40

in prayer, when the noetic fire has appeared and the noetic lamp has been lit and the mind, through spiritual contemplation, has roused the longing into a sublime flame, the body also, paradoxically, is both lightened and warmed, so that it seems to those who see it to be coming forth from the fire of a sensible furnace, according to the author of the spiritual ascent. But Christ's sweat during prayer also teaches me about the sensible warmth that arises in the body from intense supplication to God alone. What then will they say to this, those who declare the warmth from prayer to be demonic? Or will they even teach this: not to pray earnestly, nor intensely, so that, in proportion to the soul's struggle, the body too may not exhibit the warmth forbidden by them (p. 218)? But let these men be teachers of a prayer which does not lead to God or to the imitation of God, nor transforms man for the better. But we know that while we push away, through the voluntary pain of self-control, the pleasure to which, alas, we defected when we cast off the restraint of the commandment, during prayer we taste with noetic perception the divine pleasure which is unmixed with pain; and when this has wonderfully transformed the body also toward passionless and divine love, he who has experienced it cries out to God, "How sweet are thy words to my throat, sweeter than honey to my mouth," and, "My soul shall be satisfied as with marrow and fatness; and my mouth shall praise thee with joyful lips." After which and through which those who set ascents in their heart come to be in participation of the godlike repose and angelic good-feeling, "according to the deifying visitations of the divine illuminations," as Dionysius the Great has said.

And if the purifying mourning according to God is not accomplished in the soul of the combatants alone, but from it passes also to the body and to the bodily sense (and a clear sign of this is the tear of sorrow for those who mourn for their sins), why should we not also piously accept the signs of the divine pleasure that is according to the spirit, impressed upon the receptive senses of the body? And what of the Lord? Does he not for this reason bless those who mourn, because they shall be comforted, that is, they shall have in themselves the joy, the fruit of the spirit? But of this comfort the body also partakes in many ways. Some of these ways are known by those who have experienced them, while others are evident even to those who see from the outside: the gentle character, the sweet tear, the encounter full of graces for those who approach, according to the one who said in the Song of Songs, (p. 220) "Thy lips, O my spouse, drop as the honeycomb." For not only the soul receives the pledge of the good things to come, but also the body which runs with it the course of the gospel toward these things. But he who does not say this, also the participation then in the age to come in those ineffable good things, and now indeed the participation, in a manner appropriate to itself, of the grace given from God to the mind. For these reasons, then, we say that these things are perceived by sense, but we add the word "noetic" both because these things are beyond natural sensation, and because the mind is primarily receptive of them, and because of the ascent of our mind toward the first Mind, of which our mind partakes divinely according to its capacity, and is itself transformed, and through itself transforms the conjoined body, toward what is more divine, showing thereby and prefiguring the swallowing up of the flesh by the spirit in the age to come. For not the eyes of the body, but those of the soul receive the power of the spirit which sees these things; for this reason we call it noetic, although it is beyond the mind.

And in addition to these things, so that we may also restrain the thought of our hearers from thinking these spiritual and ineffable energies to be material and somatic, which is precisely what these men have recently experienced, who with profane and contrary ears and

40

προσευχῇ, τοῦ νοητοῦ πυρός ἀναφανέντος καί τῆς νοητῆς λαμπάδος ἀναφθείσης καί εἰς μετέωρον φλόγα διά πνευματικῆς θεωρίας τοῦ νοῦ τόν πόθον ἀνεγείραντος, καί τό σῶμα παραδόξως κουφίζεταί τε καί διαθερμαίνεται, ὡς ἀπό πυρός αἰσθητῆς καμίνου τοῖς ὁρῶσιν ἐξειέναι δοκεῖν, κατά τόν συγγραφέα τῆς πνευματικῆς ἀναβάσεως. Ἐμέ δέ καί ὁ κατά τήν προσευχήν ἱδρώς Χριστοῦ τήν ἐγγινομένην αἰσθητήν τῷ σώματι διδάσκει θέρμην ἐκ μόνης τῆς ἐκτενοῦς πρός τόν Θεόν δεήσεως. Τί δή πρός ταύτην φήσουσιν οἱ δαιμονιώδη τήν ἐκ προσευχῆς ἀποφαινόμενοι θέρμην; Ἤ καί τοῦτο διδάξουσι, μή ἐναγωνίως, μηδ᾿ ἐκτενῶς προσεύχεσθαι, ἵνα μή, κατά λόγον τοῦ κατά ψυχήν ἀγῶνος, καί τό σῶμα τήν ἀπηγορευμένην αὐτοῖς ἐπιδέξηται (σελ. 218) θέρμην; Ἀλλ᾿ οὕτοι μέν ἔστωσαν διδάσκαλοι τῆς μή πρός Θεόν ἤ τό θεομίμητον φερούσης, μηδέ μετασκευαζούσης πρός τό κρεῖττον τόν ἄνθρωπον εὐχῆς. Ἡμεῖς δ᾿ ἴσμεν ὡς καί τήν ἡδονήν, πρός ἥν φεῦ ηὐτομολήσαμεν τῆς ἐντολῆς ἀφηνιάσαντες διά τῆς ἑκουσίου κατά τήν ἐγκράτειαν ὀδύνης ἀπωθούμενοι, κατά τήν προσευχήν αἰσθήσει νοερᾷ γευόμεθα τῆς θείας καί ἀμιγοῦς ὀδύνης ἡδονῆς, ἧς θαυμασίως καί τό σῶμα πρός τόν ἀπαθῆ καί θεῖον ἔρωτα μετασκευασαμένης ὁ ἐν πείρᾳ γεγονώς βοᾷ πρός τόν Θεόν «ὡς γλυκέα τῷ λάρυγγί μου τά λόγιά σου, ὑπέρ μέλι τῷ στόματί μου» καί «ὡς ἐκ στέατος καί πιότητος ἐμπλησθείῃ ἡ ψυχή μου καί χείλει ἀγαλλιάσεως αἰνέσει τό στόμα μου». Μεθ᾿ ἥν καί δι᾿ ἧς οἱ ἀναβάσεις ἐν καρδίᾳ διατιθέμενοι τῆς θεοειδοῦς ρᾳστώνης καί ἀγγελικῆς εὐπαθείας ἐν μεθέξει γίνονται, «κατά τάς θεουργούς τῶν θείων ἐλλάμψεων ἐποφοιτήσεις» ὡς ∆ιονύσιος ὁ μέγας εἶπεν.

