559

springing from, and having been trained in all dialectic and sophistry, but also most venerable in the rest of his life, † and being always ranked in the first number in love towards the orthodox, he remained so until this treatise. But he also endured exile, because he was unwilling to condescend to the Arians. And what must I say? Our grief is great and our life a mourning, because the devil is accustomed to grieve us always, as I have already often said. 3.438 25. I shall begin, therefore, to speak about this saying, so that I might omit nothing of the truth, as I said. What has it profited us to cast out the mind from the incarnate presence of Christ? For if your reasoning was brought forth entirely to help, so to speak, our Lord Jesus Christ and God the Word and Son of God, so that we might not say that he took a mind, in order that we might not conceive of a lessening concerning his divinity, much more preferable to us are the Manichaeans and Marcionites and other heresies, not wishing to attribute flesh to him, in order that they might not bring about a lessening to his divinity. But the truth does not have its power according to the will of men, but according to its own governing wisdom and incomprehensible economy. Therefore, as we confess thus and do not hold with the Manichaean—for that one will not do a favor, seeming to say to Christ's praise that he did not take flesh, but rather will fall away from the truth, while seeming to confess the incarnate presence of Christ—so also in the present case for our brothers the vulgar talk will be a vain favor. For it is confessed both by them and by us * unless they wish to think otherwise, as some of them often were, being caught when pressed, and for this reason denying that Christ took true flesh, as was said by me above, that some dared to say the flesh is consubstantial with his divinity. But let those men be cast out as ones who have not repented and have been convicted for such an absurdity by those among them who think rightly concerning the flesh. For certainly the most reverent Apollinarius himself will not deny. 26. If, therefore, the Word, having come, took flesh from Mary in truth, not from the seed of a man, but through the Holy Spirit, and was conceived in truth and formed for himself the flesh, as he is God and fashioner of the first-formed man and of all things, then surely the Word, having come, was not diminished, but remained in his own unchangeable nature. For having taken the flesh, he did not undergo a change, as one who is