87

preserving the true tradition of the blessed teaching straight from Peter and James and John and Paul, the holy apostles, as a son receiving it from a father—but few are like their fathers—they have come, with God, even to us, to deposit those ancestral and apostolic seeds”. 5.12.1 At this time Narcissus, celebrated by many to this very day, was known as the bishop of the church in Jerusalem, holding the fifteenth place in the succession from the siege of the Jews under Hadrian, from which time we have shown that the church there was first established out of the Gentiles after those from the circumcision, and that Mark was the first bishop from the Gentiles to preside over them; 5.12.2 After whom the successions there relate that Cassian was bishop, and after him Publius, then Maximus, and after them Julianus, then Gaius, after whom Symmachus, and another Gaius, and again another Julianus, and in addition to these Capito, and Valens and Dolichianus, and after them all Narcissus, who was the thirtieth from the apostles according to the continuous succession. 5.13.1 At this time also Rhodo, a native of Asia, who relates that he was a disciple in Rome of Tatian, whom we have known from what was said before, composed various books, and among the rest also arrayed himself against the heresy of Marcion; which he relates was at that time divided into different opinions, accurately recording those who had caused the division and refuting the falsehoods devised by each of them. 5.13.2 Hear then what he writes: “For this reason they have also become discordant among themselves, claiming an incoherent opinion. For from their herd, Apelles, who prides himself on his conduct and his old age, confesses one principle, but says the prophecies are from an opposing spirit, persuaded by the utterances of a demon-possessed virgin, named Philumena; 5.13.3 but others, like the sailor Marcion himself, introduce two principles; of these are Potitus and Basilicus. 5.13.4 And these, having followed the Pontic wolf and not finding the distinction of things, just as he did not, resorted to the easy way and declared two principles simply and without proof; but others of them again, straying to what is worse, suppose not only two but also three natures, of whom the leader and chief is Synerus, as those who put forward his school say”. 