Commentarii in evangelium Joannis
“from where I came and where I am going. * * * you judge according to the flesh, “I judge no one. And yet if I do judge, my judgment is true, because
righteousness.” But if anyone thinks we are forcing the point by saying that to believe is not the same as to know, and that it is possible to believe
did not know the lord (for being a son he has not experienced the father as master), so observing the same God we will accept nothing absurd, saying t
but first the truth, that so he may come to see the substance or the power beyond substance and 19.6.38 nature of God. And perhaps just as in the temp
for the common good to be benefited in two ways, from both words and from deeds, which the righteous man does, these too are well brought up into the
of the wisdom spoken to the perfect, hidden in a mystery, which God predestined before the ages for the glory of His righteous ones, and to those
contain freedom. But who are they who will know or who will lift him up? as he himself teaches, saying, When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then
“You will die” is taken as the death of the enemy of Christ, as one who has sinned unto death dies, it is clear that those to whom these things were s
have come to be in incorruption? Therefore, can those who have been in ignorance and in unbelief and in sins come to be in incorruption if they were t
to have said as a unique feature of his departure from here, “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” for neither would Mos
of myself and the Father who sent me bears witness of me». 19.18.110 But what is plausible about killing himself after the words spoken in this more b
they said more simply, Will he kill himself? as if Jesus were going to kill himself and be in the place of those who have taken their own lives and
For earthly things are below, but heavenly things are above, so that in this respect, the one who is from below is in every way from this world, but t
Moreover <therefore> you will intelligibly understand † the thoughts of descending 19.22.145 things. At the same time, however, see if you might not h
<would> act irra 19.23.156 tionally. In addition to this, he who believes that He is our peace, would not do anything of war and sedition. But also
[of them] having been sown in their souls have come to dwell in the life of men. 20.2.6 But the cause of these things, according to great and ineffabl
to have become less than both of the brothers. 20.3.14 It is possible, therefore, for one not being of the seed of Abraham—since, because of the story
having governed.” And the same thing seems to me to be represented by the destruction of Sodom and of their land, of which “a testimony of their wicke
it has been said similarly. 20.6.40 But these people, to whom the word is addressed, seem not to contain the word, which is not able to enter into the
to the savior who has heard from the Father and has learned from him but the phrase “Therefore you also do what you have heard from the father,” bein
«But Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness», and thinking that this is what Do the works of Abraham refers to, so that i
«to him sheep and calves and donkeys and 20.10.74 'boys and girls and mules and camels.'» To speak about each of these would be the work of someone wi
has become human. For if he has become human, it is possible for him to be sought out to be killed but if he has not become human, then the Word who
to do,” even if we had not clearly 20.13.98 known the will of the one who spoke. But it is not surprising if to the Jews who had believed in him, but
John said, Everyone who sins has not seen him, <showing> through the has seen him that those who see the Son of God are always able to be so, and
is added, «You do the works of your father,» we inquire whether this was written on account of the first 20.15.124 commandment given to Abraham. The f
is one body but he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit. 20.17.n Jesus said to them: If God were your Father, you would love me for I came from
You shall not perjure yourself, but you shall pay to the Lord your oaths but I say to you, do not swear at all <the> That you may become sons of
sent forth by the divine will. 20.20.n Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. 20.20.163 The reason, he says, that my speech i
to be a certain one <not> in substance from creation, but having become such from a change and his own choice, and thus, so that I may name it 20.21.1
forgetting the better substance in us we will subordinate ourselves to the form from the dust, and the better part will take on the image of the earth
might say that it is sufficient for being a son of God to wish to do His desires, even if to this is not added the doing of the works of God. But it m
they will say. But see whether perhaps, even if this argument seems very plausible, being applied dissimilarly it is able to carry one away and deceiv
