42

of the age, which not only "eye has not seen, nor ear heard," but "has not even entered into the heart of man," when it explores through the incomprehensible assaults of reasonings. And how could it be invisible to sinners, if it is perceptible by the senses? Or will there also be then an obstructing element, and shadows and cones, and consequently eclipses and multiform cycles of illuminations, so that there will be need of the much-busied foolishness of the astrologers during the life that is contemplated in the unending ages?

(p. 226) But how will a bodily sense perceive a light that is not properly perceptible by the senses? By the power of the all-powerful Spirit, by which also the chief of the apostles beheld this on Tabor, flashing forth not only from the flesh which bore the Son within it, but also from the cloud which bore the Father of Christ within it. Besides, the body then will be spiritual, but not soulish, according to the apostle; "for it is sown," he says, "a soulish body, it is raised a spiritual body;" and being spiritual and seeing spiritually, it will fittingly perceive the divine radiance. And just as now it is a task to see that we have an intellective soul, capable of subsisting by itself, on account of this thick, mortal, and resistant flesh that overshadows and drags it down, making the soul especially body-like and given to fantasy, for which reason we are also ignorant of the intellective sense according to the mind, so also in that most blessed life of the age to come, for the sons of the resurrection, who will be transformed into the dignity of angels according to the gospel of Christ, the body will be as it were hidden; for it will be so refined as to seem not to be matter at all, nor to obstruct the intellective activities, the mind having been victorious. For this reason, they will also enjoy the divine light with their bodily senses.

And why do I speak of the kinship of the body at that time with the intellective nature? For Saint Maximus says, "the soul becomes God by participation in the divine grace, having itself ceased from all its activities according to mind and sense, and having also made the natural activities of the body cease along with it, the body being deified with it according to its analogous participation in deification, so that God alone then appears through both the soul and the body, their natural (p. 228) properties having been overcome by the excess of glory." Since, therefore, as I also said at the beginning, God is invisible to created things, but not invisible to Himself, and then, not only through our soul but also through our body—O, the wonder!—God will be the one who sees, for this reason we shall also see the divine and unapproachable light brightly through bodily organs then, and Christ ineffably showed to the apostles on Tabor the earnest and the prelude of this great gift of God that will be for us. The ray of the divinity, then, which is beyond all reason and all sight, how could it be perceptible by the senses? Have you understood that the light that shone around the apostles on Tabor was not properly perceptible by the senses?

Nevertheless, if the divine light, which exists beyond all sensation, was seen by sensible eyes (as indeed it was seen, just as those who contradict those spiritual men say, agreeing in this point with them and with us); if, therefore, the divine light was seen by bodily eyes, why will it not also be seen by intellective eyes? Or is the soul some evil thing, unable to be joined to the good and insensible of it, a thing which not even one of the all-daring heretics has ever said? Or is it good, but the body better than it? For how is the soul not inferior to the body, if the body is capable of partaking in and perceiving the light of God, but the soul is not? And how is this material and mortal body not more akin to, more related to, and closer to God than the soul, if through it as mediator the soul sees God in light, but the body does not see God through the soul? And if also a prelude of the future [life] in glory

42

αἰῶνος, ἅ μή μόνον «ὀφθαλμός οὐκ εἶδεν οὐδέ οὖς ἤκουσεν», ἀλλ᾿ οὐδ᾿ «ἐπί καρδίαν ἀναβέβηκεν ἀνθρώπου», λογισμῶν ἐφόδοις τοῖς ἀκαταλήπτοις ἐμβατεύοντος. Πῶς δέ καί τοῖς ἁμαρτωλοῖς ἀόρατον, εἴπερ αἰσθητόν; Ἤ καί τό διαφράττον ἔσται τότε καί σκιαί καί κῶνοι, τούτοις ἑπομένως ἐκλειπτικοί τε σύνδεσμοι καί φωτισμῶν κύκλοι πολυσχήμονες, ὡς καί τῆς πολυασχόλου δεῖν τῶν ἀστρολόγων καταιότητος κατά τήν ἐνθεωρουμένην τῷ ἀκαταλήκτῳ τῶν αἰώνων ζωήν;

(σελ. 226) Ἀλλά πῶς αἴσθησις σωματική φωτός ἀντιλήψεται μή κυρίως αἰσθητοῦ; Τῇ τοῦ παντοδυνάμου Πνεύματος δυνάμει, καθ᾿ ἥν καί οἱ πρόκριτοι τῶν ἀποστόλων τοῦτο κατεῖδον ἐν Θαβώρ, οὐκ ἀπό τῆς ἐν ἑαυτῇ φερούσης τόν υἱόν σαρκός μόνον ἀποστράπτον, ἀλλά καί ἀπό τῆς ἐν ἑαυτῇ φερούσης τόν Πατέρα τοῦ Χριστοῦ νεφέλης. Ἄλλως τε καί τό σῶμα τότε πνευματικόν, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ ψυχικόν ἔσται, κατά τόν ἀπόστολον˙ «σπείρεται» γάρ, φησί, «σῶμα ψυχικόν, ἐγείρεται σῶμα πνευματικόν˙ πνευματικόν δ᾿ ὄν καί πνευματικῶς ὁρῶν τῆς θείας εἰκότως ἀντιλήψεται αὐγῆς. Καί ὥσπερ νῦν ἔργον ἐστίν ἰδεῖν ὡς ἔχομεν νοεράν ψυχήν, καθ᾿ ἑαυτήν ὑφεστάναι δυναμένην διά τήν παχεῖαν ταύτην σάρκα καί θνητήν καί ἀντίτυπον ἐπηλυγάζουσαν καί κατασπῶσαν, σωματοειδῆ τε καί φανταστικήν μάλιστα καθιστῶσαν τήν ψυχήν, διό καί τήν κατά νοῦν νοεράν ἀγνοοῦμεν αἴσθησιν, οὕτως ἐν τῇ τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος ἐκείνῃ μακαριωτάτῃ διαγωγῇ τοῖς υἱοῖς τῆς ἀναστάσεως ὡσανεί τό σῶμα κρυβήσεται εἰς ἀγγέλων κατά τό εὐαγγέλιον τοῦ Χριστοῦ μεταποιηθεῖσιν ἀξίαν˙ διαλεπτυνθήσεται γάρ, ὡς μηδ᾿ ὕλην ὅλως εἶναι δοκεῖν, μηδ᾿ ἐπιπροσθεῖν ταῖς νοεραῖς ἐνεργείαις, ἐκνικήσαντος τοῦ νοῦ. ∆ιά τοῦτο καί σωματικαῖς αἰσθήσεσιν ἀπολαύσονται τοῦ θεϊκοῦ φωτός.

