82

bringing these things that seem to differ together into one and showing that they are not in opposition, we say that even if the mind, as incorporeal, is not within, according to Gregory of Nyssa, yet it is also within, but not outside the body, as it is joined to this and ineffably uses the heart as the primary fleshy instrument, according to Macarius the Great. Since, therefore, the one says it is not within for one reason, and the other says it is within for another, they are least of all at variance with one another; for not even one who says that the divine is not in a place, inasmuch as it is incorporeal, is opposed to one who says that the Word of God was once within the virgin and all-blameless womb, as having been joined there beyond reason to our human substance through unspeakable love for mankind.

But while we are hastening to show that those men are not at variance, you hasten to show that we are at variance with them, and yet concerning such things as how the mind has its connection to the body, and where the imaginative and opinionative faculty is located, and what establishment the mnemonic has received, and in the body what (p. 408) part is the most vital and, as it were, guiding the others, and whence the blood has its origin, and if each of the humors is unmixed, and which of the inward parts it uses as a vessel—concerning such things, therefore, it is permitted for everyone to say what he thinks, since everyone in such matters speaks what is probable, just as concerning the stillness of the stars and the movement of the planets, and the size and nature of each, and of other such things which the Spirit has not clearly revealed to us, Who alone knows precisely the truth that penetrates through all things; so that even if you had observed us contradicting the divine and wise Gregory of Nyssa in this regard, you should not have proceeded against us for this reason; for how many do you think there are who say heaven is a sphere and that there are poles equal in number to the wandering stars, although Basil the Great does not say this, and how many say it is ever-moving, though some say it stands still, and to how many does the sun seem to travel in a circle, though Saint Isaac does not think so? You, then, it seems, would declare that all these contradict the fathers, just as you do us, but you yourself will be refuted for not knowing the truth, according to which it is necessary for all of us to follow them, and you seem to me never even to have considered this truth or to have distinguished it from what is not necessary; therefore, while you oppose them in matters that lead to the blessed life, you demand from others precise agreement on matters that do not lead to that blessedness.

Therefore, let us too, disregarding his slanders against us which follow upon what has been said, turn our discourse to more necessary matters.

THE THIRD OF THE LATTER DISCOURSES IN DEFENSE OF THE SACRED HESYCHASTS. P. (410)

CONCERNING THE SACRED LIGHT

Such, then, is this instructor on noetic prayer, against those who devote themselves to it for life, and he presumes to teach those who see concerning the sacred light, and this, though he himself is blind, as he himself cannot deny, claiming that they are in error because this which he, being blind, does not see, they call light; and he declares that not this one or that one of our own time or of the time shortly before us, who are renowned for purity of life and the height of the vision of God, are in error concerning this light, but the very saints of old, who are venerated by us, as the argument will show as it proceeds. But when he heard from those who had heard him recount such things (who were struck, it seems, by the excess of the novelty of his talk and who could not bear to pass over in silence such a clear blasphemy against the holy fathers, and at the same time feared for themselves lest by passing it over in silence they become participants in such an abomination, which has also now

82

εἰς ἕν τά δοκοῦντα διαφέρειν ταῦτα συνάγοντες ἀμφότερα καί μή ἐναντίως ἔχοντα δεικνύντες, εἰ καί μή ἔνδον ἐστί, φαμέν, κατά τόν Νύσσης Γρηγόριον ὡς ἀσώματος ὁ νοῦς, ἀλλά καί ἐντός ἐστιν, ἀλλ᾿ οὐκ ἐκτός τοῦ σώματος, ὡς συννημένος τούτῳ καί πρώτῳ σαρκικῷ ὀργάνῳ τῇ καρδίᾳ χρώμενος ἀφράστως κατά τόν μέγαν Μακάριον. Ἐπεί τοίνυν κατ᾿ ἄλλο μέν ἐκεῖνος οὐκ ἔνδον εἶναι λέγει, κατ᾿ ἄλλο δέ οὗτος ἔνδον, ἥκιστα πρός ἀλλήλους διαφέρονται˙ καί γάρ οὐδ᾿ ὁ λέγων μή ἐν τόπῳ τό θεῖον εἶναι, ᾗ ἀσώματον, ἀντίκειται τῷ ἔνδον γενέσθαι ποτέ τόν τοῦ Θεοῦ λόγον λέγοντι παρθενικῆς καί παναμώμου μήτρας, ὡς ἐκεῖ συνημμένον ὑπέρ λόγον τῷ καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς φυράματι διά φιλανθρωπίαν ἄφατον.

