31

in her eyes and she herself then for the first time clearly gazes upon the beauty of the bridegroom God and in the hearing of those (p. 186) faithfully standing around relates in greater detail that beauty-creating comeliness. For just as the light in the eyes, having been united with the solar rays, becomes light in actuality and thus sees perceptible things, in the same way the intellect also, having become one Spirit with the Lord, thus clearly sees spiritual things. Yet nevertheless the Master remains even there in another way, higher than according to the groveling reasonings of those who attempt to contradict spiritual men, invisible; for no one has ever seen the entirety of that beauty, wherefore also according to Gregory of Nyssa “no eye has seen this, even if it is always seeing”; for he sees not how great it is, but insofar as one has made himself receptive of the power of the divine Spirit, to that extent he sees. And in addition to this incomprehensibility, even the comprehension which they have, they have incomprehensibly, the most divine and newest thing of all; for those who see do not know that by which they see these things, nor that by which they hear and are initiated, into either the knowledge of things not yet come to be or the science of things that always are, because of the incomprehensibility of the Spirit, through whom they see; “for by the cessation of all noetic activity such a union of those being deified with the light beyond takes place,” as the great Dionysius says, not being by cause or by analogy, since these are by the activity of the intellect, but being by abstraction, but not being this very abstraction; for if it were only abstraction, it would be in our power — but this is the dogma of the Messalians — whenever one should wish to ascend into the ineffable mysteries of God, just as also Saint Isaac says concerning them. Therefore, contemplation is not abstraction and negation alone, but union and deification, after the abstraction of all things from below that give form to the intellect, occurring mystically and ineffably by the grace of God, or rather after the cessation which is greater than abstraction; for abstraction (p. 188) is an image of that cessation. Wherefore also to separate God from all created things belongs to every believer; but the cessation of noetic activity and the union with the light beyond after it, being like a passion and a divinizing end, belongs only to those who have been purified and graced in heart. And why do I speak of the union, when even the brief vision for a time required the chosen disciples, and these being in a state of ecstasy from all sensible and noetic perception and having received true sight by not seeing at all and by unknowingly experiencing it, admitting the sensation of things beyond nature? But that these both saw and did not see properly according to sense or intellect, with God, as the discourse proceeds, we shall show.

Do you now then understand that they are blessed with an incomprehensible spirit in place of intellect and eye and ears, through which they see and hear and understand? For with all noetic activity having ceased, with what do angels and men equal to angels see God, if not by the power of the Spirit? Wherefore also this vision for them is not sensation, since they do not perceive it through its sense organs, and it is not intellection, since it is not through reasonings or the knowledge from them, but they find it by the cessation of all noetic activity; therefore, it is neither imagination, nor discursive thought, nor opinion, nor something like a conclusion of syllogisms; nor does the intellect attain this through the ascent by negation alone. For every divine commandment and every sacred law is limited by the purity of the heart, according to the saying of the fathers, and every way and every form of prayer ceases at pure prayer, and every discourse ascending from below to the one established above and released from all stops at the abstraction of all existing things. Not for this reason, however, after the divine commandments is there nothing else besides purity of heart, but there are, and there are very many things: the pledge of the promised things which is the present age according to the intellect, and the good things of the age to come (p. 190) being seen and enjoyed through it; so also after the

