<III.> <1> And first, if you please, let us investigate the name "Good", which reveals the whole procession of God's emanations, invoking the Good-Principle and Super-Good Trinity, which reveals all of its own most good providences. For it is necessary for us, first by prayers, to be led up to it as the Principle of Goodness, and by drawing closer to it, to be initiated into the all-good gifts established around it. For it is present to all, but not all are present to it. But when we invoke it with all-holy prayers, an untroubled mind, and the aptitude for divine union, then we too are present to it. For it is not in a place, so as to be absent from anything or to move from some things to others. But even to say that it is in all beings falls short of its infinity, which is above all and embraces all. Let us, therefore, stretch ourselves upward by our prayers to the higher ascent of the divine and good rays, as if, from a chain of many lights hanging from the celestial summit and reaching down to here, we, always grasping it with alternating hands, seemed to be pulling it down, but in reality we were not drawing it down, since it is present both above and below, but we ourselves were being drawn up to the higher splendors of the many-lighted rays. Or as if, having embarked on a ship and holding on to the ropes extended to us from some rock, as if given to us for our assistance, we were not pulling the rock to ourselves, but in truth we were bringing ourselves and the ship to the rock. And just as, conversely, if someone standing on the ship were to push away the rock on the shore, he would do nothing to the steadfast and unmovable rock, but would separate himself from it, and the more he pushes it away, the more he will be cast away from it. Therefore, it is necessary to begin every theology, and especially this one, with prayer, not as if pulling down the power that is everywhere and nowhere present, but as, by divine remembrances and invocations, entrusting and uniting ourselves to it. <2> And this, perhaps, deserves a defense: that although our renowned guide Hierotheus marvelously compiled the *Theological Outlines*, we have composed others, including the present theology, as if his were not sufficient. For if he had thought fit to treat in sequence all theological matters and had gone through the whole body of theology in partial expositions, we would not have come to such a point of either madness or awkwardness as to think we could approach theology with more vision and divinity than he, or to babble by saying the same things twice superfluously, and in addition to wrong both a teacher and a friend, and us, who after the divine Paul were instructed by