3. For the heretics say that Christ is not from God, that is, that the Son is not born from the Father, and is God not by nature but by appointment; in other words, that He has received an adoption which consists in the giving of a name, being God’s Son in the sense in which many are sons of God; again, that Christ’s majesty is an evidence of God’s widespread bounty, He being God in the sense in which there are gods many; although they admit that in His adoption and naming as God a more liberal affection than in other cases was shewn, His adoption being the first in order of time, and He greater than other adopted sons, and first in rank among the creatures because of the greater splendour which accompanied His creation. Some add, by way of confessing the omnipotence of God, that He was created into God’s likeness, and that it was out of nothing that He, like other creatures, was raised up to be the Image of the eternal Creator, bidden at a word to spring from non-existence into being by the power of God, Who can frame out of nothing the likeness of Himself.

3. Haereticorum opiniones de Dei filio.---Aiunt namque haeretici, non ex Deo esse Christum, id est, Filium non ex Patre natum, neque Deum ex natura, sed ex constitutione esse; adoptionem scilicet ejus in nomine, quia sicut plures Deo filii, ita et hic filius sit; dehinc liberalitatem in dignitate, quia sicut dii plures sunt, ita et hic Deus sit: indulgentiore tamen in eo et adoptionis et nuncupationis affectu, ut et prae ca eteris sit adoptatus, et adoptivis aliis major 0098B ipse sit filiis, et excellentius cunctis naturis creatus, creaturis ipse caeteris praestet. Aiunt etiam quidam eorum Dei omnipotentiam confitentes, in similitudinem eum Dei creatum, et ex nihilo 73 ut caetera in aeterni illius Creatoris sui imaginem constitisse: verbo videlicet de non exstantibus jussum esse subsistere, Deo potente similitudinem sui ex nihilo coaptare.