Book I Chapter I.—Preface—The Author’s Object—The Utility of Written Compositions.
Chapter III.—Against the Sophists.
Chapter IV.—Human Arts as Well as Divine Knowledge Proceed from God.
Chapter V.—Philosophy the Handmaid of Theology.
Chapter VI.—The Benefit of Culture.
Chapter VII.—The Eclectic Philosophy Paves the Way for Divine Virtue.
Chapter VIII.—The Sophistical Arts Useless.
Chapter IX.—Human Knowledge Necessary for the Understanding of the Scriptures.
Chapter X.—To Act Well of Greater Consequence Than to Speak Well.
Chapter XI.—What is the Philosophy Which the Apostle Bids Us Shun?
Chapter XII.—The Mysteries of the Faith Not to Be Divulged to All.
Chapter XIII.—All Sects of Philosophy Contain a Germ of Truth.
Chapter XIV.—Succession of Philosophers in Greece.
Chapter XV.—The Greek Philosophy in Great Part Derived from the Barbarians.
Chapter XVI.—That the Inventors of Other Arts Were Mostly Barbarians.
Chapter XVII.—On the Saying of the Saviour, “All that Came Before Me Were Thieves and Robbers.”
Chapter XVIII.—He Illustrates the Apostle’s Saying, “I Will Destroy the Wisdom of the Wise.”
Chapter XIX.—That the Philosophers Have Attained to Some Portion of Truth.
Chapter XX.—In What Respect Philosophy Contributes to the Comprehension of Divine Truth.
Chapter XXII.—On the Greek Translation of the Old Testament.
Chapter XXIII.—The Age, Birth, and Life of Moses.
Chapter XXIV.—How Moses Discharged the Part of a Military Leader.
Chapter XXV.—Plato an Imitator of Moses in Framing Laws.
Chapter XXVII.—The Law, Even in Correcting and Punishing, Aims at the Good of Men.
Chapter XXVIII.—The Fourfold Division of the Mosaic Law.
Chapter XXIX.—The Greeks But Children Compared with the Hebrews.
Book II. Chapter I.—Introductory.
Chapter II.—The Knowledge of God Can Be Attained Only Through Faith.
Chapter III.—Faith Not a Product of Nature.
Chapter IV.—Faith the Foundation of All Knowledge.
Chapter V.—He Proves by Several Examples that the Greeks Drew from the Sacred Writers.
Chapter VI.—The Excellence and Utility of Faith.
Chapter VII.—The Utility of Fear. Objections Answered.
Chapter VIII.—The Vagaries of Basilides and Valentinus as to Fear Being the Cause of Things.
Chapter IX.—The Connection of the Christian Virtues.
Chapter X.—To What the Philosopher Applies Himself.
Chapter XI.—The Knowledge Which Comes Through Faith the Surest of All.
Chapter XIII.—On First and Second Repentance.
Chapter XIV.—How a Thing May Be Involuntary.
Chapter XV.—On the Different Kinds of Voluntary Actions, and the Sins Thence Proceeding.
Chapter XVI.—How We are to Explain the Passages of Scripture Which Ascribe to God Human Affections.
Chapter XVII.—On the Various Kinds of Knowledge.
Chapter XIX.—The True Gnostic is an Imitator of God, Especially in Beneficence.
Chapter XX.—The True Gnostic Exercises Patience and Self-Restraint.
Chapter XXI.—Opinions of Various Philosophers on the Chief Good.
Book III. Caput I.—Basilidis Sententiam de Continentia Et Nuptiis Refutat.
Caput II.—Carpocratis Et Epiphanis Sententiam de Feminarum Communitate Refutat.
Caput IV.—Quibus Prætextibus Utantur Hæretici ad Omnis Genetis Licentiam Et Libidinem Exercendam.
Caput VII.—Qua in Re Christianorum Continentia Eam Quam Sibi Vindicant Philosophi Antecellat.
Caput X.—Verba Christi Matt. xviii. 20, Mystice Exponit.
Caput XI.—Legis Et Christi Mandatum de Non Concupiscendo Exponit.
Caput XIV.—2 Cor. xi. 3, Et Eph. iv. 24, Exponit.
