-befitting light. For the glory which the Father has given him, he himself has given to his subjects, according to the word in the gospels, and he willed that they should be with him and behold his glory. But how could this happen bodily, since he is no longer present bodily after the ascension into heaven? It is accomplished, therefore, of all necessity intellectually, whenever the intellect has become celestial and has been named, as it were, a follower of him who for our sake has ascended above the heavens, it might be manifestly and ineffably united to (p. 160) God there and attain things supernatural and ineffable

25

περιήστραψε προσώπῳ τότε, καί δεικνύς ὅπως ταῖς ψυχαῖς ἀρτίως ἐμφανίζεται τῶν ἐν ἀληθείᾳ τόν Θεόν ἠγαπηκότων, «ὡς οἱ τῆς αἰσθητῆς», φησίν, «ὄψεως ὀφθαλμοί ὁρῶσι τόν αἰσθητόν ἥλιον οὕτως ἐκεῖνοι διά τῶν τῆς ψυχῆς ὀφθαλμῶν τό νοερόν ὁρῶσι φῶς, ὅ κατά τόν (σελ. 156) καιρόν τῆς ἀναστάσεως προκύψαν καί ἐπιχυθέν τοῖς σώμασιν ὡραϊσμένα καί ταῦτα δείξει τῷ αἰνίῳ φωτί». Τό γοῦν φῶς τῆς γνώσεως νοερόν οὐδέποτ᾿ ἄν τις φαίη, τό δέ φῶς ἐκεῖνο καί ὡς νοερόν ἔστιν ὅτε ἐνεργεῖ καί ὡς νοητόν διά νοερᾶς αἰσθήσεως ὐπό τοῦ νοῦ ὁρᾶται καί ταῖς λογικαῖς ἐγγινόμενον ψυχαῖς τῆς κατά διάθεσιν ἀγνοίας ἀπαλλάττει ταύτας, εἰς μονοειδῆ γνῶσιν ἀπό τῶν πολλῶν ἐπιστρέφον δοξασμάτων. ∆ιό καί ὁ τῶν θείων ὀνομάτων ὑμνῳδός ἐκεῖνος, τήν τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ φωτωνυμικήν ἐπωνυμίαν ἐπιβαλλόμενος ὑμνεῖν, ρητέον, φησίν, ὅτι «φῶς νοητόν ὁ ἀγαθός λέγεται διά τό πάντα μέν ὑπερουράνιον νοῦν ἐμπιπλάναι νοητοῦ φωτός, πᾶσαν δέ ἀγνοίαν καί πλάνην ἐλαύνειν ἐκ πασῶν αἷς ἄν ἐγγένηται ψυχαῖς». Οὐκοῦν ἄλλο μέν ἡ γνῶσις, ἡ καί τῆς ἀγνοίας ἀπελαυνομένης ἐπιγινομένη, ἄλλο δέ τό νοητόν φῶς, ὅ παρεκτικόν ἐστιν αὐτῆς. ∆ιό καί τό μέν νοητόν φῶς τῷ ὑπερουρανίῳ νῷ ἐμφανῶς ἐγγίνεται τουτέστι τῷ ὑπεραναβάντι ἑαυτόν. Πῶς δ᾿ ἄν κληθείη γνῶσις, εἰ μή μεταφορικῶς, τό ὑπερουράνιον καί ὑπέρ νοῦν ἐκεῖνο φῶς; Ἡ δέ τῆς κατά διάθεσιν ἀγνοίας ἀποκάθαρσις, ἥν ἄγνοιαν καί πλάνην ὠνόμασεν ὁ μέγας οὗτος, ἐπί μόνης τῆς λογικῆς ψυχῆς τελεῖσθαι πέφυκεν.

