117

This knowledge naturally accrues, «from not being ignorant,» he says, «of the many things, (p. 558) nor of the principles of beings, but rather from knowing all things and hastening to learn all things, whatever anyone professes to know, whether Greek or Egyptian, so that being deficient in none,» he says, «of the things said and known concerning the nature of the cosmos, he might not from that be ignorant of God,» since, according to him, God is known only from existing things, doing something similar, just as if someone having heard that the body is nourished and sustained from edible things alone, were to say that one must be left wanting in none of the edible things, if one desires to live, nor to cease eating daily and hourly, and thus persuaded people to esteem as most necessary for human life the useless mania for luxurious tables and the passion of gluttony, desiring none of the better things. For thus also to the intellectual part of the soul God has supplied as matter the principles of nature, but as things able to guide to the higher knowledge. We, therefore, taking from these what is sufficient, leave aside the superfluous things for those who cannot contain the more perfect nourishment; and if these, being over-aged, do not wish to desist from the nourishment suitable for infants, we also smear a certain Scylla on this universal breast, sometimes moderately extending the fact that it is not very profitable, so as to make them desist from the untimely nourishment. But they, as no longer children, but as perfect in evil, rise up against us and contend to drag us down rather than to run up themselves to the proper measure.

Therefore they say that the Son with the Father comes and makes his dwelling in him, «who knows the principles of the nature of the cosmos; for this one knows the truth. But God is the truth and the Father of truth; but also everything that knows is established and remains in that which is known; therefore he who knows the knowledge of beings will be permanently established in God; and since this one has his dwelling in God immutably (p. 560), it is not unlikely that that one is said to come to this one and to have made his dwelling; «this one is,» he says, «also he who has his mind filled with divine and intelligible light.» This is the most perfect knowledge of God according to the philosopher. But I hear the gospel saying that the devil «is a liar and the father of his lie.» And I know that of opposites there is the same perception and knowledge and science. For he who knows the truth also understands falsehood. If, then, according to the words of the philosopher, that which knows is established and remains in that which is known, and for this reason, according to him, he who has the knowledge of beings is in God and God in him, then falsehood and the father of falsehood have also made their dwelling in him, and this same one is therefore he who also has his soul filled with intelligible darkness; and truly a great darkness overshadows the soul that brings forth such thoughts. For what of the one who said, «I know who you are, the Holy One of God,» did he have Christ in himself because of this knowledge? And what of the one who knows but does not do the will of God, does he have God permanently established in himself? And how «shall he be beaten with many stripes»? And yet Christ in the gospels says that His indwelling and the Father's accrues from the keeping of the commandments, and from the indwelling, the manifestation. But this one, contradicting Him, says that the indwelling comes from what seems to him to be the manifestation, and clearly in opposition, that the manifestation comes not from the commandments, but from knowledge, and a knowledge which he previously declared could in no way accrue from the keeping of the divine commandments. With such light and truth has he filled his own mind. Not only has he previously said that the divine commandments are unable to provide this knowledge, but he also called this philosophy, which is furnished through the lessons of philosophy, and said that this was foolishness before God; what he then called foolishness, (p. 562) he now declares to be God.

117

ἡ γνῶσις αὕτη προσγίνεσθαι πέφυκεν, «ἐκ τοῦ μή ἀγνοεῖν», φησί, «τά πολλά, (σελ. 558) μηδέ τούς λόγους τῶν ὄντων, μᾶλλον δέ ἐκ τοῦ γινώσκειν πάντα καί πάντα σπεύδειν μανθάνειν, ὅ τί τίς ἐπαγγέλλεται εἰδέναι, κἄν Ἕλλην ἦ κἄν Αἰγύπτιος, ἵνα μηδενός», φησί, «τῶν περί κόσμου φύσεως εἰρημένων τε καίκ ἐγνωσμένων λειπόμενος, ἐξ ἐκείνου ἀγνοήσῃ Θεόν», ἐπεί καί κατ᾿ αὐτόν ἐκ τῶν ὄντων μόνων ὁ Θεός γινώσκεται, ὅμοιόν τι ποιῶν, ὥσπερ ἄν εἴ τις ἀκούσας ἐκ τῶν ἐδωδίμων μόνων τρέφεσθαί τε καί συνίστασθαι τό σῶμα, δεῖν ἔλεγε μηδενός ἀπολελεῖφθαι τῶν ἐδωδίμων, εἴ τις τοῦ ζῆν ἐφίεται, μηδέ διαλιμπάνειν σιτιζόμενον ὁσημέραι τε καί ὧραι, καί οὕτω τήν περί τάς πολυτελεῖς τραπέζας ἄχρηστον μανίαν καί τό τῆς γαστριμαργίας πάθος ὡς ἀναγκαιότατα τῷ βίῳ τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἔπειθε δοξάζειν, μηδενός τῶν κρειττόνων ὀρεγομένους. Οὕτω γάρ καί τῷ διανοητικῷ τῆς ψυχῆς ὕλην ὁ Θεός ὑπέθετο τούς τῆς φύσεως λόγους, ἀλλ᾿ ὡς πρός τήν ὑψηλοτέραν γνῶσιν χειραγωγεῖν δυναμένους. Ἡμεῖς οὖν τό αὔταρκες ἐκ τούτων ἀπολαμβάνοντες τά περιττά παραλείπομεν τοῖς μή χωροῦσιν τήν τελεωτέραν τροφήν˙ κἄν, ὑπερήλικες ὄντες οὗτοι, τῆς νηπίοις καταλλήλου τροφῆς οὐκ ἀπανίστασθαι βούλωνται, ἐπαλείφομεν καί τινα Σκύλλαν τῷ παγκοσμίῳ τούτῳ μαστῷ, τό μή πάνυ λυσιτελεῖν ἔστιν ὅτε μετρίως ἐκτείνοντες ὡς ἀπαναστήσοντες τῆς ἀκαίρου τροφῆς. Οἵ δ᾿ ὡς οὐκέτι παῖδες, ἀλλ᾿ ὡς τέλειοι τήν κακίαν, ἡμῖν ἐπανίστανται καί φιλονεικοῦσιν ἡμᾶς κατασπᾶσαι μᾶλλον ἤ αὐτοί πρός τό προσῆκον μέτρον ἀναδραμεῖν.