Caput XV.—1 Cor. vii. 1 Luc. xiv. 26 Isa. lvi. 2, 3, Explicat.
Caput XVI.—Jer. xx. 14 Job xiv. 3 Ps. l. 5 1 Cor. ix. 27, Exponit.
Book IV. Chapter I.—Order of Contents.
Chapter II.—The Meaning of the Name Stromata or Miscellanies.
Chapter III.—The True Excellence of Man.
Chapter IV.—The Praises of Martyrdom.
Chapter V.—On Contempt for Pain, Poverty, and Other External Things.
Chapter VI.—Some Points in the Beatitudes.
Chapter VII.—The Blessedness of the Martyr.
Chapter VIII.—Women as Well as Men, Slaves as Well as Freemen, Candidates for the Martyr’s Crown.
Chapter IX.—Christ’s Sayings Respecting Martyrdom.
Chapter X.—Those Who Offered Themselves for Martyrdom Reproved.
Chapter XI.—The Objection, Why Do You Suffer If God Cares for You, Answered.
Chapter XII.—Basilides’ Idea of Martyrdom Refuted.
Chapter XIII.—Valentinian’s Vagaries About the Abolition of Death Refuted.
Chapter XIV.—The Love of All, Even of Our Enemies.
Chapter XV.—On Avoiding Offence.
Chapter XVI.—Passages of Scripture Respecting the Constancy, Patience, and Love of the Martyrs.
Chapter XVII.—Passages from Clement’s Epistle to the Corinthians on Martyrdom.
Chapter XVIII.—On Love, and the Repressing of Our Desires.
Chap. XIX.—Women as well as Men Capable of Perfection.
Chapter XXI.—Description of the Perfect Man, or Gnostic.
Chapter XXIII.—The Same Subject Continued.
Chapter XXIV.—The Reason and End of Divine Punishments.
Chapter XXV.—True Perfection Consists in the Knowledge and Love of God.
Chapter XXVI.—How the Perfect Man Treats the Body and the Things of the World.
Chapter III.—The Objects of Faith and Hope Perceived by the Mind Alone.
Chapter IV.—Divine Things Wrapped Up in Figures Both in the Sacred and in Heathen Writers.
Chapter V.—On the Symbols of Pythagoras.
Chapter VI.—The Mystic Meaning of the Tabernacle and Its Furniture.
Chapter VII.—The Egyptian Symbols and Enigmas of Sacred Things.
Chapter VIII.—The Use of the Symbolic Style by Poets and Philosophers.
Chapter IX.—Reasons for Veiling the Truth in Symbols.
Chapter X.—The Opinion of the Apostles on Veiling the Mysteries of the Faith.
Chapter XII.—God Cannot Be Embraced in Words or by the Mind.
Chapter XIII.—The Knowledge of God a Divine Gift, According to the Philosophers.
Chapter XIV.—Greek Plagiarism from the Hebrews.
Chapter II.—The Subject of Plagiarisms Resumed. The Greeks Plagiarized from One Another.
Chapter III.—Plagiarism by the Greeks of the Miracles Related in the Sacred Books of the Hebrews.
Chapter V.—The Greeks Had Some Knowledge of the True God.
Chapter VI.—The Gospel Was Preached to Jews and Gentiles in Hades.
Chapter VII.—What True Philosophy Is, and Whence So Called.
Chapter VIII.—Philosophy is Knowledge Given by God.
Chapter IX.—The Gnostic Free of All Perturbations of the Soul.
Chapter X.—The Gnostic Avails Himself of the Help of All Human Knowledge.
Chapter XI.—The Mystical Meanings in the Proportions of Numbers, Geometrical Ratios, and Music.
Chapter XII.—Human Nature Possesses an Adaptation for Perfection The Gnostic Alone Attains It.
Chapter XIII.—Degrees of Glory in Heaven Corresponding with the Dignities of the Church Below.
Chapter XIV.—Degrees of Glory in Heaven.
Chapter XV.—Different Degrees of Knowledge.
Chapter XVI.—Gnostic Exposition of the Decalogue.
Chapter XVII.—Philosophy Conveys Only an Imperfect Knowledge of God.