31

ἐν τοῖς ὄμμασι καί αὐτή τῷ τοῦ νυμφίου Θεοῦ τότε πρῶτον τρανῶς ἐνατενίζει κάλλει καί εἰς ἐπήκοον τῶν (σελ. 186) πιστῶς περιεστώτων ἀφηγεῖται διεξοδικώτερον τήν καλοποιόν εὐπρέπειαν ἐκείνην. Ὡς γάρ ἡ ἐν ὀφθαλμοῖς αὐγή, ἑνωθεῖσα ταῖς ἡλιακαῖς αὐγαῖς, φῶς ἐντελεχείᾳ γίνεται καί οὕτως ὁρᾷ τά αἰσθητά, τόν αὐτόν τρόπον καί ὁ νοῦς, ἕν Πνεῦμα μετά τοῦ Κυρίου γεγονώς, οὕτω τά πενυματικά τρανῶς ὁρᾷ. Μένει δ᾿ ὅμως καί ἐκεῖ τρόπον ἕτερον, ὑψηλότερον ἤ κατά τούς χαμερπεῖς λογισμούς τῶν τοῖς πνευματικοῖς ἀνδράσιν ἀντιλέγειν ἐγχειρούντων, ἀόρατος ὁ δεσπότης˙ οὐ γάρ ἑώρακέ ποτέ τις τό πᾶν τῆς καλλονῆς ἐκείνης, διό καί κατά τόν Νύσσης Γρηγόριον «ὀφθαλμός τοῦθ᾿ ἑώρακεν οὐδείς, εἰ καί ἀεί βλέπει»˙ οὐδέ γάρ ὅσον ἐστίν ἐκεῖνο, ἀλλά καθόσον ἑαυτόν ἐποίησε δεκτικόν τῆς τοῦ θείου Πνεύματος δυνάμεως, κατά τοσοῦτον βλέπει. Πρός δέ τῇ ἀκαταληψίᾳ ταύτῃ, καί ἥν ἔχουσι κατάληψιν ἀκαταλήπτως ἔχουσι, τό θειότατον ἁπάντων καί καινότατον˙ οὐ γάρ ᾧ ταῦτα βέπουσι τοῦτ᾿ ἴσασιν οἱ βλέποντες, οὐδ᾿ᾧ ἀκούουσί τε καί μυοῦνται, ἤ τήν τῶν μήπω γεγονότων γνῶσιν ἤ τήν τῶν ἀεί ὄντων ἐπιστήμην, διά τό ἀκατάληπτον τοῦ Πνεύματος, δι᾿ οὗ ὁρῶσι˙ «κατά γάρ ἀπόπαυσιν πάσης νοερᾶς ἐνεργείας ἡ τοιάδε γίνεται τῶν ἐκθεουμένων πρός τό ὕπερθεν φῶς ἕνωσις», ὡς ὁ μέγας λέγει ∆ιονύσιος, κατ᾿ αἰτίαν μέν οὐκ οὖσα ἤ κατά ἀναλογίαν, ἐπεί ταῦτα κατ᾿ ἐνέργειάν ἐστι τοῦ νοῦ, κατά δέ ἀφαίρεσιν οὖσα, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ αὐτό τοῦτο οὖσα ἀφαίρεσις˙ εἰ γάρ ἀφαίρεσις ἦν μόνον, ἐφ᾿ ἡμῖν ἄν ἦν - ἀλλά τοῦτο τῶν Μασσαλιανῶν ἐστι τό δόγμα - , ἡνίκ᾿ ἄν τις ἐθελήσῃ ἀνέρχεσθαι εἰς τά τοῦ Θεοῦ ἀπόρρητα μυστήρια, καθάπερ καί ὁ ἅγιος Ἰσαάκ περί αὐτῶν φησιν. Οὔκουν ἀφαίρεσις καί ἀπόφασις μόνη ἐστίν ἡ θεωρία, ἀλλ᾿ ἕνωσις καί ἐκθέωσις, μετά τήν ἀφαίρεσιν πάντων τῶν κάτωθεν τυπούντων τόν νοῦν, μυστικῶς καί ἀπορρήτως χάριτι γινομένη τοῦ Θεοῦ, μᾶλλον δέ μετά τήν ἀπόπαυσιν ἥ μεῖζόν ἐστι τῆς ἀφαιρέσεως˙ ἀπεικόνισμα γάρ ἐστιν ἡ (σελ. 188) ἀφαίρεσις τῆς ἀποπαύσεως ἐκείνης. ∆ιό καί τό χωρίζειν πάντων τῶν κτισμάτων τόν Θεόν παντός ἐστι πιστοῦ˙ ἡ δέ νοερᾶς ἐνεργείας ἀπόπαυσις καί ἡ μετ᾿ αὐτήν πρός τό ὕπερθεν φῶς ἕνωσις, οἷόν τε πάθος οὖσα καί τέλος θεουργόν, μόνων ἐστί τῶν κεκαθαρμένων καί κεχαριτωμένων τήν καρδίαν. Καί τί λέγω τήν ἕνωσιν, ὅτε καί ἡ πρός βραχύ θέα τῶν ἐκκρίτων τέως ἐδεῖτο μαθητῶν, καί τούτων κατ᾿ ἔκστασιν γεγονότων πάσης αἰσθητῆς καί νοερᾶς ἀντιλήψεως καί τῷ μηδόλως ὁρᾶν τό ὄντως ὁρᾶν εἰσδεδεγμένων καί τῷ πάσχειν ἀγνώστως τῶν ὑπέρ φύσιν τήν αἴσθησιν προσιεμένων; Ἀλλ᾿ ὅτι μέν οὗτοι καί εἶδον καί οὐχί κατ᾿ αἴσθησιν ἤ νοῦν κυρίως εἶδον, σύν Θεῷ προϊόντος τοῦ λόγου δείξομεν.