∆ιό καί τόν Υἱόν μετά τοῦ Πατρός ἥκειν καί τήν μονήν ποιεῖσθαι ἐν ἐκείνῳ φασίν, «ὅς τούς λόγους οἶδε τῆς τοῦ κόσμου φύσεως˙ γινώσκει γάρ οὗτος τό ἀληθές. Θεός δέ ἡ ἀλήθεια καί ὁ τῆς ἀληθείας Πατήρ˙ ἀλλά καί πᾶν τό γινῶσκον ἐν τῷ γινωσκομένῳ ἐστήρικταί τε καί μένει˙ οὐκοῦν ἐν τῷ Θεῷ ἔσται μονίμως ἱδρυμένος ὁ τήν τῶν ὄντων γνῶσιν εἰδώς˙ τούτου δ᾿ ἐν Θεῷ τήν μονήν ἀμετάβλητον (σελ. 560) ἔχοντος, οὐκ ἀπεικός ἐκεῖνόν γε παρά τοῦτον ἐλθεῖν λέγεσθαι καί τήν μονήν πεποιῆσθαι˙ «οὗτος ἐστι», φησί, «καί ὁ φωτός θείου καί νοητοῦ ἔμπλεων τόν νοῦν κεκτημένος». Αὕτη ἐστίν ἡ τελεωτάτη τοῦ φιλοσόφου θεογνωσία. Ἐγώ δέ ἀκούω τοῦ εὐαγγελίου λέγοντος, ὅτι ὁ διάβολος «ψεύστης ἐστί καί ὁ πατήρ τοῦ ψεύδους αὐτοῦ». Οἶδα δέ καί τῶν ἐναντίων τήν αὐτήν οὖσαν αἴσθησιν καί γνῶσιν καί ἐπιστήμην. Ὁ γοῦν εἰδώς τήν ἀλήθειαν καί τό ψεῦδος ἐπίσταται. Εἰ γοῦν, κατά τούς τοῦ φιλοσόφου λόγους, τό γινῶσκον ἐν τῷ γινοσκομένῳ ἐστήρικταί τε καί μένει καί διά τοῦτο κατ᾿ αὐτόν ὁ τήν γνῶσιν ἔχων τῶν ὄντων ἐν τῷ Θεῷ ἐστι καί ὁ Θεός ἐν αὐτῷ, οὐκοῦν καί τό ψεῦδος καί ὁ τοῦ ψεύδους Πατήρ ἐν αὐτῷ πεποίηται τήν μονήν, καί ὁ αὐτός οὗτός ἐστι λοιπόν ὁ καί σκότους νοητοῦ ἔμπλεων τήν ψυχήν κεκτημένος˙ καί ὄντως πολύ σκότος ἐπηλυγάζει τήν ψυχήν ἥ τοιαῦτα πρφέρει διανοήματα. Τί γάρ, ὁ λέγων, «οἶδα σε τί εἶ, ὁ ἅγιος τοῦ Θεοῦ», διά τήν γνῶσιν ταύτην ἐν ἑαυτῷ εἶχε τόν Χριστόν; Τί δέ, ὁ γινώσκων καί μή ποιῶν τό θέλημα τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐν ἑαυτῷ ἔχει μονίμως ἐνιδρυμένον τόν Θεόν; Καί πῶς «δαρήσεται πολλάς»; Καί μήν ὁ μέν Χριστός ἐν εὐαγγελίοις ἐκ μέν τῆς τῶν ἐντολῶν τηρήσεως προσγίνεσθαι φησι τήν αὐτοῦ καί τοῦ Πατρός ἐνοίκησιν, ἐκ δέ τῆς ἐνοικήσεως τήν ἐμφάνειαν. Οὗτος δέ ἀντεστραμμένος μέν ἐκείνῳ ἐκ τῆς αὐτῷ δοκούσης ἐμφανείας φησί τήν ἐνοίκησιν, ὑπεναντίως δέ σαφῶς, οὐκ ἐκ τῶν ἐντολῶν, ἀλλ᾿ ἐκ γνώσεως τήν ἐμφάνειαν, καί γνώσεως, ἥν ἐκ τῆς τηρήσεως τῶν θείων ἐντολῶν μηδαμῶς προσγίνεσθαι πρότερον ἀπεφήνατο. Τοιούτου φωτός καί ἀληθείας τόν οἰκεῖον νοῦν ἔμπλεων κατεσκεύασεν. Οὐ μόνον δέ τάς θείας ἐντολάς ἀδυνάτως ἔχειν τήν γνῶσιν ταύτην πορίζειν πρότερον εἴρηκε, ἀλλά καί φιλοσοφίαν ταύτην ἐκάλει διά τῶν κατά φιλοσοφίαν μαθημάτων χορηγουμένην καί μωρίαν εἶναι παρά τῷ Θεῷ ταύτην ἔφασκεν˙ ἥν οὖν μωρία τότε προσεῖπε, (σελ. 562) Θεόν αὐτήν εἶναι νῦν ἀποφαίνεται