566

and he will be turned to strange questions and “endless genealogies,” according to what was said by the apostle. For that this is very foolish and has no need of interpretation is clear to everyone who possesses understanding; that such wisdom and the hypothesis of the argument does not even require questioning. For if we are raised up again to be circumcised, for what reason have we not already undertaken to be circumcised? Do they, then, according to this, who from this life have recognized the perfect and have already undertaken to be perfected in the then-future perfection, happen to act more necessarily than we do? Where then is what was said by the apostle, that “if you are circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing” and “you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace,” and where is what was said by the Lord, “for in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage3.450, but are like angels”? But “you will sit at the table of the kingdom of my Father eating and drinking” and “when I drink it new with you in the kingdom of heaven,” with the addition of “new” and of “at the table of the kingdom,” signifies another meaning. For we ourselves also say, having learned from the divine words, that there is a certain partaking of ambrosial drink and food; about which things it has been said that “what eye has not seen, and ear has not heard, and has not entered into the heart of man, are the things that God has prepared for those who love him.” 38. But he says that first, in the millennium, we partake of natural pleasures without toil and grief, but after the millennium, then we partake of the things that have been spoken of according to the saying, “what eye has not seen and ear has not heard.” But the argument is contrary to the entire contemplation of Scripture. For if “the law made no one perfect,” and we are commanded to keep the law 3.451 after the resurrection, and if the “holy law” given by the Lord through Moses “has become our tutor unto Christ” as being inferior to those who are perfected, having been entrusted to lead them to the greater and most perfect, and when Christ the perfect and master has come and has received from the hand of the one who tutored those being led in, that is, the faithful, the holy virgin and church, and when we have recognized through the law, the tutor, the greater one and “perfecter Jesus,” it is abolished, how will the argument of those saying such things not rather be shown to be a sign of scant understanding and foolishness, that after the perfection of Christ there is again need of a tutor, so that we may return to the “beginning of the elements” and of teaching and of the “laying on of hands,” according to what is written, since the apostle clearly says to us that “everything that is becoming old and growing aged is near to disappearing,” signifying it is about the old covenant and legislation? “For when the priesthood is changed,” he says, “of necessity there is also a change of the law.” But if the old was changed and the new was renewed, who would dare again to introduce the old to us for use, changing the new into obsolescence, preparing us “to fall away from grace” and attempting to turn us away from the benefit of Christ? Having briefly discussed these things in the argument and considering this sufficient because of the breadth of the composition, let us go on to what follows, beloved, as is customary calling upon God as a helper for the hypothesis and demonstration of the remaining things and their refutation. 3.452 Against the Antidicomarianites, 58, but in sequence, 78. 1. From this, which is called by some Dimoerites or is named the presence of Christ incarnate without a mind †, certain other matters sprang up, especially in Arabia, and it was reported to our humility about these things by certain pious men. And first we have written a letter about this hypothesis. However, on account of the sequence of the number, here also setting forth the letter in its entirety, with those things reasonably added to it or taken away from it, we will speak to the heresy.

