On the Veiling of Virgins.

 Chapter I.—Truth Rather to Be Appealed to Than Custom, and Truth Progressive in Its Developments.

 Chapter II.—Before Proceeding Farther, Let the Question of Custom Itself Be Sifted.

 Chapter III.—Gradual Development of Custom, and Its Results.  Passionate Appeal to Truth.

 Chapter IV.—Of the Argument Drawn from 1 Cor. XI. 5–16.

 Chapter V.—Of the Word Woman, Especially in Connection with Its Application to Eve.

 Chapter VI.—The Parallel Case of Mary Considered.

 Chapter VII.—Of the Reasons Assigned by the Apostle for Bidding Women to Be Veiled.

 Chapter VIII.—The Argument E Contrario.

 Chapter IX.—Veiling Consistent with the Other Rules of Discipline Observed by Virgins and Women in General.

 Chapter X.—If the Female Virgins are to Be Thus Conspicuous, Why Not the Male as Well?

 Chapter XI.—The Rule of Veiling Not Applicable to Children.

 Chapter XII.—Womanhood Self-Evident, and Not to Be Concealed by Just Leaving the Head Bare.

 Chapter XIII.—If Unveiling Be Proper, Why Not Practise It Always, Out of the Church as Well as in It?

 Chapter XIV.—Perils to the Virgins Themselves Attendant Upon Not-Veiling.

 Chapter XV.—Of Fascination.

 Chapter XVI.—Tertullian, Having Shown His Defence to Be Consistent with Scripture, Nature, and Discipline, Appeals to the Virgins Themselves.

 Chapter XVII.—An Appeal to the Married Women.

Chapter II.—Before Proceeding Farther, Let the Question of Custom Itself Be Sifted.

But I will not, meantime, attribute this usage to Truth.  Be it, for a while, custom:  that to custom I may likewise oppose custom.

Throughout Greece, and certain of its barbaric provinces, the majority of Churches keep their virgins covered.  There are places, too, beneath this (African) sky, where this practice obtains; lest any ascribe the custom to Greek or barbarian Gentilehood.  But I have proposed (as models) those Churches which were founded by apostles or apostolic men; and antecedently, I think, to certain (founders, who shall be nameless).  Those Churches therefore, as well (as others), have the self-same authority of custom (to appeal to); in opposing phalanx they range “times” and “teachers,” more than these later (Churches do).  What shall we observe?  What shall we choose?  We cannot contemptuously reject a custom which we cannot condemn, inasmuch as it is not “strange,” since it is not among “strangers” that we find it, but among those, to wit, with whom we share the law of peace and the name of brotherhood.  They and we have one faith, one God, the same Christ, the same hope, the same baptismal sacraments; let me say it once for all, we are one Church.9    Comp. Eph. iv. 1–6.  Thus, whatever belongs to our brethren is ours:  only, the body divides us.

Still, here (as generally happens in all cases of various practice, of doubt, and of uncertainty), examination ought to have been made to see which of two so diverse customs were the more compatible with the discipline of God.  And, of course, that ought to have been chosen which keeps virgins veiled, as being known to God alone; who (besides that glory must be sought from God, not from men10    Comp. John v. 44 and xii. 43.) ought to blush even at their own privilege.  You put a virgin to the blush more by praising than by blaming her; because the front of sin is more hard, learning shamelessness from and in the sin itself.  For that custom which belies virgins while it exhibits them, would never have been approved by any except by some men who must have been similar in character to the virgins themselves.  Such eyes will wish that a virgin be seen as has the virgin who shall wish to be seen.  The same kinds of eyes reciprocally crave after each other.  Seeing and being seen belong to the self-same lust.  To blush if he see a virgin is as much a mark of a chaste11    Sancti. man, as of a chaste12    Sanctæ. virgin if seen by a man.

CAPUT II.

Sed nolo interim hunc morem veritati deputare. Consuetudo sit tantisper, ut consuetudini etiam consuetudinem opponam. Per Graeciam et quasdam barbarias ejus, plures Ecclesiae virgines suas abscondunt. Est et sub hoc coelo institutum istud alicubi, ne qui gentilitati graecanicae aut barbaricae consuetudinem illam adscribat. Sed eas ego Ecclesias 0890C proposui, quas et ipsi Apostoli vel Apostolici viri condiderunt, et puto ante quosdam. Habent igitur et illae eamdem consuetudinis auctoritatem, tempora 0891A et antecessores opponunt magis quam posterae istae. Quod observabimus, quid deligemus? Non possumus respuere consuetudinem, quam damnare non possumus, utpote non extraneam, quia non extraneorum, cum quibus scilicet communicamus jus pacis et nomen fraternitatis. Una nobis et illis fides, unus Deus, idem Christus, eadem spes, eadem lavacri sacramenta. Semel dixerim, una Ecclesia sumus. Ita nostrum est, quodcumque nostrorum est. Caeterum dividis corpus. Tamen hic , sicut in omnibus varie institutis et dubiis et incertis fieri solet, adhibenda fuit examinatio, quae magis ex duabus tam diversis consuetudinibus disciplinae Dei conveniret. Et utique ea deligenda quae virgines includit, soli Deo notas, quibus, praeter quod a Deo, non ab hominibus 0891B captanda gloria est, etiam ipsum bonum suum erubescendum est. Virginem magis laudando, quam vituperando confundas: quia delicti durior frons est, ab ipso et in ipso delicto impudentiam docta. Nam illam consuetudinem, quae virgines negat dum ostendit, nemo probasset, nisi aliqui tales quales virgines ipsae. Tales enim oculi volent virginem visam, quales habet virgo quae videri volet. Invicem se eadem oculorum genera desiderant. Ejusdem libidinis est videri, et videre. Tam sancti viri est subfundi, si virginem viderit, quam sanctae virginis, si a viro visa sit.