The Five Books Against Marcion.
Book I. Wherein is described the god of Marcion. …
Chapter III.—The Unity of God. He is the Supreme Being, and There Cannot Be a Second Supreme.
Chapter XXVII.—Dangerous Effects to Religion and Morality of the Doctrine of So Weak a God.
Chapter XXVIII.—The Tables Turned Upon Marcion, by Contrasts, in Favour of the True God.
Chapter II.—Why Christ’s Coming Should Be Previously Announced.
Chapter III.—Miracles Alone, Without Prophecy, an Insufficient Evidence of Christ’s Mission.
Chapter V.—Sundry Features of the Prophetic Style: Principles of Its Interpretation.
Chapter VIII.—Absurdity of Marcion’s Docetic Opinions Reality of Christ’s Incarnation.
Chapter X.—The Truly Incarnate State More Worthy of God Than Marcion’s Fantastic Flesh.
Chapter XI.—Christ Was Truly Born Marcion’s Absurd Cavil in Defence of a Putative Nativity.
Chapter XII.—Isaiah’s Prophecy of Emmanuel. Christ Entitled to that Name.
Chapter XVI.—The Sacred Name Jesus Most Suited to the Christ of the Creator. Joshua a Type of Him.
Chapter XVII.—Prophecies in Isaiah and the Psalms Respecting Christ’s Humiliation.
Chapter XIX.—Prophecies of the Death of Christ.
Chapter XXI.—The Call of the Gentiles Under the Influence of the Gospel Foretold.
Chapter XXIV.—Christ’s Millennial and Heavenly Glory in Company with His Saints.
Book IV. In Which Tertullian Pursues His…
In the scheme of Marcion, on the contrary, the mystery edition the
Chapter XXIX.—Marcion’s Own Antitheses, If Only the Title and Object of the Work Be Excepted, Afford Proofs of the Consistent Attributes of the True God.
But I would have attacked Marcion’s own Antitheses in closer and fuller combat, if a more elaborate demolition of them were required in maintaining for the Creator the character of a good God and a Judge, after758 Secundum. the examples of both points, which we have shown to be so worthy of God. Since, however, these two attributes of goodness and justice do together make up the proper fulness of the Divine Being as omnipotent, I am able to content myself with having now compendiously refuted his Antitheses, which aim at drawing distinctions out of the qualities of the (Creator’s) artifices,759 Ingeniorum. or of His laws, or of His great works; and thus sundering Christ from the Creator, as the most Good from the Judge, as One who is merciful from Him who is ruthless, and One who brings salvation from Him who causes ruin. The truth is,760 Enim. they761 i.e., Marcion’s Antitheses. rather unite the two Beings whom they arrange in those diversities (of attribute), which yet are compatible in God. For only take away the title of Marcion’s book,762 Antitheses so called because Marcion in it had set passages out of the O.T. and the N.T. in opposition to each other, intending his readers to infer from the apparent disagreement that the law and the gospel were not from the same author (Bp. Kaye on Tertullian, p. 468). and the intention and purpose of the work itself, and you could get no better demonstration that the self-same God was both very good and a Judge, inasmuch as these two characters are only competently found in God. Indeed, the very effort which is made in the selected examples to oppose Christ to the Creator, conduces all the more to their union. For so entirely one and the same was the nature of the Divine Beings, the good and the severe, as shown both by the same examples and in similar proofs, that It willed to display Its goodness to those on whom It had first inflicted Its severity. The difference in time was no matter of surprise, when the same God was afterwards merciful in presence of evils which had been subdued,763 Pro rebus edomitis. See chap. xv. and xix., where he refers to the law as the subduing instrument. who had once been so austere whilst they were as yet unsubdued. Thus, by help of the Antitheses, the dispensation of the Creator can be more readily shown to have been reformed by Christ, rather than destroyed;764 Repercussus: perhaps “refuted.”restored, rather than abolished;765 Exclusus. especially as you sever your own god from everything like acrimonious conduct,766 Ab omni motu amariore. even from all rivalry whatsoever with the Creator. Now, since this is the case, how comes it to pass that the Antitheses demonstrate Him to have been the Creator’s rival in every disputed cause?767 Singulas species, a law term. Well, even here, too, I will allow that in these causes my God has been a jealous God, who has in His own right taken especial care that all things done by Him should be in their beginning of a robuster growth;768 Arbustiores. A figurative word, taken from vines more firmly supported on trees instead of on frames. He has used the word indomitis above to express his meaning. and this in the way of a good, because rational769 Rationali. Compare chap. vi. of this book, where the “ratio,” or purpose of God, is shown to be consistent with His goodness in providing for its highest development in man’s interest. emulation, which tends to maturity. In this sense the world itself will acknowledge His “antitheses,” from the contrariety of its own elements, although it has been regulated with the very highest reason.770 Ratione: in reference to God’s ratio or purpose in creation. See chap. vi. note 10. [p. 301, supra.] Wherefore, most thoughtless Marcion, it was your duty to have shown that one (of the two Gods you teach) was a God of light, and the other a God of darkness; and then you would have found it an easier task to persuade us that one was a God of goodness, the other a God of severity. How ever, the “antithesis” (or variety of administration) will rightly be His property, to whom it actually belongs in (the government of) the world.
CAPUT XXIX.
Caeterum, ipsas quoque antitheses Marcionis cominus caecidissem, si operosiore destructione earum egeret defensio Creatoris tam boni quam et judicis, secundum utriusque partis et exempla congruentia Deo, ut ostendimus. Quod si utraque pars bonitatis atque justitiae dignam plenitudinem divinitatis efficiunt omnia potentis, compendio interim possum antitheses retudisse, gestientes ex qualitatibus ingeniorum sive legum sive virtutum discernere, 0319B atque ita alienare Christum a Creatore, ut optimum a judice, et mitem a fero, et salutarem ab exitioso. Magis enim eos conjungunt, quos in eis diversitatibus ponunt quae Deo congruunt. Aufer titulum Marcionis et intentionem atque propositum operis ipsius, et nihil aliud praestat quam demonstrationem ejusdem Dei optimi et judicis: quia haec duo in solum Deum competunt. Nam et ipsum studium in eis exemplis opponendi Christum Creatori, ad unitatem 0320A magis spectat. Adeo enim ipsa et una erat substantia divinitatibus , bona et severa, et eisdem exemplis et in similibus argumentis, ut bonitatem suam voluerit ostendere, in quibus praemiserat severitatem. Quia nec mirum erit diversitas temporalis, si postea Deus mitior pro rebus edomitis, qui retro austerior pro indomitis. Ita per antitheseis facilius ostendi potest ordo Creatoris a Christo reformatus et repercussus, et redditus potius quam exclusus, cum praesertim Deum tuum ab omni motu amariore secernas, utique et ab aemulatione Creatoris scilicet. Nam si ita est, quomodo eum antitheses singulas species Creatoris aemulatum demonstrant, agnoscam igitur et in hoc per illas Deum meum zelotem, qui res suas arbustiores in primordiis bona et rationali aemulatione 0320B maturitatis praecuraverit suo jure. Cujus antitheses etiam ipse mundus ejus agnoscet, ex contrarietatibus elementorum, summa tamen ratione modulatus. Quamobrem, inconsiderantissime Marcion, alium Deum lucis ostendisse debueras, alium vero tenebrarum, quo facilius alium bonitatis, alium severitatis persuasisses. Caeterum ejus erit antithesis, cujus est et in mundo.