I say unoriginate, eternal, unceasing, and, to say the same thing, it is called uncreated according to itself. For according to the divine Maximus again, "the principle of eternal well-being comes by grace to the worthy, bringing with it God Who is by nature superior to all beginning and end, making those who by nature have a beginning and end to be unoriginate and unceasing by grace," since also the great Paul, no longer living a temporal life, but "the divine and eternal life of the indwelling Word," has become unoriginate and unceasing by grace, and Melchizedek "had neither beginning of days nor end of life," not because of his created nature, by which he began to be and ceased, but because of the divine and uncreated grace which is ever-existing beyond all nature and time from the ever-existing God. Therefore Paul was created only so long as he lived the life that came to be out of nothing by the command of God; but when he lived not this life, but the one that came to be by the indwelling of God, he became uncreated by grace, just as also Melchizedek and everyone who has acquired in himself the Word of God alone as living and active.

Thus also the great Basil says that "that which is moved by the Holy Spirit becomes a holy living being with an eternal motion; and man, with the Spirit indwelling in him, received the dignity of a prophet, an apostle, an angel, of God, though he was formerly earth and ashes." And again, "through the Holy Spirit to become a partaker of the grace of Christ, to be called a child of light, to share in eternal glory." And the divine Gregory of Nyssa says "man transcends his own nature (p. 614), becoming immortal from mortal, and incorruptible from perishable, and eternal from ephemeral, and altogether God from man; for he who is deemed worthy to become a son of God will surely have in himself the dignity of the Father." Such, then, are all the godlike by grace, as also gods. But this grace itself is uncreated, not by grace (for there would be a grace of a grace, and of this again another, and this would proceed to infinity and not stop; therefore grace is truly uncreated). For we should let the empty-minded one babble, who says that this grace is a natural imitation, since many terrible heresies are born from this, and according to the divine Maximus again, "nothing created is by nature productive of deification, and deification is in no way an achievement of natural power." You then, guard for me this good deposit of the fathers, that divine grace is uncreated as an energy of God's nature and, according to Saint Isaac, "as the glory of His nature." For when one says that God alone is uncreated, he has included all of His natural energies. What need is there then to inquire and divide further?

But this empty-minded man, initiated into the depths of Satan and impiously holding the divine energies to be created, deceitfully preaches only one uncreated divinity, the divine nature, so that he might be readily accepted by those who do not know the scriptures well, declaring the divine energies to be created, and especially by wickedly dividing the deifying grace of the all-holy Spirit from that super-essential nature. We, therefore, not being ignorant of such villainy, in no way agreed with the things proposed by him, or rather we did not deign to say anything before a precise investigation; but we challenged him to a discussion, so that the pious mind might be made manifest. But he shrank back and did not dare, believe me, even to utter a syllable, though many were present. And if now for this reason he preaches wicked things (p. 616) against us there, he becomes for us a cause of joy and of a great reward in the heavens. Wherefore also to him who proclaimed these things we say, 'Lord, do not hold this sin against him', even though we grieve for those who are being harmed. Nearly all those here will testify together that this is so.

After, however, our departure for the holy mountain in which also a Tome in seven

φημί ἄναρχον, ἀΐδιον, ἀτελεύτητον, ταὐτό δ᾿ εἰπεῖν ἄκτιστον καλεῖσθαι κατ᾿ αὐτήν. Κατά γάρ τό θεῖον πάλιν Μάξιμον «ὁ τοῦ ἀεί εὖ εἶναι λόγος κατά χάριν τοῖς ἀξίοις παραγίνεται τόν Θεόν ἐπιφερόμενος τόν πάσης ἀρχῆς καί τέλους κατά φύσιν ἀνώτερον, ποιοῦντα τούς ἀρχήν ἔχοντας κατά φύσιν καί τέλος ἀνάρχους κατά χάριν καί ἀτελευτήτους», ἐπεί καί ὁ μέγας Παῦλος, τήν χρονικήν μηκέτι ζῶν ζωήν, ἀλλά «τήν τοῦ ἐνοικήσαντος λόγου θείαν καί ἀΐδιον», ἄναρχος γέγονε καί ἀτελεύτητος χάριτι, καί Μελχισεδέκ «οὔτε ἀρχήν ἡμερῶν, οὔτε ζωῆς τέλος ἔσχεν», οὐ διά τήν φύσιν τήν κτιστήν, δι᾿ ἥν τοῦ εἶναι ἤρξατο καί ἔληξεν, ἀλλά διά τήν χάριν τήν θείαν καί ἄκτιστον καί ἀεί οὖσαν ὑπέρ πᾶσαν φύσιν καί χρόνον ἐκ τοῦ ἀεί ὄντος Θεοῦ. Κτιστός οὖν ἦν ὁ Παῦλος μόνον μέχρις ἄν ἔζη τήν προστάγματι Θεοῦ ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων γεγονυῖαν ζωήν˙ ὅτε δέ μή ταύτην ἔζη, ἀλλά τήν ἐνοικήσει τοῦ Θεοῦ προσγενομένην, ἄκτιστος γέγονε τῇ χάριτι, καθά καί ὁ Μελχεσεδέκ καί πᾶς ὁ ζῶντα καί ἐνεργοῦντα μόνον τόν τοῦ Θεοῦ λόγον ἐν ἑαυτῷ κτησάμενος.