Νῦν δ᾿ ἆρα συνορᾷς ὅτι τό ἀκατάληπτον ἀντί νοῦ καί ὀφθαλμοῦ καί ὤτων εὐμοιροῦσι πνεῦμα, δι᾿ οὗ ὁρῶσι καί ἀκούουσι καί συνιᾶσι; Νοερᾶς γάρ πάσης καταπαυσαμένης ἐνεργείας, τίνι ὁρῶσιν ἄγγελοί τε καί ἄνθρωποι ἰσάγγελοι Θεόν, εἰ μή τῇ τοῦ Πνεύματος δυνάμει; ∆ιό καί ἡ ὅρασις αὐτοῖς αὕτη αἴσθησις μέν οὐκ ἔστιν, ἐπεί μή διά τῶν αἰσθητηρίων αὐτῆς ἀντιλαμβάνονται, νόησις δέ οὐκ ἔστιν, ἐπεί μή διά λογισμῶν ἤ τῆς δι᾿ αὐτῶν γνώσεως, ἀλλά κατά ἀπόπαυσιν πάσης νοερᾶς ἐνεργείας εὑρίσκουσιν αὐτήν˙ οὔκουν, οὐδέ φαντασία ἐστίν, οὐδέ διάνοια, οὐδέ δόξα, οὔθ᾿ οἷον συμπέρασμα συλλογισμῶν˙ οὐδέ διά τῆς κατά ἀπόφασιν ἀνόδου μόνης ὁ νοῦς ἐπιτυγχάνει ταύτης. Πᾶσα μέν γάρ θεία ἐντολή καί πᾶς νόμος ἱερός μέχρι τῆς καθαρότητος τῆς καρδίας ὁρίζεται, κατά τόν λόγον τῶν πατέρων, καί πᾶς τρόπος καί πᾶν εἶδος προσευχῆς μέχρι τῆς καθαρᾶς λήγει προσευχῆς, καί πᾶς λόγος κάτωθεν ἀνιών εἰς τόν ὑπερανιδρυμένον καί ἀπολελυμένον τοῦ παντός μέχρι τῆς ἀφαιρέσεως τῶν ὄτων πάντων ἵσταται. Οὐ μή διά τοῦτο μετά τάς θείας ἐντολάς οὐδέν ἐστιν ἄλλο πλήν ἡ τῆς καρδίας καθαρότης, ἀλλ᾿ εἰσί καί πλεῖστά εἰσιν˙ ὁ κατά τόν νοῦν νῦν αἰῶνα τῶν ἐπηγγελμένων ἀρραβών καί τά τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος ἀγαθά (σελ. 190) δι᾿ αὐτῆς ὁρώμενά τε καί τρυφώμενα˙ οὕτω καί μετά τήν