Chapter XVIII.—The Use of Philosophy to the Gnostic.
Chapter II.—The Son the Ruler and Saviour of All.
Chapter III.—The Gnostic Aims at the Nearest Likeness Possible to God and His Son.
Chapter IV.—The Heathens Made Gods Like Themselves, Whence Springs All Superstition.
Chapter V.—The Holy Soul a More Excellent Temple Than Any Edifice Built by Man.
Chapter VI.—Prayers and Praise from a Pure Mind, Ceaselessly Offered, Far Better Than Sacrifices.
Chapter VII.—What Sort of Prayer the Gnostic Employs, and How It is Heard by God.
Chapter VIII.—The Gnostic So Addicted to Truth as Not to Need to Use an Oath.
Chapter IX.—Those Who Teach Others, Ought to Excel in Virtues.
Chapter X.—Steps to Perfection.
Chapter XI.—Description of the Gnostic’s Life.
Chapter XII.—The True Gnostic is Beneficent, Continent, and Despises Worldly Things.
Chapter XIII.—Description of the Gnostic Continued.
Chapter XIV.—Description of the Gnostic Furnished by an Exposition of 1 Cor. vi. 1, Etc.
Chapter XV.—The Objection to Join the Church on Account of the Diversity of Heresies Answered.
Chapter XVI.—Scripture the Criterion by Which Truth and Heresy are Distinguished.
Chapter XVII.—The Tradition of the Church Prior to that of the Heresies.
Book VIII. Chapter I.—The Object of Philosophical and Theological Inquiry—The Discovery of Truth.
Chapter II.—The Necessity of Perspicuous Definition.
Chapter III.—Demonstration Defined.
Chapter IV.—To Prevent Ambiguity, We Must Begin with Clear Definition.
Chapter V.—Application of Demonstration to Sceptical Suspense of Judgment.
Chapter VI.—Definitions, Genera, and Species.
Chapter VII.—On the Causes of Doubt or Assent.
But the art of sophistry, which the Greeks cultivated, is a fantastic power, which makes false opinions like true by means of words. For it produces rhetoric in order to persuasion, and disputation for wrangling. These arts, therefore, if not conjoined with philosophy, will be injurious to every one. For Plato openly called sophistry “an evil art.” And Aristotle, following him, demonstrates it to be a dishonest art, which abstracts in a specious manner the whole business of wisdom, and professes a wisdom which it has not studied. To speak briefly, as the beginning of rhetoric is the probable, and an attempted proof88 ἐπιχειρημα. Ps. viii. 5. the process, and the end persuasion, so the beginning of disputation is what is matter of opinion, and the process a contest, and the end victory. For in the same manner, also, the beginning of sophistry is the apparent, and the process twofold; one of rhetoric, continuous and exhaustive; and the other of logic, and is interrogatory. And its end is admiration. The dialectic in vogue in the schools, on the other hand, is the exercise of a philosopher in matters of opinion, for the sake of the faculty of disputation. But truth is not in these at all. With reason, therefore, the noble apostle, depreciating these superfluous arts occupied about words, says, “If any man do not give heed to wholesome words, but is puffed up by a kind of teaching, knowing nothing, but doting (νοσῶν) about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh contention, envy, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, destitute of the truth.”89 1 Tim. vi. 3–5. [He treats the sophists with Platonic scorn, but adopts St. Paul’s enlarged idea of sophistry.] Rom. xvi. 26, 27.
You see how he is moved against them, calling their art of logic—on which, those to whom this garrulous mischievous art is dear, whether Greeks or barbarians, plume themselves—a disease (νοσος). Very beautifully, therefore, the tragic poet Euripides says in the Phœnissæ,—
“But a wrongful speech Is diseased in itself, and needs skilful medicines.”90 Phœnissæ, 471, 472. Ex. xxxiii. 11. |
For the saving Word91 [He has no idea of salvation by any other name, though he regards Gentile illumination as coming through philosophy.] Prov. vi. 6, 8. is called “wholesome,” He being the truth; and what is wholesome (healthful) remains ever deathless. But separation from what is healthful and divine is impiety, and a deadly malady. These are rapacious wolves hid in sheep-skins, men-stealers, and glozing soul-seducers, secretly, but proved to be robbers; striving by fraud and force to catch us who are unsophisticated and have less power of speech.
