Philocalia

 they laid down the toils of faith. For them, indeed, nearly their whole life was spent in showing the most holy and sovereign Trinity to be of equal h

 to attempt to correct the sayings of scripture for consistency, greatly preserving for those who are able to understand the coherence of the thought.

 Free Will. 20. On good and evil things, and that these are in things subject to choice and in things not subject to choice, and according to the teach

 rulers spoken of from Judah and leaders [from] his loins, when he for whom it is reserved, that is, the kingdom, shall come, and the expectation of th

 And he came who according to Job subdued the great sea monster, and who gave authority to his genuine disciples to tread upon snakes and scorpions, an

 that is, of the elementary teaching, to be brought to perfection, so that the wisdom spoken to the perfect may also be spoken to us. For he who posses

 of the wives of Abraham, and of two sisters married to Jacob, and of two handmaids who bore children by him, they will say nothing else than that thes

 orphans but Clement will send to the cities abroad and you will report to the presbyters of the church. For Grapte, who admonishes the widows and th

 of new moons or of sabbaths which are a shadow of things to come. And further, also in the [epistle] to the Hebrews, speaking of those of the circumc

 to things that have happened and things to be done, wherever the Word found things that had happened according to history which could be applied to th

 Moses commands us to offer but a griffin has never been recorded to have been subject to man, which the lawgiver forbids to be eaten. But even the fa

 to his brother, and so on and: But I say to you, do not swear at all. and in the Apostle the saying must be observed: Warn those who are unruly, comf

 Isaac, he too having descended from Abraham, with all being traced back to Adam, whom the apostle says is Christ? For every beginning of families that

 he came to gather the lost sheep of the house of Israel and when many from Israel did not yield to his teaching, those from the Gentiles are also cal

 fleeing the allegory in these things, and thinking that the letter has been written for its own sake, they will stand by the will of the Holy Spirit w

 behold, the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has conquered, to open the book and its seven seals. 2.2 But concerning its being sealed on

 holy, for one who perceives the weakness of our race, and that it is impossible for us to grasp the principles of God's art, contemplated with all acc

 It is. from the fifth volume of the commentary on the Gospel of John, on the prologue. Since you are not content for us to have undertaken the present

 of many theorems, of which each theorem is a part of the whole discourse. But those outside this, promising to contain any kind of discussion and decl

 the things before, he has understood the entire scripture as one book, understood as very sweet in the beginning when one chews it, but bitter in the

 to the gospel or to himself or to the apostles. But one who has been educated in the music of God, being wise in deeds and words, and for this reason

 he might change it, leading it to the singular. For having read: “They wept and entreated me ” and: “In the house of On they found me ” he might say t

 of angels in the hand of a mediator and in the passage: So that the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by f

 to others. And if we carefully observe this, we are freed from many errors and misinterpretations. It is necessary, therefore, to know that the word

 in unbelief, confusion, outside. From the 20th book on Ezekiel. Thus says the Lord Lord: behold, I will judge between sheep and sheep, between rams a

 For there are certain powers in us, of which the better ones are nourished by these, as it were, incantations, being kindred to them, and though we do

 so that having despoiled the Egyptians, they might find material for the construction of the things received for the worship of God. For from the thin

 His Christ would also know, and he who partakes of the spirit of God and the spirit of Christ. May you partake, and may you always increase your parti

 of a spotted robe and of countless other things, one who takes the pains can find not a few examples. But we have made this digression, in order that

 arising in those who speak effectively. For the prophet says in the sixty-seventh psalm, that the Lord will give a word to those who preach the gospel

 knowing the first good, wrote indeed, as of God manifesting himself to the worthy and suitable, that God appeared, so to speak, to Abraham, or to Isaa

 to the prophets of the Jews or to the oracles of the Christians the argument must be constructed in this way, from a certain example concerning foods

 the concept of forbearance is corrupted by the meanness of the words, but in this too Celsus slanders the Word, saying: “But concerning these and othe

 three apostles. But he will say that these things are fabrications and in no way different from myths, just as are the other wonderful things about Je

 who are in no way lacking intelligible thunder. 15.19 And his garments below are different, they are not white, they are not as the light if you go u

