89

1116 For it is good for the worse part to be lifted up towards virtue on the shoulders of action by the better part, than for the better part to be carried by the worse part towards love of pleasure through weakness.

1.81 (πα΄) As long as we have not purely in mind gone out from our own substance and that of all things after God, we have not yet received the state of immutability in virtue. But whenever this high state is achieved by us through love, then we will know the power of the divine promise. For it is necessary to believe that the worthy ones are there in an unchangeable state, where the mind, having gone before through love, has rooted its own power. For one who has not gone out of himself and of all things that can in any way be conceived, and entered into the silence that is beyond understanding, cannot be entirely free from change.

1.82 (πβ΄) All thought has an indication of plurality; or at least, certainly of duality. For it is a relationship between certain extremities, joining them to one another, both that which understands and that which is understood. But neither of them at all is able by nature to preserve simplicity. For that which understands is a certain subject, having necessarily conceived along with it the power of understanding. And that which is understood is certainly some subject, or in a subject; having (14__490> conceived along with it the power of being understood; or having as a presupposition the substance of which it is the power. For no existing thing as a whole in and of itself is a simple substance or thought, so as to be also an indivisible monad. But God, if we call Him substance, does not have by nature conceived along with Himself the power of being understood, so that He may not be composite; if we call Him thought, He does not have by nature an underlying substance receptive of thought; but God Himself is thought in His substance; and wholly thought, and only thought; 1117 and He Himself is substance in His thought, and wholly substance and only substance; and wholly beyond substance, and wholly beyond thought, because He is also an indivisible, impartible, and simple monad. Therefore, one who has thought in any way, has not yet gone out from duality; but one who has entirely abandoned this has in some way come to be in the monad, having transcendently laid aside the power of thinking.

1.83 (πγ΄) Among the many, there is otherness and unlikeness and difference; but in God, who is properly one and only, there is only identity and simplicity, and likeness. It is not safe, therefore, before going outside the many, to apply oneself to the contemplations of God; and Moses shows this, pitching the tent of his mind outside the camp, and then conversing with God. For to try to speak of the ineffable with spoken reason is dangerous; because spoken reason is a dyad, and more. But to contemplate Being without voice with the soul alone, is most secure; because it stands in the indivisible monad, and not among the many. For the high priest, commanded to enter with difficulty but once a year into the Holy of Holies within the veil, teaches that it is necessary only for him, who has passed through the court and the holy place, and entered into the Holy of Holies; that is, he who has passed beyond the entire nature of both sensible and intelligible things, and has become (14__492> pure from every property of genesis, to approach the conceptualizations of God with a garmentless and naked mind.

1.84 (πδ΄) Moses the great, having pitched his tent outside the camp; that is, having established his will and mind outside of things seen, begins to worship God; and having entered into the darkness, the invisible and immaterial place of knowledge, there he remains, being initiated into the most sacred rites.

1120 1.85 (πε΄) The darkness is the invisible, immaterial, and bodiless state, which has the knowledge of the exemplars of beings; in which one who has entered within, like another Moses, perceives the unseen things with a mortal nature; through which, having painted in himself the beauty of the divine virtues, like a picture having the image of the archetypal beauty in a well-imitated way, he comes down; presenting himself to those

89

1116 Καλόν γάρ ὑπό τοῦ κρείττονος τοῖς ὤμοις τῆς πράξεως, τό χεῖρον αἴρεσθαι πρός ἀρετήν, ἤ τό κρεῖττον διά θρύψεως πρός φιληδονίαν ὑπό τοῦ χείρονος φέρεσθαι.

1.81 (πα΄) Ἕως τῆς ἡμῶν τε καί πάντων τῶν μετά Θεόν οὐσίας κατά διάνοιαν καθαρῶς οὐκ ἐκβεβήκαμεν, οὔπω τήν τῆς κατ᾿ ἀρετήν ἀτρεψίας ἕξιν ἐλάβομεν. Ὁπηνίκα δέ τοῦτο δι᾿ ἀγάπης ἡμῖν κατορθωθῇ τό ἀξίωμα, τότε γνωσόμεθα τῆς θείας ἐπαγγελίας τήν δύναμιν. Ἐκεῖ γάρ εἶναι χρή πιστεύειν καθ᾿ ἵδρυσιν ἀμετάθετον τούς ἀξίους, ἔνθα προλαβών ὁ νοῦς δι᾿ ἀγάπης τήν σφετέραν ἐνεῤῥίζωσε δύναμιν. Ὁ γάρ μή ἐκβάς ἑαυτοῦ, καί πάντων τῶν ὁπωσοῦν νοεῖσθαι δυναμένων, καί εἰς τήν ὑπέρ νόησιν σιγήν καταστάς, οὐ δύναται τροπῆς εἶναι πάμπαν ἐλεύθερος.