Εἰ δέ καί τό κατά Θεόν καθάρσιον πένθος οὐκ ἐπί τήν ψυχήν μόνον τελεῖται τῶν ἀγωνιζομένων, ἀλλ᾿ ἀπό ταύτης καί ἐπί τό σῶμα καί τήν κατά σῶμα διαβαίνει αἴσθησιν (καί δεῖγμα τούτου ἐναργές τό κατώδυνον τοῖς ἐφ᾿ ἁμαρτήσασι πενθοῦσι δάκρυον), διατί μή καί τά γῆς κατά πνεῦμα θείας ἡδονῆς τεκμήρια, ταῖς χωρούσαις τοῦ σώματος αἰσθήσεσιν ἐνσημαινόμενα, εὐλαβῶς παραδεξαίμεθα; Τί δέ καί ὁ Κύριος, οὐ διά τοῦτο μακαρίζει τούς πενθοῦντας, ἐπειδή παρακληθήσονται, τουτέστι τήν χαράν, τόν καρπόν ἐν ἑαυτοῖς ἕξουσι τοῦ πνεύματος; Ἀλλά τῆς παρακλήσεως ταύτης καί τό σῶμα μεταλαγχάνει πολυτρόπως. Ὧν τούς μέν ἴσασιν οἱ ἐν πείρᾳ γεγονότες, οἱ δέ καί τοῖς ἔξωθεν ὁρῶσι δῆλοι, τό προσηνές ἦθος, τό γλυκύ δάκρυον, ἡ χαρίτων γέμουσα τοῖς προσιοῦσιν ἔντευξις, κατά τόν ἐν Ἆσμασιν εἰπόντα, (σελ. 220) «κηρία μέλιτος ἀπό στόματός σου στάζουσι, νύμφη». Λαμβάνει γάρ οὐχ ἡ ψυχή μόνον τόν ἀρραβῶνα τῶν μελλόντων ἀγαθῶν, ἀλλά καί τό σῶμα τό συνδιανύον τόν πρός ταῦτα τοῦ εὐαγγελίου δρόμον. Ὁ δέ μή τοῦτο λέγων, καί τήν ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι αἰῶνι συμμεθέξει τότε τῶν ἀπορρήτων ἐκείνων ἀγαθῶν, καί νῦν δήπου συμμεθέξει καταλλήλως ἑαυτῷ τῆς ἐνδιδομένης πρός Θεοῦ χάριτος τῷ νῷ. ∆ιά ταῦτα γοῦν αἰσθήσει καταλαμβάνεσθαι φαμέν αὐτά, προστίθεμεν δέ «τό νοερᾷ» διά τε τό ὑπέρ αἴσθησιν εἶναι ταῦτα φυσικήν καί διά τό πρώτως τόν νοῦν εἶναι τούτων δεκτικόν καί διά τήν πρός τόν πρῶτον νοῦν ἀνάτασιν τοῦ ἡμετέρου νοῦ, οὐ κατά τό ἐγχωροῦν μεταλαγχάνων θείως, αὐτός τε καί δι᾿ αὐτοῦ τό συνημμένον σῶμα πρός τό θειότερον μετασκευάζεται, δεικνύς ἐντεῦθεν καί προοιμιαζόμενος τήν ὑπό τοῦ πνεύματος ἐπί τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος τῆς σαρκός κατάποσιν. Οὐ γάρ οἱ ὀφθαλμοί τοῦ σώματος, ἀλλ᾿ οἱ τῆς ψυχῆς τήν ὁρῶσαν ταῦτα δύναμιν τοῦ πνεύματος λαμβάνουσι˙ διά ταῦτα νοεράν αὐτήν καλοῦμεν, ὑπέρ νοεράν οὖσαν.

Πρός δέ τούτοις, ὡς ἄν καί τῶν ἀκουόντων τήν διάνοιαν ἀπείρξωμεν τοῦ μή προσύλους καί σωματικάς οἴεσθαι τάς πνευματικάς καί ἀπορρήτους ἐνεργείας ταύτας, ὅπερ καί οὗτοι πεπόνθασιν ἀρτίως, οἵ βεβήλοις καί ἀντέροις ἀκοαῖς καί