237

you and the power of the Most High will overshadow you?” 6. What then shall we say? Since Matthew did not report what was said by Luke, is Saint Matthew therefore discordant with the truth? Or is Saint Luke not telling the truth, saying nothing about the first things treated by Matthew? Did not God distribute to each, so that the four evangelists, being obligated to preach, might each find what they should work on, and preach some things harmoniously and equally, to show that they have set out from the same source, but that another might narrate the things omitted by each, as he received from the Spirit a portion of the analogy? What shall we do? While Matthew preaches that Mary gave birth in Bethlehem, and according to the genealogies with him from Abraham and David * the incarnate theophany of Christ, 2.255 Saint Mark is not found saying these things, but from the account in the Jordan he makes the introduction of the gospel and says, “The beginning of the gospel, as it is written in Isaiah the prophet, the voice of one crying in the wilderness,” *. Thus also the things treated by Saint John and secured in the Holy Spirit took care not only to speak often about the things already preached, but about the preachings necessarily left by the others for him. For the entire hypothesis of the gospels was of such a manner. For with Matthew having preached that Christ was born and conceived of the Holy Spirit, and according to the flesh was administered from the seed of David and Abraham, some error arose among those who did not understand—not because the gospel was the cause of their being led into error, but because their own minds had strayed from the things devised with good intention from the gospel for the presentation of the full information concerning them. For from this, the followers of Cerinthus and Ebion held him to be a mere man, and * Merinthus and Cleobius or rather Cleobulus, and Claudius and Demas and Hermogenes, who loved the present age and abandoned the way of truth. For at that time, contradicting the disciples of the Lord, they attempted to present their folly from the genealogy according to Abraham and David, not thinking rightly, but hunting for a pretext from this. For they were often contradicted by Saint John and those with him, Lucius and many others, but shamelessness, having hardened 2.256 its own forehead, was ambitious to draw its own evils upon itself. Immediately after Matthew, Mark, having become a follower of Saint Peter in Rome, is permitted to set forth the gospel, and having written it, is sent by Saint Peter to the land of the Egyptians. And this man happened to be one of the seventy-two who were scattered at the word which the Lord spoke, “Unless one eats my flesh and drinks my blood, he is not worthy of me,” so that the presentation might be clear to those who have read the gospels; nevertheless, having returned through Peter, he is deemed worthy to evangelize, being filled with the Holy Spirit. He begins to preach from where the Spirit commanded him, setting the beginning from the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, thirty years after the treatise of Matthew. And with a second evangelist having come, who did not signify clearly concerning the descent from above of God the Word, but in every way emphatically, yet not with such precision, there came about for the aforementioned deceived ones a second darkening of their thoughts, from not being deemed worthy for the illumination of the gospel; they saying that behold, also a second gospel signifying concerning Christ, and nowhere does it speak of the birth from above, but, it says, in the Jordan the Spirit descended upon him and * a voice: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” 7. And since these things were thus being accomplished among such foolish ones, it compels the

