138

Lord," he presents the same sequence of purpose." And, "for the blessed," he says, "Paul, the light that shone on the road, through which he was also taken up to the third heaven and became a hearer of ineffable mysteries, was not some illumination of thoughts and knowledge, but a substantial illumination of the power of the good Spirit in the soul, the excess of whose brilliance the eyes of the flesh could not endure and were blinded, through which all knowledge is revealed and God is truly made known to the worthy and beloved soul."

These things, then, are in this way. But it is not at all surprising if the saints, ordering their words with judgment and delivering their teaching in measure with the capacity of their hearers, interpret these visions in many ways. However, the divine and faithful interpreter Symeon, having been initiated by one who knew well through experience the mystical and perfecting energies of the Spirit, as he says in turn from him, hearing the word of the kingdom and being brought to tears, let us not remain in these tears of ours, nor in our hearing, as having heard well, nor in our eyes, as having seen well, and let us not consider ourselves to have enough; "for there are (p. 650) other ears and other eyes and other weepings, and also another mind and soul, which is the divine and heavenly Spirit itself, which hears and weeps, and prays and knows and does the will of God in truth"; "For those, however, who are at the summit of virtue and in whose hearts the noetic light has shone actively, these things become manifest and evident; for 'solid food,' says the blessed Paul, 'is for the perfect, for those who by practice have their senses trained for the discernment of both good and evil; but also the divine Peter says, 'And you have the prophetic word, to which you do well to pay attention, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.'"

But Barlaam, holding all such things as nothing, but also putting them forward as being of the dogma of the Messalians, makes them all collectively of their leader, the Blachernite, and, after openly declaring that those are impious who say there is something else eternal besides the essence of God, he brings the seeing of the eternal glory of God and grants it to this Blachernite. For where is he found saying that not the essence of God is visible, but the eternal glory? For if he had said this, we would have acquitted him of every charge, as one who had learned piety, since Stephen also saw the super-celestial glory of God. For what need was there for the heavens to be opened, if that beholder of it was not to see the glory beyond them? But he also saw with his eyes; "for gazing intently," it says, "he saw." But he also saw it beyond sense; for what power of sight could be able to reach as far as the super-celestial things? And Gregory, surnamed the Theologian, when he calls the angels beholders of the eternal glory, was he too a Blachernite from Trebizond? And I think you would easily say that even the angels in heaven were caught by the error, (p. 652) you who dared to condemn to the heterodox those who chose to live on earth like them, namely those who hymn the most monarchical Trinity as putting forth a natural, co-eternal glory, and who long to see the unutterable radiance; or shall we not also number these among the Messalians? And as for those who pray to be illumined by the essential splendor of God and thus to obtain the light-giving radiance, of what splendor and radiance shall we say they are lovers? For knowledge, which you alone call divine light, is not the essential splendor of God. And those who saw "the hidden lightning under the flesh of the essential beauty" of Christ, what lightning do you think they saw? For surely the sensible light is not the essential beauty of God. And how can the essential light of the highest Trinity be created? Why, then, wishing the things of the Messalians

138

Κύριε", τήν αὐτήν ἀκολουθίαν τοῦ σκοποῦ παρίστησι». Καί, «τῷ μακαρίῳ δέ», φησί, «Παύλῳ τό ἐλλάμψαν ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ φῶς, δι᾿ οὗ καί εἰς τρίτον οὐρανόν ἦρται καί μυστηρίων ἀλαλήτων ἀκουστῆς ἐγένετο, οὐ νοημάτων τις καί γνώσεως φωτισμός ἦν, ἀλλά δυνάμεως τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ Πνεύματος καθ᾿ ὑπόστασιν ἐν τῇ ψυχῇ ἔλλαμψις, οὗ τήν ὑπερβολήν τῆς λαμπρότητος οἱ τῆς σαρκός ὀφθαλμοί μή διενεγκότες ἀπετυφλώθησαν, δι᾿ οὗ πᾶσά τε γνῶσις ἀποκαλύπτεται καί Θεός πρός ἀλήθειαν τῇ ἀξίᾳ καί φιλουμένῃ ψυχῇ γνωρίζεται».

Ταῦτα μέν ταύτη θαυμαστόν δέ οὐδέν εἰ ἐν κρίσει τούς λόγους οἰκονομοῦντες οἱ ἅγιοι καί τῇ τῶν ἀκροωμένων δυνάμει σύμμετρον τήν διδασκαλίαν ἀποδιδόντες πολυτρόπως τάς ὁράσεις ταύτας διερμηνεύουσιν. Ὁ μέντοι θεῖος καί πιστός ἑρμηνεύς Συμεών, ἐκ τοῦ διά πείρας καλῶς εἰδότος τάς μυστικάς καί τελεστικάς ἐνεργείας τοῦ Πνεύματος μυηθείς, ὡς ἀπ᾿ ἐκείνου πάλιν φησίν, ἀκούοντες τοῦ λόγου τῆς βασιλείας καί πρός δάκρυα καταγόμενοι, μή τοῖς ἡμετέροις τούτοις ἐναπομείνωμεν δάκρυσι, μηδέ τῇ ἡμῶν ἀκοῇ, ὡς καλῶς ἀκούσαντες, μηδέ τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς, ὡς καλῶς ἰδόντες, καί ἀρκούντως ἔχειν ἑαυτούς λογισώμεθα˙ «καί γάρ εἰσίν (σελ. 650) ἕτερα ὦτα καί ἕτεροι ὀφθαλμοί καί κλαυθμοί ἕτεροι, ὡς δέ καί διάνοια καί ψυχή ἑτέρα, ὅπερ ἐστίν αὐτό τό θεϊκόν Πνεῦμα καί ἐπουράνιον, τό ἀκοῦόν τε καί κλαῖον, εὐχόμενόν τε καί γινῶσκον καί τό τοῦ Θεοῦ θέλημα ἐν ἀληθείᾳ ποιοῦν»˙ «τοῖς μέντοι τήν ἀρετήν ἄκροις καί ὧν ἐνεργῶς τό νοερόν φῶς ταῖς καρδίαις ἐνέλαμψεν ἐπίδηλα ταῦτα καί καταφανῆ γίνεται˙ "τελείων" γάρ, ὁ μακάριός φησι Παῦλος, "ἡ στερεά τροφή, τῶν διά τήν ἕξιν αἰσθητήρια γεγυμνασμένων πρός τήν τοῦ καλοῦ τε κακοῦ διάκρισιν˙ ἀλλά καί ὁ θεῖος Πέτρος φησί, "καί ὑμεῖς ἔχοντες τόν προφητικόν λόγον, ᾧ καλῶς ποιεῖτε προσέχοντες, ὡς λύχνῳ φαίνοντι ἐν αὐχμηρῷ τόπῳ, ἕως οὗ ἡμέρα διαυγάσῃ καί φωσφόρος ἀνατελεῖ ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ὑμῶν"».