566

καὶ ξένας ζητήσεις καὶ «ἀπεράντους γενεαλογίας», κατὰ τὰ ὑπὸ τοῦ ἀποστόλου εἰρημένα, τραπήσεται. εἶναι γὰρ τοῦτο εὔηθες πολὺ καὶ μηδὲ χρείαν ἔχον ἑρμηνείας παντὶ σαφές ἐστι τῷ σύνεσιν κεκτημένῳ· ὅτι οὐδὲ ἐπιδέεται ζητήσεως ἡ τοιαύτη σοφία καὶ ὑπόθεσις τοῦ λόγου. εἰ γὰρ ἐγειρόμεθα πάλιν περιτέμνεσθαι, τίνι τῷ λόγῳ οὐ προειλήφαμεν τὸ περιτέμνεσθαι; ἄρα οὖν κατὰ τοῦτο ἀναγκαιότερον ἡμῶν πράττοντες τυγχάνουσιν οἱ ἀπεντεῦθεν τὸ τέλειον ἐπιγνόντες καὶ προειληφότες τελειοῦσθαι ἐν τῇ τότε μελλούσῃ τελειότητι. ποῦ οὖν τὸ παρὰ τῷ ἀποστόλῳ εἰρημένον ὅτι «ἐὰν περιτέμνησθε, Χριστὸς ὑμᾶς οὐδὲν ὠφελήσει» καὶ «οἵτινες ἐν νόμῳ δικαιοῦσθε, τῆς χάριτος ἐξεπέσατε», καὶ ποῦ τὸ παρὰ τῷ κυρίῳ εἰρημένον «ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἀναστάσει οὔτε γαμοῦσιν οὔτε γαμίσκον3.450 ται, ἀλλὰ ἰσάγγελοί εἰσι»; τὸ δὲ «καθήσεσθε ἐπὶ τῆς τραπέζης τῆς βασιλείας τοῦ πατρός μου ἐσθίοντες καὶ πίνοντες» καὶ «ὅταν αὐτὸ πίω καινὸν μεθ' ὑμῶν ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τῶν οὐρανῶν» μετὰ προσθήκης τοῦ καινόν καὶ τοῦ «ἐπὶ τῆς τραπέζης τῆς βασιλείας» ἕτερον τὸν νοῦν σημαίνει. καὶ γὰρ καὶ αὐτοί φαμεν μεμαθηκότες ἀπὸ τῶν θείων λόγων μετάληψίν τινα πόματος καὶ βρώματος ἀμβροσίου· περὶ ὧν εἴρηται ὅτι «ἃ ὀφθαλμὸς οὐκ εἶδε καὶ οὖς οὐκ ἤκουσε, καὶ ἐπὶ καρδίαν ἀνθρώπου οὐκ ἀνέβη, ἃ ἡτοίμασεν ὁ θεὸς τοῖς ἀγαπῶσιν αὐτόν». 38. Ἀλλά φησιν ὅτι πρῶτον μὲν ἐν τῇ χιλιονταετηρίδι τῶν φυσικῶν μεταλαμβάνομεν ἡδέων ἄνευ καμάτου καὶ λύπης, μετὰ δὲ τὴν χιλιονταετηρίδα, τότε μεταλαμβάνομεν ὧν εἴρηται κατὰ τὸ εἰρημένον «ἃ ὀφθαλμὸς οὐκ εἶδε καὶ οὖς οὐκ ἤκουσεν». ἀντίθετος δέ ἐστιν ὁ λόγος πρὸς τὴν πᾶσαν τῆς γραφῆς θεωρίαν. εἰ γὰρ «ὁ νόμος οὐδένα ἐτελείωσε», νόμον 3.451 δὲ μετὰ ἀνάστασιν φυλάττειν προσταττόμεθα, καὶ εἰ ὁ «ἅγιος νόμος» ὁ διὰ Μωυσέως ὑπὸ κυρίου δοθεὶς «παιδαγωγὸς εἰς Χριστὸν ἡμῖν γέγονεν» ὡς ὑποδεέστερος τῶν τελειουμένων, τῷ μείζονι καὶ τελειοτάτῳ προσάγειν πεπιστευμένος, Χριστοῦ δὲ τοῦ τελείου ἐλθόντος καὶ δεσπότου καὶ παρειληφότος ἐκ χειρὸς τοῦ παιδαγωγήσαντος τῶν εἰσαγομένων τουτέστι τῶν πιστῶν τὴν ἁγίαν παρθένον καὶ ἐκκλησίαν καὶ ἡμῶν ἐπιγνόντων διὰ μὲν νόμου τοῦ παιδαγωγοῦ τὸν μείζονα καὶ «τελειωτὴν Ἰησοῦν» καταργεῖται, πῶς οὐχὶ μᾶλλον βραχείας ἐννοίας καὶ εὐηθείας σημεῖον δειχθήσεται ὁ λόγος τῶν τὰ τοιαῦτα λεγόντων ὅτι μετὰ τὴν τοῦ Χριστοῦ τελείωσιν πάλιν παιδαγωγοῦ χρεία, ὅπως ἐπιστρέψωμεν ἐπὶ τὴν «ἀρχὴν τῶν στοιχείων» καὶ διδαχῆς καὶ «ἐπιθέσεως χειρῶν», κατὰ τὸ γεγραμμένον, σαφῶς ἡμῖν τοῦ ἀποστόλου λέγοντος ὅτι «πᾶν τὸ παλαιούμενον καὶ γηράσκον ἐγγὺς ἀφανισμοῦ γίνεται», ὡς περὶ παλαιᾶς διαθήκης καὶ νομοθεσίας σημαίνων. «μετατιθεμένης», γάρ φησι, «τῆς ἱερωσύνης ἐξ ἀνάγκης καὶ νόμου μετάθεσις γίνεται». εἰ δὲ μετετέθη ἡ παλαιὰ καὶ ἀνεκαινίσθη ἡ νέα, τίς ἡμῖν πάλιν τολμηρῶς παρεισάγοι παλαιὰν εἰς χρῆσιν, τὴν καινὴν εἰς παλαίωσιν μετατιθέμενος, «τῆς μὲν χάριτος ἀποπεσεῖν» παρασκευάζων καὶ ἀπὸ τῆς ὠφελείας Χριστοῦ ἡμᾶς ἐκτρέπειν πειρώμενος; Συντόμως δὲ ταῦτα τῷ λόγῳ διελόντες καὶ τοῦτο ἱκανὸν λογισάμενοι διὰ τὸ πλάτος τῆς συντάξεως, ἐπὶ τὰς ἑξῆς ἴωμεν, ἀγαπητοί, θεὸν βοηθὸν συνήθως ἐπικαλούμενοι εἰς τὴν τῶν λοιπῶν ὑπόθεσίν τε καὶ ὑπόδειξιν καὶ τούτων ἀνατροπήν. 3.452 Κατὰ Ἀντιδικομαριαμιτῶν ˉνˉη, τῆς δὲ ἀκολουθίας ˉοˉη. 1. Ἀπὸ ταύτης τῆς παρά τισι ∆ιμοιριτῶν κεκλημένης ἢ χωρὶς νοῦ ἐνσάρκου Χριστοῦ παρουσίας † ὀνομαζομένης, ἐφύη τινὰ ἕτερα πράγματα, μάλιστα ἐν τῇ Ἀραβίᾳ, ἀνηνέχθη δὲ τῇ ἡμῶν ταπεινότητι περὶ τούτων ὑπό τινων εὐλαβῶν. καὶ πρῶτον μὲν ἐπιστολὴν περὶ τῆς ὑποθέσεως ταύτης γεγραφήκαμεν. ὅμως δὲ διὰ τὴν ἀκολουθίαν τοῦ ἀριθμοῦ καὶ ἐνταῦθα αὐτὴν διόλου τὴν ἐπιστολὴν παραθέμενοι μετὰ καὶ τῶν εὐλόγως ταύτῃ προστεθειμένων ἢ ἀπὸ αὐτῆς ἐξαιρουμένων εἰς τὴν αἵρεσιν ἐροῦμεν.