Ad nationes.

 Book i.

 Chapter ii. —the heathen perverted judgment in the trial of christians. they would be more consistent if they dispensed with all form of trial.  tertu

 Chapter iii. —the great offence in the christians lies in their very name. the name vindicated.

 Chapter iv. —the truth hated in the christians so in measure was it, of old, in socrates. the virtues of the christians.

 Chapter v. —the inconsistent life of any false christian no more condemns true disciples of christ, than a passing cloud obscures a summer sky.

 Chapter vi. —the innocence of the christians not compromised by the iniquitous laws which were made against them.

 Chapter vii. —the christians defamed. a sarcastic description of fame its deception and atrocious slanders of the christians lengthily described.

 Chapter viii. —the calumny against the christians illustrated in the discovery of psammetichus. refutation of the story.

 Chapter ix. —the christians are not the cause of public calamities: there were such troubles before christianity.

 Chapter x. —the christians are not the only contemners of the gods. contempt of them often displayed by heathen official persons. homer made the gods

 Chapter xi. —the absurd cavil of the ass’s head disposed of.

 Chapter xii. —the charge of worshipping a cross. the heathens themselves made much of crosses in sacred things nay, their very idols were formed on a

 Chapter xiii. —the charge of worshipping the sun met by a retort.

 Chapter xiv. —the vile calumny about onocoetes retorted on the heathen by tertullian.

 Chapter xv. —the charge of infanticide retorted on the heathen.

 Chapter xvi. —other charges repelled by the same method. the story of the noble roman youth and his parents.

 Chapter xvii. —the christian refusal to swear by the genius of cæsar. flippancy and irreverence retorted on the heathen.

 Chapter xviii. —christians charged with an obstinate contempt of death.  instances of the same are found amongst the heathen.

 Chapter xix. —if christians and the heathen thus resemble each other, there is great difference in the grounds and nature of their apparently similar

 Chapter xx.—truth and reality pertain to christians alone. the heathen counselled to examine and embrace it.

 Book ii

 Book ii.

 Chapter ii.—philosophers had not succeeded in discovering god. the uncertainty and confusion of their speculations.

 Chapter iii.—the physical philosophers maintained the divinity of the elements the absurdity of the tenet exposed.

 Chapter iv.—wrong derivation of the word θεός. the name indicative of the true deity. god without shape and immaterial. anecdote of thales.

 Chapter v.—the physical theory continued. further reasons advanced against the divinity of the elements.

 Chapter vi.—the changes of the heavenly bodies, proof that they are not divine.  transition from the physical to the mythic class of gods.

 Chapter vii.—the gods of the mythic class. the poets a very poor authority in such matters. homer and the mythic poets. why irreligious.

 Chapter viii.—the gods of the different nations. varro’s gentile class. their inferiority. a good deal of this perverse theology taken from scripture.

 Chapter ix.—the power of rome. romanized aspect of all the heathen mythology. varro’s threefold distribution criticised. roman heroes (æneas included,

 Chapter x.—a disgraceful feature of the roman mythology. it honours such infamous characters as larentina.

 Chapter xi.—the romans provided gods for birth, nay, even before birth, to death. much indelicacy in this system.

 Chapter xii. —the original deities were human—with some very questionable characteristics. saturn or time was human. inconsistencies of opinion about

 Chapter xiii. —the gods human at first. who had the authority to make them divine? jupiter not only human, but immoral.

 Chapter xiv.—gods, those which were confessedly elevated to the divine condition, what pre-eminent right had they to such honour? hercules an inferior

 Chapter xv.—the constellations and the genii very indifferent gods. the roman monopoly of gods unsatisfactory. other nations require deities quite as

 Chapter xvi.—inventors of useful arts unworthy of deification. they would be the first to acknowledge a creator. the arts changeable from time to time

 Chapter xvii. —conclusion, the romans owe not their imperial power to their gods. the great god alone dispenses kingdoms, he is the god of the christi

Book I.

Chapter I.1    Compare The Apology, c. i.—The Hatred Felt by the Heathen Against the Christians is Unjust, Because Based on Culpable Ignorance.

