SANCTI HILARII PICTAVENSIS EPISCOPI DE TRINITATE LIBRI DUODECIM.
14. Christi fides et mortis metum et vitae tollit taedium. 0036A
15. Haereticorum ingenium. ---Sed inter haec emerserunt 0036B supple,
36. Liber XII quae de Spiritu sancto confitenda sunt aperit. 0048C
28. Christus gestis Deum egit. ---Par etiam reliquae 0069A
7. Vox HOMOUSION qua necessitate suscepta. 0100C
10. Filii honor nil detrahit Patri. ---Dicturi autem 0103A
19. Jacob in lucta Deum vidit, non oculis corporis 0141B sed fidei. 0141C 0142A
8. Quid jam sibi tractandum proponat Hilarius. --- 0162A 0162B
19. Quid Scripturis de Deo edoctus sit Hilarius. --- 0171B 0171C 0172A al.
4. Quod natus homo Deus maneat, sensus jam non 0283B refugit. 0283C 0284A
262 6. Alia sunt dicta Christi nondum nati, alia 0285A nati et morituri, alia aeterni. 0285B
37. Unitas Patris et Filii non humano more cogitanda. 0308C Filii nativitas. 0309A
52. Fides vera haereticae adversa. ---Sed inter 0384B 0384C
10. Dictum est EX UTERO ad verae nativitatis ostensionem. 0439C 0440A
21. Filius etsi natus, semper tamen est, quia de 0446A Patre qui semper est. 0446B 0446C
27. De nato ante tempora dici nequit, ANTE QUAM NATUS EST, nec 0450B
32. Semper natus, semper esse animo sentitur. --- 0452C 0453A
40. Mundum Deus ab aeterno simul ac semet praeparavit. 0458B 0458C 0459A
55. Spiritus sanctus non est creatura. ---Et mihi quidem 0469A 0469B
54. Now I ask, whose Godhead is it whereof the fulness dwells in Him? If it be not that of the Father, what other God do you, misleading preacher of one God, thrust upon me as Him Whose Godhead dwells fully in Christ? But if it be that of the Father, inform me how this fulness dwells in Him in bodily fashion. If you hold that the Father abides in the Son in bodily fashion, the Father, while dwelling in the Son, will not exist in Himself. If on the other hand, and this is more true, the Godhead abiding in Him in bodily shape displays within Him the verity of the nature of God from God, inasmuch as God is in Him, abiding neither through condescension nor through will but by birth, true and wholly in bodily fulness according as He is; and inasmuch as, in the whole compass of His being, He was born by His divine birth to be God, and within the Godhead there is no difference or dissimilarity, except that in Christ He dwells in bodily form, and yet whatever dwells in Him bodily is according to the fulness of Godhead; why follow after the doctrines of men? Why cleave to the teaching of empty falsehoods? Why talk of ‘agreement’ or ‘harmony of will’ or ‘a creature?’ The fulness of Godhead dwells in Christ bodily.
54. Qui divinitatis plenitudo in Christo corporaliter habitet.---Et interrogo, cujus in eo divinitatis plenitudo est? Quae si non Patris est, quem mihi Deum alium unius Dei fallax praedicator imponis, cujus divinitatis 0277A plenitudo habitet in Christo? Si vero Patris est, edoce quomodo corporaliter haec in eo habitet plenitudo. Si enim corporali modo Patrem in Filio credis; Pater in Filio habitans non exstabit in sese. Si vero, quod est potius, corporaliter in eo manens divinitas naturae in eo Dei ex Deo significat veritatem; dum in eo Deus est, non aut per dignationem aut per voluntatem, sed per generationem verus et totus corporali secundum se plenitudine manens; dum quod ipse est, id etiam per nativitatem Dei in Deum natum est; neque diversum aut differens aliquid in Deo est, quam id quod corporaliter habitet in Christo; et quidquid inhabitet corporaliter, id ipsum secundum divinitatis est plenitudinem: quid humana sectaris? 253 quid inanium 0277B deceptionum doctrinis inhaeres? quid mihi affers unanimitatem, concordiam, creaturam? Plenitudo divinitatis in Christo est corporaliter.