237

σὲ καὶ δύναμις ὑψίστου ἐπισκιάσει σοι;» 6. Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν; ἐπεὶ μὴ κατήγγειλεν ὁ Ματθαῖος τὰ ὑπὸ τοῦ Λουκᾶ ῥηθέντα, ἄρα ἀσύμφωνος εἴη ὁ ἅγιος Ματθαῖος πρὸς τὴν ἀλήθειαν; ἢ οὐκ ἀληθεύει ὁ ἅγιος Λουκᾶς, εἰπὼν οὐδὲν περὶ τῶν πρώτων τῷ Ματθαίῳ πεπραγματευμένων; οὐχὶ ἑκάστῳ ἐμέρισεν ὁ θεός, ἵνα οἱ τέσσαρες εὐαγγελισταὶ ὀφείλοντες κηρῦξαι εὕρωσιν ἕκαστος τί ἐργάσωνται καὶ τὰ μὲν συμφώνως καὶ ἴσως κηρύξωσιν, ἵνα δείξωσιν ὅτι ἐκ τῆς αὐτῆς πηγῆς ὥρμηνται, τὰ δὲ ἑκάστῳ παραλειφθέντα ἄλλος διηγήσηται, ὡς ἔλαβε παρὰ τοῦ πνεύματος μέρος τῆς ἀναλογίας; τί δὲ ποιήσωμεν; Ματθαίου μὲν κηρύττοντος ἐν Βηθλεὲμ τὴν Μαριὰμ γεγεννηκέναι, κατά τε τὰς παρ' αὐτῷ γενεαλογίας ἀπὸ Ἀβραὰμ καὶ ∆αυὶδ * τὴν ἔνσαρκον Χριστοῦ θεοφάνειαν, 2.255 ὡς οὐχ εὑρίσκεται ὁ ἅγιος Μάρκος ταῦτα λέγων, ἀλλὰ ἀπὸ τῆς ἐν τῷ Ἰορδάνῃ πραγματείας ποιεῖται τὴν εἰσαγωγὴν τοῦ εὐαγγελίου καί φησιν «ἀρχὴ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου, ὡς γέγραπται ἐν Ἠσαΐᾳ τῷ προφήτῃ, φωνὴ βοῶντος ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ», *. οὕτω καὶ τὰ τῷ ἁγίῳ Ἰωάννῃ πεπραγματευμένα καὶ ἐν ἁγίῳ πνεύματι ἠσφαλισμένα τὴν φροντίδα ἔσχεν, οὐ περὶ τῶν ἤδη κεκηρυγμένων πολλάκις μόνον λέγειν, ἀλλὰ περὶ τῶν ἀναγκαίως ὑπὸ τῶν ἄλλων εἰς αὐτὸν κηρυγμάτων καταλειφθέντων. Ἡ γὰρ πᾶσα τῶν εὐαγγελίων ὑπόθεσις τοιοῦτον εἶχε τὸν τρόπον. Ματθαίου μὲν γὰρ κεκηρυχότος τὸν Χριστὸν γεννηθέντα καὶ ἐκ πνεύματος ἁγίου συλληφθέντα, ἐκ σπέρματός τε ∆αυὶδ καὶ Ἀβραὰμ κατὰ σάρκα οἰκονομηθέντα, πλάνη τις γεγένηται τοῖς μὴ νενοηκόσιν οὐ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου αἰτίου ὄντος αὐτοῖς εἰς τὸ πλανηθῆναι, ἀλλὰ τῆς αὐτῶν διανοίας πεπλανημένης τὰ εἰς παράστασιν τῆς περὶ τῶν αὐτῶν πληροφορίας ἀπὸ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου καλῇ ὑπονοίᾳ ἐπινενοημένα. ἔνθεν γὰρ οἱ περὶ Κήρινθον καὶ Ἐβίωνα ψιλὸν αὐτὸν ἄνθρωπον κατέσχον καὶ * Μήρινθον καὶ Κλεόβιον εἴτ' οὖν Κλεόβουλον καὶ Κλαύδιον καὶ ∆ημᾶν καὶ Ἑρμογένην, τοὺς ἀγαπήσαντας τὸν ἐνταῦθα αἰῶνα καὶ καταλείψαντας τὴν ὁδὸν τῆς ἀληθείας. ἀντιλέγοντες γὰρ τοῖς τοῦ κυρίου μαθηταῖς κατ' ἐκεῖνο καιροῦ ἀπὸ τῆς κατὰ τὸν Ἀβραὰμ καὶ ∆αυὶδ γενεαλογίας τὴν αὐτῶν ἄνοιαν παριστᾶν ἐπειρῶντο, οὐ καλῶς μὲν οἰόμενοι, πλὴν ἐντεῦθεν τὴν πρόφασιν θηρώμενοι. ἀντελέγοντο γὰρ πολλάκις ὑπὸ τοῦ ἁγίου Ἰωάννου καὶ τῶν ἀμφ' αὐτόν, Λευκίου καὶ ἄλλων πολλῶν, παρατρίψασα δὲ 2.256 ἑαυτῆς τὸ μέτωπον ἡ ἀναισχυντία τὰ ἑαυτῆς κακὰ ἐπισπᾶσθαι ἐφιλοτιμήσατο. εὐθὺς δὲ μετὰ τὸν Ματθαῖον ἀκόλουθος γενόμενος ὁ Μάρκος τῷ ἁγίῳ Πέτρῳ ἐν Ῥώμῃ ἐπιτρέπεται τὸ εὐαγγέλιον ἐκθέσθαι καὶ γράψας ἀποστέλλεται ὑπὸ τοῦ ἁγίου Πέτρου εἰς τὴν τῶν Αἰγυπτίων χώραν. οὗτος δὲ εἷς ἐτύγχανεν ἐκ τῶν ἑβδομήκοντα δύο, τῶν διασκορπισθέντων ἐπὶ τῷ ῥήματι ᾧ εἶπεν ὁ κύριος «ἐὰν μή τις φάγῃ μου τὴν σάρκα καὶ πίῃ μου τὸ αἷμα, οὐκ ἔστι μου ἄξιος», ὡς τοῖς τὰ εὐαγγέλια ἀναγνοῦσι σαφὴς εἴη ἡ παράστασις· ὅμως διὰ Πέτρου ἐπανακάμψας εὐαγγελίζεσθαι καταξιοῦται, πνεύματι ἁγίῳ ἐμπεφορημένος. ἄρχεται δὲ κηρύττειν ὅθεν τὸ πνεῦμα αὐτῷ παρεκελεύσατο, τὴν ἀρχὴν τάττων ἀπὸ πεντεκαιδεκάτου ἔτους Τιβερίου Καίσαρος, μετὰ ἔτη τριάκοντα τῆς τοῦ Ματθαίου πραγματείας. δευτέρου δὲ γενομένου εὐαγγελιστοῦ καὶ μὴ περὶ τῆς ἄνωθεν καταγωγῆς τοῦ θεοῦ Λόγου τηλαυγῶς σημήναντος, ἀλλὰ πάντῃ μὲν ἐμφαντικῶς, οὐ μὴν κατὰ ἀκριβολογίαν τοσαύτην, γέγονε τοῖς προειρημένοις ἠπατημένοις εἰς δεύτερον σκότωσις τῶν διανοημάτων τοῦ μὴ καταξιωθῆναι πρὸς φωτισμὸν τοῦ εὐαγγελίου· λεγόντων αὐτῶν ὅτι ἰδοὺ καὶ δεύτερον εὐαγγέλιον περὶ Χριστοῦ σημαῖνον καὶ οὐδαμοῦ ἄνωθεν λέγον τὴν γέννησιν ἀλλά, φησίν, ἐν τῷ Ἰορδάνῃ κατῆλθεν τὸ πνεῦμα ἐπ' αὐτὸν καὶ * φωνή· οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός, ἐφ' ὃν ηὐδόκησα. 7. Ἐπειδὴ δὲ ταῦτα οὕτως ἐν τοῖς τοιούτοις ἀνοήτοις ἐτελεῖτο, ἀναγκάζει τὸ