Ὁ δέ Βαρλάαμ, τά τοιαῦτα πάντα παρ᾿ οὐδέν θέμενος, ἀλλά καί προθέμενος ὡς τοῦ Μασσαλιανῶν ὑπάρχοντα δόγματος, τοῦ προστάτου τούτων Βλαχερνίτου ποιεῖται συλλήβδην ἅπαντα καί, ἀσεβεῖς αὐτός φανερῶς ἀποφηνάμενος εἶναι τούς ἀΐδιον ἄλλο τι παρά τήν οὐσίαν τοῦ Θεοῦ λέγοντος, τό τήν ἀΐδιον δόξαν τοῦ Θεοῦ ὁρᾶν τῷ Βλαχερνίτῃ τούτῳ φέρων χαρίζεται. Ποῦ γάρ ἐκεῖνος εὕρηται μή τήν οὐσίαν ὁρατήν λέγων τοῦ Θεοῦ, ἀλλά τήν ἀΐδιον δόξαν; Εἰ γάρ τοῦτ᾿ εἶπεν, ὡς μεταμαθόντα τήν εὐσέβειαν, πάσης ἄν ἡμεῖς τοῦτον ἀπελύσαμεν αἰτίας, ἐπεί καί Στέφανος τήν ὑπερουράνιον εἶδε δόξαν τοῦ Θεοῦ. Τίς γάρ ἦν χρεία τούς οὐρανούς διανοιγῆναι, εἰ μή τήν ὑπέρ αὐτούς δόξαν ὁ θεατής αὐτῆς ἐκεῖνος ὁρᾶν; Ἀλλά καί τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς εἶδεν˙ «ἀτενίσας γάρ», φησίν, «εἶδεν». Ἀλλά καί ὑπέρ αἴσθησιν ἑώρακεν αὐτήν˙ ποία γάρ ὄψεως ἰσχύς μέχρις αὐτῶν ἐλθεῖν τῶν ὑπερουρανίων δυνηθείη ἄν; Γρηγόριος δέ ὁ τῆς θεολογίας ἐπώνυμος λέγων τῆς ἀϊδίου δόξης τούς ἀγγέλους θεωρούς, μή καί αὐτός τραπεζούντιος ὁ Βλαχερνίτης ἦν; Ρᾳδίως δ᾿ ἄν αὐτός οἶμαι καί τούς ἐν οὐρανοῖς ἀγγέλους ὑπό τῆς πλάνης ἁλῶναι φαίης, (σελ. 652) ὁ τούς κατ᾿ ἐκείνους ἐν γῇ βιοῦν ᾑρημένους ἐγκρίναι τοῖς κακοδόξοις τολμήσας, τούς γε μήν ἐξυμνοῦντας τήν μοναρχικωτάτην τριάδα, ὡς φυσικήν συναΐδιον δόξαν προβαλλομένην καί ἐπιποθοῦντας τήν ἄφθεγκτον ἰδεῖν αὐγήν˙ ἤ μή καί τούτους τοῖς Μασσαλιανοῖς ἐναριθμήσωμεν; Τούς δ᾿ ἐπευχομένους ὑπό τῆς οὐσιώδους αἴγλης καταυγασθῆναι τοῦ Θεοῦ καί τυχεῖν οὕτω τῆς φωτοδότιδος αὐγῆς, ποίας ἐροῦμεν αὐτούς αἴγλης καί αὐγῆς ἐρᾶν; Οὐ γάρ ἡ γνῶσις, ἥν σύ μόνην λέγεις θεῖον φῶς, οὐσιώδης αἴγλη τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐστιν. Οἱ δ᾿ ἰδόντες «τήν κεκρυμμένην ἀστραπήν ὑπό τήν σάρκα τῆς οὐσιώδους εὐπρεπείας» τοῦ Χριστοῦ, τίνα σοι δοκοῦσιν ἀστραπήν ἰδεῖν; Οὐ γάρ δή τό αἰσθητόν φῶς οὐσιώδης ἐστίν εὐπρέπεια Θεοῦ. Πῶς δέ καί κτιστόν τό τῆς ἀνωτάτω Τριάδος οὐσιῶδες φῶς; Τί τοίνυν βουλόμενος Μασσαλιανῶν τά