122

He indicated an indwelling and an abiding, perfecting by union and nourishing by contemplation that spiritual eye.

If, then, true knowledge and union and likeness to God are acquired only through the keeping of the commandments, what the philosopher calls knowledge is false knowledge. For he himself also said clearly at the beginning, "it is not possible for this knowledge to be acquired from the keeping of the commandments," and a little above, showing whence this knowledge is naturally acquired, "from not being ignorant," he says, "of the many things, (p. 558) nor of the principles of beings, but rather from knowing all things and hastening to learn everything that anyone professes to know, whether Greek or Egyptian, so that," he says, "lacking nothing of what has been said and known about the nature of the world, he might from that be ignorant of God," since, according to him, God is known only from existing things, doing something similar, as if someone hearing that the body is nourished and sustained from food alone were to say that one must not lack any food, if one desires to live, nor cease eating every day and hour, and thus he would persuade men to consider the useless madness for luxurious tables and the passion of gluttony as most necessary for life, desiring none of the better things. For thus God also laid down the principles of nature as matter for the intellectual part of the soul, but as things able to lead to higher knowledge. We, therefore, receiving what is sufficient from these things, omit the superfluous for those who cannot contain the more perfect food; and if these, being overage, do not wish to depart from the food suitable for infants, we smear some Scylla on this universal breast, at times moderately extending the fact that it is not at all profitable, so as to make them stand up from the untimely food. But they, as no longer children, but as perfect in wickedness, rise up against us and strive to drag us down rather than to run up themselves to the proper measure.

For this reason they say that the Son comes with the Father and makes His abode in him, "who knows the principles of the nature of the world; for this one knows the truth. But God is truth and the Father of truth; but also everything that knows is established and remains in that which is known; therefore he who knows the knowledge of beings will be permanently established in God; and since this one has his abode in God unchangeably (p. 560), it is not unreasonable for Him to be said to come to this one and to have made His abode; "this is," he says, "he who has his mind filled with divine and intelligible light." This is the most perfect knowledge of God of the philosopher. But I hear the Gospel saying, that the devil "is a liar and the father of its lie." And I know also of opposites that there is the same perception and knowledge and science. For he who knows the truth also understands the lie. If, then, according to the words of the philosopher, that which knows is established and remains in that which is known and for this reason, according to him, he who has the knowledge of beings is in God and God is in him, then also the lie and the Father of the lie has made his abode in him, and this same one is then he who has his soul filled with intelligible darkness; and truly great darkness overshadows the soul which brings forth such thoughts. For what? did he who said, "I know who you are, the Holy One of God," have Christ in himself on account of this knowledge? And what? does he who knows and does not do the will of God have God permanently established in himself? And how "will he be beaten with many stripes"? And indeed Christ in the Gospels says that from the keeping of the commandments His own indwelling and the Father's is acquired, and from the indwelling, the manifestation. But this one, inverting that, from the manifestation which seems good to him

122

ἐπιφοίτησιν καί μονήν ὑπέδειξε, τελειοῦσαν τῇ ἑνώσει καί τρέφουσαν τῇ ἐποψίᾳ τό πνευματικόν ἐκεῖνο ὄμμα.

Εἰ γοῦν διά μόνης τῆς τῶν ἐντολῶν τηρήσεως ἡ ἀληθής προσγίνεται γνῶσις καί ἡ πρός τόν Θεόν ἕνωσις καί ὁμοίωσις, ὅπερ ὁ φιλόσοφός φησι γνῶσιν , ψευδογνωσία ἐστίν. Ἀρχόμενος γάρ καί αὐτός σαφῶς εἶπεν «ἐκ τῆς τῶν ἐντολῶν τηρήσεως μή δυνατόν εἶναι ταύτην προσγίνεσθαι τήν γνῶσιν», καί μικρόν ἀνωτέρω δεικνύς, ὅθεν ἡ γνῶσις αὕτη προσγίνεσθαι πέφυκεν, «ἐκ τοῦ μή ἀγνοεῖν», φησί, «τά πολλά, (σελ. 558) μηδέ τούς λόγους τῶν ὄντων, μᾶλλον δέ ἐκ τοῦ γινώσκειν πάντα καί πάντα σπεύδειν μανθάνειν, ὅ τί τίς ἐπαγγέλλεται εἰδέναι, κἄν Ἕλλην ἦ κἄν Αἰγύπτιος, ἵνα μηδενός», φησί, «τῶν περί κόσμου φύσεως εἰρημένων τε καίκ ἐγνωσμένων λειπόμενος, ἐξ ἐκείνου ἀγνοήσῃ Θεόν», ἐπεί καί κατ᾿ αὐτόν ἐκ τῶν ὄντων μόνων ὁ Θεός γινώσκεται, ὅμοιόν τι ποιῶν, ὥσπερ ἄν εἴ τις ἀκούσας ἐκ τῶν ἐδωδίμων μόνων τρέφεσθαί τε καί συνίστασθαι τό σῶμα, δεῖν ἔλεγε μηδενός ἀπολελεῖφθαι τῶν ἐδωδίμων, εἴ τις τοῦ ζῆν ἐφίεται, μηδέ διαλιμπάνειν σιτιζόμενον ὁσημέραι τε καί ὧραι, καί οὕτω τήν περί τάς πολυτελεῖς τραπέζας ἄχρηστον μανίαν καί τό τῆς γαστριμαργίας πάθος ὡς ἀναγκαιότατα τῷ βίῳ τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἔπειθε δοξάζειν, μηδενός τῶν κρειττόνων ὀρεγομένους. Οὕτω γάρ καί τῷ διανοητικῷ τῆς ψυχῆς ὕλην ὁ Θεός ὑπέθετο τούς τῆς φύσεως λόγους, ἀλλ᾿ ὡς πρός τήν ὑψηλοτέραν γνῶσιν χειραγωγεῖν δυναμένους. Ἡμεῖς οὖν τό αὔταρκες ἐκ τούτων ἀπολαμβάνοντες τά περιττά παραλείπομεν τοῖς μή χωροῦσιν τήν τελεωτέραν τροφήν˙ κἄν, ὑπερήλικες ὄντες οὗτοι, τῆς νηπίοις καταλλήλου τροφῆς οὐκ ἀπανίστασθαι βούλωνται, ἐπαλείφομεν καί τινα Σκύλλαν τῷ παγκοσμίῳ τούτῳ μαστῷ, τό μή πάνυ λυσιτελεῖν ἔστιν ὅτε μετρίως ἐκτείνοντες ὡς ἀπαναστήσοντες τῆς ἀκαίρου τροφῆς. Οἵ δ᾿ ὡς οὐκέτι παῖδες, ἀλλ᾿ ὡς τέλειοι τήν κακίαν, ἡμῖν ἐπανίστανται καί φιλονεικοῦσιν ἡμᾶς κατασπᾶσαι μᾶλλον ἤ αὐτοί πρός τό προσῆκον μέτρον ἀναδραμεῖν.

