39

having the form of the whole indwelling God the Word appearing unceasingly through His divine characteristics, with none of the old features having been left behind, by which the human is naturally indicated, all having yielded to the better things, just as sunless air is thoroughly infused with light.

24. A CONTEMPLATION ON MELCHIZEDEK

A contemplation on Melchizedek. Which, I think, having known and experienced, that wonderful and great Melchizedek,

concerning whom the divine word in Scripture recounts great and wonderful things, was deemed worthy to be above time and nature, and to be made like the Son of God, having become by disposition, that is, according to grace, as far as possible, such as the Giver of grace Himself is believed to be in His essence. (14D_168> For the saying about him, "Without father, without mother, without genealogy," I suppose, signifies nothing other than the complete putting away of his natural characteristics, which came to him from the highest grace according to virtue. And the phrase "having neither beginning of days nor end of life," knowledge which circumscribes the property of all time and age, 1140 and bears witness to a contemplation that transcends the existence of all material and immaterial substance. And the phrase "made like the Son of God, he remains a priest forever," perhaps indicates that he was able to keep the intellectual eye unclosed until the end, in an unchangeable state of the most godlike virtue and of the divine contemplation directed toward God. For virtue is by nature disposed to fight against nature, and true contemplation against time and age, so that the one may remain unenslaved and uncontrolled by all other things which are believed to exist after God, as knowing only God as begetter, and the other uncircumscribed, not remaining in any of the things that have a beginning or an end, as imaging through itself God, the one who defines every beginning and end, and who draws all intellection of those who understand towards Himself in an ineffable ecstasy.

From which things the divine likeness is shown, I mean of knowledge and of virtue, and through which unwavering love for God alone is preserved by the worthy, according to which the dignity of adoption, given in a manner befitting God, grants them to intercede with and stand before God continually, offering the divine likeness itself for the entreaty of the one interceding. Whence I reasonably suppose not by time and nature, under which the great Melchizedek was naturally subject, things which had already been transcended in life and reason and completely left behind, should he be designated, The divine Word has justified him, but that he should be named from and through those things by which he remade himself according to his will, I mean virtue and knowledge. For in those things where the will has nobly (14D_170> through the virtues overcome the most difficult law of nature, and the movement of the mind through knowledge purely flies beyond the property of time and age, for these it is not just to ascribe as a characteristic the property of the things left behind, but rather the magnificence of the things acquired, from which and in which alone they henceforth exist and are recognized. Since we also, naturally directing our attention to visible things, both recognize and name bodies from their colors, as for instance, calling illumined air light, and any kind of kindled matter fire, and a whitened body white, and however many other such things there are.

If, therefore, according to his will he preferred virtue to nature and all things according to it, because of the good choice of the dignity that is in our power, and according to knowledge he surpassed all time and age, having placed everything after God behind himself gnostically according to contemplation, the divine Melchizedek, not remaining in any of the beings in which any limit is observed, but toward the divine and unoriginate

39

ὅλου τοῦ ἐνορῶντος Θεοῦ Λόγου τό εἶδος ἀπαραλείπτως διά τῶν θείων αὐτοῦ γνωρισμάτων φαινόμενον ἔχοντες, τῷ ἐλλειφθῆναι μηδένα τῶν παλαιῶν χαρακτήρων, οἱς μηνύεσθαι πέφυκε τό ἀνθρώπινον, πάντων εἰξάντων τοῖς ἀμείνοσιν, οἷον ἀήρ ἀφεγγής φωτί δι᾿ ὅλου μετεγκραθείς.

Κ∆ (24). ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΕΙΣ ΤΟΝ ΜΕΛΧΙΣΕ∆ΕΚ

Θεωρία εἰς τόν Μελχισεδέκ. Ὅπερ, οἶμαι, γνούς καί παθών ὁ θαυμαστός ἐκεῖνος καί μέγας Μελχισεδέκ,

