A Treatise on Nature and Grace, against Pelagius

 Chapter 1 [I.]—The Occasion of Publishing This Work What God’s Righteousness is.

 Chapter 2 [II.]—Faith in Christ Not Necessary to Salvation, If a Man Without It Can Lead a Righteous Life.

 Chapter 3 [III.]—Nature Was Created Sound and Whole It Was Afterwards Corrupted by Sin.

 Chapter 4 [IV.]—Free Grace.

 Chapter 5 [V.]—It Was a Matter of Justice that All Should Be Condemned.

 Chapter 6 [VI.]—The Pelagians Have Very Strong and Active Minds.

 Chapter 7 [VII.]—He Proceeds to Confute the Work of Pelagius He Refrains as Yet from Mentioning Pelagius’ Name.

 Chapter 8.—A Distinction Drawn by Pelagius Between the Possible and Actual.

 Chapter 9 [VIII.]—Even They Who Were Not Able to Be Justified are Condemned.

 Chapter 10 [IX.]—He Could Not Be Justified, Who Had Not Heard of the Name of Christ Rendering the Cross of Christ of None Effect.

 Chapter 11 [X.]—Grace Subtly Acknowledged by Pelagius.

 Chapter 12 [XI.]—In Our Discussions About Grace, We Do Not Speak of that Which Relates to the Constitution of Our Nature, But to Its Restoration.

 Chapter 13 [XII.]—The Scope and Purpose of the Law’s Threatenings “Perfect Wayfarers.”

 Chapter 14 [XIII.]—Refutation of Pelagius.

 Chapter 15 [XIV.]—Not Everything [of Doctrinal Truth] is Written in Scripture in So Many Words.

 Chapter 16 [XV.]—Pelagius Corrupts a Passage of the Apostle James by Adding a Note of Interrogation.

 Chapter 17 [XVI.]—Explanation of This Text Continued.

 Chapter 18 [XVII.]—Who May Be Said to Be in the Flesh.

 Chapter 19.—Sins of Ignorance To Whom Wisdom is Given by God on Their Requesting It.

 Chapter 20 [XVIII.]—What Prayer Pelagius Would Admit to Be Necessary.

 Chapter 21 [XIX.]—Pelagius Denies that Human Nature Has Been Depraved or Corrupted by Sin.

 Chapter 22 [XX.]—How Our Nature Could Be Vitiated by Sin, Even Though It Be Not a Substance.

 Chapter 23 [XXI.]—Adam Delivered by the Mercy of Christ.

 Chapter 24 [XXII.]—Sin and the Penalty of Sin the Same.

 Chapter 25 [XXIII.]—God Forsakes Only Those Who Deserve to Be Forsaken. We are Sufficient of Ourselves to Commit Sin But Not to Return to the Way of

 Chapter 26 [XXIV.]—Christ Died of His Own Power and Choice.

 Chapter 27.—Even Evils, Through God’s Mercy, are of Use.

 Chapter 28 [XXV.]—The Disposition of Nearly All Who Go Astray. With Some Heretics Our Business Ought Not to Be Disputation, But Prayer.

 Observe, indeed, how cautiously he expresses himself: “God, no doubt, applies His mercy even to this office, whenever it is necessary because man afte

 Chapter 30 [XXVII.]—Sin is Removed by Sin.

 Chapter 31.—The Order and Process of Healing Our Heavenly Physician Does Not Adopt from the Sick Patient, But Derives from Himself. What Cause the Rig

 Chapter 32 [XXVIII.]—God Forsakes Us to Some Extent that We May Not Grow Proud.

 Chapter 33 [XXIX.]—Not Every Sin is Pride. How Pride is the Commencement of Every Sin.

 Chapter 34 [XXX.]—A Man’s Sin is His Own, But He Needs Grace for His Cure.

 Chapter 35 [XXXI.]—Why God Does Not Immediately Cure Pride Itself. The Secret and Insidious Growth of Pride. Preventing and Subsequent Grace.

 Chapter 36 [XXXII.]—Pride Even in Such Things as are Done Aright Must Be Avoided. Free Will is Not Taken Away When Grace is Preached.

 Chapter 37 [XXXIII.]—Being Wholly Without Sin Does Not Put Man on an Equality with God.

 Chapter 38 [XXXIV.]—We Must Not Lie, Even for the Sake of Moderation. The Praise of Humility Must Not Be Placed to the Account of Falsehood.

 Chapter 39.—Pelagius Glorifies God as Creator at the Expense of God as Saviour.

 Chapter 40 [XXXV.]—Why There is a Record in Scripture of Certain Men’s Sins, Recklessness in Sin Accounts It to Be So Much Loss Whenever It Falls Shor

 Chapter 41.—Whether Holy Men Have Died Without Sin.

 Chapter 42 [XXXVI.]—The Blessed Virgin Mary May Have Lived Without Sin. None of the Saints Besides Her Without Sin.

 Chapter 43 [XXXVII.]—Why Scripture Has Not Mentioned the Sins of All.

 Chapter 44.—Pelagius Argues that Abel Was Sinless.

 Chapter 45 [XXXVIII.]—Why Cain Has Been by Some Thought to Have Had Children by His Mother Eve. The Sins of Righteous Men. Who Can Be Both Righteous,

 Chapter 46 [XXXIX.]—Shall We Follow Scripture, or Add to Its Declarations?

 Chapter 47 [XL.]—For What Pelagius Thought that Christ is Necessary to Us.

 Chapter 48 [XLI.]—How the Term “All” Is to Be Understood.

 Chapter 49 [XLII.]—A Man Can Be Sinless, But Only by the Help of Grace. In the Saints This Possibility Advances and Keeps Pace with the Realization.

 Chapter 50 [XLIII.]—God Commands No Impossibilities.