Ταῦτα ἄρα καί ὁ μέγας φησί Βασίλειος ὅτι «τό κινηθέν ὑπό Πνεύματος ἁγίου κίνησιν ἀΐδιον ζῶον ἅγιον ἐγένετο˙ ἔσχε δέ ἀξίαν ἄνθρωπος, Πνεύματος εἰσοικισθέντος ἐν αὐτῷ, προφήτου, ἀποστόλου, ἀγγέλου, Θεοῦ, ὤν πρότερον γῆ καί σποδός». Καί πάλίν, «διά πνεύματος ἁγίου κοινωνόν γενέσθαι τῆς χάριτος τοῦ Χριστοῦ, τέκνον φωτός χρηματίζειν, δόξης ἀϊδίου μετέχειν». Ὁ δέ Νύσσης θεῖος Γρηγόριος «ἐκβαίνει» φησί «τήν ἑαυτοῦ φύσιν ὁ ἄνθρωπος (σελ. 614) ἀθάνατος ἐκ θνητοῦ καί ἐξ ἐπικήρου ἀκήρατος καί ἐξ ἐφημέρου ἀΐδιος καί τό ὅλον Θεός ἐξ ἀνθρώπου γινόμενος˙ ὁ γάρ Θεοῦ Υἱός γενέσθαι καταξιωθείς ἕξει πάντως ἐν ἑαυτῷ τοῦ Πατρός τό ἀξίωμα». Τοιοῦτοι μέν οὖν οἱ θεοειδεῖς πάντες κατά τήν χάριν ὥσπερ καί θεοί. Αὐτή δ᾿ ἡ χάρις ἄκτιστος οὐ κατά χάριν (ἔσται γάρ χάρις χάριτος καί ταύτης πάλιν ἄλλη καί τοῦτ᾿ ἐπ᾿ ἄπειρον οὐ στήσεται προβαῖνον˙ ἄκτιστος οὖν ὡς ἀληθῶς ἡ χάρις. Τόν γάρ κενόφρονα ληρεῖν ἐᾶν, μίμησιν φυσικήν εἶναι λέγοντα τήν χάριν ταύτην, ἐπεί πολλαί τε καί δειναί καί ἀπό τούτου τίκτονται αἱρέσεις καί κατά τόν θεῖον πάλιν Μάξιμον «θεώσεως οὐδέν γενητόν κατά φύσιν ἐστί ποιητικόν, καί τῆς κατά φύσιν δυνάμεως οὐδαμῶς ἡ θέωσις ὑπάρχει κατόρθωμα». Σύ δή φύλαττέ μοι τήν καλήν ταύτην τῶν πατέρων παρακαταθήκην ὅτι ἄκτιστος ἡ θεία χάρις ὡς φύσεως ἐνέργεια Θεοῦ καί κατά τόν ἅγιον Ἰσαάκ «ὡς δόξα τῆς φύσεως αὐτοῦ». Μόνον δέ ἄκτιστον εἰπών τις τόν Θεόν, καί τάς αὐτοῦ φυσικάς ἐνεργείας συμπεριείληφεν ἁπάσας. Τί οὖν ἔτι δεῖ ζητεῖν καί διαιρεῖν;

Ἀλλ᾿ ὁ κενόφρων οὗτος, τά βαθέα τοῦ Σατανᾶ μεμυημένος καί κτιστάς δυσσεβῶς δοξάζων τάς θείας ἐνεργείας, μίαν ἄκτιστον δολίως κηρύττει θεότητα μόνην, τήν θείαν φύσιν, ὡς εὐπαράδεκτος εἴη τοῖς μή καλῶς εἰδύσι τάς φραφάς κτιστάς ἀποφαινόμενος τάς θείας ἐνεργείας, μάλιστα δέ τήν θεοποιόν χάριν τοῦ παναγίου Πνεύματος κακῶς διαιρῶν τῆς ὑπερουσίου φύσεως ἐκείνης. Μή ἀγνοήσαντες οὖν ἡμεῖς τήν τοιαύτην πανουργίαν ἥκιστα συνεθέμεθα τοῖς ὑπ᾿ αὐτοῦ προτεινομένοις, μᾶλλον δέ οὐδέ φάναι τι πρό τῆς ἀκριβοῦς ἐρεύνης ἠξιώσαμεν˙ προὐκαλεσάμεθα δέ αὐτός εἰς λόγους, ἵνα φανερά γένηται ἡ εὐσεβής διάνοια. Ὁ δέ ὑπέπτηξε καί οὐδέ γρύξαι, πίστευσον, ἐτόλμησε, πολλῶν παρόντων. Εἰ δέ νῦν πονηρά διά τοῦτο κηρύττει (σελ. 616) καθ᾿ ἡμῶν αὐτόσε, χαρᾶς ἡμῖν πρόξενος γίνεται καί μισθοῦ πολλοῦ τοῦ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς. ∆ιό καί τῷ ἐπαγγειλαμένῳ ταῦτα λέγομεν 'Κύριε, μή στήσῃς αὐτῷ τήν ἁμαρτίαν ταύτην', εἰ καί διά τούς βλαπτομένους ὀδυνώμεθα. Τοῦθ᾿ οὕτως ἔχειν σχεδόν πάντες οἱ ἐνταῦθα συμμαρτυρήσουσι.

Μετά μέντοι τήν πρός τό ἅγον ὄρος ἡμῶν ἀποδημίαν ἐν ᾧ καί Τόμον ἐν ἑπτά