consubstantial with God the Father and not alien from the Father and his Holy Spirit. If, therefore, it is clearly confessed that he took flesh and was fully grown, then he is not without a soul. For everything that grows to maturity, except for inanimate things, consists of soul and body, according to what is said, "And Jesus advanced in 3.439 wisdom and stature," so that he might show the flesh through the stature; and stature, as I said, is perfected from the soul and body. And after saying "he advanced in stature," it says consequently, "and in wisdom." But he who is the wisdom of the Father, how did he advance in wisdom, if the vessel was alien to a human mind? And if he was without a mind, how did he advance in wisdom in soul and body? And you see how forced an opinion is of those who cast out the mind? But, he says, I do not say that he took a human mind, since we will make him desiring, aroused; for since in us the mind is desirous. And simply, great is the cavilling of men, as it has been said, "God made man simple, but they have made for themselves many reasonings." For if, when we confess that he took a human mind, we will understand in himself the parts of our own lessening, much more, when we confess that he took flesh, will we grant in this part by the same reasoning, that he has been diminished in the flesh; which may it not be. As therefore not in the flesh

559

ὁρμώμενος, πᾶσάν τε διαλεκτικὴν καὶ σοφιστικὴν πεπαιδευμένος, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸν ἄλλον βίον σεμνότατος, † καὶ τῶν πρὸς ὀρθοδόξους ἀεὶ ἐν ἀγάπῃ ἐν πρώτῳ ἀριθμῷ ταττόμενος ἕως τούτου τοῦ λόγου διέμεινεν. ἀλλὰ καὶ ἐξορίαν ὑπέμεινε, διὰ τὸ μὴ βούλεσθαι τοῖς Ἀρειανοῖς συγκατιέναι. καὶ τί με δεῖ λέγειν; πολλὴ ἡμῶν ἡ λύπη καὶ πένθος ἡ ζωή, ὅτι λυπεῖν εἴωθεν ὁ διάβολος ἡμᾶς ἀεί, ὡς ἤδη πολλάκις εἶπον. 3.438 25. Ἄρξομαι τοίνυν περὶ τούτου τοῦ ῥητοῦ λέγειν, ἵνα μηδέν τι, ὡς ἔφην, τῆς ἀληθείας παραλείψω. τί ἡμᾶς ὠφέλησε τὸ παρεκβάλλειν τὸν νοῦν ἀπὸ τῆς ἐνσάρκου παρουσίας Χριστοῦ; εἰ γὰρ ὅλως τοῦ βοηθῆσαι, ἵν' οὕτως εἴπω, τῷ κυρίῳ ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστῷ καὶ θεῷ λόγῳ καὶ υἱῷ θεοῦ ὁ ὑμέτερος λογισμὸς προήχθη, ἵνα μὴ εἴπωμεν αὐτὸν εἰληφέναι νοῦν, ὅπως μὴ νοήσωμεν ἐλάττωσιν περὶ τὴν αὐτοῦ θεότητα, πολλῷ μᾶλλον προτιμότεροι ἡμῶν τυγχάνουσι Μανιχαῖοι καὶ Μαρκιωνισταὶ καὶ ἄλλαι αἱρέσεις, μὴ σάρκα αὐτῷ προσάπτειν βουλόμενοι, ἵνα μὴ ἐλάττωσιν τῇ θεότητι αὐτοῦ περιποιήσωνται. ἀλλ' οὐ κατὰ τὴν τῶν ἀνθρώπων βούλησιν ἡ ἀλήθεια ἔχει τὴν δύναμιν, ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὴν αὐτῆς διακυβερνητικὴν σοφίαν καὶ οἰκονομικὴν ἀκαταληψίαν. τοίνυν ἡμῶν οὕτως ὁμολογούντων καὶ μὴ κατὰ τὸν Μανιχαῖον ἐχόντων οὐ χάριν γὰρ ἐκεῖνος δώσει, δοκῶν εἰς ἔπαινον Χριστοῦ σάρκα λέγειν αὐτὸν μὴ εἰληφέναι, ἀλλὰ μᾶλλον τῆς ἀληθείας ἐκπεσεῖται, δοκήσει ὁμολογῶν τὴν ἔνσαρκον Χριστοῦ παρουσίαν, οὕτω καὶ ἐν τῷ παρόντι τοῖς ἡμετέροις ἀδελφοῖς ἔσται ἡ χυδαιολογία ματαία χάρις τυγχάνουσα. ὡμολόγηται γὰρ παρ' αὐτοῖς τε καὶ παρ' ἡμῖν * ἐὰν μὴ θέλωσιν ἑτέρως φρονεῖν, καθώς τινες πολλάκις ἀπ' αὐτῶν ὄντες ἑάλωσαν πιεζόμενοι, διὰ τοῦτο καὶ ἀρνούμενοι σάρκα ἀληθινὴν τὸν Χριστὸν εἰληφέναι, ὡς ἄνω μοι εἴρηται, ὅτι τινὲς ἐτόλμησαν λέγειν ὁμοούσιον εἶναι τὴν σάρκα τῇ αὐτοῦ θεότητι. ἀλλ' ἐκεῖνοι μὲν παρεκβαλλέσθωσαν ὡς μὴ μεταγνόντες καὶ ἐλεγχθέντες ἐπὶ τῷ τοιούτῳ ἀτοπήματι παρὰ τοῖς περὶ σαρκὸς ἐν αὐτοῖς καλῶς φρονοῦσι. πάντως γάρ που ὁ αὐτὸς εὐλαβέστατος Ἀπολινάριος οὐκ ἀρνήσεται. 26. Εἰ τοίνυν σάρκα εἴληφεν ἐλθὼν ὁ λόγος καὶ ἀπὸ Μαρίας ἐν ἀληθείᾳ, οὐκ ἀπὸ σπέρματος ἀνδρός, ἀλλὰ διὰ πνεύματος ἁγίου, ἐγκυμονηθεὶς δὲ ἐν ἀληθείᾳ καὶ ἀναπλασάμενος ἑαυτῷ τὴν σάρκα, ὡς θεὸς καὶ πλάστης ὢν τοῦ πρωτοπλάστου ἀνθρώπου καὶ πάντων, ἄρα γε οὐκ ἠλαττώθη ἐλθὼν ὁ λόγος, ἀλλ' ἔμεινεν ἐν τῇ ἰδίᾳ ἀτρέπτῳ φύσει. οὐ γὰρ λαβὼν τὴν σάρκα τροπὴν ὑπέστη, ὡς ὁμοούσιος θεῷ πατρὶ καὶ οὐκ ἀλλότριος παρὰ τὸν πατέρα καὶ τὸ ἅγιον αὐτοῦ πνεῦμα. εἰ τοίνυν ὡμολόγηται σαφῶς σάρκα αὐτὸν εἰληφέναι καὶ ἡδρύνθαι, ἄρα οὐκ ἐκτὸς ψυχῆς τυγχάνει. πᾶν γὰρ τὸ ἁδρυνόμενον πλὴν τῶν ἀκινήτων ἐκ ψυχῆς καὶ σώματος συνέστηκε, κατὰ τὸ εἰρημένον «ὁ δὲ Ἰησοῦς προέκοπτεν ἐν 3.439 σοφίᾳ καὶ ἡλικίᾳ», ἵνα δείξῃ διὰ τῆς ἡλικίας τὴν σάρκα· ἡλικία δὲ ἀπὸ τῆς ψυχῆς, ὡς ἔφην, καὶ σώματος τελειοῦται. μετὰ δὲ τὸ εἰπεῖν «προέκοπτεν ἡλικίᾳ» ἀκολούθως φησί «καὶ σοφίᾳ». ὁ ὢν δὲ σοφία πατρὸς πῶς προέκοπτεν ἐν σοφίᾳ, εἰ ἀλλότριον ἦν τὸ σκεῦος νοῦ ἀνθρωπίνου; καὶ εἰ ἄνευ νοὸς ἐτύγχανε, πῶς σοφίᾳ ἐν ψυχῇ καὶ σώματι προέκοπτε; καὶ ὁρᾷς πόση τίς ἐστι βεβιασμένη διάνοια τῶν τὸν νοῦν παρεκβαλλόντων; ἀλλά, φησίν, οὐ λέγω ὅτι νοῦν εἴληφεν ἀνθρώπινον, ἐπεὶ ποιήσομεν αὐτὸν ἐπιθυμοῦντα, ἐρεθιζόμενον· ἐπειδὴ γὰρ ἐν ἡμῖν ἐπιθυμητὴς ὁ νοῦς τυγχάνει. καὶ ἁπλῶς πολλὴ τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἐρεσχελία, ὡς εἴρηκεν «ἐποίησεν ὁ θεὸς ἁπλοῦν σὺν τὸν ἄνθρωπον, αὐτοὶ δὲ ἐποίησαν ἑαυτοῖς λογισμοὺς πολλούς». εἰ γὰρ ὅλως ὁμολογούντων ἡμῶν νοῦν εἰληφέναι τὸν ἀνθρώπινον νοήσομεν εἰς ἑαυτὸν τῆς ἡμετέρας ἐλαττώσεως τὰ μέρη, πολλῷ μᾶλλον ὁμολογούντων ἡμῶν σάρκα αὐτὸν εἰληφέναι δώσομεν κατὰ τὸ μέρος τοῦτο κατὰ τὸν αὐτὸν λόγον, ὅτι ἐν σαρκὶ ἠλάττωται· ὅπερ μὴ γένοιτο. ὡς οὖν οὐκ ἐν τῇ σαρκὶ