SANCTI HILARII PICTAVENSIS EPISCOPI DE TRINITATE LIBRI DUODECIM.
14. Christi fides et mortis metum et vitae tollit taedium. 0036A
15. Haereticorum ingenium. ---Sed inter haec emerserunt 0036B supple,
36. Liber XII quae de Spiritu sancto confitenda sunt aperit. 0048C
28. Christus gestis Deum egit. ---Par etiam reliquae 0069A
7. Vox HOMOUSION qua necessitate suscepta. 0100C
10. Filii honor nil detrahit Patri. ---Dicturi autem 0103A
19. Jacob in lucta Deum vidit, non oculis corporis 0141B sed fidei. 0141C 0142A
8. Quid jam sibi tractandum proponat Hilarius. --- 0162A 0162B
19. Quid Scripturis de Deo edoctus sit Hilarius. --- 0171B 0171C 0172A al.
4. Quod natus homo Deus maneat, sensus jam non 0283B refugit. 0283C 0284A
262 6. Alia sunt dicta Christi nondum nati, alia 0285A nati et morituri, alia aeterni. 0285B
37. Unitas Patris et Filii non humano more cogitanda. 0308C Filii nativitas. 0309A
52. Fides vera haereticae adversa. ---Sed inter 0384B 0384C
10. Dictum est EX UTERO ad verae nativitatis ostensionem. 0439C 0440A
21. Filius etsi natus, semper tamen est, quia de 0446A Patre qui semper est. 0446B 0446C
27. De nato ante tempora dici nequit, ANTE QUAM NATUS EST, nec 0450B
32. Semper natus, semper esse animo sentitur. --- 0452C 0453A
40. Mundum Deus ab aeterno simul ac semet praeparavit. 0458B 0458C 0459A
55. Spiritus sanctus non est creatura. ---Et mihi quidem 0469A 0469B
50. Further their heretical ingenuity presses on in the path prepared by their own godlessness, even to the entire absorption of God the Word into the human soul, and consequent denial that Jesus Christ, the Son of Man, was the same as the Son of God. So either God the Word ceased to be Himself while He performed the function of a soul in giving life to a body674 Apollinaris’ heresy that in Christ the place of the ordinary human soul was supplied by the Logos, the second Person in the Trinity., or the man who was born was not the Christ at all, but the Word dwelt in him, as the Spirit dwelt in the prophets675 This doctrine was held by Marcellus of Ancyra (Sozomen, H.E. II. 33), and Photinus: cp. also what Sozomen (VII. 7) says of Hebion.. These absurd and perverse errors have grown in boldness and godlessness till they assert that Jesus Christ was not Christ until He was born of Mary. He Who was born was not a pre-existent Being, but began at that moment to exist676 This doctrine was held by Marcellus of Ancyra (Sozomen, H.E. II. 33), and Photinus: cp. also what Sozomen (VII. 7) says of Hebion..
Hence follows also the error that God the Word, as it were some part of the Divine power extending itself in unbroken continuation, dwelt within that man who received from Mary the beginning of his being, and endowed him with the power of Divine working: though that man lived and moved by the nature of his own soul677 The preaching of Sabellius, cf. I. 16, protensio sit potius quam descensio, ‘an extension rather than a descent.’.
50. Commenta eorum varia de Verbi et hominis conjunctione.---Quin etiam ad irreligiositatis hujus tamquam 0383A ad praeparatam sibi viam, per id ingenia haeretica contendunt, quod aut defecisse omnino Deum Verbum in animam corporis volunt, ut non idem fuerit Jesus Christus hominis filius, qui et Dei filius; et aut de se defecerit Deus Verbum, dum corpus officio animae vivificat; aut omnino nec fuerit Christus homo natus, quia in eo Dei Verbum modo spiritus prophetalis habitaverit. Sed ridiculae hujus perversitatis error in majorem se impietatis extendit audaciam, ne Jesus Christus, ante quam ex Maria natus est, Christus sit: dum non qui erat natus est, sed ad id tum primum quod 357 natus est coeperit. Per quod etiam illud vitii adjungitur, ut Deus Verbum tamquam pars aliqua virtutum Dei quodam se tractu continuationis extendens, hominem illum 0383B qui a Maria esse coepit habitaverit, et virtutibus divinae operationis instruxerit; animae tamen suae motu naturaque viventem.