“Often a man, impeded through want of words, carries less weight In expressing what is right, than the man of eloquence. But now in fluent mouths the weightiest truths They disguise, so that they do not seem what they ought to seem,” |
says the tragedy. Such are these wranglers, whether they follow the sects, or practice miserable dialectic arts. These are they that “stretch the warp and weave nothing,” says the Scripture;92 Where, nobody knows. Rom. iii. 20. prosecuting a bootless task, which the apostle has called “cunning craftiness of men whereby they lie in wait to deceive.”93 Eph. iv. 14. Rom. v. 13. “For there are,” he says, “many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers.”94 Tit. i. 10. Rom. vii. 6. Wherefore it was not said to all, “Ye are the salt of the earth.”95 Matt. v. 13. 1 Tim. i. 9. For there are some even of the hearers of the word who are like the fishes of the sea, which, reared from their birth in brine, yet need salt to dress them for food. Accordingly I wholly approve of the tragedy, when it says:—
“O son, false words can be well spoken, And truth may be vanquished by beauty of words. But this is not what is most correct, but nature and what is right; He who practices eloquence is indeed wise, But I consider deeds always better than words.” |
We must not, then, aspire to please the multitude. For we do not practice what will please them, but what we know is remote from their disposition. “Let us not be desirous of vainglory,” says the apostle, “provoking one another, envying one another.”96 Gal. v. 26. Rom. xiii. 8–10.
Thus the truth-loving Plato says, as if divinely inspired, “Since I am such as to obey nothing but the word, which, after reflection, appears to me the best.”97 Plato, Crito, vi. p. 46. Luke x. 27.
Accordingly he charges those who credit opinions without intelligence and knowledge, with abandoning right and sound reason unwarrantably, and believing him who is a partner in falsehood. For to cheat one’s self of the truth is bad; but to speak the truth, and to hold as our opinions positive realities, is good.