his oracles, by usurping for ourselves his most renowned theory and exposition. But since in fact, in explaining divine things in a way befitting an elder, he set forth for us concise definitions that encompassed many things in one, commanding us and as many teachers of newly initiated souls as are like us to unfold and distinguish, with a discourse commensurate to us, the comprehensive and unified condensations of that most intelligent man's power, and since you yourself have often urged us to this and have sent back the book itself as being too lofty for you. For this reason, we too set him apart for those above the many as a teacher of perfect and mature minds, like a second set of oracles and a sequel to the divinely-inspired ones. But to those like us, we will hand down the divine things in a way analogous to ourselves. For if "solid food is for the perfect," of how much perfection would it be to feast others with it? Therefore, we have also rightly said this: that the direct vision of the intelligible oracles and their comprehensive teaching require the power of an elder, while the knowledge and learning of the discourses that lead to this are fitting for the subordinate ranks of the consecrated and the priests. And yet this too has been very carefully observed by us, so that we have not at all attempted tautology with respect to what has been clearly explained in exposition by the divine guide himself in the same clarification of the oracle set before him. Since even among our own divinely inspired writers

<III.> <1> Καὶ πρώτην, εἰ δοκεῖ, τὴν παντελῆ καὶ τῶν ὅλων τοῦ θεοῦ προόδων ἐκφαντορικὴν ἀγαθωνυμίαν ἐπισκεψώμεθα τὴν ἀγαθαρχικὴν καὶ ὑπεράγαθον ἐπικαλεσάμενοι τριάδα τὴν ἐκφαντορικὴν τῶν ὅλων ἑαυτῆς ἀγαθωτάτων προνοιῶν. Χρὴ γὰρ ἡμᾶς ταῖς εὐχαῖς πρῶτον ἐπ' αὐτὴν ὡς ἀγαθαρχίαν ἀνάγεσθαι καὶ μᾶλλον αὐτῇ πλησιάζοντας ἐν τούτῳ μυεῖσθαι τὰ πανάγαθα δῶρα τὰ περὶ αὐτὴν ἱδρυμένα. Καὶ γὰρ αὐτὴ μὲν ἅπασι πάρεστιν, οὐ πάντα δὲ αὐτῇ πάρεστι. Τότε δέ, ὅταν αὐτὴν ἐπικαλούμεθα πανάγνοις μὲν εὐχαῖς, ἀνεπιθολώτῳ δὲ νῷ καὶ τῇ πρὸς θείαν ἕνωσιν ἐπιτηδειότητι, τότε καὶ ἡμεῖς αὐτῇ πάρεσμεν. Aὐτὴ γὰρ οὔτε ἐν τόπῳ ἔστιν, ἵνα καὶ ἀπῇ τινος ἢ ἐξ ἑτέρων εἰς ἕτερα μεταβῇ. Ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸ ἐν πᾶσι τοῖς οὖσιν αὐτὴν εἶναι λέγειν ἀπολείπεται τῆς ὑπὲρ πάντα καὶ πάντων περιληπτικῆς ἀπειρίας. Ἡμᾶς οὖν αὐτοὺς ταῖς εὐχαῖς ἀνατείνωμεν ἐπὶ τὴν τῶν θείων καὶ ἀγαθῶν ἀκτίνων ὑψηλοτέραν ἀνάνευσιν, ὥσπερ εἰ πολυφώτου σειρᾶς ἐκ τῆς οὐρανίας ἀκρότητος ἠρτημένης, εἰς δεῦρο δὲ καθηκούσης καὶ ἀεὶ αὐτῆς ἐπὶ τὸ πρόσω χερσὶν ἀμοιβαίαις δραττόμενοι καθέλκειν μὲν αὐτὴν ἐδοκοῦμεν, τῷ ὄντι δὲ οὐ κατήγομεν ἐκείνην ἄνω τε καὶ κάτω παροῦσαν, ἀλλ' αὐτοὶ ἡμεῖς ἀνηγόμεθα