 admittedly more numerous but I think also among barbarians, as many as profess to practice medicine. And again, since philosophy, professing truth an

 to think and to speak and to do, when reviled, we bless when persecuted, we endure when defamed, we entreat and we would not say things that may an

 brother of Artemis, and paternal brother of Hermes and as many other things as the wise fathers of Celsus's doctrines and the ancient theologians of

 of the name of Isaac, and something is revealed from the voice of Jacob and if indeed the one who calls or the one who adjures names the God of Abrah

 as they wish, so he says it also happens among Christians. And he says that some, not even wishing to give or receive a reason for what they believe,

 to seek proofs. And how is it not more reasonable, since all human affairs depend on faith, to trust God rather than them? For who sails, or marries,

 I know the Stoic, or all the Peripatetic doctrines? unless perhaps, having heard the phrase for I know all things from some insensitive laymen who w

 a profession was apparent since the word and the preaching were in the persuasive wisdom of phrasing and composition of words and faith would have b

 to remove from such great evils those who were preoccupied in them. And among the Greeks a certain Phaedo, and I know not if a second, and one Polemon

 We will say that the story about Aristotle is also a slander against Jesus and his disciples for when he saw that a court was about to be assembled a

 And indeed one of the prophets, Hosea, says at the end of his words: Who is wise, and will understand these things? Or prudent, and will know them? Bu

 that he might bring to nothing things that are, that no flesh should glory in his presence some have been moved to suppose that no one educated or wi

 inviting them. which certain of the Cynics especially have done, discoursing in public to those who happen to be present. Will they then say that thes

 a gathering of prudent men would never be addressed, but where they see boys and a crowd of household slaves and a throng of foolish men, there to bri

 of the riddles and of the things said with concealment in the law and prophets and gospels, which you have despised as containing nothing of value, no

 of stone as being worthy of worship but the common conception demands we understand that God is in no way corruptible matter, nor is he honored in in

 to say to those who, through hatred for the hated, accuse them of things for which their dearest friends are praised. For just as in their case hatred

 for food, and others for shelter. For it was better for those not intending to seek divine things and to philosophize to be in want, so as to use thei

 to be captured by them? For if indeed the world came to be by providence, and God presides over all things it was necessary that the first sparks of

 among them their succession, because men have need of honey for many things, for the healing of suffering bodies and as a purifying food. But what is

 Indeed, when they meet, they converse with each other, which is why they do not miss their paths therefore, there is among them a fulfillment of disc

 to have granted aids, because neither wisdom nor reason is in them, but a certain natural constitution for such things for the sake of the animals' pr

 divination and after this to set forth the defense more clearly and demonstratively to reject the arguments of those who do away with such kinds of

 mantic birds and the other irrational animals and conceptions of the divine and foreknowledge concerning future things, would have revealed such thing

 taken as an example of the worst things, and never is a wolf or a fox named in connection with a good thing. It seems, then, that there is a certain f

 For none of the irrational animals has a conception of God. And it is a falsehood that irrational animals are nearer to divine communion since even

 to act, he would not have said that storks are more pious than men. Furthermore, as if standing up for the piety of the irrational animals, Celsus int

 has the cause of movement, animals and plants and simply all things that are held together by nature and soul, among which they say are also minerals.

 being driven out of what is solemn and stable so that they change to licentiousness, often beginning their licentiousness in the middle of their life

 someone that in like manner those who are perishing are not of free will nor will they perish by their own fault. And what is said in Ezekiel: I will

 to Pharaoh? For it is necessary for one who believes that the scriptures are true and that God is just, if he is fair-minded, to struggle with how in

 narratives are also considered violent, let us see also from prophetic discourse, what those say who have experienced the great goodness of God, and h

 One might blame the farmer for not casting the seeds sooner upon the rocky ground, seeing some other rocky ground that has received the seeds and is f