5.13.5 The same author writes that he also had a discussion with Apelles, speaking thus: “For the old man Apelles, when he met with us, was refuted for saying many things wrongly; for which reason he also said that one ought not to examine the doctrine at all, but that each one should remain as he has believed; for he declared that those who have hoped in the Crucified one will be saved, only if they are found in good works; but the most obscure thing of all was the doctrine he taught, as we have said before, concerning God. For he said there is one principle, just as our doctrine does”. 5.13.6 Then, after setting forth his entire opinion, he adds, saying: “When I said to him, ‘Whence have you this proof, or how can you say there is one principle? Tell us,’ he said that the prophecies refute themselves because they have said nothing at all true; for they are discordant and false and self-contradictory. But as to how there is one principle, he said he did not know, but was simply moved to believe so. 5.13.7 Then, when I adjured him to speak the truth, he swore that he was telling the truth in saying he did not understand how there is one unbegotten God, but that he believed this. But I laughed and condemned him, because, while saying he was a teacher, he did not know how to establish what he taught”. 5.13.8 In the same work, addressing Callistion, the same author confesses that he was a disciple of Tatian in Rome; and he says that a book of Problems was also composed by Tatian, in which Tatian promised to make clear what is obscure and hidden in the divine Scriptures, and that Rhodo himself in his own writing will set forth the solutions to his problems

87

τὴν ἀληθῆ τῆς μακαρίας σῴζοντες διδασκαλίας παράδοσιν εὐθὺς ἀπὸ Πέτρου καὶ Ἰακώβου Ἰωάννου τε καὶ Παύλου τῶν ἁγίων ἀποστόλων παῖς παρὰ πατρὸς ἐκδεξάμενος ὀλίγοι δὲ οἱ πατράσιν ὅμοιοι, ἧκον δὴ σὺν θεῷ καὶ εἰς ἡμᾶς, τὰ προγονικὰ ἐκεῖνα καὶ ἀποστολικὰ καταθησόμενοι σπέρματα». 5.12.1 Ἐπὶ τούτων τῆς ἐν Ἱεροσολύμοις ἐκκλησίας ἐπίσκοπος ὁ παρὰ πολλοῖς εἰς ἔτι νῦν βεβοημένος Νάρκισσος ἐγνωρίζετο, πεντεκαιδεκάτην ἄγων διαδοχὴν ἀπὸ τῆς τῶν Ἰουδαίων κατὰ Ἁδριανὸν πολιορκίας, ἐξ οὗ δὴ πρῶτον τὴν αὐτόθι ἐκκλησίαν ἐξ ἐθνῶν συστῆναι μετὰ τοὺς ἐκ περιτομῆς καθηγήσασθαί τε αὐτῶν πρῶτον ἐξ ἐθνῶν ἐπίσκοπον Μάρκον ἐδηλώσαμεν· 5.12.2 μεθ' ὃν ἐπισκοπεῦσαι Κασσιανὸν αἱ τῶν αὐτόθι διαδοχαὶ περιέχουσιν, καὶ μετὰ τοῦτον Πούπλιον, εἶτα Μάξιμον, καὶ ἐπὶ τούτοις Ἰουλιανόν, ἔπειτα Γάϊον, μεθ' ὃν Σύμμαχον, καὶ Γάϊον ἕτερον, καὶ πάλιν ἄλλον Ἰουλιανόν, Καπίτωνά τε πρὸς τούτοις καὶ Οὐάλεντα καὶ ∆ολιχιανόν, καὶ ἐπὶ πᾶσι τὸν Νάρκισσον, τριακοστὸν ἀπὸ τῶν ἀποστόλων κατὰ τὴν τῶν ἑξῆς διαδοχὴν γεγενημένον. 