∆ιό καί τόν Υἱόν μετά τοῦ Πατρός ἥκειν καί τήν μονήν ποιεῖσθαι ἐν ἐκείνῳ φασίν, «ὅς τούς λόγους οἶδε τῆς τοῦ κόσμου φύσεως˙ γινώσκει γάρ οὗτος τό ἀληθές. Θεός δέ ἡ ἀλήθεια καί ὁ τῆς ἀληθείας Πατήρ˙ ἀλλά καί πᾶν τό γινῶσκον ἐν τῷ γινωσκομένῳ ἐστήρικταί τε καί μένει˙ οὐκοῦν ἐν τῷ Θεῷ ἔσται μονίμως ἱδρυμένος ὁ τήν τῶν ὄντων γνῶσιν εἰδώς˙ τούτου δ᾿ ἐν Θεῷ τήν μονήν ἀμετάβλητον (σελ. 560) ἔχοντος, οὐκ ἀπεικός ἐκεῖνόν γε παρά τοῦτον ἐλθεῖν λέγεσθαι καί τήν μονήν πεποιῆσθαι˙ «οὗτος ἐστι», φησί, «καί ὁ φωτός θείου καί νοητοῦ ἔμπλεων τόν νοῦν κεκτημένος». Αὕτη ἐστίν ἡ τελεωτάτη τοῦ φιλοσόφου θεογνωσία. Ἐγώ δέ ἀκούω τοῦ εὐαγγελίου λέγοντος, ὅτι ὁ διάβολος «ψεύστης ἐστί καί ὁ πατήρ τοῦ ψεύδους αὐτοῦ». Οἶδα δέ καί τῶν ἐναντίων τήν αὐτήν οὖσαν αἴσθησιν καί γνῶσιν καί ἐπιστήμην. Ὁ γοῦν εἰδώς τήν ἀλήθειαν καί τό ψεῦδος ἐπίσταται. Εἰ γοῦν, κατά τούς τοῦ φιλοσόφου λόγους, τό γινῶσκον ἐν τῷ γινοσκομένῳ ἐστήρικταί τε καί μένει καί διά τοῦτο κατ᾿ αὐτόν ὁ τήν γνῶσιν ἔχων τῶν ὄντων ἐν τῷ Θεῷ ἐστι καί ὁ Θεός ἐν αὐτῷ, οὐκοῦν καί τό ψεῦδος καί ὁ τοῦ ψεύδους Πατήρ ἐν αὐτῷ πεποίηται τήν μονήν, καί ὁ αὐτός οὗτός ἐστι λοιπόν ὁ καί σκότους νοητοῦ ἔμπλεων τήν ψυχήν κεκτημένος˙ καί ὄντως πολύ σκότος ἐπηλυγάζει τήν ψυχήν ἥ τοιαῦτα πρφέρει διανοήματα. Τί γάρ, ὁ λέγων, «οἶδα σε τί εἶ, ὁ ἅγιος τοῦ Θεοῦ», διά τήν γνῶσιν ταύτην ἐν ἑαυτῷ εἶχε τόν Χριστόν; Τί δέ, ὁ γινώσκων καί μή ποιῶν τό θέλημα τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐν ἑαυτῷ ἔχει μονίμως ἐνιδρυμένον τόν Θεόν; Καί πῶς «δαρήσεται πολλάς»; Καί μήν ὁ μέν Χριστός ἐν εὐαγγελίοις ἐκ μέν τῆς τῶν ἐντολῶν τηρήσεως προσγίνεσθαι φησι τήν αὐτοῦ καί τοῦ Πατρός ἐνοίκησιν, ἐκ δέ τῆς ἐνοικήσεως τήν ἐμφάνειαν. Οὗτος δέ ἀντεστραμμένος μέν ἐκείνῳ ἐκ τῆς αὐτῷ δοκούσης ἐμφανείας