Men are deprived of what is good unwillingly. Nevertheless they are deprived either by being deceived or beguiled, or by being compelled and not believing. He who believes not, has already made himself a willing captive; and he who changes his persuasion is cozened, while he forgets that time imperceptibly takes away some things, and reason others. And after an opinion has been entertained, pain and anguish, and on the other hand contentiousness and anger, compel. Above all, men are beguiled who are either bewitched by pleasure or terrified by fear. And all these are voluntary changes, but by none of these will knowledge ever be attained.
Ἡ δὲ σοφιστικὴ τέχνη, ἣν ἐζηλώκασιν Ἕλληνες, δύναμίς ἐστι φανταστική, διὰ λόγων δοξῶν ἐμποιητικὴ ψευδῶν ὡς ἀληθῶν· παρέχει γὰρ πρὸς μὲν πειθὼ τὴν ῥητορικήν, πρὸς τὸ ἀγωνιστικὸν δὲ τὴν ἐριστικήν. αἱ τοίνυν τέχναι [αὗται] ἐὰν μὴ μετὰ φιλοσοφίας γένωνται, βλαβερώτεραι παντί που εἶεν ἄν. ἄντικρυς γοῦν ὁ Πλάτων κακοτεχνίαν προσεῖπεν τὴν σοφιστικὴν ὅ τε Ἀριστοτέλης ἑπόμενος κλεπτικήν τινα αὐτὴν ἀποφαίνεται, ἅτε τὸ ὅλον τῆς σοφίας ἔργον πιθανῶς ὑφαιρουμένην καὶ ἐπαγγελλομένην σοφίαν ἣν οὐκ ἐμελέτησεν. ἐν βραχεῖ δὲ εἰπεῖν, καθάπερ τῆς ῥητορικῆς ἀρχὴ μὲν τὸ πιθανόν, ἔργον δὲ τὸ ἐπιχείρημα καὶ τέλος ἡ πειθώ, οὕτω τῆς ἐριστικῆς ἀρχὴ μὲν τὸ δόξαν, ἔργον δὲ τὸ ἀγώνισμα καὶ τέλος ἡ νίκη. τὸν αὐτὸν γὰρ τρόπον καὶ τῆς σοφιστικῆς ἀρχὴ μὲν τὸ φαινόμενον, ἔργον δὲ διττόν, τὸ μὲν ἐκ ῥητορικῆς διεξοδικὸν φαινομένον, τὸ δὲ ἐκ διαλεκτικῆς ἐρωτητικόν, τέλος δὲ αὐτῆς ἡ ἔκπληξις. ἥ τε αὖ θρυλουμένη κατὰ τὰς διατριβὰς διαλεκτικὴ γύμνασμα φιλοσόφου περὶ τὸ ἔνδοξον δείκνυται ἀντιλογικῆς ἕνεκεν δυνάμεως· οὐδαμοῦ δ' ἐν τούτοις ἡ ἀλήθεια. εἰκότως τοίνυν ὁ γενναῖος ἀπόστολος, ἐκφαυλίζων τὰς περιττὰς ταύτας τῶν λέξεων τέχνας, εἴ τις μὴ προσέρχεται ὑγιαίνουσι λόγοις φησί, διδασκαλίᾳ δέ τινι τετύφωται μηδὲν ἐπιστάμενος, ἀλλὰ νοσῶν περὶ ζητήσεις καὶ λογομαχίας, ἐξ ὧν γίνεται ἔρις, φθόνος, βλασφημία, ὑπόνοιαι πονηραί, διαπαρατριβαὶ διεφθαρμένων ἀνθρώπων τὸν νοῦν καὶ ἀπεστερημένων τῆς ἀληθείας. ὁρᾷς ὅπως πρὸς αὐτοὺς κεκίνηται, νόσον ὀνομάζων τὴν λογικὴν τέχνην αὐτῶν, ἐφ' ᾗ σεμνύνονται οἷς φίλη ἡ στωμύλος αὕτη κακοτεχνία, εἴτε Ἕλληνες εἶεν εἴτε καὶ βάρβαροι σοφισταί. παγκάλως οὖν ὁ τραγικὸς Εὐριπίδης ἐν ταῖς Φοινίσσαις λέγει· ὁ δὲ ἄδικος λόγος νοσῶν ἐν αὑτῷ φαρμάκων δεῖται σοφῶν. ὑγιαίνων μὲν γὰρ ὁ σωτήριος εἴρηται λόγος αὐτὸς ὢν ἀλήθεια, καὶ τὸ ὑγιαῖνον αἰεὶ ἀθάνατον μένει, ἡ δὲ ἀπὸ τοῦ ὑγιεινοῦ τε καὶ θείου διάκρισις ἀθεότης τε καὶ πάθος θανατηφόρον. λύκοι οὗτοι ἅρπαγες προβάτων κῳδίοις ἐγκεκρυμμένοι, ἀνδραποδισταί