 21.15 After this was the passage from the gospel, when the savior said that for this reason he speaks to those outside in parables, that seeing they m

 that they would have long ago repented, sitting in sackcloth and ashes, when the savior came near their borders, they do not even hear the things of t

 we might stumble, while it is understood that something has happened in a human way, but the good deed is thankfully referred to God the perfecter th

 thus? Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor? For someone will

 O man, who are you who answers back to God? 21.22 But to those who introduce natures and use the saying, these things must be said: if they preserve t

 those who were allotted to be overseers of the earth established laws for those who were being legislated for, cooperating with the lawgivers. It seem

 different relations and laws see if temperance will not consequently be one of the relatives, and courage and prudence and knowledge and the other vi

 the voice of his neighbor. And the Lord scattered them from there over the face of all the earth, and they stopped building the city and the tower. Fo

 in proportion to the sins of those who had obtained the other lands, first, having been punished to a lesser degree and paid the penalty, as if discip

 blessings for none of these things will any longer reasonably come to be. And if one were to look at the consequences for himself of what he teaches,

 in a prophetic book which makes clear beforehand the things concerning Judas the traitor, to suppose, having learned what was to be, seeing it being f

 king of the Macedonians, and Ptolemy who ruled Egypt, who was surnamed Lagos, it is thus prophesied: And behold, a he-goat came from the west over the

 that what is in our power can be preserved. 23.8 To these we must say that when God applies himself to the beginning of the creation of the world, sin

 hearing they will turn back or they will persist in their own sins just as it is said in Jeremiah: Perhaps they will hear and repent. For God does no

 in the psalm, whose beginning is: O God, do not be silent about my praise for the mouth of the sinner and the mouth of the deceitful has been opened

 taking the hour of this man’s birth, they ascertain how each of the wandering stars is perpendicularly aligned, either with this degree of the zodiac

 of the father and that of the mother and that of his wife and of his sons and of the servants and of the dearest friends, and perhaps also of the murd

 the intelligible dodecatemorion being one thing, and the, as it were, formation another and they say the results are found not from the formation, bu

 Pharaoh was for the demonstration of the power of God and the proclamation of his name in all the earth, consider how great a demonstration of God's p

 of men that not at every hour are some of the stars well-positioned and others ill-positioned for it is an even, varied circle, having infinite prete

 a place for withdrawal. But if anyone should say that matter is in God, it is necessary to examine likewise, whether as though he were separating hims

 If you have something to say, begin your speech. For if our inquiry were born of contention, I would not have thought it right to define evils a secon

 God is the creator. Let this argument, therefore, be well addressed to him but to me it seems a falsehood to say that matter is without quality. For

 and to turn that to the better, seems to me to be worthy of incurring blame, having left a part of matter to be evil to the destruction of the part wh

 it was opposed to itself. Thus since opposites exist, it is shown that matter does not exist. These things have been drawn from the 7th book of the Ev

 of their coming into being and as knowing all things before their coming into being he foreknew and predestined some to be conformed to the image of

 he will discipline his body and bring it into subjection, being careful lest, having preached to others, he himself should become disqualified, and th

 events teaching that we must choose justice and temperance and prudence and courage and the actions according to them, but shun their opposites. There

 accomplishing by the very act of working, they were doing good to men and delivering them from evils. And those who say such things will pass on to th

 For the just man did not give his money at interest and did not take bribes against the innocent and: He who does these things will not be shaken for

 of providence, according to the good temper of the airs and the bearing of sufficient rain so the good of the rational being is a mixture of both his

 for God to effect a hardening of anyone's heart, and to effect a hardening for the purpose of the one being hardened disobeying the will of the one ha

 being destroyed. Yet this also must be inquired into, because the apostle, using the words from here, says: Therefore, He has mercy on whom He wills,

 to do something alien to the profession of physicians, leading him who should be healed to inflammations and abscesses so I think God also said: But

 to punish him for the sins against Abner the son of Ner, and to kill him for his offenses then he adds: And you will bring down his gray head in peac

 man shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. But observe in these things that God afflicts and tests, so that the things in each

 from the text that the heart of Pharaoh was hardened how is he just who hardened the heart of the king so that he would not send away his people, and