περί ὅν τά μεγάλα καί θαυμαστά παρά τῆ Γραφῇ ὁ θεῖος διεξέρχεται λόγος, χρόνου καί φύσεως ὑπεράνω γενέσθαι, καί ὁμοιωθῆναι τῷ Υἱῷ τοῦ Θεοῦ κατηξιώθη, τοιοῦτος ἕξει δηλαδή κατά τήν χάριν ὡς ἐφικτόν γενόμενος, οἷος αὐτός ὁ δοτήρ τῆς χάριτος κατά τήν οὐσίαν ὑπάρχων πιστεύεται. (14∆_168> Τό γάρ Ἀπάτωρ καί ἀμήτωρ καί ἀγενεαλόγητος περί αὐτοῦ λεγόμενον, οὐκ ἄλλο μηνύειν ὑπονοῶ ἤ τήν ἐγγενομένην αὐτῷ ἐκ τῆς κατ᾿ ἀρετήν ἀκροτάτης χάριτος τελείαν τῶν φυσικῶν γνωρισμάτων ἀπόθεσιν· τό δέ μήτε ἀρχήν ἡμερῶν, μήτε ζωῆς τέλος ἔχειν, τήν χρόνου παντός καί αἰῶνος ἰδιότητα περιγράφουσα γνῶσιν, 1140 καί πάσης ὑλικῆς καί ἀΰλου οὐσίας τήν ὕπαρξιν ὑπερβαίνουσαν θεωρίαν μαρτυρεῖ· τό δέ Ἀφωμοιωμένος τῷ Υἱῷ τοῦ Θεοῦ μένει εἰς τό διηνηκές ἱερεύς, τάχα μέχρι τέλους καθ᾿ ἕξιν ἄτρεπτον τῆς θεοειδεστάτης ἀρετῆς καί τῆς θείας καί πρός τόν Θεόν ἐνατενίσεως τό νοερόν ὄμμα ἀνεπίμυστον δυνηθῆναι φυλάξαι παραδηλοῖ. Τῇ φύσει γάρ ἡ ἀρετή μάχεσθαι πέφυκε, καί χρόνῳ καί αἰῶνι ἡ ἀληθής θεωρία, ἵνα ἡ μέν ἀδούλωτος μένοι τοῖς ἄλλοις ὅσα μετά Θεόν εἶναι πιστεύεται, καί ἀκράτητος, ὡς Θεόν μόνον εἰδυῖα γεννήτορα, ἡ δέ ἀπερίγραφος, οὐδενί τῶν ἀρχήν ἤ τέλος ἐχόντων ἐναπομένουσα, ὡς Θεόν δι᾿ ἑαυτῆς εἰκονίζουσα, τόν πάσης ἀρχῆς καί τέλους ὁριστικόν, καί πᾶσαν νόησιν τῶν νοούντων κατ᾿ ἔκστασιν ἄῤῤητον πρός ἑαυτόν ἕλκοντα.

Ἐξ ὧν ἡ θεῖα ὁμοίωσις δείκνυται, γνώσεώς τέ φημι καί ἀρετῆς, καί δι' ὧν ἡ εἰς μόνον τόν Θεόν ἀκλόνητος ἀγάπη τοῖς ἀξίοις φυλάττεται, καθ᾿ ἥν τό τῆς υἱοθεσίας ἀξίωμα θεοπρεπῶς διδόμενον διηνεκῶς ἐντυγχάνειν Θεῷ καί παρεστάναι χαρίζεται, πρός δυσώπησιν αὐτήν τοῦ ἐντυγχάνοντος τήν θείαν ὁμοίωσιν παρεχόμενον. Ὅθεν εἰκότως ὑπολαμβάνω μή διά χρόνου καί φύσεως, ὑφ᾿ ἅ φυσικῶς ἐτέλει ὁ μέγας Μελχισεδέκ, βίῳ καί λόγῳ ὑπερβαθέντων ἤδη καί παντελῶς καταλελειμμένων προσαγορευθῆναι δεῖν, Ὁ θεῖος αὐτόν ἐδικαίωσε λόγος, ἀλλ᾿ ἐξ ὧν καί δι᾿ ὧν ἑαυτόν μετεποίησε γνωμικῶς, ἀρετῆς· λέγω καί γνώσεως, ὀνομασθῆναι. Ἐφ᾿ ὧν γάρ ἡ γνώμη γενναίως (14∆_170> διά τῶν ἀρετῶν τόν δυσμαχώτατον τῆς φύσεως κατηγωνίσατο νόμον, καί τήν χρόνου καί αἰῶνος ἰδιότητα διά γνώσως ἀχράντως ἡ τοῦ νοῦ ὑπερίπταται κίνησις, τούτοις οὐκ ἔστιν ἐπιφημίσαι δίκαιον τῶν ἀπολειφθέντων ὡς γνώρισμα τήν ἰδιότητα, ἀλλά μᾶλλον τήν τῶν προσληφθέντων μεγαλοπρέπειαν, ἐξ ὧν καί ἐν οἷς μόνον εἰσί λοιπόν καί ἐπιγινώσκονται. Επεί καί ἡμεῖς φυσικῶς τοῖς ὁρατοῖς ἐπιβάλλοντες ἐκ τῶν χρωμάτων τά σώματα καί γνωρίζομεν καί ὀνομάζομεν, οἷον ὡς φῶς τόν πεφωτισμένον ἀέρα, καί πῦρ τήν οἱανοῦν πυρός ἐξημμένην ὕλην, καί λευκόν τό λευκασμένον σῶμα, καί ὅσα ἄλλα τοιουτότροπα.

Εἰ τοίνυν γνωμικῶς τήν ἀρετήν τῆς φύσεως καί τῶν κατ᾿ αὐτήν ἁπάντων προετίμησε, διά τήν καλήν τοῦ ἐφ᾿ ἡμῖν ἀξιώματος αἵρεσιν, καί πάντα χρόνον καί αἰῶνα κατά τήν γνῶσιν ὑπερηκόντισε, πάντα ὅσα μετά Θεόν κατόπιν ἑαυτοῦ γνωστικῶς κατά τήν θεωρίαν ποιησάμενος, οὐδενί τῶν ὄντων ἐμμείνας ᾧ ἐπιθεωρεῖται τό οἱανοῦν πέρας ὁ θεῖος Μελχισεδέκ, πρός δέ τάς θείας καί ἀνάρχους