54

Having praised this himself, then as if hearing "icon-knower," he took it badly, as if he himself were not the one who previously, to the more precise part of the church, as to heretics, applied a new and terrible appellation for the purpose of slander. But not much time in between, and having changed his mind, he says concerning this insult that it is not right to be vexed, as a disciple of Christ, nor to retaliate with the same, remembering the commandment, he who has counter-attacked many times over and intemperately used every slander against us. And yet our former writings are directed in no way towards him, but I bring forth my argument in response to what is rumored by report and to the words, not to the one who speaks; and so far am I from using slanders concerning his words, as he does concerning ours, that I have even omitted the worst of the things said by him. And what is more important, I do not write on my own behalf, but on behalf of the simpler brethren who are being mistreated, myself bearing their burden according to the apostolic commandment. But he writes on his own behalf and clearly addresses me and, openly setting forth some of my own sayings, he becomes extensive in distorting and opposing. But what is worse (p.286) is that he himself, having both begun this mistreatment and defended himself against it, then, as one who has neither begun nor defended, justifies himself as a disciple of Christ, "who when he was reviled, did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but committed himself to him who judges righteously."

But indeed, as if using steps of evil, he progresses to worse things and proceeds against the saints, now shamelessly contradicting them himself, now convicting them of contradicting themselves and each other, and sometimes even falsifying and setting forth their sayings. For when the wise in divine things, Gregory of Nyssa, says that the state in the age to come is not the same for the one who has arrived through every virtue and the one who has not participated in life at all, that is, the infant snatched away for a few hours who has departed from here to there ("For the one," he says, "through every perception and all manner of training came to know and please God, but the other went through life with an untrained and unpracticed mind"), this wise man thought that this very fact that someone is benefited through training and studies was a godsend he had found against both the words of Basil the Great and our own words. For since Basil the Great was brought forward by me as a witness, and calls vain both geometry and the study of geometry, which the Egyptians invented, and figures and shadows and meteorology which is honored by the Chaldeans, he sets up in opposition the brother, as one not thinking brotherly thoughts to this one, and with him also contradicting me. To whom one might say: O admirable one, the one who has arrived through every virtue has also been benefited from vain things, just as Gregory says that he was benefited from the superstitious error in Athens, "laughing at demons where demons are marveled at." If, then, someone calls superstition harmful, will you not say this contradicts the great one? By all means you would say not in the least, unless you also (p. 288) wish to be superstitious. In the same way, then, the one who calls that vain and harmful does not contradict the one who says there is some benefit to be had from geometry and the other studies for the one who has arrived through every virtue. For evil cooperates with the good, though not with a good purpose, and the flesh of a snake becomes saving food, but only after it has been killed and transformed by the methods of a master of medicine. For in those cases, neither the Egyptians who invented them nor the Chaldeans who honored them invented and honored geometry and astronomy as being advantageous for the knowledge of God, but they raised up a kind of terrible dividing wall between God and men and, speaking solemnly through these studies, they both raised up to the stars the reverence owed by men to God, and drew down the cause of things that are and come to be from God to these things.

54

ταύτην ἐγκωμιάσας αὐτός, εἶθ᾿ ὡς ἀκούσας «εἰκονογνώστης» βαρέως ἤνεγκεν, ὥσπερ ἄν οὐκ αὐτός ὤν ὁ πρότερος τῷ τῆς ἐκκλησίας ἀκριβεστέρῳ μέρει, καθάπερ αἱρεσιώταις, καινήν καί δεινήν ἐπωνυμίαν πρός διαβολήν ἐπιθείς. Ἀλλ᾿ οὐ πολύ τό ἐν μέσῳ, καί μεταβαλών περί ταυτησί φησι τῆς ὕβρεως δυσχεραίνειν οὐκ ἄξιον, ὡς Χριστοῦ μαθητής, οὐδέ τοῖς ἴσοις ἀμείβεσθαι τῆς ἐντολῆς μεμνημένος, ὁ πολλαπλασίως ἀνθυπενεγκών καί ἀκρατῶς πάςῃ καθ᾿ ἡμῶν κεχρημένος διαβολῇ. Καίτοι τείνει μέν ἡμῖν τά πρότερα τῶν συγγραμμάτων πρός ἐκεῖνον οὐδαμῶς, πρός δέ τά ὑπό τῆς φήμης θρυλούμενα καί πρός τούς λόγους ἀντεπεξάγω τόν λόγον, οὐ πρός τόν λέγοντα˙ καί τοσοῦτον ἀπέχω συκοφαντίαις χρῆσθαι περί τούς ἐκείνου λόγους, ὥσπερ ἐκεῖνος περί τούς ἡμετέρους, ὥστε καί τά χείρω τῶν ὑπ᾿ ἐκείνου λεγομένων παρῆκα. Τό δέ μεῖζον ὡς οὐχ ὑπέρ ἑμαυτοῦ γράφω, ἀλλ᾿ ὑπέρ τῶν ἐπηρεαζομένων ἁπλουστέρων ἀδελφῶν, τό βάρος ἐκείνων αὐτός βαστάσας κατά τήν ἀποστολικήν ἐντολήν. Ἐκεῖνος δ᾿ ὑπέρ ἑαυτοῦ γράφει καί πρός ἐμέ σαφῶς ἀποτείνεται καί, τῶν ἐμῶν ρητῶν ἔστιν ἅ φανερῶς προβαλλόμενος, πολύς γίνεται διαστρέφων καί ἀντικείμενος. Τό δέ (σελ.286) χεῖρον ὅτι αὐτός τῆς ἐπηρείας ταύτης καί ἄρξας καί ἀμυνόμενος, εἶθ᾿ ὡς μήτ᾿ ἄρξαντα μήτ᾿ ἀμυνόμενον δικαιοῖ αὐτός ἑαυτόν ὡς Χριστοῦ μαθητήν, «ὅς λοιδορούμενος οὐκ ἀντελοιδόρει, πάσχων οὐκ ἠπείλει, παρεδίδου δέ τῷ κρίνοντι δικαίως».

