33

of the passionate part of the soul, having energetically separated the mind from all things through dispassion, it unites it through prayer to the grace of the Spirit, through which it comes to the enjoyment of the divine splendors, from which it becomes angel-like and God-like. Therefore the fathers after the great Dionysius called it a spiritual sense, which is itself fitting and somehow more revelatory of that mystical and ineffable contemplation. For then in truth man sees by the spirit, but not by the mind, nor by the body. And that he sees a light beyond light supernaturally he knows precisely; but by what he sees this, he does not know then, nor can he examine its nature, because of the unsearchability of the spirit by which he sees. And this is what Paul also said, when he heard the unutterable things and saw the invisible things: "for 'I saw,' he says, 'whether out of the body I do not know, or in the body I do not know'"; that is, I did not know whether it was the mind or the body that was seeing. For he sees, not by sense-perception, but as sense-perception sees sensible things, clearly and more clearly than it does. And he sees himself, by the ineffable sweetness of that which is seen, taken out of himself and seized not only from every thing and thought of things, but also from himself. And by this ecstasy he even forgets his supplication to God; and this is what Saint Isaac said, having the great and divine Gregory as a fellow witness, that "prayer is a purity of mind, which alone is cut short with amazement by the light of the Holy Trinity; and again, 'it is a purity of mind upon which the light of the Holy Trinity shines through at the time of prayer, and then the mind becomes beyond prayer, (p. 196) and one must not call this prayer, but the offspring of pure prayer, sent down through the Spirit; nor does the mind pray with prayer then, but is in ecstasy among incomprehensible realities; and this is the ignorance that is superior to knowledge'." That which seized and took the mind out of all things and turned it wholly to itself, a most pleasing reality, he sees as a kind of light, revelatory, but not of sensible bodies, nor indeed is it bounded below, nor above, nor to the sides, and he sees no limit at all of the light that is seen and shines around him, but as if it were a sun infinitely more brilliant and greater than the universe; and he himself stands in the middle of it, being wholly an eye; such a thing is that.

Therefore the great Macarius says this light is infinite and super-celestial. And another of the more perfect saints has seen all existing things as if contained under a single ray of this intelligible sun, and yet even he, seeing not what and how great that is, but as much as he had made himself receptive of it, and learning from this contemplation and from the union with it that is beyond the mind, not what it is in its nature, but that it truly is, and is supernatural and super-essential, being something other than all existing things, and being properly and alone Being and ineffably comprehending every being in itself. But this infinite reality is never seen by one or by all. And he who does not see understands that he himself is unable to see, not being perfectly harmonized with the spirit through a more complete purity, but not that the object seen has a limit. When, therefore, the things of contemplation have subsided, from the similar dispassionate gladness and intellectual calm springing forth for the one who sees, and from the renewed fire of love for God, the one who sees knows precisely that (p. 198) this is that light, even if he sees it more dimly; and in proportion to his God-pleasing practice, both his abstinence from all other things and his attentiveness in prayer and his upward striving with his whole soul to God being always carried forward and experiencing a clearer contemplation, from this he understands the infinity of what is seen that it is infinite and he sees no limit of its splendor, but rather he sees more the weakness of his own fitness for receiving the light.