deceived and Eve gave to the hus 20.25.222 band from the tree, and the man ate. however, understanding according to the deeper aspects of the doctrine
of the Lord, we shall not «precede those who have fallen asleep for the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the «voice
men, you are dying.” If, then, anyone else 20.27.243 has not stood in the truth, it is clear that the devil also, a murderer from the beginning, and t
now to those. I consider every evil and deceitful spirit to be a lie, and each of these when it speaks, to speak from its own things and in no way fro
<αὐτὸν> 20.30.271 believe and do not believe. And then again, those who believe in the Father of Jesus Christ, but do not believe in the creator and m
theoretical visions of truth are not purified, because they have been veiled or 20.32.285 thickened or muddied by wickedness. But understanding what i
One does not become a son of the Father in heaven in any other way than by loving his own enemies and praying for those who persecute him, it is clear
and that the one who knows all the mysteries and all knowledge, and with these has achieved perfect 20.34.306 love, is wholly from God. But see if it
saying, You have a demon I do not have a demon. 20.35.317 And see if the parable in the Gospel according to Luke can be applied to this, concerni
of cures, in which are also the expulsions of demons, we will say that demons are always driven out by Jesus from all those who, because they have bee
of you». It is clear then that when Jesus said in the most masterful and most perfect way: 'I do not have a demon, but I honor my Father,' his imitato
it has been said, “All that is mine is yours,” it is clear that also this judgment about which he says, “My judgment is just,” is the Father's judgmen
to prevent death from being seen. And so one must hear the words, “If anyone keeps my word, he will never see death for ever,” as if he who said these
keeps it, he will never taste death for ever. Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died? And the prophets died who do you make yourself out t
being pitied for this. Therefore, even if Abraham died, yet he lived and no longer saw death 20.42.395 from the time when, seeing the day of Jesus, he
the Lord can be tasted and seen, 20.43.408 so also his enemy, death, can be tasted and is seen. And its tastable aspect is presented by There are som
him. And the «Who then do you make yourself?» was the voice of those who had not perceived that Jesus did not make himself what 20.44.421 he is. There
Jesus. But if you are able, consider why in the case of the cave the stone lying upon it is not rolled away but is lifted, while in the case of the we
in imitation of Christ's prayer when he is about to pray, lifting up the eyes of his soul and raising them from the affairs and memory and notions and
of themselves, not to look to heaven nor to remember righteous judgments, they repented, having made an attempt on the woman but not obtaining what th
the Father's will having hearkened to Jesus, and seeing her entering through the place, from where the stone was taken away, he said: Father, I thank
bound and tied by his own sins, living on the one hand through repentance and having heard the voice of Jesus, but on the other hand, because he has n
the Father to have made the soul of Lazarus return 28.9.69 to his body which was laid away in the tomb for one might say that the Father, having hear
having come to Mary and having seen what he did believed in 28.11.81 him. And especially because of the spiritual interpretation I am moved that per
of a power coming into being so that for this reason he was not able to do all things, nor to deliver 28.12.90 himself from their plot. They therefor
pursue,7 and 7wisely pursue wisdom,7 and 28.13.104 analogously for the other virtues. We said these things in order to make a comparison to someone
scribes, and they led him to their council. 28.14.115 But Mark says that Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve, came to the chief priests in order to
because Jesus was not yet glorified. And if there was no spirit even in the apostles before Jesus was glorified, how much more was it not in Caiapha
himself to consider the things that follow from the sayings that have been set out concerning how Caiaphas prophesied. But perhaps these things also m
except for God, he might taste death for everyone», and he will punctuate 28.18.155 after «For everyone» or after «Except for God, for everyone». He w
unto death, even death on a cross,» the judgment was taken away for so I understand the text: «In His humiliation His judgment was taken away» so th
he says of the sick: Those who are strong have no need of a physician, but those who are sick, and as if there were righteous men, he says: I have
