Ad nationes.

 Book i.

 Chapter ii. —the heathen perverted judgment in the trial of christians. they would be more consistent if they dispensed with all form of trial.  tertu

 Chapter iii. —the great offence in the christians lies in their very name. the name vindicated.

 Chapter iv. —the truth hated in the christians so in measure was it, of old, in socrates. the virtues of the christians.

 Chapter v. —the inconsistent life of any false christian no more condemns true disciples of christ, than a passing cloud obscures a summer sky.

 Chapter vi. —the innocence of the christians not compromised by the iniquitous laws which were made against them.

 Chapter vii. —the christians defamed. a sarcastic description of fame its deception and atrocious slanders of the christians lengthily described.

 Chapter viii. —the calumny against the christians illustrated in the discovery of psammetichus. refutation of the story.

 Chapter ix. —the christians are not the cause of public calamities: there were such troubles before christianity.

 Chapter x. —the christians are not the only contemners of the gods. contempt of them often displayed by heathen official persons. homer made the gods

 Chapter xi. —the absurd cavil of the ass’s head disposed of.

 Chapter xii. —the charge of worshipping a cross. the heathens themselves made much of crosses in sacred things nay, their very idols were formed on a

 Chapter xiii. —the charge of worshipping the sun met by a retort.

 Chapter xiv. —the vile calumny about onocoetes retorted on the heathen by tertullian.

 Chapter xv. —the charge of infanticide retorted on the heathen.

 Chapter xvi. —other charges repelled by the same method. the story of the noble roman youth and his parents.

 Chapter xvii. —the christian refusal to swear by the genius of cæsar. flippancy and irreverence retorted on the heathen.

 Chapter xviii. —christians charged with an obstinate contempt of death.  instances of the same are found amongst the heathen.

 Chapter xix. —if christians and the heathen thus resemble each other, there is great difference in the grounds and nature of their apparently similar

 Chapter xx.—truth and reality pertain to christians alone. the heathen counselled to examine and embrace it.

 Book ii

 Book ii.

 Chapter ii.—philosophers had not succeeded in discovering god. the uncertainty and confusion of their speculations.

 Chapter iii.—the physical philosophers maintained the divinity of the elements the absurdity of the tenet exposed.

 Chapter iv.—wrong derivation of the word θεός. the name indicative of the true deity. god without shape and immaterial. anecdote of thales.

 Chapter v.—the physical theory continued. further reasons advanced against the divinity of the elements.

 Chapter vi.—the changes of the heavenly bodies, proof that they are not divine.  transition from the physical to the mythic class of gods.

 Chapter vii.—the gods of the mythic class. the poets a very poor authority in such matters. homer and the mythic poets. why irreligious.

 Chapter viii.—the gods of the different nations. varro’s gentile class. their inferiority. a good deal of this perverse theology taken from scripture.

 Chapter ix.—the power of rome. romanized aspect of all the heathen mythology. varro’s threefold distribution criticised. roman heroes (æneas included,

 Chapter x.—a disgraceful feature of the roman mythology. it honours such infamous characters as larentina.

 Chapter xi.—the romans provided gods for birth, nay, even before birth, to death. much indelicacy in this system.

 Chapter xii. —the original deities were human—with some very questionable characteristics. saturn or time was human. inconsistencies of opinion about

 Chapter xiii. —the gods human at first. who had the authority to make them divine? jupiter not only human, but immoral.

 Chapter xiv.—gods, those which were confessedly elevated to the divine condition, what pre-eminent right had they to such honour? hercules an inferior

 Chapter xv.—the constellations and the genii very indifferent gods. the roman monopoly of gods unsatisfactory. other nations require deities quite as

 Chapter xvi.—inventors of useful arts unworthy of deification. they would be the first to acknowledge a creator. the arts changeable from time to time

 Chapter xvii. —conclusion, the romans owe not their imperial power to their gods. the great god alone dispenses kingdoms, he is the god of the christi

Chapter VI.73    Compare The Apology, c. iv.—The Innocence of the Christians Not Compromised by the Iniquitous Laws Which Were Made Against Them.

Whenever these statements and answers of ours, which truth suggests of its own accord, press and restrain your conscience, which is the witness of its own ignorance, you betake yourselves in hot haste to that poor altar of refuge,74    Ad arulam quandam. the authority of the laws, because these, of course, would never punish the offensive75    Istam. sect, if their deserts had not been fully considered by those who made the laws. Then what is it which has prevented a like consideration on the part of those who put the laws in force, when, in the case of all other crimes which are similarly forbidden and punished by the laws, the penalty is not inflicted76    Cessat, “loiters.” until it is sought by regular process?77    Requiratur. Take,78    Lege. for instance, the case of a murderer or an adulterer. An examination is ordered touching the particulars79    Ordo. of the crime, even though it is patent to all what its nature80    Genus. is. Whatever wrong has been done by the Christian ought to be brought to light.  No law forbids inquiry to be made; on the contrary, inquiry is made in the interest of the laws.81    Literally, “holding the inquiry makes for the laws.” For how are you to keep the law by precautions against that which the law forbids, if you neutralize the carefulness of the precaution by your failing to perceive82    Per defectionem agnoscendi. what it is you have to keep? No law must keep to itself83    Sibi debet. the knowledge of its own righteousness,84    Justitiæ suæ. but (it owes it) to those from whom it claims obedience. The law, however, becomes an object of suspicion when it declines to approve itself.  Naturally enough,85    Merito. then, are the laws against the Christians supposed to be just and deserving of respect and observance, just as long as men remain ignorant of their aim and purport; but when this is perceived, their extreme injustice is discovered, and they are deservedly rejected with abhorrence,86    Despuuntur. along with (their instruments of torture)—the swords, the crosses, and the lions. An unjust law secures no respect. In my opinion, however, there is a suspicion among you that some of these laws are unjust, since not a day passes without your modifying their severity and iniquity by fresh deliberations and decisions.

6. His propositionibus responsionibusque nostris, quas veritas de suo suggerit, quotiens comprimitur et coarctatur consciencia vestra, tacitae ignorantiae suae testis, confugitis aestuantes ad arulam quamdam, 0565D id est, legum auctoritatem, quod utique non plecterent 0566A sectam istam, nisi de meritis apud conditores legum constitisset. Quid ergo prohibuit apud executores quoque legum proinde constare, cum de caeteris criminibus, quae similiter legibus arcentur ac puniuntur, nisi prius requiratur, poena cessat? verbi gratia, homicidam, adulterum lege, discutitur tamen de ordine admissi; et tamen cognitum est omnibus genus facti. Christianum puniunt leges. Si quod est factum Christiani, erui debet; nulla lex prohibet inquirere. Atquin pro legibus facit inquisitio. Quomodo enim legem observabis cavendo quod lege prohibetur, adempta diligentia cavendi per defectum agnoscendi quid observes. Nulla sibi lex debet conscientiam justitiae suae, sed eis a quibus captat obsequium. Caeterum suspecta lex est, si probari se non 0566B vult. Merito igitur tamdiu justae in Christianos et reverendae et observandae censentur, quamdiu ignoratur quod persequuntur; merito, post agnitionem iniquissimae repertae, cum suis machaeris et patibulis et leonibus despuuntur; legis injustae honor nullus est. Ut opinor autem, dubitatur de iniquitate legum quarumdam, cum quotidie novis consultis constitutisque duritias nequitiasque earum temperetis.