Chapter IV.—Hermogenes Gives Divine Attributes to Matter, and So Makes Two Gods.
Chapter VIII.—On His Own Principles, Hermogenes Makes Matter, on the Whole, Superior to God.
Chapter IX.—Sundry Inevitable But Intolerable Conclusions from the Principles of Hermogenes.
Chapter XIII.—Another Ground of Hermogenes that Matter Has Some Good in It. Its Absurdity.
Chapter XIV.—Tertullian Pushes His Opponent into a Dilemma.
Chapter XVIII.—An Eulogy on the Wisdom and Word of God, by Which God Made All Things of Nothing.
Chapter XXIV.—Earth Does Not Mean Matter as Hermogenes Would Have It.
Chapter XXVII.—Some Hair-Splitting Use of Words in Which His Opponent Had Indulged.
Chapter XXXV.—Contradictory Propositions Advanced by Hermogenes Respecting Matter and Its Qualities.
Chapter V.—Hermogenes Coquets with His Own Argument, as If Rather Afraid of It. After Investing Matter with Divine Qualities, He Tries to Make It Somehow Inferior to God.
But God is God, and Matter is Matter. As if a mere difference in their names prevented equality,50 Comparationi. when an identity of condition is claimed for them! Grant that their nature is different; assume, too, that their form is not identical,—what matters it so long as their absolute state have but one mode?51 Ratio. God is unborn; is not Matter also unborn? God ever exists; is not Matter, too, ever existent? Both are without beginning; both are without end; both are the authors of the universe—both He who created it, and the Matter of which He made it. For it is impossible that Matter should not be regarded as the author52 Auctrix. of all things, when the universe is composed of it. What answer will he give? Will he say that Matter is not then comparable with God as soon as53 Statim si. it has something belonging to God; since, by not having total (divinity), it cannot correspond to the whole extent of the comparison? But what more has he reserved for God, that he should not seem to have accorded to Matter the full amount of the Deity?54 Totum Dei. He says in reply, that even though this is the prerogative of Matter, both the authority and the substance of God must remain intact, by virtue of which He is regarded as the sole and prime Author, as well as the Lord of all things. Truth, however, maintains the unity of God in such a way as to insist that whatever belongs to God Himself belongs to Him alone. For so will it belong to Himself if it belong to Him alone; and therefore it will be impossible that another god should be admitted, when it is permitted to no other being to possess anything of God. Well, then, you say, we ourselves at that rate possess nothing of God. But indeed we do, and shall continue to do—only it is from Him that we receive it, and not from ourselves. For we shall be even gods, if we, shall deserve to be among those of whom He declared, “I have said, Ye are gods,”55 Ps. lxxxii. 6. and, “God standeth in the congregation of the gods.”56 Ver. 1. But this comes of His own grace, not from any property in us, because it is He alone who can make gods. The property of Matter, however, he57 Hermogenes. makes to be that which it has in common with God. Otherwise, if it received from God the property which belongs to God,—I mean its attribute58 Ordinem: or course. of eternity—one might then even suppose that it both possesses an attribute in common with God, and yet at the same time is not God. But what inconsistency is it for him59 Quale autem est: “how comes it to pass that.” to allow that there is a conjoint possession of an attribute with God, and also to wish that what he does not refuse to Matter should be, after all, the exclusive privilege of God!
CAPUT V.
Sed Deus, Deus est; materia, materia est: quasi diversitas nominum comparationi resistat, si status idem vindicetur. Sit et natura diversa, sit et forma non eadem, dummodo ipsius status una sit ratio. Innatus Deus, an non et innata materia? semper Deus, annon semper et materia? Ambo sine initio, 0202A ambo sine fine, ambo etiam auctores universitatis, tam qui fecit, quam de qua fecit. Neque enim potest non et materia auctrix omnium deputari, de qua universitas consistit. Quomodo respondebit ? Non statim materiam comparari Deo, si quid Dei habeat, quia non totum habendo non concurrat in plenitudinem comparationis? Quid Deo reliquit amplius, ut non totum Dei, materiae dedisse videatur? Vel qua, inquit, et sic habente materia, salva sit Deo et auctoritas et substantia, qua solus et primus auctor est, et Dominus omnium censeatur. Veritas autem sic unum Deum exigit defendendo, ut solius sit quidquid ipsius est. Ita enim ipsius erit, si fuerit solius: et ex hoc alius deus non possit admitti, dum nemini licet habere de Deo aliquid. Ergo, inquis, nec nos 0202B habemus Dei aliquid. Imo habemus, et habebimus, sed ab ipso, non a nobis. Nam et dei crimus, si meruimus illi esse de quibus praedicavit: Ego dixi: Vos Dei estis; et, stetit Deus in ecclesia deorum (Ps. LXXXI, 1): sed ex gratia ipsius, non ex nostra proprietate, quia ipse est solus qui deos faciat. Materiae autem proprium facit quod cum Deo habet: aut si a Deo accepit, quod est Dei, ordinem dico aeternitatis, potest credi et habere illam cum Deo aliquid, et deum illam non esse. Quale est autem, cum confitetur ille aliquid cum Deo habere, et vult solius Dei esse quod materiam non negat habere?