26

of spectacles, being filled with a light higher than all immaterial knowledge, not as a spectator of sacred sensible symbols, nor as a judge of scriptural variety, but as being adorned by the beautifying and primal beauty and being illumined by the splendor of God. For in the same manner also the highest orders of the super-cosmic minds, in proportion to themselves, according to the celestial revealer and interpreter of their Hierarchy, are hierarchically filled not only by a first-given knowledge and science, but also by a first light from the highest triadic initiator and they become partakers and spectators not only of the triadic glory, but also of the light-manifestation of Jesus, which was also revealed to the disciples on Tabor. For being deemed worthy of this contemplation, they are initiated, He Himself being a deifying light, as they truly approach Him and become partakers in the first participation of His deifying lights. Wherefore also Macarius of the same name calls this light the food of the heavenly ones. And another of the theologians says, “this, which all the intelligible ordering of the super-cosmic beings immaterially feasts upon, is set forth as the clearest proof of the Word's love for humanity toward us.” For these reasons then also the great Paul, about to encounter in himself invisible and heavenly spectacles, having been caught up, became super-celestial, not as the mind needing to ascend above the heavens in place, although the rapture declares some other mystery, known only to those who have experienced it, about which it is not necessary to speak now, things which we have heard from the experienced fathers, lest we should also set these things forth for malicious use. But that there is an intelligible illumination seen by those purified in heart, entirely different from knowledge, which also is productive of it, we will show most easily even from the things that have been said to those who are not persuaded.

(p. 162) For they say, as you yourself said, that the illuminations in the old law are symbolic. Those, therefore, show this very thing, that there is a sacred illumination of which they themselves have become a symbol. But that most of those were symbols of this we have also learned from the holy Nilus, who says, “when the mind, having put off the old man, puts on the one from grace, then it will also see its own state at the time of prayer like sapphire or a heavenly color, which the Scripture also calls the place of God, seen by the elders under Mount Sinai.” Likewise we also hear from the holy Isaac saying: “at the time of prayer the graced mind sees its own purity, similar to the heavenly color, which was named the place of God by the eldership of Israel, when it appeared to them on the mountain.” Do you see how those were symbols of the things being now perfected in pure hearts? But John, golden both in tongue and in mind, clarifying that apostolic saying, “God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ is the one who has shone in our hearts,” he says, “shows with addition the glory of Moses shining in us; for just as upon the face of Moses, so did He shine in our hearts,” and going on further, he says, “in the beginning of creation, He spoke, and there was light; but now He did not speak, but He Himself has become light for us. If then the light at the beginning of creation or that on the face of Moses was a measured knowledge, the illumination in our hearts would also be a higher knowledge, as having received an addition. But since that was not knowledge, but a splendor appearing on the face, the illumination in you is also not knowledge but a splendor of the soul, appearing to the purified mind. That one, therefore, being subject to sensible eyes, one must call sensible, (p. 164) just as this one is intelligible, being subject to intelligible eyes and activated within us.

26

θεαμάτων, πάσης ἀΰλου γνώσεως ὑψηλοτέρου φωτός ἀναπιμπλάμενος, οὐχ ὡς αἰσθητῶν συμβόλων ἱερῶν θεωρός, οὐδ᾿ ὡς ἱερογραφικῆς ποικιλίας ἐπιγνώμων, ἀλλ᾿ ὡς τῷ καλοποιῷ καί ἀρχικῷ καλλωπιζόμενος κάλλει καί τῇ τοῦ Θεοῦ λαμπρυνόμενος λαμπρότητι. Τόν αὐτόν γάρ τρόπον καί αἱ ἀνωτάτω τάξεις τῶν ὑπερκοσμίων νόων ἀναλόγως ἑαυταῖς, κατά τόν οὐρανοφάντορα καί ὑποφήτην τῆς κατ᾿ αὐτάς Ἱεραρχίας, οὐ μόνον πρωτοδότου γνώσεως καίἐπικστήμης, ἀλλά καί πρώτου φωτός, πρός τῆς ἀνωτάτω τριαδικῆς τελεταρχίας ἱεραρχούμεναι πληροῦνται καί οὐχί τῆς τριαδικῆς μόνης δόξης μέτοχοι γίνονται καί θεωροί, ἀλλά καί τῆς Ἰησοῦ φωτοφανείας, ἤ καί τοῖς μαθηταῖς ἐν Θαβώρ ἀπεκαλύφθη. Μυοῦνται γάρ τῆς θεωρίας κατηξιωμέναι ταύτης, θεωργόν φῶς ὄντα καί αὐτόν, ὡς ἀληθῶς αὐτῷ πλησιάζουσαι καί τῶν θεουργικῶν αὐτοῦ φώτων ἐν πρώτῃ μετουσίᾳ γινόμεναι. ∆ιό καί ὁ φερώνυμος Μακάριος βρῶμα τῶν ἐπουρανίων τουτί καλεῖ τό φῶς. Ἕτερος δέ τις τῶν θεολόγων, «τοῦτο», φησί, «πᾶσα τῶν ὑπερκοσμίων ἡ νοητή διακόσμησις ἀΰλως ἑστιωμένη τεκμήριον ἐναργέστατον τίθεται τῆς περί ἡμᾶς τοῦ λόγου φιλανθρωπίας». Ταῦτ᾿ ἄρα καί ὁ μέγας Παῦλος, τοῖς ἀοράτοις καί ἐπουρανίοις ἐν αὐτῷ θεάμασι μέλλων ἐντυγχάνειν, ἁρπαγείς γέγονεν ὑπερουράνιος, οὐχ ὡς τοπικῶς ὑπεραναβῆναι δεομένου τοῦ νοῦ τούς οὐρανούς, εἰ καί μυστήριον ἄλλο τι ἡ ἁρπαγή δηλοῖ, μόνοις τοῖς παθοῦσιν ἐγνωσμένον, περί οὗ νῦν λέγειν οὐκ ἐπάναγκες, ἅ παρά τῶν πεπειραμένων πατέρων ἐσμέν ἀκηκοότες, μή καί ταῦτα προθώμεθα πρός κακουργίαν. Ὡς δ᾿ ἔστι φωτισμός νοερός τοῖς κεκαθαρμένοις τήν καρδίαν ἐνορώμενος, ἄλλος παντάπασι παρά τήν γνῶσιν, ὅς καί παρεκτικός ἐστιν αὐτῆς καί ἀπ᾿ αὐτῶν τῶν εἰρημένων τοῖς μή πειθομένοις εὐχερέστατά γε δείξομεν.

