Chap. XXII.—Arguments of Unbelievers Against the Incarnation of Jesus.

I have now confirmed, as I imagine, the things which are thought false and incredible by those who are not instructed in the true knowledge of heavenly learning. But, however, that we may refute those also who are too wise, not without injury to themselves, and who detract from the credit due to divine things, let us disprove their error, that they may at length perceive that the fact ought to have been as we show that it actually was. And although with good judges either testimonies are of sufficient weight without arguments, or arguments without testimonies, we, however, are not content with the one or the other, since we are supplied with both, that we may not leave room for any one of depraved ingenuity either to misunderstand or to dispute on the opposite side. They say that it was impossible for anything to be withdrawn784    Ut naturæ immortali quidquam decederet.   from an immortal nature. They say, in short, that it was unworthy of God to be willing to become man, and to burthen Himself with the infirmity of flesh; to become subject of His own accord to sufferings, to pain, and death: as though it had not been easy for Him to show Himself to men without785    Citra.   the weakness incident to a body, and to teach them righteousness (if He so wished) with greater authority, as of one who acknowledged786    Professi Dei. The expression denotes one who shows himself in his real character, without any veiling or concealment. There is another reading—“professi Deum.”   Himself to be God. For in that case all would have obeyed the heavenly precepts, if the influence and power of God enjoining them had been united with them. Why, then (they say), did He not come as God to teach men? why did He render Himself so humble and weak, that it was possible for Him both to be despised by men and to be visited with punishment? why did He suffer violence from those who are weak and mortal? why did He not repel by strength, or avoid by His divine knowledge,787    Divinitate.   the hands of men? why did He not at least in His very death reveal His majesty? but He was led as one without strength to trial, was condemned as one who was guilty, was put to death as one who was mortal. I will carefully refute these things, nor will I permit any one to be in error. For these things were done by a great and wonderful plan; and he who shall understand this, will not only cease to wonder that God was tortured by men, but also will easily see that it could not have been believed that he was God if those very things which he censures had not been done.  

CAPUT XXII. Argumenta Infidelium contra Jesu incarnationem.

Confirmata sunt, ut opinor, quae falsa et incredibilia putantur ab iis, quos vera coelestium litterarum doctrina non imbuit: sed tamen ut refellantur a nobis etiam illi, qui nimium non sine malo suo sapiunt, rebusque divinis fidem detrahunt, argumentis quoque illorum coarguamus errorem; ut tandem aliquando 0518A quando pervideant ita fieri oportuisse, sicut nos ostendimus factum. Et quamquam apud bonos judices satis habeant firmitatis vel testimonia sine argumentis, vel argumenta sine testimoniis; nos tamen non contenti alterutro sumus, cum suppetat nobis utrumque, ne cui perverse ingenioso, aut non intelligendi, aut contra disserendi locum relinquamus. Negant fieri potuisse, ut naturae immortali quidquam decederet. Negant denique Deo dignum, ut homo fieri vellet, seque infirmitate carnis oneraret; ut passionibus, ut dolori, ut morti se ipse subjiceret: quasi non facile illi esset, ut citra corporis imbecillitatem se hominibus ostenderet, eosque justitiam doceret (siquidem id volebat) majore auctoritate, ut professi Dei. Tunc enim cunctos fuisse praeceptis coelestibus 0518B parituros, si ad ea virtus ac potestas Dei praecipientis accederet. Cur igitur (aiunt) ad docendos homines non ut Deus venit? Cur se tam humilem imbecillemque constituit, ut ab hominibus et contemni, et poena affici posset? cur vim ab imbecillis, et mortalibus passus est? cur non manus hominum, aut virtute repulit, aut divinitate vitavit? cur non majestatem suam sub ipsa saltem morte patefecit? sed ut invalidus in judicium ductus est, ut nocens damnatus, ut mortalis occisus. Refutabo haec diligenter, nec quemquam patiar errare. Illa enim magna et mirabili ratione sunt 0519A facta; quam quicumque 0519A perceperit, non tantum mirari desinet Deum ab hominibus esse cruciatum, verum etiam facile pervidebit ne Deum quidem potuisse credi, si ea ipsa quae arguit facta non essent.