Καί τί λέγω τό συγγενές πρός τήν νοεράν φύσιν τοῦ τότε σώματος; Ὁ γάρ ἅγιος Μάξιμος, «ἡ ψυχή», φησί, «γίνεται Θεός τῇ μεθέξει τῆς θεϊκῆς χάριτος, πασῶν τῶν κατά νοῦν τε καί αἴσθησιν αὐτή τε παυσαμένη καί τάς τοῦ σώματος συναποπαύσασα φυσικάς ἐνεργείας, συνθεωθέντος αὐτῇ κατά τήν ἀναλογοῦσαν αὐτῷ μεθέξιν τῆς θεώσεως, ὥστε μόνον τόν Θεόν διά τε τῆς ψυχῆς καί τοῦ σώματος τότε φαίνεσθαι, νικηθέντων αὐτῶν τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῆς δόξης τῶν φυσικῶν (σελ. 228) γνωρισμάτων». Ἐπεί τοίνυν, ὅ καί τήν ἀρχήν εἶπον, τοῖς κτιστοῖς ἀόρατος ὁ Θεός, ἑαυτῷ δέ οὐκ ἀόρατος, τότε δέ οὐ μόνον διά τῆς καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς ψυχῆς ἀλλά καί διά τοῦ σώματος, ὤ τοῦ θαύματος, ὁ Θεός ὁ βλέπων ἔσται, διά τοῦτο καί διά σωματικῶν ὀργάνων τότε τό θεϊκόν καί ἀπρόσιτον φῶς τηλαυγῶς ὀψόμεθα καί τῆς ἐσομένης εἰς ἡμᾶς μεγαλοδωρεᾶς ταύτης τοῦ Θεοῦ τόν ἀρραβῶνα καί τό προοίμιον ἐν Θαβώρ τοῖς ἀποστόλοις ὁ Χριστός ὑπέδειξε ἀρρήτως. Ἡ γοῦν ὑπέρ πάντα λόγον καί πᾶσαν ὅρασιν τῆς θεότητος ἀκτίς, πῶς ἄν εἴη αἰσθητή; Συνῆκας ὅτι τό περιαστράψαν φῶς ἐν Θαβώρ τούς ἀποστόλους οὐκ αἰσθητόν κυρίως ἦν;

Οὐ μήν ἀλλ᾿ εἴπερ αἰσθητοῖς ὤφθη ὀφθαλμοῖς τό θεῖον καί ὑπέρ πᾶσαν αἴσθησιν ὑπάρχον φῶς (ὥσπερ οὖν καί ὤφθη, καθάπερ καί οἱ τοῖς πνευματικοῖς ἐκείνοις ἀνδράσιν ἀντιλέγοντές φασι, κατά τοῦτ᾿ ἐκείνοις καί ἡμῖν ὁμολογοῦντες)˙ εἴπερ οὖν τό φῶς τό θεῖον σωματικοῖς ὤφθη ὀφθαλμοῖς, διατί μή καί νοεροῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς ὀφθήσεται; Ἤ πονηρόν τι πρᾶγμα ἡ ψυχή καί ἀσυνδύαστον τῷ ἀγαθῷ καί ἀνεπαίσθητον αὐτοῦ, ὅ μηδέ τῶν παντόλμων κακοδόξων πώποτέ τις εἴρηκεν; Ἤ καλόν μέν, κρεῖττον δέ τό σῶμα ταύτης; Πῶς γάρ οὐχ ἧττον ἡ ψυχή τοῦ σώματος εἴπερ τό μέν σῶμα μεταληπτικόν καί ἀντιληπτικόν ἐστι φωτός Θεοῦ, ἡ ψυχή δ᾿ οὐχί; Πῶς δ᾿ οὐ τῆς ψυχῆς συγγενέστερόν τε καί προσεχέστερον καί μᾶλλον ἐγγίζον Θεῷ τό σῶμα τουτί τό ὑλικόν τε καί θνητόν, εἴπερ δι᾿ αὐτοῦ μέν αὕτη μεσιτεύοντος ἐν φωτί Θεόν ὁρᾷ, ἀλλ᾿ οὐχί τοῦτο δι᾿ αὐτῆς; Εἰ δέ καί προοίμιον τῆς ἐν δόξῃ μελλούσης