Ὑπεραναβαίνει δέ ἑαυτόν οὐκ ἀγγέλων μόνον, ἀλλά καί ἀνθρώπινος νοῦς, ἀγγελοειδής δι᾿ ἀπαθείας γεγονώς˙ οὐκοῦν καί τοῦ φωτός ἐκείνου τεύξεται καί θεοφανείας ὑπερφυοῦς ἀξιωθήσετγαι, τήν μέν τοῦ Θεοῦ οὐσίαν οὐχ ὁρῶν, Θεόν δέ ὁρῶν διά θεοπρεποῦς ἐκφαντορίας ἀναλόγου ἑαυτῷ˙ κατά ἀπόφασιν μέν, οὐ (ὁρᾷ γάρ τι) κρεῖττον δ᾿ ἤ κατά ἀπόφασιν, τοῦ Θεοῦ μή μόνον ὑπέρ γνῶσιν ἀλλά καί ὑπεραγνώστου ὄντος καί ὡς ἀληθῶς κρύφιον καί τήν ἔκφανσιν (σελ. 158) ἔχοντος, τό θειότατον καί πάντων καινότατον, ἐπεί καί αἱ θεοειδεῖς ὄψεις, κἄν συμβολικαί ὦσιν, ὑπεροχικῶς ἔχουσι τό ἄγνωστον˙ ἑτέρῳ γάρ παρά τήν φύσιν τήν τε θείαν καί ἀνθρωπίνην θεσμῷ διαφαίνονται καί, ὡς εἰπεῖν, καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς ὑπέρ ἡμᾶς, ὡς μηδέ ὄνομα δηλωτικόν αὐτῶν κυρίως εἶναι. Καί τοῦτ᾿ ἔδειξεν ὁ τῷ Μανωέ πυθομένῳ τί τό ὄνομά σου; Φάμενος ὅτι καί αὐτό θαυμαστόν, ὡς καί τῆς ὀράσεως οὐχ ἧττον οὔσης θαυμαστῆς καί πρός τῷ ἀλήπτῳ καί τό ἀνώνυμον ἐχούσης.

Οὐ μήν ἀλλ᾿ εἰ καί ἡ ὅρασις κρεῖττον ἤ κατά ἀπόφασιν, ἀλλ᾿ ὁ ἑρμηνεύς ἐκείνης λόγος ἀποδεῖ τῆς κατά ἀπόφασιν ἀνόδου, παραδειγματικῶς ἤ κατά ἀναλογίαν προαγόμενος, διό καί τό ὡς, ὁμοιωματικήν φέρον σημασίαν, συνηρμένον ὡς ἐπί τό πλεῖστον ἔχει τοῖς ὀνόμασιν, ὡς ἀρρήτου καί ὑπερωνύμου τῆς ὁράσεως οὔσης. Ὅταν δ᾿ ἐν ἑαυτοῖς οἱ ἱεροί ἄνδρες τό θεοπρεπές ἐκεῖνο θεωρῶσι φῶς, ὁρῶσι δ᾿ ἡνίκα τύχωσι τῆς θεουργοῦ κοινωνίας τοῦ πνεύματος κατά τήν ἀπόρρητον τῶν τελεσιουργῶν ἐλλάμψεων ἐπιφοίτησιν, τό τῆς θέσεως αὑτῶν ὁρῶσιν ἔνδυμα, τοῦ νοῦ δοξαζομένου καί τῆς ὑπερκάλου πληρουμένου ἀγλαΐας ὑπό τῆς τοῦ λόγου χάριτος, καθάπερ ὑπό τῆς τοῦ λόγου θεότητος θεοπρεπεῖ φωτί τό συνημμένον ἐπί τοῦ ὄρους ἐδοξάσθη σῶμα. Τήν γάρ δόξαν ἥν ὁ πατήρ ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ δέδωκεν αὐτός τοῖς ὑπηκόοις, κατά τόν ἐν εὐαγγελίοις λόγον, καί ἠθέλησεν ἵνα ὦσιν οὗτοι μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ καί θεωρῶσι τήν δόξαν αὐτοῦ. Τοῦτο δέ πῶς ἄν γίγνοιτο σωματικῶς, μηκέτι σωματικῶς αὐτοῦ παρόντος μετά τήν εἰς οὐρανούς ἀνάληψιν; Τελεῖται τοίνυν κατά πᾶσαν ἀνάγκην νοερῶς, ὁπηνίκα γεγονώς ὁ νοῦς ἐπουράνιος καί οἷον ὀπαδός χρηματίσας τοῦ ὑπεραναβεβηκότος δι᾿ ἡμᾶς τούς οὐρανούς, ἐμφανῶς καί ἀπορρήτως ἑνωθείη τῷ (σελ. 160) Θεῷ ἐκεῖ καί τῶν ὑπερφυῶν καί ἀπορρήτων ἐπιτυγχάνοι