104

the God-wise, the God-proclaimers? I fear lest you fall away from the inheritance of the saints in light, lest, opening your mouth, you draw in not the Spirit, but that which is opposed to the truth, lest you dogmatize as the essence of God that which is non-existent. For what is the point of that struggle of yours, setting out with greatest diligence to show that there is no contemplation beyond the intellectual energies, even though it is through this very contemplation that transcends the intellectual energies that both the real being of God is most clearly and pre-eminently [shown], and that God is beyond beings? For how could it not be the essence of God, (p. 484) if for those who through sincere prayer have ascended beyond everything sensible and intelligible, the glory of that divine nature is beheld in that very prayer? But how much more beyond every sensible and intelligible thing would the essence of God be, if it were beyond this vision, which is beyond all sensation and intellection?

What of the good things of the age to come? Are they not beyond all our sensory and intellectual powers? “For what eye has not seen, and ear has not heard, and has not entered into the heart of man, God has prepared,” he says, “for those who love Him”˙ but indeed, these things then “the purity of heart will see,” according to Saint Maximos. How then is there in no way a vision beyond all intellections? For do not again sophistically through homonymy, since you are no longer able to contradict us, play the part of one who agrees. For neither will one who calls that which is beyond intellection “intellection” metaphorically and homonymously, because that is also beyond name, changing his mind again struggle to show that it is not beyond intellection. And yet, the one who says that what is beyond intellection is not beyond intellection, since it is called intellection, has some pretext and mask, homonymy, but he who does not even place it beyond the intellectual energies does not even have a sophism; for it would hardly be called an intellectual energy. But in that most blessed way of life in the unending age, the sons of the resurrection will have need of none of the things that constitute life in this age, not of air, nor of light, nor of place and such things, but “instead of all things, the divine nature will be for us,” according to Gregory of Nyssa, and according to Saint Maximos, the deification then of the soul and of the body “will grant the cessation of all natural energies according to intellect and sensation, so that God may appear through both the soul and the body, the natural (p. 486) characteristics having been overcome by the excess of glory.” What then is the light seen by the bodily eyes, without air and not sensible, beyond all natural knowledge? Is it not the glory of God that shines around and shines within? And what is it that makes us contemplative beyond all sensation and intellection? Is it not the Spirit of God, who will then make not only our mind, but also our body spiritual? How then is there no vision beyond intellection, nor any other light of the heart, except knowledge?

But I also, in another way, posit our sacred faith as a vision of our heart beyond all sensations and all intellections, as transcending all the intellectual powers of our soul; and by faith I mean not the pious confession, but the unshakeable foundation upon it and upon the things promised by God. For how through it do we see the things promised in that future, unending age? By the senses? But “faith is the substance of things hoped for,” but by sensation there would be no means to see that which is future and hoped for; for this reason the Apostle also added, “the evidence of things not seen.” Will some intellectual power then see the things hoped for? And how, when they have in no way entered into the heart of man? What then, do we not see through faith the things promised to us by God, since it transcends all sensory and intellectual energies? But have not all those from of old the

104

τούς θεοσόφους, τούς θεοκήρυκας; ∆έδοικα μή τοῦ ἐν φωτί κλήρου τῶν ἁγίων ἀπορρυῇς, μή, τό στόμα ἀνοίξας, ἑλκύσῃς Πνεῦμα, ἀλλά τό ἀντικείμενον τῇ ἀληθείᾳ, μή οὐσίαν δογματίσῃς Θεοῦ τό ἀνύπαρκτον. Τί γάρ σοι βούλεται ὁ ἀγών ἐκεῖνος, δεῖξαι τιθεμένῳ διά σπουδῆς μεγίστης ὡς οὐκ ἔστι θεωρία ὑπέρ τάς νοεράς ἐνεργείας, καίτοι δι᾿ αὐτῆς μόνης τῆς ὑπερβαινούσης τάς νοεράς ἐνεργείας θεωρίας καί τό ὄντως εἶναι τόν Θεόν τρανότατα καί ἐς τά μάλιστα διαφερόντως καί τό ὑπέρ τά ὄντα εἶναι τόν Θεόν; Πῶς γάρ οὐκ ἄν εἴη ἡ οὐσία τοῦ Θεοῦ, (σελ. 484) εἴγε τοῖς διά τῆς εἰλικρινοῦς προσευχῆς ὑπεραναβᾶσι πᾶν ὅ τί περ αἰσθητόν καί νοητόν ἐν αὐτῇ τῇ προσευχῇ ἡ δόξα τῆς θείας ἐκείνης ἐνορᾶται φύσεως; Πόσῳ δ᾿ ἄν εἴη ὑπέρ πᾶν αἰσθητόν καί νοητόν ἡ οὐσία τοῦ Θεοῦ, εἴπερ ὑπέρ ταύτην εἴη τήν θέαν, τήν ὑπέρ πᾶσαν αἴσθησιν καί νόησιν οὖσαν;