τε καὶ ψυχαγωγοὶ εὔγλωσσοι, κλέπτοντες μὲν ἀφανῶς, διελεγχόμενοι δὲ λῃσταί, αἱρεῖν ἀγωνιζόμενοι καὶ δόλῳ καὶ βίᾳ ἡμᾶς δὴ τοὺς ἀπερίττους, ὡς ἂν εἰπεῖν ἀδυνατωτέρους. ἀγλωσσίᾳ δὲ πολλάκις ληφθεὶς ἀνὴρ δίκαια λέξας ἧσσον εὐγλώσσου φέρει. νῦν δ' εὐρόοισι στόμασι τἀληθέστατα κλέπτουσιν, ὥστε μὴ δοκεῖν ἃ χρὴ δοκεῖν, ἡ τραγῳδία λέγει. τοιοῦτοι δὲ οἱ ἐριστικοὶ οὗτοι εἴτε αἱρέσεις μετίοιεν εἴτε καὶ διαλεκτικὰ συνασκοῖεν τεχνύδρια, οὗτοι οἱ τὰ κατάρτια κατασπῶντες καὶ μηθὲν ὑφαίνοντες, φησὶν ἡ γραφή, ματαιοπονίαν ἐζηλωκότες, ἣν κυβείαν ἀνθρώπων ὁ ἀπόστολος ἐκάλεσεν καὶ πανουργίαν, πρὸς τὴν μεθοδείαν τῆς πλάνης ἐπιτήδειον. εἰσὶ γάρ, φησί, πολλοὶ ἀνυπότακτοι, ματαιολόγοι, φρεναπατοῦντες. οὔκουν οὐ πᾶσιν εἴρηται· ὑμεῖς ἐστε οἱ ἅλες τῆς γῆς. εἰσὶ γάρ τινες τῶν καὶ τοῦ λόγου ἐπακηκοότων τοῖς ἰχθύσι τοῖς θαλασσίοις ἐοικότες, οἳ δὴ ἐν ἅλμῃ ἐκ γενετῆς τρεφόμενοι ἁλῶν ὅμως πρὸς τὴν σκευασίαν δέονται. ἐγὼ γοῦν καὶ πάνυ ἀποδέχομαι τὴν τραγῳδίαν λέγουσαν· ὦ παῖ, γένοιντ' ἂν εὖ λελεγμένοι λόγοι ψευδεῖς, ἐπῶν δὲ κάλλεσι[ν] νικῷεν ἂν τἀληθές· ἀλλ' οὐ τοῦτο τἀκριβέστατον, ἀλλ' ἡ φύσις καὶ τοὐρθόν· ὃς δὲ εὐγλωσσίᾳ νικᾷ, σοφὸς μέν, ἀλλὰ γὰρ τὰ πράγματα κρείσσω νομίζω τῶν λόγων ἀεί ποτε. οὔποτε ἄρα ὀρεκτέον τοῖς πολλοῖς ἀρέσκειν. ἃ μὲν γὰρ ἐκείνους ἥδει, οὐκ ἀσκοῦμεν ἡμεῖς· ἃ δὲ ἡμεῖς ἴσμεν, μακράν ἐστι τῆς ἐκείνων διαθέσεως. μὴ γινώμεθα κενόδοξοι, φησὶν ὁ ἀπόστολος, ἀλλήλους προκαλούμενοι, ἀλλήλους φθονοῦντες. ταύτῃ τοι ὁ φιλαλήθης Πλάτων οἷον θεοφορούμενος ὡς ἐγὼ τοιοῦτος φησίν, ὁποῖος οὐδενὶ ἄλλῳ ἢ τῷ λόγῳ πείθεσθαι, ὃς ἄν μοι σκοπουμένῳ βέλτιστος φαίνοιτο. αἰτιᾶται γοῦν τοὺς ἄνευ νοῦ καὶ ἐπιστήμης δόξαις πιστεύοντας, ὡς μὴ προσῆκον ἀφεμένους τοῦ ὀρθοῦ καὶ ὑγιοῦς λόγου τῷ κοινωνοῦντι τοῦ ψεύδους πιστεύειν. τὸ μὲν γὰρ ἐψεῦσθαι τῆς ἀληθείας κακόν ἐστι, τὸ δὲ ἀληθεύειν καὶ τὰ ὄντα δοξάζειν ἀγαθόν. τῶν δὲ ἀγαθῶν ἀκουσίως μὲν στέρονται ἄνθρωποι, στέρονται δὲ ὅμως ἢ κλαπέντες ἢ γοητευθέντες ἢ βιασθέντες καὶ εἰκῆ πιστεύσαντες. ὁ μὲν δὴ πιστεύσας ἑκὼν ἤδη παραναλίσκεται· κλέπτεται δὲ ὁ μεταπεισθεὶς [καὶ ὁ] ἐκλαθόμενος, ὅτι τῶν μὲν ὁ χρόνος, τῶν δὲ ὁ λόγος ἐξαιρούμενος λανθάνει· βιάζεταί τε πολλάκις ὀδύνη τε καὶ ἀλγηδὼν φιλονικία τε αὖ καὶ θυμὸς μεταδοξάσαι, καὶ ἐπὶ πᾶσι γοητεύονται οἱ ἤτοι ὑφ' ἡδονῆς κηληθέντες ἢ ὑπὸ φόβου δείσαντες· πᾶσαι δὲ ἀκούσιοι τροπαί, καὶ τούτων οὐδὲν ἄν ποτε ἐπιστήμην ἐκβάλοι.