Ἀλλά γάρ ὥσπερ ἀναβαθμοῖς κακῶν χρώμενος, ἐπί τά χείρω προκόπτει καί κατά τῶν ἁγίων χωρεῖ, νῦν μέν ἀναίδην ἀντιλέγων αὐτός αὐτοῖς, νῦν δ᾿ ἀντιλέγοντας ἑαυτοῖς καί ἀλλήλοις ἐλέγχων, ἔστι δ᾿ οὗ καί τάς αὐτῶν ρήσεις παραχαράττων καί προβαλλόμενος. Τοῦ γάρ σοφοῦ τά θεῖα Γρηγορίου τοῦ Νύσσης οὐχ ὁμοίαν τήν διαγωγήν εἶναι λέγοντος ἐν τῷ μέλλοντι τοῦ τε διά πάσης ἀρετῆς ἥκοντος καί τοῦ μηδέ ὅλως μετεσχηκότος τοῦ βίου, τῷ νήπιον ἐντεῦθεν ἐκεῖσε μεταχωρῆσαι πρός ὥρας ἀναρπαθέν («ὁ μέν γάρ διά πάσης» φησίν, «αἰσθήσεως καί παντοίας παιδεύσεως ἔγνω καί εὐηρέστησε Θεόν, τό δέ ἀγύμναστον καί ἀτριβές τήν διάνοιαν διῆλθε τόν βίον»), αὐτό τό διά παιδεύσεώς τε καί τῶν μαθημάτων ὠφεληθῆναί τινα ὁ σοφός οὗτος ᾠήθη ἕρμαιον εὑρεῖν κατά τε τῶν τοῦ μεγάλου Βασιλείου καί τῶν λόγων τῶν ἡμετέρων. Τοῦ γάρ μεγάλου Βασιλείου πρός μαρτυρίαν ὑπ᾿ ἐμοῦ παρηγμένου καί ματαίαν λέγοντος γεωμετρίαν τε καί τήν ἐπί τῇ γεωμετρίᾳ σχολήν, ἥν ἐξεῦρον Αἰγύπτιοι, σχήματά τε καίσκιάς καί μετεωρολογίαν τήν παρά τῶν Χαλδαίων τετιμημένην, αὐτός ἀντιτίθησιν ὡς μή ἀδελφά φρονοῦντα τούτῳ τόν ἀδελφόν, καί σύν ἐκείνῳ καί πρός ἐμέ ἀντιλέγοντα. Πρός ὅν ἄν τις εἶπεν˙ ὦ θαυμάσιε, ὁ διά πάσης ἀρετῆς ἥκων κἀκ τῶν ματαίων ὠφέληται, ὡς καί Γρηγόριος φησίν ἐκ τῆς δεισιδαίμονος πλάνης ἐν Ἀθήναις ὠφεληθῆναι, «καταγελάσας δαιμόνων, οὗ θαυμάζονται δαίμονες». Εἴ τις οὖν βλαβεράν τήν δεισιδαιμονίαν ἐρεῖ, οὐ τοῦτο ἀντιλέγειν ἐρεῖς τῷ μεγάλῳ; Πάντως ἥκιστα φαίης, εἰ μή καί (σελ. 288) δεισιδαίμων ἐθέλεις εἶναι. Τόν αὐτόν ἄρα τρόπον οὐδέ τῷ λέγοντι καί παρά γεωμετρίας καί τῶν ἄλλων μαθημάτων ὄνησιν εἶναι τινα γενέσθαι τῷ διά πάσης ἀρετῆς ἥκοντι ὁ λέγων ἐκείνην ματαίαν καί βλαβεράν ἀντιλέγει. Συνεργεῖ γάρ τό κακόν τῷ ἀγαθῷ προαιρέσει οὐ καλῇ καί σάρξ ὄφεως τροφή γίνεται σωτήριος, ἀλά θανατωθέντος αὐτοῦ καί μετασκευασθέντος μεγαλοτέχνου μεθόδοις ἰατρικῆς. Οὐδέ γάρ ἐπ᾿ ἐκείνων οἱ ἐξευρόντες Αἰγύπτιοι καί οἱ τετιμηκότες Χαλδαῖοι ὡς πρός θεογνωσίαν λυσιτελούσας γεωμετρίαν τε καί ἀστρονομίαν ἐξεῦρόν τε καί ἐτίμησαν, ἀλλ᾿ οἷόν τι δεινόν διατείχισμα μέσον Θεοῦ καί ἀνθρώπων ἀνήγειραν καί διά τῶν μαθημάτων σεμνολογήσαντες ἀνήγαγον μέν πρός ἀστέρας τό παρ᾿ ἀνθρώπων τῷ θεῷ ὀφειλόμενον σέβας, κατέσπασαν δέ τήν αἰτίαν τῶν τε ὄντων καί γινομένων ἀπό τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐπί ταῦτα.