5.13.1 Ἐν τούτῳ καὶ Ῥόδων, γένος τῶν ἀπὸ Ἀσίας,μαθητευθεὶς ἐπὶ Ῥώμης, ὡς αὐτὸς ἱστορεῖ, Τατιανῷ, ὃν ἐκ τῶν πρόσθεν ἔγνωμεν, διάφορα συντάξας βιβλία, μετὰ τῶν λοιπῶν καὶ πρὸς τὴν Μαρκίωνος παρατέτακται αἵρεσιν· ἣν καὶ εἰς διαφόρους γνώμας κατ' αὐτὸν διαστᾶσαν ἱστορεῖ, τοὺς τὴν διάστασιν ἐμπεποιηκότας ἀναγράφων ἐπ' ἀκριβές τε τὰς παρ' ἑκάστῳ τούτων ἐπινενοημένας διελέγχων ψευδολογίας. 5.13.2 ἄκουε δ' οὖν καὶ αὐτοῦ ταῦτα γράφοντος· «διὰ τοῦτο καὶ παρ' ἑαυτοῖς ἀσύμφωνοι γεγόνασιν, ἀσυστάτου γνώμης ἀντιποιούμενοι. ἀπὸ γὰρ τῆς τούτων ἀγέλης Ἀπελλῆς μέν, ὁ τὴν πολιτείαν σεμνυνόμενος καὶ τὸ γῆρας, μίαν ἀρχὴν ὁμολογεῖ, τὰς δὲ προφητείας ἐξ ἀντικειμένου λέγει πνεύματος, πειθόμενος ἀποφθέγμασι παρθένου δαιμονώσης, ὄνομα Φιλουμένης· 5.13.3 ἕτεροι δὲ καθὼς καὶ αὐτὸς ὁ ναύτης Μαρκίων, δύο ἀρχὰς εἰσηγοῦνται· ἀφ' ὧν εἰσιν Ποτῖτός τε καὶ Βασιλικός. 5.13.4 καὶ οὗτοι μὲν κατακολουθήσαντες τῷ Ποντικῷ λύκῳ καὶ μὴ εὑρίσκοντες τὴν διαίρεσιν τῶν πραγμάτων, ὡς οὐδ' ἐκεῖνος, ἐπὶ τὴν εὐχέρειαν ἐτράποντο καὶ δύο ἀρχὰς ἀπεφήναντο ψιλῶς καὶ ἀναποδείκτως· ἄλλοι δὲ πάλιν ἀπ' αὐτῶν ἐπὶ τὸ χεῖρον ἐξοκείλαντες, οὐ μόνον δύο, ἀλλὰ καὶ τρεῖς ὑποτίθενται φύσεις· ὧν ἐστιν ἀρχηγὸς καὶ προστάτης Συνέρως, καθὼς οἱ τὸ διδασκαλεῖον αὐτοῦ προβαλλόμενοι λέγουσιν». 5.13.5 γράφει δὲ ὁ αὐτὸς ὡς καὶ εἰς λόγους ἐληλύθει τῷ Ἀπελλῇ, φάσκων οὕτως· «ὁ γὰρ γέρων Ἀπελλῆς συμμίξας ἡμῖν, πολλὰ μὲν κακῶς λέγων ἠλέγχθη· ὅθεν καὶ ἔφασκεν μὴ δεῖν ὅλως ἐξετάζειν τὸν λόγον, ἀλλ' ἕκαστον, ὡς πεπίστευκεν, διαμένειν· σωθήσεσθαι γὰρ τοὺς ἐπὶ τὸν ἐσταυρωμένον ἠλπικότας ἀπεφαίνετο, μόνον ἐὰν ἐν ἔργοις ἀγαθοῖς εὑρίσκωνται· τὸ δὲ πάντων ἀσαφέστατον ἐδογματίζετο αὐτῷ πρᾶγμα, καθὼς προειρήκαμεν, τὸ περὶ θεοῦ. ἔλεγεν μὲν γὰρ μίαν ἀρχὴν καθὼς καὶ ὁ ἡμέτερος λόγος». 5.13.6 εἶτα προθεὶς αὐτοῦ πᾶσαν τὴν δόξαν, ἐπιφέρει φάσκων· «λέγοντος δὲ πρὸς αὐτόν· «πόθεν ἡ ἀπόδειξις αὕτη σοι, ἢ πῶς δύνασαι λέγειν μίαν ἀρχήν; φράσον ἡμῖν», ἔφη τὰς μὲν προφητείας ἑαυτὰς ἐλέγχειν διὰ τὸ μηδὲν ὅλως ἀληθὲς εἰρηκέναι· ἀσύμφωνοι γὰρ ὑπάρχουσι καὶ ψευδεῖς καὶ ἑαυταῖς ἀντικείμεναι. τὸ δὲ πῶς ἐστιν μία ἀρχή, μὴ γινώσκειν ἔλεγεν, οὕτως δὲ κινεῖσθαι μόνον. 5.13.7 εἶτ' ἐπομοσαμένου μου τἀληθὲς εἰπεῖν, ὤμνυεν ἀληθεύων λέγειν μὴ ἐπίστασθαι πῶς εἷς ἐστιν ἀγένητος θεός, τοῦτο δὲ πιστεύειν. ἐγὼ δὲ γελάσας κατέγνων αὐτοῦ, διότι διδάσκαλος εἶναι λέγων, οὐκ ᾔδει τὸ διδασκόμενον ὑπ' αὐτοῦ κρατύνειν». 5.13.8 ἐν τῷ αὐτῷ δὲ συγγράμματι Καλλιστίωνι προσφωνῶν ὁ αὐτὸς μεμαθητεῦσθαι ἐπὶ Ῥώμης Τατιανῷ ἑαυτὸν ὁμολογεῖ· φησὶν δὲ καὶ ἐσπουδάσθαι τῷ Τατιανῷ Προβλημάτων βιβλίον· δι' ὧν τὸ ἀσαφὲς καὶ ἐπικεκρυμμένον τῶν θείων γραφῶν παραστήσειν ὑποσχομένου τοῦ Τατιανοῦ, αὐτὸς ὁ Ῥόδων ἐν ἰδίῳ συγγράμματι τὰς τῶν ἐκείνου προβλημάτων ἐπιλύσεις ἐκθήσεσθαι