On the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter X.—Holy Scripture Magnifies the Flesh, as to Its Nature and Its Prospects.
Chapter XI.—The Power of God Fully Competent to Effect the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XII.—Some Analogies in Nature Which Corroborate the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXV.—St. John, in the Apocalypse, Equally Explicit in Asserting the Same Great Doctrine.
Chapter XXVII.—Certain Metaphorical Terms Explained of the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXVIII.—Prophetic Things and Actions, as Well as Words, Attest This Great Doctrine.
Chapter XXIX.—Ezekiel’s Vision of the Dry Bones Quoted.
Chapter XXXI.—Other Passages Out of the Prophets Applied to the Resurrection of the Flesh.
Chapter XXXVI.—Christ’s Refutation of the Sadducees, and Affirmation of Catholic Doctrine.
Chapter XXXIX.—Additional Evidence Afforded to Us in the Acts of the Apostles.
Chapter XLI.—The Dissolution of Our Tabernacle Consistent with the Resurrection of Our Bodies.
Chapter XLII.—Death Changes, Without Destroying, Our Mortal Bodies. Remains of the Giants.
Chapter XLV.—The Old Man and the New Man of St. Paul Explained.
Chapter XLVII.—St. Paul, All Through, Promises Eternal Life to the Body.
Chapter L.—In What Sense Flesh and Blood are Excluded from the Kingdom of God.
Chapter LXII.—Our Destined Likeness to the Angels in the Glorious Life of the Resurrection.
Chapter XLIII.—No Disparagement of Our Doctrine in St. Paul’s Phrase, Which Calls Our Residence in the Flesh Absence from the Lord.
In the same way, when he says, “Therefore we are always confident, and fully aware, that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not be sight,”282 2 Cor. v. 6, 7. it is manifest that in this statement there is no design of disparaging the flesh, as if it separated us from the Lord. For there is here pointedly addressed to us an exhortation to disregard this present life, since we are absent from the Lord as long as we are passing through it—walking by faith, not by sight; in other words, in hope, not in reality. Accordingly he adds: “We are indeed confident and deem it good rather to be absent from the body, and present with the Lord;”283 Ver. 8. in order, that is, that we may walk by sight rather than by faith, in realization rather than in hope. Observe how he here also ascribes to the excellence of martyrdom a contempt for the body. For no one, on becoming absent from the body, is at once a dweller in the presence of the Lord, except by the prerogative of martyrdom,284 Comp. his De Anima, c. lv. [Elucidation III.] he gains a lodging in Paradise, not in the lower regions. Now, had the apostle been at a loss for words to describe the departure from the body? Or does he purposely use a novel phraseology? For, wanting to express our temporary absence from the body, he says that we are strangers, absent from it, because a man who goes abroad returns after a while to his home. Then he says even to all: “We therefore earnestly desire to be acceptable unto God, whether absent or present; for we must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ Jesus.”285 2 Cor. v. 9, 10. If all of us, then all of us wholly; if wholly, then our inward man and outward too—that is, our bodies no less than our souls. “That every one,” as he goes on to say, “may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.”286 2 Cor. v. 10. Now I ask, how do you read this passage? Do you take it to be confusedly constructed, with a transposition287 Per hyperbaton. of ideas? Is the question about what things will have to be received by the body, or the things which have been already done in the body? Well, if the things which are to be borne by the body are meant, then undoubtedly a resurrection of the body is implied; and if the things which have been already done in the body are referred to, (the same conclusion follows): for of course the retribution will have to be paid by the body, since it was by the body that the actions were performed. Thus the apostle’s whole argument from the beginning is unravelled in this concluding clause, wherein the resurrection of the flesh is set forth; and it ought to be understood in a sense which is strictly in accordance with this conclusion.
CAPUT XLIII.
Proinde cum dicit: Itaqueconfisi semper, et scientes quod cumimmoramur in corpore, peregrinamura Domino: per fidem enim incedimus, non per speciem; manifestatum est hoc quoque non pertinere 0855C ad offuscationem carnis, quasi separantis nos a Domino. Et hic enim exhortatio fastidiendae vitae hujus obvertitur; siquidem peregrinamur a Domino quamdiu vivimus, per fidem incedentes, non per speciem, id est spe, non re; et ideo subjungit: Fidentes autem, et bonum ducentesmagis peregrinari a corpore, et immorari ad Dominum: scilicet ut per spectem 0856A magis incedamus, quam per fidem; per rem potius, quam per spem. Vides quam et hic corporum contemptum ad martyriorum praestantiam referat. Nemo enim peregrinatus a corpore, statim immoratur penes Dominum, nisi ex martyrii praerogativa; paradiso scilicet , non inferis, deversurus . Defecerant autem Apostolo verba ad significandum de corpore excessum? An ratione etiam nove loquitur? Temporalem enim abstentiam a corpore volens significare, peregrinari nos ab eo dixit, quoniam qui peregrinatur, etiam revertetur in domicilium. Exinde etiam ad omnes: Et ideogestimus, inquit (II Cor. V), sive peregrinantes, sive immorantes, placibiles Deo esse . Omnes enim manifestari nos oportet pro tribunaliChristi Jesu. Si omnes, et totos: 0856B si totos, et interiores et exteriores, id est, tam animas quam et corpora: Uti unusquisque, inquit, reportetper corpus secundum quae gessit, bonum, seu malum. Hoc jam quomodo legas, quaero; quasi turbate enim per hyperbaton struxit : utrumne quae per corpus reportanda erunt, an quae per corpus gesta sunt? Sed et si quae per corpus reportanda sunt, corporalis indubitate resurrectio est: et si quae per corpus gesta sunt , per corpus utique pensanda sunt, per quod et gesta sunt. Ita et totus hic a capite tractatus Apostoli, tali clausula detextus qua carnis resurrectio ostenditur, secundum haec erit intelligendus quae cum clausula consonant.