for one who has fallen into the struggle of confessing Jesus not to shrink from the confession, 28.23.194 nor to hesitate about dying for the truth. B
indeed, 'he said to them: I 28.23.207 am he,' [of power] they went backward and fell to the ground.” Then after this, because he wished to undertake t
He remained with 28.24.222 the disciples. And until now Jesus is with his disciples near the desert, in a city called Ephraim for he is present 28.24
sin of the world. And these Jews were seeking Jesus, not that they might be benefited, but that they might kill him to whom he might have said: «But n
Iscariot, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he had come from God and was going to God, rises from supper and lays
door, I will come in to him ‘and I will dine with him, and he with me,’ perhaps Jesus neither has breakfast with anyone (for he does not need an intro
the Father has given to him into his hands, and in Christ all will be made alive, the righteousness of God is not confused, nor the principle that eac
he rises from supper, and for a time stops eating, until he should wash the feet of the disciples, they being unable to have a part with him, unless h
we will use what was said in due course for the sake of an example, if it should be necessary, that it is possible for someone with the best intention
the feet of the disciples, but also of his fellow students. For if he himself, as he thought, did what was fitting in wishing to prevent it, but they
that has been said: “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the 32.7.79 good news.” But if by washing the feet of the disciples he makes them
for “Every man is a liar” and we shall opportunely use the saying at some point against those who have said rather rashly and without judgment that
we will be content but the things that contribute to wealth and luxury accrue to the delicate-living from abundance, not as necessary and things wit
what defiles 32.10.117 his feet he casts off. And no one in his right mind would say that as he is the door, or as he is the shepherd, or as he is the
being discipled by falsehoods. 32.12.131 Yet even a holy person may need the washing of feet, since the widow who is enrolled for ecclesiastical honor
it has that reference. But the teachings according to the passage, how the feet of disciples who have already bathed are soiled, and in what way they
I hoped, he who ate my bread magnified against me a supplanting. 32.14.158 Therefore the Savior says this saying was spoken concerning Judas and hims
to the Lord, not accusing themselves as faithless they said to him, Lord, add to us faith for indeed in the add it is clearly shown that they had
having created and established and made all things from non-being into being all things. But one must also believe that Jesus Christ is Lord, and in a
a servant is greater than his lord, nor an apostle greater than him who sent him. 32.17.202 According to this, then, he will not err in calling John
Is 'the spirit of Jesus was troubled' analogous to 'Now my soul is troubled,' or is 'He was troubled in spirit' analogous to 'Now my soul is troubled'
imitating his 32.18.234 fall, sinners fall. For as he, being in divinity, has fallen, so also those to whom the word says, “I said: You are gods, and
relating that with good reason the disciples at the word of the Lord 32.19.247 looked at one another, at a loss as to whom he was speaking of. But i
of the gospel it is written that «Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved follow»ing, which also leaned on his breast at supper, and
a spiritual law, showing the way of life to be pure and 32.21.269 restored to the will of the nature of the Word. And observe that to these is added t
the Lord to Judas, but he then put aside something better that was within him, and perhaps the peace, which returns from the one who heard but did not
of those who did not understand in what way he said: “Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass,” but most courageously for the 32.23.296 contest,
to a cup, which for a better underlying disposition works what is better, but for a worse one produces condemnation so the morsel from Jesus was of t
was glorified in him.” But the glory on account of the death for men was not of the only-begotten Word and Wisdom and Truth, who was not by nature sub
they spoke of his departure which he was about to fulfill 32.27.336 “in Jerusalem”. And Paul, see for what things he takes up the name of glory: for w
But one must venture to suggest what in 32.28.350 the passage can be sought. And I ask whether it is possible for God to be glorified, apart from bein
the Son of Man in 32.29.364 God, the lesser in the greater. And the glory is much more excellent in the Son when the Father glorifies Him, than in the
of the age») but by the fulfillment of «You will all be offended because «of Me this night. For it is written: ‘I will strike the shepherd, «and the s
