SANCTI HILARII PICTAVENSIS EPISCOPI DE TRINITATE LIBRI DUODECIM.
14. Christi fides et mortis metum et vitae tollit taedium. 0036A
15. Haereticorum ingenium. ---Sed inter haec emerserunt 0036B supple,
36. Liber XII quae de Spiritu sancto confitenda sunt aperit. 0048C
28. Christus gestis Deum egit. ---Par etiam reliquae 0069A
7. Vox HOMOUSION qua necessitate suscepta. 0100C
10. Filii honor nil detrahit Patri. ---Dicturi autem 0103A
19. Jacob in lucta Deum vidit, non oculis corporis 0141B sed fidei. 0141C 0142A
8. Quid jam sibi tractandum proponat Hilarius. --- 0162A 0162B
19. Quid Scripturis de Deo edoctus sit Hilarius. --- 0171B 0171C 0172A al.
4. Quod natus homo Deus maneat, sensus jam non 0283B refugit. 0283C 0284A
262 6. Alia sunt dicta Christi nondum nati, alia 0285A nati et morituri, alia aeterni. 0285B
37. Unitas Patris et Filii non humano more cogitanda. 0308C Filii nativitas. 0309A
52. Fides vera haereticae adversa. ---Sed inter 0384B 0384C
10. Dictum est EX UTERO ad verae nativitatis ostensionem. 0439C 0440A
21. Filius etsi natus, semper tamen est, quia de 0446A Patre qui semper est. 0446B 0446C
27. De nato ante tempora dici nequit, ANTE QUAM NATUS EST, nec 0450B
32. Semper natus, semper esse animo sentitur. --- 0452C 0453A
40. Mundum Deus ab aeterno simul ac semet praeparavit. 0458B 0458C 0459A
55. Spiritus sanctus non est creatura. ---Et mihi quidem 0469A 0469B
52. Therefore, in the discourse we have expounded above, He had borne witness to the unity of His nature with the Father’s: He that hath seen Me, hath seen the Father also542 St. John xiv. 9.: The Father is in Me, and I in the Father543 Ib. x. 38: cf. xiv. 10, 11. These two passages perfectly agree, since Both Persons are of equal nature; to behold the Son is the same as to behold the Father; that the One abides in the One shows that They are inseparable. And, lest they should misunderstand Him, as though when they beheld His body, they beheld the Father in Him, He had added, Believe Me, that I am in the Father and the Father in Me: or else believe Me for the very works’ sake544 Ib. xiv. 11.. His power belonged to His nature, and His working was the exercise of that power; in the exercise of that power, then, they might recognise in Him the unity with the Father’s nature. In proportion as any one recognised Him to be God in the power of His nature, he would come to know God the Father, present in that mighty nature. The Son, Who is equal with the Father, shewed by His works that the Father could be seen in Him: in order that we, perceiving in the Son a nature like the Father’s in its power, might know that in Father and Son there is no distinction of nature.
52. Pater in Filio visus.---Et idcirco in hoc eodem superiore sermone, naturae sibi cum Patre unitatem contestatus dixerat: Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem (Joan. XIV, 9); et, Pater in me, et ego in Patre (Joan. X, 38). Quae utique differentiam non habent ex aequalitate naturae; cum contemplatio Filii visum compenset et Patrem, et unus in uno manens unum non discernat ab uno. Ac ne per corporalem contemplationem referre ex se paternae contemplationis 0323B visum existimaretur, subjecerat: Credite mihi, quoniam ego in Patre, et Pater in me: sin autem, vel propter opera credite (Joan. XIV, 11 et 12): ut cum virtus naturae res esset, et operatio ipsa virtutis sit potestas; per virtutis potestatem, naturae in se paternae unitas nosceretur: cum in quantum se quisquam Deum cognovisset in virtute naturae, in tantum Deum Patrem cognosceret in potestate naturae: et cum tantus, quantus est Pater, Filius videndum in se Patrem praestaret in gestis, indifferens per id Pater a Filio nosceretur, per intelligentiam indifferentis pro potestate naturae.