If you have something to say, begin your speech. For if our inquiry were born of contention, I would not have thought it right to define evils a second time; but since we are making our examination of the arguments rather for the sake of friendship and the benefit of our neighbor, I ask you to allow us to define these things from the beginning. I think my own purpose has long been clear to you, and my earnestness in our discussions, that I do not wish to win by speaking falsehood persuasively, but for the truth to be shown after careful examination; and I know clearly that you are of the same mind. Therefore, whatever method you think you can use to find the truth, use it without any hesitation; for you will not only benefit yourself by using the better method, but surely me also concerning what I do not know. It seems clear to me that evils are also certain substances; for I do not see them existing outside of substances. 24.4 Since, then, my friend, you say that evils are also substances, it is necessary to examine the definition of substance. Does it seem to you that substance is a certain corporeal constitution? It does. And does this corporeal constitution exist in and of itself, not needing anything in which to exist in order to receive its being? It is so. Does it seem to you that evils are the activities of someone? So it seems to me. And do activities receive their being at the time when the one acting is present? It is so. And when the one acting is not, will that which he does ever exist? It will not. Therefore, if substance is a certain corporeal constitution, and the corporeal constitution does not need anything in which to exist in order to receive its being; but evils are the activities of someone, and activities need someone in whom to exist in order to receive their being, then evils will not be substances. But if evils are substances, and murder is an evil, then murder will be a substance; but surely murder is the activity of someone; therefore murder will not be a substance. If you wish to say that the agents are substances, I agree; for instance, the murderer is a man, and insofar as he is a man, he is a substance; but the murder which he commits is not a substance, but some work of the substance. And we call a man sometimes evil for murdering, and at other times again good for doing good; and these names are attached to the substance from its accidents, which are not the substance itself. For the substance is neither murder, nor again adultery, nor any of the similar evils; but just as from grammar one is called a grammarian, and from rhetoric a rhetorician, and from medicine a physician, while the substance is neither medicine nor rhetoric nor grammar, but receives its name from its accidents, from which it seems to be so named, though it is neither of them; in the same way, it seems to me that the substance also acquires a name from the things that seem to be evil, though it is neither of them. And similarly consider, if you fashion in your mind some other cause of evils for men, that he too, insofar as he acts in these things and suggests the doing of evils, is himself also evil from what he does. For this reason he too is called evil, because he is a maker of evils; but what someone does, he is not himself, but they are his activities, from which he receives the name of being called evil. For if we were to say that he is the things he does, and he commits murders and adulteries and thefts and as many things as are similar to these, he himself will be these things. And if he is these things, and these things have their constitution when they happen, and cease to be when they are not happening, and these things are done by men, then men will be the makers of these things, and the cause of their being and their ceasing to be. But if you say these are his activities, from what he does he has his being evil, not from what he is as a substance. And we said that 'evil' is spoken of from the accidents of the substance, which are not the substance; as 'physician' from medicine. But if from what each one does he is evil, and what he does receives a beginning of being, then he also began to be evil, and these things also began to be evils. And if it is so, he is not without beginning evil, nor are evils unbegotten, by your saying that they are begotten by him. 24.5 The argument against your companion, my friend, you seem to me to have made sufficiently; for from the premises he conceded to the argument, you seemed to conclude well; for truly, if matter happened to be without quality, and God is the creator of qualities, and evils are qualities, he will be of evils