πρὸς τὰς ὑψηλοτέρας τῶν πολυφώτων ἀκτίνων μαρμαρυγάς. Ἢ ὥσπερ εἰς ναῦν ἐμβεβηκότες καὶ ἀντεχόμενοι τῶν ἔκ τινος πέτρας εἰς ἡμᾶς ἐκτεινομένων πεισμάτων καὶ οἷον ἡμῖν εἰς ἀντίληψιν ἐκδιδομένων οὐκ ἐφ' ἡμᾶς τὴν πέτραν, ἀλλ' ἡμᾶς αὐτοὺς τῷ ἀληθεῖ καὶ τὴν ναῦν ἐπὶ τὴν πέτραν προσήγομεν. Ὥσπερ καὶ τὸ ἔμπαλιν, εἴ τις τὴν παραλίαν πέτραν ἑστὼς ἐπὶ τῆς νηὸς ἀπώσεται, δράσει μὲν οὐδὲν εἰς τὴν ἑστῶσαν καὶ ἀκίνητον πέτραν, ἑαυτὸν δὲ ἐκείνης ἀποχωρίσει, καὶ ὅσῳ μᾶλλον αὐτὴν ἀπώσεται, μᾶλλον αὐτῆς ἀκοντισθήσεται. ∆ιὸ καὶ πρὸ παντὸς καὶ μᾶλλον θεολογίας εὐχῆς ἀπάρχεσθαι χρεὼν οὐχ ὡς ἐφελκομένους τὴν ἁπανταχῆ παροῦσαν καὶ οὐδαμῆ δύναμιν, ἀλλ' ὡς ταῖς θείαις μνήμαις καὶ ἐπικλήσεσιν ἡμᾶς αὐτοὺς ἐγχειρίζοντας αὐτῇ καὶ ἑνοῦντας. <2> Καὶ τοῦτο δὲ ἴσως ἀπολογίας ἄξιον, ὅτι τοῦ κλεινοῦ καθηγεμόνος ἡμῶν Ἱεροθέου τὰς Θεολογικὰς στοιχειώσεις ὑπερφυῶς συναγαγόντος ἡμεῖς ὡς οὐχ ἱκανῶν ἐκείνων ἄλλας τε καὶ τὴν παροῦσαν θεολογίαν συνεγραψάμεθα. Καὶ γάρ, εἰ μὲν ἐκεῖνος ἑξῆς διαπραγματεύσασθαι πάσας τὰς θεολογικὰς πραγματείας ἠξίωσε καὶ μερικαῖς ἀνελίξεσι διῆλθεν ἁπάσης θεολογίας κεφάλαιον, οὐκ ἂν ἡμεῖς ἐπὶ τοσοῦτον ἢ μανίας ἢ σκαιότητος ἐληλύθαμεν μς ἢ ὀπτικώτερον ἐκείνου καὶ θειότερον οἰηθῆναι ταῖς θεολογίαις ἐπιβάλλειν ἢ δὶς τὰ αὐτὰ περιττῶς λέγοντας εἰκαιολογῆσαι, προσέτι καὶ ἀδικῆσαι καὶ διδάσκαλον καὶ φίλον ὄντα καὶ ἡμᾶς τοὺς μετὰ Παῦλον τὸν θεῖον ἐκ τῶν ἐκείνου λογίων στοιχειωθέντας, τὴν κλεινοτάτην αὐτοῦ καὶ θεωρίαν καὶ ἔκφανσιν ἑαυτοῖς ὑφαρπάζοντας. Ἀλλ' ἐπειδὴ τῷ ὄντι τὰ θεῖα πρεσβυτικῶς ὑφηγούμενος ἐκεῖνος συνοπτικοὺς ἡμῖν ὅρους ἐξέθετο καὶ ἐν ἑνὶ πολλὰ περιειληφότας ὡς οἷον ἡμῖν καὶ ὅσοι καθ' ἡμᾶς διδάσκαλοι τῶν νεοτελῶν ψυχῶν ἐγκελευόμενος ἀναπτύξαι καὶ διακρῖναι τῷ ἡμῖν συμμέτρῳ λόγῳ τὰς συνοπτικὰς καὶ ἑνιαίας τῆς νοερωτάτης τἀνδρὸς ἐκείνου δυνάμεως συνελίξεις, καὶ πολλάκις ἡμᾶς καὶ αὐτὸς εἰς τοῦτο προέτρεψας καὶ τήν γε βίβλον αὐτὴν ὡς ὑπεραίρουσαν ἀνταπέσταλκας. Ταύτῃ τοι καὶ ἡμεῖς τὸν μὲν ὡς τελείων καὶ πρεσβυτικῶν διανοιῶν διδάσκαλον τοῖς ὑπὲρ τοὺς πολλοὺς ἀφορίζομεν ὥσπερ τινὰ δεύτερα λόγια καὶ τῶν θεοχρήστων ἀκόλουθα. Τοῖς καθ' ἡμᾶς δὲ ἡμεῖς ἀναλόγως ἡμῖν τὰ θεῖα παραδώσομεν. Eἰ γὰρ «τελείων ἐστὶν ἡ στερεὰ τροφή», τὸ ταύτην ἑστιᾶν ἑτέρους ὁπόσης ἂν εἴη τελειότητος; Ὀρθῶς οὖν ἡμῖν καὶ τοῦτο εἴρηται τὸ τὴν μὲν αὐτοπτικὴν τῶν νοητῶν λογίων θέαν καὶ τὴν συνοπτικὴν αὐτῶν διδασκαλίαν πρεσβυτικῆς δεῖσθαι δυνάμεως, τὴν δὲ τῶν εἰς τοῦτο φερόντων λόγων ἐπιστήμην καὶ ἐκμάθησιν τοῖς ὑφειμένοις καθιερωταῖς καὶ ἱερωμένοις ἁρμόζειν. Καίτοι καὶ τοῦτο ἡμῖν ἐπιτετήρηται λίαν ἐμμελῶς ὥστε τοῖς αὐτῷ τῷ θείῳ καθηγεμόνι κατὰ ἔκφανσιν σαφῆ διηυκρινημένοις μηδ' ὅλως ἐγκεχειρηκέναι ποτὲ πρὸς ταὐτολογίαν εἰς τὴν αὐτὴν τοῦ προτεθέντος αὐτῷ λογίου διασάφησιν. Ἐπεὶ καὶ παρ' αὐτοῖς τοῖς θεολήπτοις ἡμῶν