Chapter I.—On the Authority of the Gospels.
Chapter II.—On the Order of the Evangelists, and the Principles on Which They Wrote.
Chapter IV.—Of the Fact that John Undertook the Exposition of Christ’s Divinity.
Chapter IX.—Of Certain Persons Who Pretend that Christ Wrote Books on the Arts of Magic.
Chapter XIII.—Of the Question Why God Suffered the Jews to Be Reduced to Subjection.
Chapter XVII.—In Opposition to the Romans Who Rejected the God of Israel Alone.
Chapter XIX.—The Proof that This God is the True God.
Chapter XXII.—Of the Opinion Entertained by the Gentiles Regarding Our God.
Chapter XXIII.—Of the Follies Which the Pagans Have Indulged in Regarding Jupiter and Saturn.
Chapter XXVIII.—Of the Predicted Rejection of Idols.
Chapter XXXI.—The Fulfilment of the Prophecies Concerning Christ.
Chapter XXXIV.—Epilogue to the Preceding.
Chapter VI.—On the Position Given to the Preaching of John the Baptist in All the Four Evangelists.
Chapter VII.—Of the Two Herods.
Chapter XII.—Concerning the Words Ascribed to John by All the Four Evangelists Respectively.
Chapter XIII.—Of the Baptism of Jesus.
Chapter XIV.—Of the Words or the Voice that Came from Heaven Upon Him When He Had Been Baptized.
Chapter XVI.—Of the Temptation of Jesus.
Chapter XVII.—Of the Calling of the Apostles as They Were Fishing.
Chapter XVIII.—Of the Date of His Departure into Galilee.
Chapter XIX.—Of the Lengthened Sermon Which, According to Matthew, He Delivered on the Mount.
Chapter XXI.—Of the Order in Which the Narrative Concerning Peter’s Mother-In-Law is Introduced.
Chapter XXIX.—Of the Two Blind Men and the Dumb Demoniac Whose Stories are Related Only by Matthew.
Chapter XVII.—Of the Harmony of the Four Evangelists in Their Notices of the Draught of Vinegar.
Chapter X.—Of the Evangelist John, and the Distinction Between Him and the Other Three.
Chapter I.—On the Authority of the Gospels.
1. In the entire number of those divine records which are contained in the sacred writings, the gospel deservedly stands pre-eminent. For what the law and the prophets aforetime announced as destined to come to pass, is exhibited in the gospel in its realization1 Reading redditum. Four mss. give revelatum = as brought to light.—Migne. and fulfilment. The first preachers of this gospel were the apostles, who beheld our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in person when He was yet present in the flesh. And not only did these2 Instead of Qui non solum, as above, many mss. read Cujus, etc.—Migne. men keep in remembrance the words heard from His lips, and the deeds wrought by Him beneath their eyes; but they were also careful, when the duty of preaching the gospel was laid upon them, to make mankind acquainted with those divine and memorable occurrences which took place at a period antecedent to the formation of their own connection with Him in the way of discipleship, which belonged also to the time of His nativity, His infancy, or His youth, and with regard to which they were able to institute exact inquiry and to obtain information, either at His own hand or at the hands of His parents or other parties, on the ground of the most reliable intimations and the most trustworthy testimonies. Certain of them also—namely, Matthew and John—gave to the world, in their respective books, a written account of all those matters which it seemed needful to commit to writing concerning Him.
2. And to preclude the supposition that, in what concerns the apprehension and proclamation of the gospel, it is a matter of any consequence whether the enunciation comes by men who were actual followers of this same Lord here when He manifested Himself in the flesh and had the company of His disciples attendant on Him, or by persons who with due credit received facts with which they became acquainted in a trustworthy manner through the instrumentality of these former, divine providence, through the agency of the Holy Spirit, has taken care that certain of those also who were nothing more than followers of the first apostles should have authority given them not only to preach the gospel, but also to compose an account of it in writing. I refer to Mark and Luke. All those other individuals, however, who have attempted or dared to offer a written record of the acts of the Lord or of the apostles, failed to commend themselves in their own times as men of the character which would induce the Church to yield them its confidence, and to admit their compositions to the canonical authority of the Holy Books. And this was the case not merely because they were persons who could make no rightful claim to have credit given them in their narrations, but also because in a deceitful manner they introduced into their writings certain matters which are condemned at once by the catholic and apostolic rule of faith, and by sound doctrine. 3 [The character of the Apocryphal Gospels is obvious. The reference of Luke (i. 1) is probably to fragmentary records, now lost. Comp. below Book iv. chap. 8.—R.]
CAPUT PRIMUM. Evangeliorum auctoritas.
1041
1. Inter omnes divinas auctoritates, quae sanctis 1042 Litteris continentur, Evangelium merito excellit. Quod enim Lex et Prophetae futurum praenuntiaverunt, 1043 hoc redditum atque completum in Evangelio demonstratur. Cujus primi praedicatores Apostoli fuerunt, qui Dominum ipsum et Salvatorem nostrum Jesum Christum etiam praesentem in carne viderunt. Qui non solum ea quae ex ore ejus audita vel ab illo sub oculis suis operata, dicta et facta meminerant; verum etiam quae priusquam illi per discipulatum adhaeserant, in ejus nativitate, vel infantia, vel pueritia, divinitus gesta et digna memoria, sive ab ipso, sive a parentibus ejus, sive a quibuslibet aliis, certissimis indiciis et fidelissimis testimoniis requirere et cognoscere potuerunt, imposito sibi evangelizandi munere, generi humano annuntiare curarunt. Quorum quidam, hoc est Matthaeus et Joannes, etiam scripta de illo, quae scribenda visa sunt, libris singulis ediderunt.
2. Ac ne putaretur, quod attinet ad percipiendum et praedicandum Evangelium, interesse aliquid utrum illi annuntient, qui eumdem Dominum hic in carne apparentem discipulatu famulante secuti sunt, an ii qui ex illis fideliter comperta crediderunt; divina providentia procuratum est per Spiritum sanctum, ut quibusdam etiam ex illis qui primos Apostolos sequebantur, non solum annuntiandi, verum etiam scribendi Evangelium tribueretur auctoritas: hi sunt Marcus et Lucas. Caeteri autem homines, qui de Domini vel Apostolorum actibus aliqua scribere conati vel ausi sunt, non tales suis temporibus exstiterunt, ut eis fidem haberet Ecclesia, atque in auctoritatem canonicam sanctorum Librorum eorum scripta reciperet: nec solum quia illi non tales erant, quibus narrantibus credi oporteret; sed etiam quia scriptis suis quaedam fallaciter indiderunt, quae catholica atque apostolica regula fidei et sana doctrina condemnat.