(σελ. 162) Φασί γάρ, ὡς αὐτός εἶπες, συμβολικούς εἶναι τούς ἐν τῷ πάλαι νόμῳ φωτισμούς. Ἐκεῖνοι τοίνυν τοῦτ᾿ αὐτό δεικνύουσιν ὡς ἔστιν ἱερός φωτισμός οὗ γεγόνασιν αὐτοί σύμβολον. Ὅτι δέ τούτου ἦσαν οἱ πλείους ἐκείνων σύμβολα καί παρά τοῦ ἁγίου μεμαθήκαμεν Νείλου λέγοντος, «ὅταν ὁ νοῦς, τόν παλαιόν ἄνθρωπος ἀποδυσάμενος, τόν ἐκ τῆς χάριτος ἐπενδύσηται, τότε καί τήν ἑαυτοῦ κατάστασιν ὄψεται κατά τόν καιρόν τῆς προσευχῆς σαπφείρῳ ἤ οὐρανίῳ χρώματι παρεμφερῆ, ἥντινα καί τόπον Θεοῦ ἡ Γραφή ὀνομάζει, ὑπό τῶν πρεσβυτέρων ὀφθέντα ὑπό τό ὄρος Σινᾶ». Ὡσαύτως δέ καί τοῦ ἁγίου Ἰσαάκ ἀκούομεν λέγοντος˙ «κατά τόν καιρόν τῆς προσευχῆς ὁρᾶν τήν ἑαυτοῦ καθαρότητα τόν κεχαριτωμένον νοῦν, ὁμοίαν τῇ ἐπουρανίῳ χροιᾷ, ἥτις Θεοῦ ὑπό τῆς γερουσίας τοῦ Ἰσραήλ ὠνόμασται τόπος, ἡνίκα ὤφθη αὐτοῖς ἐν τῷ ὄρει». Βλέπεις πῶς τῶν ἐν ταῖς καθαραῖς καρδίαις ἀρτίως τελουμένων ἐκεῖνα σύμβολα; Ἰωάννης δέ ὁ χρυσοῦς καί τήν γλῶτταν καί τήν διάνοιαν, τό ἀποστολικόν ἐκεῖνο διευκρινῶν, «ὁ Θεός ὁ εἰπών ἐκ σκότους φῶς λάμψαι, ὅς ἔλαμψεν ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ἡμῶν», «δείνυσι», φησί, «μετά προσθήκης τήν Μωσέως δόξαν ἐν ἡμῖν ἀστράπτουσαν˙ καθάπερ γάρ εἰς τό πρόσωπον Μωσέως, οὕτως εἰς τάς ἡμετέρας καρδίας ἔλαμψε», καί παρακατιών, «ἐν ἀρχῇ μέν», φησί, «τῆς κτίσεως εἶπε, καί ἐγένετο φῶς˙ νῦν δέ οὐκ εἶπεν, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτός ἡμῖν γέγονεν φῶς. Εἰ μέν οὖν τό φῶς ἐν ἀρχῇ τῆς κτίσεως ἤ τό ἐν τῷ προσώπῳ Μωσέως γνῶσις ἦν μετρί καί ἡ ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ἡμῶν ἔλλαμψις γνῶσις ἄν ἦν ὑψηλοτέρα, ὡς προσθήκην δεξαμένη. Ἐπεί δ᾿ἐκείνη οὐ γνῶσις ἦν, ἀλλά λαμπρότης ἐπιφαινομένη τῷ προσώπῳ καί ἡ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔλλαμψις οὐ γνῶσις ἀλλά λαμπρότης ἐστί ψυχῆς, ἐπιφαινομένη τῷ κεκαθαρμένῳ νῷ. Ἐκείνην μέν οὖν αἰσθητοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς ὑποκειμένην αἰσθητήν ἀνάγκη λέγειν, (σελ. 164) καθάπερ ταύτην νοητήν, νοητοῖς ὑποκειμένην ὄμμασι καί ἐντός ἡμῶν ἐνεργουμένην.