 Chapter 51 [XLIV.]—State of the Question Between the Pelagians and the Catholics. Holy Men of Old Saved by the Self-Same Faith in Christ Which We Exer

 Chapter 52.—The Whole Discussion is About Grace.

 Chapter 53 [XLV.]—Pelagius Distinguishes Between a Power and Its Use.

 Chapter 54 [XLVI.]—There is No Incompatibility Between Necessity and Free Will.

 Chapter 55 [XLVII.]—The Same Continued.

 Chapter 56 [XLVIII.]—The Assistance of Grace in a Perfect Nature.

 Chapter 57 [XLIX.]—It Does Not Detract from God’s Almighty Power, that He is Incapable of Either Sinning, or Dying, or Destroying Himself.

 Chapter 58 [L.]—Even Pious and God-Fearing Men Resist Grace.

 Chapter 59 [LI.]—In What Sense Pelagius Attributed to God’s Grace the Capacity of Not Sinning.

 Chapter 60 [LII.]—Pelagius Admits “Contrary Flesh” In the Unbaptized.

 Chapter 61 [LIII.]—Paul Asserts that the Flesh is Contrary Even in the Baptized.

 Chapter 62.—Concerning What Grace of God is Here Under Discussion. The Ungodly Man, When Dying, is Not Delivered from Concupiscence.

 Chapter 63 [LIV.]—Does God Create Contraries?

 Chapter 64.—Pelagius’ Admission as Regards the Unbaptized, Fatal.

 Chapter 65 [LV.]—“This Body of Death,” So Called from Its Defect, Not from Its Substance.

 Chapter 66.—The Works, Not the Substance, of the “Flesh” Opposed to the “Spirit.”

 Chapter 67 [LVII.]—Who May Be Said to Be Under the Law.

 Chapter 68 [LVIII.]—Despite the Devil, Man May, by God’s Help, Be Perfected.

 Chapter 69 [LIX.]—Pelagius Puts Nature in the Place of Grace.

 Chapter 70 [LX.]—Whether Any Man is Without Sin in This Life.

 Chapter 71 [LXI.]—Augustin Replies Against the Quotations Which Pelagius Had Advanced Out of the Catholic Writers. Lactantius.

 Chapter 72 [LXI.]—Hilary. The Pure in Heart Blessed. The Doing and Perfecting of Righteousness.

 Chapter 73.—He Meets Pelagius with Another Passage from Hilary.

 Chapter 74 [LXIII.]—Ambrose.

 Chapter 75.—Augustin Adduces in Reply Some Other Passages of Ambrose.

 Chapter 76 [LXIV.]—John of Constantinople.

 Chapter 77.—Xystus.

 Chapter 78 [LXV.]—Jerome.

 Chapter 79 [LXVI.]—A Certain Necessity of Sinning.

 Chapter 80 [LXVII.]—Augustin Himself. Two Methods Whereby Sins, Like Diseases, are Guarded Against.

 Chapter 81.—Augustin Quotes Himself on Free Will.

 Chapter 82 [LXVIII.]—How to Exhort Men to Faith, Repentance, and Advancement.

 Chapter 83 [LXIX.]—God Enjoins No Impossibility, Because All Things are Possible and Easy to Love.

 Chapter 84 [LXX.]—The Degrees of Love are Also Degrees of Holiness.

Chapter 44.—Pelagius Argues that Abel Was Sinless.

This, however, even he probably observed, and therefore he went on to say: “But, granted that it has sometimes abstained, in a numerous crowd, from narrating the sins of all; still, in the very beginning of the world, when there were only four persons in existence, what reason (asks he) have we to give why it chose not to mention the sins of all? Was it in consideration of the vast multitude, which had not yet come into existence? or because, having mentioned only the sins of those who had transgressed, it was unable to record any of him who had not yet committed sin?” And then he proceeds to add some words, in which he unfolds this idea with a fuller and more explicit illustration. “It is certain,” says he, “that in the earliest age Adam and Eve, and Cain and Abel their sons, are mentioned as being the only four persons then in being. Eve sinned,—the Scripture distinctly says so much; Adam also transgressed, as the same Scripture does not fail to inform us; whilst it affords us an equally clear testimony that Cain also sinned: and of all these it not only mentions the sins, but also indicates the character of their sins. Now if Abel had likewise sinned, Scripture would without doubt have said so. But it has not said so, therefore he committed no sin; nay, it even shows him to have been righteous. What we read, therefore, let us believe; and what we do not read, let us deem it wicked to add.”

44. Sed hoc etiam forsitan ipse vidit, et ideo subjecit atque ait: «Sed esto, aliis temporibus turbae numerositate omnium dissimulaverit peccata contexere: in ipso statim mundi primordio, ubi nonnisi quatuor homines erant, quid,» inquit, «dicimus, cur non omnium voluerit delicta memorare? Utrumne ingentis multitudinis causa, quae nondum erat? an quia illorum tantum qui commiserant meminit, illius vero qui nulla commiserat meminisse non potuit?» Adhuc adjungit verba, quibus ista sententia uberius et planius astruatur: «Certe,» inquit, «primo in tempore Adam et Eva, ex quibus Cain et Abel nati sunt, quatuor tantum homines fuisse referuntur: peccavit Eva, Scriptura hoc prodidit, Adam quoque deliquit, eadem Scriptura non tacuit (Gen. III): sed et Cain peccasse, ipsa aeque Scriptura testata est (Id. IV): quorum non modo peccata, verum etiam peccatorum indicat qualitatem. Quod si et Abel peccasset, et hoc sine dubio Scriptura dixisset: sed non dixit; ergo nec ille peccavit; quin etiam justum ostendit. Credamus igitur quod legimus, et quod non legimus, nefas credamus astruere.»