“Where I am going, you cannot come,” the “As I said to the Jews,” although we thought these things were said more simply, referring to the departure o
sent forth by the divine will. 20.20.n Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. 20.20.163 The reason, he says, that my speech is not known by you is that you are not able to hear my word. First, therefore, one must acquire an auditory capacity for the divine word, so that after this 20.20.164 we may be able to also know all of Jesus' speech; for it is possible for one who was previously unable to hear the word of Jesus to later arrive at being able to hear it, since, indeed, as long as one's ears have not yet been healed by the word of the one who says to the deaf man, "Be opened," 20.20.165 he is not able to hear. But when the bond that causes the deafness is loosed, then one will be able <to> hear Jesus, when he is also able to know his speech; or let those who think that the argument concerning nature is established also by these things tell us whether those whom he later healed were able, while still 20.20.166 deaf, to hear, or were they not able? And since the "7they were not able"7 is clear, it is evident that it is possible to change from not being able to hear the words of Jesus to hearing them, and it is not on account of a nature that is incurably disposed, when one is not able to hear; and especially must these things be brought to the heterodox, who delight in allegories and refer the history concerning healings to the therapies of the soul, which is freed by Jesus from all sickness and all infirmity. 20.20.167 But I think that "to hear" is now used for understanding the things being said, and "to know" for comprehending and assenting, having been enlightened by the light of the knowledge of the things being said. 20.20.168 Heracleon, however, supposes 20that a reason is given for their being unable to hear Jesus' word or know his speech in the phrase, «You are of your fa «ther the devil.»20. For in these very words he says: 20»Why «are you unable to hear my word, except that you «are of your father the devil?» instead of «of the «substance of the devil,» thus revealing their nature to them, and having convicted them that they are neither children of Abraham (for they would not have hated him), nor of 20.20.169 God, for which reason they did not love him20. And if he had understood «You are of «your father the devil» as we explained above, and said: Because you are still of the devil, you are not able to hear my word, we might have accepted his 20.20.170 explanation. But as it is, he is clearly speaking of certain men as being of the same substance as the devil, being of a different substance, as his followers think, from those whom they call psychic or pneumatic. 20.21.n You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. 20.21.171 The saying is ambiguous; for from it one thing is signified, that the devil has a father, of which father, as far as the text is concerned, those to whom the word is addressed appear to be; 20.21.172 but another, which is better, is that you are of this father, of whom "7devil"7 is predicated. The saying would indeed have been ambiguous even if the first article "7the"7 had been omitted, except that the meaning of the text would have appeared clearer. <Not> yet he who argues that the devil has a father, whose sons he will think are meant to be those to whom the word is addressed, will not use the following phrase which has it thus: «When «he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own, for he is a liar and his father «», and he will say that the devil is the lie, but that the father of the lie is another besides 20.21.173 him. But this will not be said soundly; for "the lie" will rather apply to the adversary of the one who said, "I am the truth"; I mean the antichrist, whose father is a liar, 20.21.174 being the devil. But it is likely that someone will stumble at the antichrist being the lie, since he will no longer be blameworthy if in his substance he is nothing other than a lie. To whom, citing «You have become destruction, «and you shall not exist forever» said in Ezekiel about someone who through wickedness changed into becoming destruction, he will by way of comparison console also the point concerning the lie
ὑπὸ τοῦ θείου βουλήματος προπεμφθεῖσαι. 20.20.n ∆ιὰ τί τὴν λαλιὰν τὴν ἐμὴν οὐ γινώσκετε; ὅτι οὐ δύνασθε ἀκούειν τὸν λόγον
τὸν ἐμόν. 20.20.163 Αἴτιον, φησίν, ἐστὶ τοῦ ὑμῖν μὴ γινώσκεσθαι τὴν ἐμὴν λαλιὰν τὸ μὴ δύνασθαι ὑμᾶς ἀκούειν τοῦ λόγου μου.
πρότερον οὖν δύναμιν περιποιητέον ἀκουστικὴν τοῦ θείου λόγου, ἵνα μετὰ τοῦτο 20.20.164 οἷοί τε γενώμεθα καὶ γινώσκειν πᾶσαν
τὴν Ἰησοῦ λαλιάν· ἔξεστιν γὰρ πρότερον οὐ δυνάμενον ἀκούειν τὸν λόγον Ἰησοῦ ὕστερον φθά νειν ἐπὶ τὸ ἀκούειν δύνασθαι αὐτόν,
ἐπεὶ καὶ ὅσον μὲν οὐδέπω ἰάθη τις τὰς ἀκοὰς ἀπὸ τοῦ λόγου τοῦ λέγοντος τῷ κωφῷ· «∆ιανοίχθητι», 20.20.165 οὐ δύναται ἀκούειν.