33

παθητικοῦ μέρους τῆς ψυχῆς, πάντων διά τῆς ἀπαθείας ἐνεργῶς χωρίσασα τόν νοῦν, ἑνοῖ διά τῆς προσευχῆς τῇ τοῦ Πνεύματος χάριτι, δι᾿ ἧς ἐν ἀπολαύσει γίνεται τῶν θείων μαρμαρυγῶν, ἐξ ὧν ἀγγελοειδής τε καί θεοειδής καθίσταται. ∆ιό οἱ μετά τόν μέγαν ∆ιονύσιον πατέρες αἴσθησιν πνευματικήν προσηγόρευσαν αὐτήν, ὅ καί αὐτό κατάλληλόν ἐστι καί ἐμφανικώτερόν πως τῆς μυστικῆς ἐκείνης καί ἀπορρήτου θεωρίας. Τότε γάρ ὡς ἀληθῶς ὁ ἄνθρωπος πνεύματι, ἀλλ᾿ οὐχί νῷ, οὐδέ σώματι ὁρᾶ. Καί ὅτι μέν ὁρᾷ φῶς ὑπέρ φῶς ὑπερφυῶς οἶδεν ἀκριβῶς˙ τίνι δέ τοῦθ᾿ ὁρᾷ, οὐκ οἶδε τότε, ἀλλ᾿ οὐδ᾿ ἐξετάζειν δύναται τήν τούτου φύσιν, διά τό ἀνεξιχνίαστον τοῦ πνεύματος δι᾿ οὗ ὁρᾷ. Καί τοῦτό ἐστιν ὅ καί Παῦλος εἶπεν, ἡνίκα ἤκουε τά ἄρρητα καί ἑώρα τά ἀόρατα˙ «ἑώρων» γάρ, φησίν, «εἴτε ἐκτός τοῦ σώματος οὐκ οἶδα, εἴτε ἐντός τοῦ σώματος οὐκ οἶδα»˙ τουτέστιν οὐκ ἤδειν εἴτε νοῦς ἦν, εἴτε σῶμα τό ὁρῶν. Ὁρᾷ γάρ, οὐκ αἰσθήσει μέν, ὡς ἡ αἴσθησις δέ, τά αἰσθητά τρανῶς καί τρανότερον ἤ αὕτη. Ὁρᾷ δ᾿ ἑαυτόν ὑπό τῆς τοῦ ὁρωμένου γλυκυθυμίας ἀπορρήτου ἐκστάντα τε καί ἁρπαγέντα οὐ μόνον παντός πράγματός τε καί νοήματος πραγμάτων, ἀλλά καί ἑαυτόῦ. Καί αὐτῆς ὑπό τῆς ἐκστάσεως ἐπιλανθάνεται τῆς πρός Θεόν δεήσεως˙ καί τοῦτό ἐστιν ὅ εἶπεν ὁ ἅγιος Ἰσαάκ, συνεπιμαρτυροῦντα τόν μέγας καί θεῖον ἔχων Γρηγόριον, ὅτι «προσευχή ἐστι καθαρότης νοός, ἥτις μόνη ἐκ τοῦ φωτός τῆς ἁγίας Τριάδος μετ᾿ ἐκπλήξεως τέμνεται˙ καί πάλιν, «καθαρότης ἐστί νοός ἐφ᾿ ᾗ διαυγάζει ἐν τῷ καιρῷ τῆς προσευχῆς τό φῶς τῆς ἁγίας Τριάδος, καί τότε ὁ νοῦς ὑπεράνω τῆς προσευχῆς γίνεται, (σελ. 196) καί οὐ δεἰ καλεῖν ταύτην προσευχήν, ἀλλά τοκετόν τῆς καθαρᾶς προσευχῆς, τῆς διά τοῦ Πνεύματος καταπεμπομένης˙ οὐδέ προσευχῇ τότε προσεύχεται ὁ νοῦς, ἀλλ᾿ ἐν ἐκστάσει γίνεται ἐν τοῖς ἀκαταλήπτοις πράγμασι˙ καί αὕτη ἐστίν ἡ ἄγνοια ἡ ὑπερτέρα τῆς γνώσεως». Τό γοῦν ἁρπάσαν ἐκεῖνο καί τόν νοῦν ἐκστῆσαν πάντων καί πρός ἑαυτό ὅλον ἐπιστρέψαν θυμηρέστατόν τι χρῆμα, φῶς οἷον ὁρᾷ, ἀποκαλυπτικόν μέν, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ αἰσθητῶν σωμάτων, μήτε μέντοι πρός τά κάτω περαινόμενον, μήτε πρός τά ἄνω, μήτ᾿ ἐπί τά πλάγια, καί πέρας ὅλως οὐχ ὁρᾷ τοῦ ὁρωμένου καί περιλάμποντος αὐτόν φωτός, ἀλλ᾿ ὥσπερ ἄν εἴ τις ἦν ἥλιος ἀπειροπλασίως λαμπρότερός τε καί μείζων τοῦ παντός˙ μέσον δ᾿ ἔστηκεν αὐτός, ὤν ὅλος ὀφθαλμός˙ τοιοῦτόν τί ἐστιν ἐκεῖνο.

