136

but a manifestation of the activity according to natural power, and what has come to be will not be paradoxical, if deification were according to the receptive power of nature; for deification would reasonably be a work of nature, and not a gift of God, and such a one will be able to be God by nature and be properly so called; for the natural power of each of the beings is nothing other than an inviolable movement of nature toward activity. But how deification (p. 616) takes the deified one out of himself, if it is contained within the limits of nature, I cannot comprehend.

The grace of deification, therefore, is beyond nature and virtue and knowledge, and all such things, according to Saint Maximus, fall infinitely short of it; for all virtue and our imitation of God makes the one who possesses it fit for the divine union, but grace itself accomplishes the ineffable union; for through it God whole pervades the worthy whole, and the saints whole pervade God wholly, having received the whole God in place of themselves and having acquired God Himself alone as a prize, as it were, for the ascent to Him, «in the manner of a soul embracing a body, as its own members», and having been deemed worthy to be in Him through the hypostatic adoption by the gift and grace of the Holy Spirit. When, therefore, you hear that God dwells in us through the virtues or that we have Him established in ourselves through memory, do not think this simply is deification, the possession of the virtues, but the brightness and grace of God which comes through the virtues, just as Basil the Great also says, that the soul, having increased the natural impulses by its own ascetic practice and by the help of the Spirit, becomes worthy in the just judgment of God of the brightness given by the grace of God to the saints. And that the brightness given by the grace of God is light, you will learn from him who says, «light is the brightness from there for those who have been purified here, when the righteous will shine forth like the sun, in whose midst God stands, being of gods and kings, distinguishing and dividing the dignities of the blessedness from there». And that this is super-celestial and supra-cosmic, no one will deny; therefore, whoever, he says, «awaits the super-celestial light in the promises of good things, about which Solomon also says, (p. 618) light is for the righteous forever»; and the Apostle, «giving thanks to God who has made us worthy to share in the inheritance of the saints in light».

Indeed, when we say that wisdom comes to someone through diligence and study, we do not say that diligence or study is itself wisdom, but what is produced through them. Moreover, the Lord dwells among men in different ways, according to the worthiness and the manner of those who seek him; for He dwells in one way with the practical, in another with the contemplative, and otherwise with the seer, and in one way with earnest men, but in another with those who have already become gods. But also in the divine vision itself there are many differences; for also to the prophets, to one He appeared in a dream, to another while awake, though in riddles and mirrors, but to Moses 'in appearance and not in riddles'. But when you hear of a vision of God in appearance and not in riddles, remember him who says, «deification, the hypostatic illumination in appearance, which has no generation, but an unimaginable manifestation in the worthy, and the mystical union with God beyond mind and reason in the incorruptible age of beings, by which the saints, beholding the light of the invisible and super-ineffable glory, themselves also become receptive of the blessed purity with the powers above, and the invocation of the great God and Father, which is a symbol of the hypostatic and real adoption by the gift and grace of the Holy Spirit, by which, through the visitation of grace, all the saints are called and will be sons of God».

136

ἀλλά τῆς κατά τήν φυσικήν δύναμιν ἐνεργείας φανέρωσις, καί οὐδέ παράδοξον ἔσται τό γενόμενον, εἰ κατά δεκτικήν δύναμιν φύσεως ἡ θέωσις εἴη˙ φύσεως γάρ ἄν εἰκότως ἔργον, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ Θεοῦ δῶρον ἡ θέωσις εἴη, καί δυνήσεται καί φύσει Θεός ὁ τοιοῦτος εἶναι καί κυρίως προσαγορεύεσθαι˙ οὐδέ γάρ ἄλλο τι καθέστηκεν ἡ κατά φύσιν τῶν ὄντων ἑκάστου δύναμις ἤ φύσεως πρός ἐνέργειαν ἀπαράβατος κίνησις. Πῶς δέ καί (σελ. 616) ἐξίστησιν ἑαυτοῦ τόν θεούμενον ἡ θέωσις, εἰ τοῖς ὅροις τῆς φύσεως αὐτή περιείληπται, συνιδεῖν οὐκ ἔχω.