εἰπεῖν ἔχεις, ἄρχου τοῦ λόγου. εἰ μὲν γὰρ ἐκ φιλονεικίας ἡμῖν ἡ ζήτησις ἐγίνετο, οὐκ ἂν δεύτερον περὶ τῶν κακῶν ἠξίουν ὁρίζεσθαι· ἐπεὶ δὲ φιλίας ἕνεκα μᾶλλον καὶ τῆς πρὸς τὸν πλησίον ὠφελείας, τὴν ἐξέτασιν ποιού μεθα τῶν λόγων, ἄνωθεν περὶ τούτων ὁρίζεσθαι ἀξιῶ συγχωρεῖν. Τὴν μὲν προαίρεσιν τὴν ἐμὴν ἐκ πολλοῦ σοι φανερὰν εἶναι δοκῶ καὶ τὴν ἐν τοῖς λόγοις σπουδὴν, ὅτι οὐ πιθανῶς εἰπὼν ψεῦδος νικῆσαι θέλω, ἀλλὰ δειχθῆναι τὴν ἀλήθειαν μετὰ ἀκριβοῦς ἐξετάσεως· καὶ σὲ δὲ οὕτω διακεῖσθαι σαφῶς ἐπίσταμαι· ὅθεν οἵῳ τρόπῳ χρώμενος νομίζεις δύνασθαι τὸ ἀληθὲς εὑρεῖν, τούτῳ χρῆσαι μηδὲν δυσωπού μενος· οὐ γὰρ σεαυτὸν ὠφελήσεις μόνον χρησάμενος τῷ κρείττονι, ἀλλὰ πάντως κἀμὲ περὶ ὧν ἀγνοῶ. σαφῶς παραστῆναί μοι δοκεῖ καὶ τὰ κακὰ οὐσίας ὑπάρχειν τινάς· οὐδὲ γὰρ ἐκτὸς οὐσιῶν αὐτὰ ὄντα βλέπω. 24.4 Ἐπεὶ τοίνυν, ὦ οὗτος, καὶ τὰ κακὰ οὐσίας εἶναι λέγεις, ἀνάγκη τὸν τῆς οὐσίας ἐξετάζειν λόγον. δοκεῖ σοι τὴν οὐσίαν σωματικήν τινα σύστασιν εἶναι; ∆οκεῖ. Ἡ δὲ σωματικὴ σύστασις αὐτὴ ἐφ' ἑαυτῆς ὑπάρχει, οὐ δεομένη τινὸς, οὗ γενομένου τὸ εἶναι λήψεται; Οὕτως ἔχει. ∆οκεῖ δέ σοι τὰ κακὰ ἐνεργείας εἶναί τινος; Οὕτω μοι φαίνεται. Αἱ δὲ ἐνέργειαι τότε τὸ εἶναι λαμβάνουσιν, ὁπότ' ἂν ὁ ἐνεργῶν παρῇ; Οὕτως ἔχει. Οὐκ ὄντος δὲ τοῦ ἐνεργοῦντος, οὐδ' ὅπερ ἐνεργεῖ ἔσται ποτέ; Οὐκ ἔσται. Οὐκοῦν εἰ ἡ οὐσία σωματική τίς ἐστι σύστασις, ἡ δὲ σωματικὴ σύστασις οὐ δεῖταί τινος, ἐν ᾧ γενομένη τὸ εἶναι λήψεται· τὰ δὲ κακὰ ἐνέργειαι ὑπάρχουσί τινος, αἱ δὲ ἐνέργειαι δέονταί τινος, ἐν ᾧ γενόμεναι τὸ εἶναι λαμβάνου σιν, οὐκ ἔσονται οὐσίαι τὰ κακά. εἰ δὲ οὐσίαι τὰ κακὰ, κακὸν δὲ ὁ φόνος, οὐσία ἔσται ὁ φόνος· ἀλλὰ μὴν ὁ φόνος ἐνέργεια ὑπάρχει τινός· οὐκ ἔσται ἄρα οὐσία ὁ φόνος. εἰ δὲ τὰ ἐνεργοῦντα οὐσίας εἶναι θέλεις, σύμφημι κἀγώ· οἷον ἄνθρωπος ὁ φονεύς, καθ' ὃν μὲν λόγον ἄνθρωπός ἐστιν, ὑπάρχει οὐσία· ὁ δὲ φόνος ὃν ποιεῖ οὐκ ἔστιν οὐσία, ἀλλ' ἔργον τι τῆς οὐσίας. λέγομεν δὲ τὸν ἄνθρωπόν ποτε μὲν κακὸν διὰ τὸ φονεύειν, ποτὲ δ' αὖ πάλιν διὰ τὸ εὐεργετεῖν ἀγαθόν· καὶ πέπλεκται ταῦτα τὰ ὀνόματα τῇ οὐσίᾳ ἐκ τῶν συμβεβηκότων αὐτῇ, ἅτινα οὐκ ἔστιν αὐτή. οὔτε γὰρ φόνος ἐστὶν ἡ οὐσία, οὔτ' αὖ πάλιν [ἡ] μοιχεία, οὔτε τι τῶν ὁμοίων κακῶν· ἀλλ' ὥσπερ ἀπὸ τῆς γραμματικῆς ὁ γραμματικὸς λέγεται καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς ῥητορικῆς ὁ ῥήτωρ καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς ἰατρικῆς ὁ ἰατρὸς, τῆς οὐσίας οὔτε ἰατρικῆς οὔσης οὔτε μὴν ῥητορικῆς οὔτε γραμματικῆς, ἀλλ' ἀπὸ τῶν συμβεβηκότων αὐτῇ τὴν προσηγορίαν λαμβανούσης, ἀφ' ὧν οὕτως ὀνομάζεσθαι δοκεῖ, οὐδ' ὁπότερον αὐτῶν οὖσα· ὁμοίως μοι φαίνεται καὶ ἀπὸ τῶν δοκούντων εἶναι κακῶν τὴν οὐσίαν ὄνομα προσλαμβάνειν, οὐδ' ὁπότερον οὖσαν αὐτῶν. καὶ ὁμοίως ἐπινόησον, εἴ τινα ἕτερον ἀναπλάττεις ἐν τῷ νῷ τῶν κακῶν τοῖς ἀνθρώποις αἴτιον, ὡς κἀκεῖνος, καθὸ ἐν τούτοις ἐνεργεῖ καὶ ὑποβάλλει ποιεῖν τὰ κακὰ, ἐστὶ καὶ αὐτὸς κακὸς ἐξ ὧν ποιεῖ. διὰ τοῦτο γὰρ κἀκεῖνος κακὸς εἶναι λέγεται, ὅτι τῶν κακῶν ἐστὶ ποιητής· ἃ δέ τις ποιεῖ, οὐκ ἔστιν αὐτὸς, ἀλλ' ἐνέργειαι αὐτοῦ, ἀφ' ὧν τὴν προσηγορίαν τοῦ κακὸς λέγεσθαι λαμβάνει. εἰ γὰρ αὐτὸν ὑπάρχειν εἴποιμεν ἃ ποιεῖ, ποιεῖ δὲ φόνους καὶ μοιχείας καὶ κλοπὰς καὶ ὅσα τούτοις ὅμοια, αὐτὸς ἔσται ταῦτα. εἰ δὲ ταῦτά ἐστιν αὐτὸς, ταῦτα δ' ὅτε γίνεται τὴν σύστασιν ἔχει, οὐ γινόμενα δὲ καὶ τοῦ εἶναι παύεται, γίνεται δὲ ταῦτα πρὸς ἀνθρώπων, ἔσονται τούτων οἱ ἄνθρωποι ποιηταὶ, καὶ τοῦ εἶναι καὶ τοῦ μηκέτ' εἶναι αἴτιοι. εἰ δὲ ταῦτα αὐτοῦ ἐνεργείας φῂς, ἐξ ὧν ποιεῖ τὸ κακὸς εἶναι ἔχει, οὐκ ἐξ ὧν ἐστὶν οὐσία. κακὸν δὲ εἴπομεν λέγεσθαι ἀπὸ τῶν συμβε βηκότων τῇ οὐσίᾳ, ἅτινα οὐκ ἔστιν ἡ οὐσία· ὡς ἀπὸ τῆς ἰατρικῆς ὁ ἰατρός. εἰ δὲ ἐξ ὧν ἐνεργεῖ ἕκαστος ὑπάρχει κακὸς, ἃ δὲ ἐνεργεῖ ἀρχὴν τοῦ εἶναι λαμβάνει, ἤρξατο κἀκεῖνος εἶναι κακὸς, ἤρξατο δὲ καὶ ταῦτα εἶναι κακά. εἰ δὲ οὕτως ἔχει, οὐκ ἔστιν ἀνάρχως κακὸς, οὐδὲ ἀγένητα τὰ κακὰ, τῷ γενητὰ πρὸς αὐτοῦ εἶναι φάναι. 24.5 Τὸν μὲν πρὸς τὸν ἑταῖρον, ὦ φίλε, λόγον ἱκανῶς μοι πεποιηκέναι δοκεῖς· ἐξ ὧν γὰρ προλαβὼν ἔδωκε τῷ λόγῳ, ἐκ τούτων συνάγειν ἔδοξας καλῶς· ὡς ἀληθῶς γὰρ, εἰ ἄποιος ἐτύγχανεν ἡ ὕλη, τῶν δὲ ποιοτήτων δημιουργὸς ὑπάρχει ὁ θεὸς, ποιότητες δὲ τὰ κακὰ, τῶν κακῶν ἔσται