Τί δέ τοῦ μέλλοντος αἰῶνος ἀγαθά; Οὐχ ὑπέρ πάσας ἐστί τάς αἰσθητικάς ἠμῶν δυνάμεις καί τάς νοεράς; «Ἅ γάρ ὀφθαλμός οὐκ εἶδε καί οὖς οὐκ ἤκουσε καί ἐπί καρδίαν ἀνθρώπου οὐκ ἀνέβη ἡτοίμασε», φησίν, «ὁ Θεός τοῖς ἀγαπῶσιν αὐτόν»˙ ἀλλά μήν ταῦτα τότε «ἡ καθαρότης τῆς καρδίας ὄψεται», κατά τόν ἅγιον Μάξιμον. Πῶς οὖν οὐκ ἔστιν οὐδαμῶς ὅρασις ὑπέρ πάσας τάς νοήσεις; Μηδέ γάρ σοφιστικῶς αὖθις διά τῆς ὁμωνυμίας, ἅτε μηκέθ᾿ ἡμῖν ἔχων ἀντιλέγειν, ὑποκρίναιο τόν συμφθεγγόμενον. Οὐδέ γάρ ὁ λέγων μεταφορικῶς καί ὁμωνύμως νόησιν τό ὑπέρ νόησιν, διά τό καί ὑπερώνυμον ἐκεῖνο εἶναι, μεταβαλών αὖθις ἀγωνιεῖται δεῖξαι μή ὑπέρ νόησιν ἐκεῖνο εἶναι. Καί μήν ὁ μέν εἰπών οὐχ ὑπέρ νόησιν τό ὑπέρ νόησιν, ὡς νόησιν καλούμενον, ἔχει τι πρόσχημα καί προσωπεῖον, τήν ὁμωνυμίαν, ὁ δέ μηδ᾿ ὑπέρ τάς νοεράς ἐνεργείας ἐκεῖνο τιθέμενος οὐδέ σοφίσασθαι γοῦν ἔχει˙ νοερά γάρ ἐνέργεια ἐκεῖνο ἥκιστα κληθείη ἄν. Ἀλλά γάρ ἐν τῇ μακαριωτάτῃ ἐκείνῃ κατά τόν ἄληκτον αἰῶνα διαγωγῇ τοῖς υἱοῖς τῆς ἀναστάσεως οὐδενός δεήσει τῶν κατά τόν αἰῶνα συνιστώντων τόν βίον, οὐκ ἀέρος, οὐ φωτός, οὐ τόπου καί τῶν τοιούτων, ἀλλ᾿ «ἀντί πάντων ἡμῖν ἡ θεία γενήσεται φύσις» κατά τόν Νύσσης Γρηγόριον, καί κατά τόν ἅγιον Μάξιμον ἡ τῆς ψυχῆς τότε καί τοῦ σώματος θέωσις «παςῶν τῶν κατά νοῦν τε καί αἴσθησιν φυσικῶν ἐνεργειῶν χαρίσεται τήν ἀπόπαυσιν, ὡς τόν Θεόν διά τε τῆς ψυχῆς καί τοῦ σώματος φαίνεσθαι, νικηθέντων τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῆς δόξης τῶν φυσικῶν (σελ. 486) γνωρισμάτων». Τί τοίνυν τό διά τῶν σωματικῶν ὀφθαλμῶν, ἄνευ ἀέρος καί οὐκ αἰσθητόν, ὑπέρ πᾶσαν γνῶσιν φυσικήν ὁρώμενον φῶς; Οὐχ ἡ περιαυγάζουσά τε καί ἐναυγάζουσα δόξα τοῦ Θεοῦ; Τί δέ τό ὑπέρ πᾶσαν αἴσθησίν τε καί νόησιν θεωρητικόν ἡμᾶς ἀπεργαζόμενον; Οὐ τό Πνεῦμα τοῦ Θεοῦ, τό μή τόν νοῦν μόνον, ἀλλά καί τό σῶμα τόθ᾿ ἡμῶν πνευματικόν ποιῆσον; Πῶς οὖν οὐδεμία ὅρασίς ἐστιν ὑπέρ τήν νόησιν, οὐδέ φῶς τῆς καρδίας ἕτερον, ὅτι μή ἡ γνῶσις;

Ἐγώ δέ καί τήν ἱεράν ἡμῶν πίστιν ὑπέρ πάσας τάς αἰσθήσεις καί πάσας τάς νοήσεις ὅρασιν τῆς ἡμετέρας ἕτερον τρόπον τίθεμαι καρδίας, ὠς ὑπερβαίνουσαν τάς νοεράς πάσας δυνάμεις τῆς ἡμῶν ψυχῆς˙ πίστιν δέ λέγω οὐ τήν εὐσεβῆ ὁμολογίαν, ἀλλά τήν ἐπ᾿ αὐτῇ καί τοῖς ὐπό τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπηγγελμένοις ἀμετάπειστον ἵδρυσιν. Πῶς γάρ δι᾿ αὐτῆς ὁρῶμεν τά ἐπηγγελμένα κατά τόν μέλλοντα ἐκεῖνον ἄληκτον αἰῶνα; Ταῖς αἰσθήσεσιν; Ἀλλά «πίστις ἐστί ἐλπιζομένων ὑπόστασις», αἰσθήσει δέ τό μέλλον τε καί ἐλπιζόμενον οὐδ᾿ ἰδεῖν γένοιτ᾿ ἄν τις μηχανή˙ διό καί ὁ ἀπόστολος προσέθηκε, «πραγμάτων ἔλεγχος οὐ βλεπομένων». Ἆρ᾿ οὖν νοερά τις δύναμις ὄψεται τά ἐλπιζόμενα; Καί πῶς, ἅ μηδαμῶς ἐπί καρδίαν ἀναβέβηκεν ἀνθρώπου; Τί οὖν, οὐχ ὁρῶμεν διά τῆς πιστεως τά ἐπηγγελμένα ἡμῖν παρά Θεοῦ, ἐπειδήπερ ὑπεραναβαίνει τάς αἰσθητικάς καί νοεράς πάσας ἐνεργείας; Ἀλλά μή πάντες οἱ ἀπ᾿ αἰῶνος τήν