Σύ δ᾿ ἡμᾶς τούς μή διαφέρεσθαι δεῖξαι σπεύδοντας ἐκείνους, πρός ἐκείνους σπεύδεις δεῖξαι διαφερομένους, καίτοι περί τῶν τοιούτων, πῶς ἴσχει τήν πρός σῶμα συναφήν ὁ νοῦς, καί ποῦ κεῖται τό φανταστικόν τε καί δοξαστικόν, καί τίνα τό μνημονευτικόν ἔλαχε τήν ἵδρυσιν, κἀν τῷ σώματι τί (σελ. 408) τῶν μερῶν τό καιριώτατον καί οἷον καθοδηγούμενον τῶν ἄλλων, καί ὅθεν ἔχει τήν ἀρχήν τῆς γενέσεως τό αἷμα, καί εἰ ἀμιγής τῶν χυμῶν ἕκαστός ἐστι, καί ποίῳ τῶν σπλάγχνων ὡς ἀγγείῳ χρῆται, περί τῶν τοιούτων τοίνυν ἔξεστι παντί λέγειν τό δοκοῦν, ἐπεί πάντες ἐν τοῖς τοιούτοις τά εἰκότα λέγουσιν, ὥσπερ καί περί ἀκινησίας ἄστρων καί ἀστέρων κινήσεως, μεγέθους τε καί φύσεως ἑκάστου καί τῶν ἄλλων τῶν τοιούτων, ὅσα μή σαφῶς ἀπεκάλυψεν ἡμῖν τό Πνεῦμα, μόνον γινῶσκον ἀκριβῶς τήν διά πάντων διικνουμένην ἀλήθειαν˙ ὥστ᾿ εἰ καί ἀντιλέγοντας τῷ Νύσσης θείῳ καί σοφῷ Γρηγορίῳ κατά τοῦτ᾿ ἐφώρασας ἡμᾶς, οὐκ ἔδει σε καθ᾿ ἡμῶν χωρῆσαι διά τοῦτο˙ πόσους γάρ οἴει τούς σφαῖραν λέγοντας τόν οὐρανόν καί πόλους τοῖς πλανωμένοις ἰσαρίθμους ἀστράσι, μή τοῦτο λέγοντος τοῦ μεγάλου Βασιλείου, πόσους δ᾿ ἀεικίνητον, ἔστιν ὧν ἱστάντων, πόσοις δ᾿ ὁ ἥλιος κύκλῳ περιέρχεσθαι δοκεῖ, μή τοῦτο τοῦ ἁγίου Ἰσαάκ νομίζοντος; Πάντας οὖν τούτου σύ γ᾿ ἄν, ὡς ἔοικεν, ἀποφήναιο τοῖς πατράσιν ἀντιλέγειν, ὥσπερ καί ἡμᾶς, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτός ἐξελεγχθήσῃ μή εἰδώς τήν ἀλήθειαν, καθ᾿ ἥν ἕπεσθαι πάντας ἡμᾶς ἐκείνοις ἀναγκαῖον, καί ἔοικάς μοι μηδ᾿ ἐνθυμηθῆναί ποτε ταύτην ἤ διακρῖναι τῆς μή ἀναγκαίας˙ διό ἐν τοῖς πρός τόν μακάριον βίον φέρουσιν ἀντικείμενος αὐτοῖς, τούς ἄλλους ἀκριβῆ τήν ὁμολογίαν ἀπαιτεῖς ἐπί τῶν μή φερόντων εἰς ἐκείνην τήν μακαριότητα.

Ταῦτ᾿ ἄρα καί ἡμεῖς ὑπεριδόντες τῶν ἐφεξῆς τοῖς εἰρημένοις καθ᾿ ἡμῶν αὐτοῦ διαβολῶν, ἐπί τἀναγκαιότερα τρέψωμεν τόν λόγον.

ΛΟΓΟΣ ΥΠΕΡ ΤΩΝ ΙΕΡΩΣ ΗΣΥΧΑΖΟΝΤΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΥΣΤΕΡΩΝ Ο ΤΡΙΤΟΣ. Σελ. (410)

ΠΕΡΙ ΦΩΤΟΣ ΙΕΡΟΥ

Ὁ δή τῆς νοερᾶς προσευχῆς κατά τῶν διά βίου ταύτῃ προσανεχόντων τοιοῦτος ὑφηγητής καί περί φωτός ἱεροῦ διδάσκειν ἀξιοῖ τούς ὁρῶντας, καί ταῦτα τυφλός ὤν αὐτός, ὡς καί αὐτός ἀρνεῖσθαι οὐκ ἔχει, ἁμαρτάνειν αὐτούς ἰσχυριζόμενος ὅτι τοῦθ᾿ ὅ μή βλέπει, τυφλός ὤν οὗτος, φῶς αὐτοί λέγουσι, καί ταῦθ᾿ οὐ τόν δεῖνα ἤ τόν δεῖνα τῶν ἐφ᾿ ἡμῶν ὄντων ἤ τῶν μικρῷ πρό ἡμῶν ἐπί καθαρότητι βίου καί θεοπτίας ὕψει βεβοημένων ἁμαρτάνειν περί τό φῶς ἀποφαινόμενος τοῦτο, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτούς τούς ἐκ παλαιοῦ προσκυνητούς ἡμῖν ἁγίους, ὡς ὁ λόγος δείξει προϊών. Ἐπεί δ᾿ ἤκουσε παρά τῶν τοιαῦτα διεξιόντος ἀκουσάντων αὐτοῦ (κατεπληγμένων, ὡς ἔοικε, τῆς καινοφωνίας τήν ὑπερβολήν καί σιωπῇ τήν οὕτω σαφῆ κατά τῶν ἁγίων πατέρων παρελθεῖν βλασφημίαν οὐκ ἐνεγκόντων, ἅμα δέ καί δεδοικότων περί σφίσιν αὐτοῖς μή τοῦ τοιούτου μύσους κοινωνοί γένωνται σιωπῇ παρελθόντες, ὅ καί ἡμᾶς ἀρτίως