∆ιό ἄπειρον μέν ὁ μέγας Μακάριος καί ὑπερουράνιον τουτί φησι τό φῶς. Πάντα δέ τά ὄντα, ὥσπερ ὑπό μίαν τινά περιεχόμενα ἀκτῖνα τοῦ νοητοῦ ἡλίου τούτου, τῶν τελεωτέρων τις ἕτερος ἑώρακε ἁγίων, καίτοι κἀκεῖνος, οὐχ ὅπερ καί ὅσον ἐστίν ἐκεῖνο, ἀλλ᾿ ὅσον ἑαυτόν ἐκείνου δεκτικόν ἐποίησεν ἰδών, καί μαθών ἀπό τῆς θεωρίας ταύτης καί τῆς πρός αὐτό ὑπέρ νοῦν ἑνώσεως, οὐχ ὅπερ ἐστίν αὐτό τήν φύσιν, ἀλλ᾿ ὅ,τι ἐστίν ὡς ἀληθῶς, καί ὑπερφυές καί ὑπερούσιόν ἐστιν, ἄλλο τι παρά τά ὄντα πάντα ὄν, ὄν δέ κυρίως τε καί μόνον καί πᾶν ὄν ἀπορρήτως ἐν ἑαυτῷ συνειληφός. Πάντοτε δ᾿ ἑνί ἤ πᾶσι τό ἄπειρον τοῦτο οὐχ ὁρᾶται. Ὁ δέ μή ὁρῶν συνίησιν ὡς αὐτός ὁρᾶν ἀδυνατεῖ μή τελείως δι᾿ ἐντελεστέρας καθαρότητος ἐναρμοσθείς τῷ πνεύματι, ἀλλ᾿ οὐχί τό ὁρώμενον λαμβάνει πέρας. Ὅτε τοίνυν τά τῆς θεωρίας ὑποβέβηκεν, ἐκ τῆς πηγαζομένης ὁμοίας ἀπαθοῦς τῷ ὁρῶντι θυμηδίας καί γαλήνης νοερᾶς καί τοῦ ἀνακαιομένου πυρός τῆς πρός τόν Θεόν ἀγάπης, ἀκριβῶς οἶδεν ὁ ὁρῶν ὅτι (σελ. 198) τοῦτό ἐστιν ἐκεῖνο τό φῶς, εἰ καί ἀμυδρότερον ὁρᾷ˙ καί κατ᾿ ἀναλογίαν δέ τῆς θεαρέστου πράξεως, τῆς τε τῶν ἄλλων πάντων ἀποχῆς καί τῆς προσοχῆς τῆς προσευχῆς καί τῆς πρός τόν Θεόν ἐκ ψυχῆς ὅλης ἀνανεύσεως ἐπί τά πρόσω φερόμενος ἀεί καί διαυγεστέρας πειρώμενος τῆς θεωρίας, κἀντεῦθεν τό ἄπειρον συνίησι τοῦ ὁρωμένου ὅτι ἄπειρον καί τῆς μέν λαμπρότητος ἐκείνου πέρας οὐχ ὁρᾷ, τῆς δ᾿ ἑαυτοῦ πρός φωτοληψίαν ἐπιτηδειότητος ἐπί μᾶλλον ὁρᾷ τό ἀδρανές.