ἐπὰν δὲ λυθῇ ὁ αἴτιος τῆς κωφότητος σύνδεσ μος, τότε ἀκούειν τις οἷός <τε> ἔσται τοῦ Ἰησοῦ, ὅτε καὶ γινώσκειν δύναται αὐτοῦ
τὴν λαλιάν· ἢ λεγέτωσαν ἡμῖν οἱ νομίζοντες καὶ διὰ τούτων συνίστασθαι τὸν περὶ φύσεως λόγον, πότερον ἐδύναντο ἔτι 20.20.166
κωφοὶ ὄντες ἀκούειν οὓς ὕστερον ἰάσατο, ἢ οὐκ ἐδύναντο; σαφοῦς δὲ ὄντος τοῦ "7οὐκ ἐδύναντο"7, δῆλον ὅτι ἔξεστιν μεταβαλεῖν
ἀπὸ τοῦ μὴ δύνασθαι ἀκούειν τῶν Ἰησοῦ λόγων ἐπὶ τὸ ἀκούειν αὐτῶν, καὶ οὐ διὰ φύσιν ἀνιάτως ἔχουσαν, ὅτε οὐ δύναταί τις ἀκούειν·
καὶ μάλιστα ταῦτα προσακτέον τοῖς ἑτεροδόξοις, χαίρουσι ταῖς ἀλληγορίαις καὶ ἀνάγουσιν τὴν περὶ τῶν ἰάσεων ἱστορίαν ἐπὶ τὰς
τῆς ψυχῆς θερα πείας, ἀπολυομένης ὑπὸ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ πάσης νόσου καὶ πάσης μαλακίας. 20.20.167 νομίζω δὲ τὸ μὲν ἀκούειν νῦν ἐπὶ
τοῦ συνιέναι τάσσεσθαι τῶν λεγο μένων, τὸ δὲ γινώσκειν ἐπὶ τοῦ καταλαμβάνοντα συγκατατίθεσθαι, τῷ φωτὶ τῆς περὶ τῶν λεγομένων
γνώσεως πεφωτισμένον. 20.20.168 Ὁ μέντοι γε Ἡρακλέων ὑπολαμβάνει 20αἰτίαν ἀποδίδοσθαι τοῦ μὴ δύνασθαι αὐτοὺς ἀκούειν τὸν Ἰησοῦ
λόγον μηδὲ γινώσκειν αὐτοῦ τὴν λαλιὰν ἐν τῷ «Ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ πα «τρὸς τοῦ διαβόλου ἐστέ»20. αὐταῖς γοῦν λέξεσίν φησι· 20»∆ιατί
«δὲ οὐ δύνασθε ἀκούειν τὸν λόγον τὸν ἐμόν, ἢ ὅτι ὑμεῖς «ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς τοῦ διαβόλου ἐστέ;» ἀντὶ τοῦ «ἐκ τῆς «οὐσίας τοῦ διαβόλου»,
φανερῶν αὐτοῖς λοιπὸν τὴν φύσιν αὐτῶν, καὶ προσελέγξας αὐτοὺς ὅτι οὔτε τοῦ Ἀβραάμ εἰσιν τέκνα (οὐ γὰρ ἂν ἐμίσουν αὐτόν), οὔτε
τοῦ 20.20.169 θεοῦ, διὸ οὐκ ἠγάπων αὐτόν20. καὶ εἰ μὲν τὸ «Ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ «πατρὸς τοῦ διαβόλου ἐστέ» ἐξεδέχετο ὡς ἐν τοῖς ἀνωτέρω
διηγησάμεθα, καὶ ἔλεγεν· διὰ τὸ ἔτι ὑμᾶς εἶναι ἐκ τοῦ διαβόλου, οὐ δύνασθε ἀκούειν τὸν λόγον τὸν ἐμόν, κἂν παρεδεξάμεθα αὐτοῦ