Ὑπέρ φύσιν τοίνυν καί ἀρετήν καί γνῶσιν ἡ τῆς θεώσεως χάρις καί ἀπείρως τά τοιαῦθ᾿ ἅπαντα κατά τόν ἅγιον Μάξιμον ταύτης ἀποδεῖ˙ ἀρετή μέν γάρ πᾶσα καί ἡ ἐφ᾿ ἡμῖν τοῦ Θεοῦ μίμησις πρός τήν θείαν ἕνωσιν ἐπιτήδειον ποιεῖται τόν κεκτημένον, ἡ δέ χάρις αὐτήν τελετουργεῖ τήν ἀπόρρητον ἕνωσιν˙ δι᾿ αὐτῆς γάρ ὅλος μέν ὅλοις τοῖς ἀξίοις ὁ Θεός περιχωρεῖ, ὅλῳ δέ ὅλοι περιχωροῦσιν ὁλικῶς οἱ ἅγιοι τῷ Θεῷ, ὅλον ἀντιλαβόντες ἑαυτῶν τόν Θεόν καί τῆς πρός αὐτόν ἀναβάσεως οἷον ἔπαθλον αὐτόν μόνον κτησάμενοι τόν Θεόν, «ψυχῆς πρός σῶμα περιφύντα τρόπον, ὡς οἰκείοις μέλεσι», καί ἐν αὐτῷ εἶναι καταξιώσαντα διά τῆς ἐνυποστάτου κατά δωρεάν καί χάριν τοῦ ἁγίου Πνεύματος υἱοθεσίας. Ὅταν οὖν ἀκούσῃς ἐνδημεῖν ἡμῖν διά τῶν ἀρετῶν τόν Θεόν ἤ διά τῆς μνήμης ἐνιδρυμένον ἔχειν τοῦτον ἐν ἑαυτοῖς, μή τοῦθ᾿ ἁπλῶς νόμιζε θέωσιν, τήν τῶν ἀρετῶν κτῆσιν, ἀλλά τήν δι᾿ ἀρετῶν προσγινομένην τοῦ Θεοῦ λαμπρότητα καί χάριν, καθάπερ καί ὁ μέγας φησί Βασίλειος, ὅτι ψυχή τάς φυσικάς ὁρμάς οἰκείᾳ τε ἀσκήσει καί τῇ βοηθείᾳ τοῦ Πνεύματος συναυξήσασα, ἀξία γίνεται ἐν τῇ δικαίᾳ τοῦ Θεοῦ κρίσει τῆς χάριτι τοῦ Θεοῦ διδομένης λαμπρότητος τοῖς ἁγίοις. Ὅτι δέ φῶς ἡ χάριτι τοῦ Θεοῦ διδομένη λαμπρότης, μαθήσῃ παρά τοῦ λέγοντος, «φῶς ἡ ἐκεῖθεν λαμπρότης τοῖς ἐνταῦθα κεκαθαρμένοις, ἡνίκ᾿ ἄν ἐκλάμψωσιν οἱ δίκαιοι ὡς ὁ ἥλιος, ὧν ἵσταται ὁ Θεός ἐν μέσῳ, θεῶν ὄντων καί βασιλέων, διαστέλλων καί διαιρῶν τάς ἀξίας τῆς ἐκεῖθεν μακαριότητος». Ὅτι δέ ὑπερουράνιόν ἐστι τοῦτο καί ὑπερκόσμιον, οὐδείς ἀντερεῖ˙ οὔκουν ὅστις, «τό ὑπερουράνιον», φησί, «φῶς ἐν ταῖς τῶν ἀγαθῶν ἐπαγγελίαις ἐκδέχεται, περί οὗ καί Σολομών λέγει, (σελ. 618) φῶς δικαίοις διαπαντός»˙ καί ὁ ἀπόστολος, «εὐχαριστοῦντες τῷ Θεῷ τῷ ἱκανώσαντι ἡμᾶς ἐν τῇ μερίδι τοῦ κλήρου τῶν ἁγίων ἐν τῷ φωτί».

Οὐ μήν ἀλλά καί διά σπουδῆς καί μελέτης ἐγγίνεσθαί τῳ σοφίαν λέγοντες, οὐκ αὐτό τοῦτο τήν σπουδήν ἤ τήν μελέτην σοφίαν φαμέν, ἀλλά τό δι᾿ αὐτῶν προσγενόμενον. Ἄλλως τε καί διαφόρως ἐνδημῶν ἐστι τοῖς ἀνθρώποις ὁ Κύριος, κατά τήν ἀξίαν καί τόν τρόπον τῶν ζητούντων αὐτόν˙ ἑτέρως μέν γάρ τῷ πρακτικῷ, ἑτέρως δέ τῷ θεωρητικῷ καί τῷ ἐποπτικῷ ἄλλως, καί ἄλλως μέν ᾗ ἀνθρώποις σπουδαίοις, ἑτέρως δέ θεοῖς ἤδη γεγονόσιν. Ἀλλά καί κατ᾿ αὐτήν τήν θείαν ἐποψίαν πολλαί διαφοραί˙ καί τοῖς προφήταις γάρ, τῷ μέν ὄναρ, τῷ δ᾿ ὕπαρ, δι᾿ αἰνιγμάτων μέντοι καί ἐσόπτρων, τῷ δέ Μωϋσῆς «ἐν εἴδει καί οὐ δι᾿ αἰνιγμάτων» ὤφθη. Θεοῦ δέ ὅρασιν ἀκούων ἐν εἴδει καί οὐ δι᾿ αἰνιγμάτων ἀναμνήσθητι τοῦ λέγοντος, «θέωσιν, τήν κατ᾿ εἶδος ἐνυπόστατον ἔλλαμψιν, ἥτις οὐκ ἔχει γένεσιν, ἀλλ᾿ ἀνεπινόητον ἐν τοῖς ἀξίοις φανέρωσιν, καί τήν ὑπέρ νοῦν καί λόγον ἐν τῷ ἀφθάρτῳ τῶν ὄντων αἰῶνι μυστικήν ἕνωσιν πρός τόν Θεόν, καθ᾿ ἥν τό φῶς τῆς ἀφανοῦς καί ὑπεραρρήτου δόξης οἱ ἅγιοι ἐποπτεύοντες, τῆς μακαρίας μετά τῶν ἄνω δυνάμεων καί αὐτοί δεκτικοί γίνονται καθαρότητος, καί τήν τοῦ μεγάλου Θεοῦ καί Πατρός ἐπίκλησιν, σύμβολον οὖσαν τῆς ἐνυποστάτου τε καί ἐνυπάρκτου κατά δωρεάν καί χάριν τοῦ ἁγίου Πνεύματος υἱοθεσίας, καθ᾿ ἥν τῇ ἐπιφοιτήσει τῆς χάριτος υἱοί Θεοῦ χρηματίζουσί τε καί ἔσονται πάντες οἱ ἅγιοι».