1.82 (πβ΄) Πᾶσα νόησις, πλήθους· ἤ τουλάχιστον, δυάδος πάντως ἔμφασιν ἔχει. Μέση γάρ ἐστι τινῶν ἀκροτήτων σχέσις, ἀλλήλοις συνάπτουσα, τό τε νοοῦν καί τό νοούμενον. Οὐδέτερον δέ διόλου τήν ἁπλότητα πέφυκε σώζειν. Τό τε γάρ νοοῦν, ὑποκείμενόν τί ἐστι, πάντως συνεπινοουμένην αὐτῷ τήν τοῦ νοεῖν ἔχον δύναμιν. Καί τό νοούμενον ὑποκείμενόν τι πάντως ἐστίν, ἤ ἐν ὑποκειμένῳ· συνεπινοουμένην (14__490> αὐτῷ τήν τοῦ νοεῖσθαι δύναμιν ἔχον· ἤ προϋποκειμένην τήν, οὗ ἐστι δύναμις, οὐσίαν. Οὐ γάρ τι τῶν ὄντων τό σύνολον αὐτό καθ᾿ αὑτό ἁπλῆ τις οὐσία ἤ νόησίς ἐστιν, ἵνα καί μονάς ἀδιαίρετος. Τόν δέ Θεόν, εἴτε οὐσίαν εἴπωμεν, οὐκ ἔχει φυσικῶς συνεπινοουμένην αὐτῷ τήν τοῦ νοεῖσθαι δύναμιν, ἵνα μή σύνθετος· εἴτε νόησιν, οὐκ ἔχει φυσικῶς δεκτικήν τῆς νοήσεως ὑποκειμένην οὐσίαν· ἀλλ᾿ αὐτός κατ᾿ οὐσίαν νόησίς ἐστιν ὁ Θεός· καί ὅλος νόησις, καί μόνον· 1117 καί αὐτός κατά τήν νόησιν οὐσία, καί ὅλος οὐσία καί μόνον· καί ὑπέρ οὐσίαν ὅλος, καί ὑπέρ νόησιν ὅλος, διότι καί μονάς ἀδιαίρετος καί ἀμερής καί ἁπλῆ. Ὁ τοίνυν καθ᾿ ὁτιοῦν νόησιν ἔχων, οὔπω τῆς δυάδος ἐξῆλθεν· ὁ δέ ταύτην πάμπαν ἀπολιπών, γέγονε ποσῶς ἐν τῇ μονάδι, τήν τοῦ νοεῖν ὑπεροχικῶς ἀποθέμενος δύναμιν.

1.83 (πγ΄) Ἐν μέν τοῖς πολλοῖς, ἑτερότης καί ἀνομοιότης ἐστί καί διαφορά· ἐν δέ τῷ Θεῷ, κυρίως ἑνί καί μόνῳ τυγχάνοντι, ταυτότης καί ἁπλότης μόνον ἐστί, καί ὁμοιότης. Οὐκ ἀσφαλές οὖν πρίν ἔξω γενέσθαι τῶν πολλῶν, ἐπιβάλλειν ταῖς περί Θεοῦ θεωρίαις· καί δηλοῖ τοῦτο Μωϋσῆς, ἔξω τῆς παρεμβολῆς πηγνύμενος τήν σκηνήν τῆς διανοίας, καί τότε προσομιλῶν τῷ Θεῷ. Τό γάρ μετά λόγου τοῦ κατά προφοράν πειρᾶσθαι φάναι τόν ἄῤῥητον, ἐπικίνδυνον· ὅτι δυάς, καί πλέον ἐστίν ὁ κατά προφοράν λόγος. Τό δέ ἄνευ φωνῆς μόνῃ τῇ ψυχῇ τό ὄν θεωρεῖν, ἰσχυρότατον· ὅτι κατά τήν ἀδιαίρετον ἵσταται μονάδα, καί οὐκ ἐν τοῖς πολλοῖς. Ὁ γάρ ἀρχιερεύς, ἅπαξ τοῦ ἑνιαυτοῦ εἰς τά Ἅγια τῶν ἁγίων εἴσω τοῦ καταπετάσματος εἰσιέναι μόλις προστεταγμένος, διδάσκει μόνον δεῖν ἐκεῖνον, τόν τήν αὐτήν καί τά ἅγια διαβάντα, καί εἰς τά Ἅγια τῶν ἁγίων εἴσω γενόμενον· τουτέστι, τήν ἅπασαν τῶν αἰσθητῶν τε καί νοητῶν παρελθόντα φύσιν, καί πάσης τῆς κατά γένεσιν ἰδιότητος γενόμενον (14__492> καθαρόν, ἀνείμονι καί γυμνῇ τῇ διανοίᾳ προσβάλλειν ταῖς περί Θεοῦ φαντασίαις.

1.84 (πδ΄) Μωϋσῆς ὁ μέγας, ἔξω τῆς παρεμβολῆς πηξάμενος ἑαυτοῦ τήν σκηνήν· τουτέστι, τήν γνώμην καί τήν διάνοιαν ἱδρυσάμενος ἔξω τῶν ὁρωμένων, προσκυνεῖν τόν Θεόν ἄρχεται· καί εἰς τόν γνόφον εἰσελθών, τόν ἀειδῆ καί ἄϋλον τῆς γνώσεως τόπον, ἐκεῖ μένει τάς ἱερωτάτας τελούμενος τελετάς.

1120 1.85 (πε΄) Ὁ γνόφος ἐστίν, ἡ ἀειδής καί ἄϋλος καί ἀσώματος κατάστασις, ἡ τήν παραδειγματικήν τῶν ὄντων ἔχουσα γνῶσιν· ἐν ᾗ ὁ γενόμενος ἐντός, καθάπερ τις ἄλλος Μωϋσῆς, φύσει θνητῇ κατανοεῖ τά ἀθέατα· δι᾿ ἧς τῶν θείων ἀρετῶν ἐν ἑαυτῷ ζωγραφήσας τό κάλλος, ὥσπερ γραφήν εὐμιμήτως ἔχουσαν τοῦ ἀρχετύπου κάλλους τό ἀπεικόνισμα, κάτεισιν· ἑαυτόν προβαλλόμενος τοῖς