20.20.170 τὴν διήγησιν. νυνὶ δὲ δῆλός ἐστιν ὁμοουσίους τινὰς τῷ δια βόλῳ λέγων ἀνθρώπους, ἑτέρας, ὡς οἴονται οἱ ἀπ' αὐτοῦ,
οὐσίας τυγχάνοντας παρ' οὓς καλοῦσι ψυχικοὺς ἢ πνευματικούς. 20.21.n Ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ πατρὸς τοῦ διαβόλου ἐστὲ καὶ τὰς ἐπιθυμίας
τοῦ πατρὸς ὑμῶν θέλετε ποιεῖν. 20.21.171 Ἀμφίβολος ἡ λέξις ἐστίν· δηλοῦται γὰρ ἀπ' αὐτῆς ἓν μὲν ὡς ἄρα ἔχει ὁ διάβολος πατέρα,
ἐξ οὗ πατρός, ὅσον ἐπὶ τῷ ῥητῷ, ἐμφαίνονται εἶναι οὗτοι πρὸς οὓς ὁ λόγος· ἕτερον δέ, ὃ βέλ τιόν ἐστιν, ὅτι ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦδε
τοῦ πατρός ἐστε, καθ' οὗ κατηγορεῖται 20.21.172 τὸ "7διάβολος"7. ἀμφίβολον μὲν οὖν ἦν ἂν τὸ λεγόμενον καὶ εἰ περιῄρητο τὸ
πρότερον ἄρθρον τὸ "7τοῦ"7, πλὴν μᾶλλον ἂν ἐφαίνετο σαφέστερον τὸ βούλημα τοῦ ῥητοῦ. <οὐ> μέντοι γε ὁ συναγορεύων τῷ εἶναί
τινα τοῦ διαβόλου πατέρα, οὗ υἱοὺς δόξει λέγειν τοὺς πρὸς οὓς ὁ λόγος ἐστίν, χρήσεται τῷ ἐπιφερομένῳ οὕτως ἔχοντι· «Ὅταν «λαλῇ
τὸ ψεῦδος, ἐκ τῶν ἰδίων λαλεῖ, ὅτι ψεύστης ἐστὶν καὶ ὁ πατὴρ «αὐτοῦ», καὶ φήσει ψεῦδος μὲν εἶναι τὸν διάβολον, ἄλλον δὲ παρὰ
20.21.173 τοῦτον εἶναι τὸν τοῦ ψεύδους πατέρα. ἀλλ' οὐχ ὑγιῶς τοῦτο λεχ θήσεται· μᾶλλον γὰρ τὸ ψεῦδος ἐφαρμόσει τῷ ἐναντίῳ
τοῦ εἰπόν τος· «Ἐγώ εἰμι ἡ ἀλήθεια»· λέγω δὲ τῷ ἀντιχρίστῳ, οὗ ψεύστης 20.21.174 ἐστὶν ὁ πατήρ, ὁ διάβολος ὤν. ἀλλ' εἰκός
τινα προσκόψειν τῷ ψεῦ δος εἶναι τὸν ἀντίχριστον, οὐκέτι ψεκτὸν ἐσόμενον, ἐὰν τῇ ὑπο στάσει ἕτερον μηδὲν ψεύδους ᾖ. πρὸς ὃν
παραθέμενος τὸ «Ἀπώλεια «ἐγένου, καὶ οὐχ ὑπάρξεις εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα» εἰρημένον ἐν τῷ Ἰεζεκιὴλ περί τινος διὰ τὴν κακίαν μεταβεβληκότος
εἰς τὸ γενέσθαι αὐτὸν ἀπώλειαν, καθ' ὁμοιότητα παραμυθήσει καὶ τὸ περὶ τοῦ ψεῦδος