One proof of that ignorance of yours, which condemns2    Revincit. “Condemnat” is Tertullian’s word in The Apology, i. whilst it excuses3    Defendit. “Excusat” in Apol. your injustice, is at once apparent in the fact, that all who once shared in your ignorance and hatred (of the Christian religion), as soon as they have come to know it, leave off their hatred when they cease to be ignorant; nay more, they actually themselves become what they had hated, and take to hating what they had once been. Day after day, indeed, you groan over the increasing number of the Christians. Your constant cry is, that the state is beset (by us); that Christians are in your fields, in your camps, in your islands. You grieve over it as a calamity, that each sex, every age—in short, every rank—is passing over from you to us; yet you do not even after this set your minds upon reflecting whether there be not here some latent good.  You do not allow yourselves in suspicions which may prove too true,4    Non licet rectius suspicari. nor do you like ventures which may be too near the mark.5    Non lubet propius experiri. This is the only instance in which human curiosity grows torpid. You love to be ignorant of what other men rejoice to have discovered; you would rather not know it, because you now cherish your hatred as if you were aware that, (with the knowledge,) your hatred would certainly come to an end. Still,6    At quin. if there shall be no just ground for hatred, it will surely be found to be the best course to cease from the past injustice.  Should, however, a cause have really existed there will be no diminution of the hatred, which will indeed accumulate so much the more in the consciousness of its justice; unless it be, forsooth,7    Nisi si. that you are ashamed to cast off your faults,8    Emendari pudet. or sorry to free yourselves from blame.9    Excusari piget. I know very well with what answer you usually meet the argument from our rapid increase.10    Redundantiæ nostræ. That indeed must not, you say, be hastily accounted a good thing which converts a great number of persons, and gains them over to its side. I am aware how the mind is apt to take to evil courses. How many there are which forsake virtuous living!  How many seek refuge in the opposite!  Many, no doubt;11    Bona fide. nay, very many, as the last days approach.12    Pro extremitatibus temporum. But such a comparison as this fails in fairness of application; for all are agreed in thinking thus of the evil-doer, so that not even the guilty themselves, who take the wrong side, and turn away from the pursuit of good to perverse ways, are bold enough to defend evil as good.13    Or perhaps, “to maintain evil in preference to good.” Base things excite their fear, impious ones their shame. In short, they are eager for concealment, they shrink from publicity, they tremble when caught; when accused, they deny; even when tortured, they do not readily or invariably confess (their crime); at all events,14    Certe. they grieve when they are condemned.  They reproach themselves for their past life; their change from innocence to an evil disposition they even attribute to fate. They cannot say that it is not a wrong thing, therefore they will not admit it to be their own act. As for the Christians, however, in what does their case resemble this? No one is ashamed; no one is sorry, except for his former (sins).15    Pristinorum. In the corresponding passage (Apol. i.) the phrase is, “nisi plane retro non fuisse,” i.e., “except that he was not a Christian long ago.” If he is pointed at (for his religion), he glories in it; if dragged to trial, he does not resist; if accused, he makes no defence. When questioned, he confesses; when condemned, he rejoices. What sort of evil is this, in which the nature of evil comes to a standstill?16    Cessat.

0559B 1. Testimonium ignorantiae vestrae, quae iniquitatem dum defendit, revincit, in promptu est, quod omnes, qui vobiscum retro ignorabant et vobiscum oderant, simul eis contigit scire, desinunt odisse qui desinunt ignorare, imo fiunt et ipsi quod oderant, et incipiunt odisse quod fuerant. Adeo quotidie adolescentem numerum Christianorum ingemitis. Obsessam vociferamini civitatem; in agris, in castellis, in insulis Christianos; omnem sexum, omnem aetatem, omnem denique dignitatem transgredi a vobis quasi detrimento doletis. Nec tamen hoc ipso ad aestimationem alicujus latentis boni animos promovetis; non licet rectius suspicari, non libet propius experiri; hic tantum curiositas 0559C humana torpescit. Amatis ignorare, quod alii gaudeant invenisse; mavultis nescire, quia jam odistis, quasi certe non odituros vos sciatis. Atquin, si nullum erit odii, reperietur optimum utique ab injustitia priore discedere; sin vero caussa constiterit, nihil odio detrahetur, quod adeo amplius justitiae scientia cumulabitur, nisi si emendari pudet aut excusari piget. Scio plane, qua responsione soletis redundantiae nostrae testimonium convenire: non utique eo bonum praejudicari, quia plerosque convertat et sibi rapiat, inquitis. Novi demutationem mentis et malas partes. Quot desertores bonae vitae? quot transfugae in perversum? Multi bona fide, imo jam plures pro extremitatibus temporum. Verum deficit adaequatio comparationis istius. Nam de malo ita constat 0559D apud omnes, ut ne ipsi quidem rei, qui ad malum transeunt et a vobis in perversa divertunt, defendere malum pro bono audeant. Turpia timori, pudori impia habent; denique gestiunt latere, devitant apparere, trepidant deprehensi, negant accusati; ne torti quidem facile aut semper confitentur, certe damnati moerent; exprobrant etenim quod erant in semetipsos: 0560B malae mentis ab innocentia transitum vel fato imputant; adeo nolunt suum esse, quia malum negare non possunt. Christiani vero quid tale consequuntur? Neminem pudet, neminem poenitet, nisi tantum pristinorum. Si denotatur, gloriatur: si trahitur, non subsistit. Si accusatur, non defendit; interrogatus, confitetur; damnatus, gloriatur. Quod hoc malum est, in quo mali natura cessat?