Chapter I.—Truth Rather to Be Appealed to Than Custom, and Truth Progressive in Its Developments.
Chapter II.—Before Proceeding Farther, Let the Question of Custom Itself Be Sifted.
Chapter III.—Gradual Development of Custom, and Its Results. Passionate Appeal to Truth.
Chapter IV.—Of the Argument Drawn from 1 Cor. XI. 5–16.
Chapter V.—Of the Word Woman, Especially in Connection with Its Application to Eve.
Chapter VI.—The Parallel Case of Mary Considered.
Chapter VII.—Of the Reasons Assigned by the Apostle for Bidding Women to Be Veiled.
Chapter VIII.—The Argument E Contrario.
Chapter X.—If the Female Virgins are to Be Thus Conspicuous, Why Not the Male as Well?
Chapter XI.—The Rule of Veiling Not Applicable to Children.
Chapter XII.—Womanhood Self-Evident, and Not to Be Concealed by Just Leaving the Head Bare.
Chapter XIV.—Perils to the Virgins Themselves Attendant Upon Not-Veiling.
Chapter IX.—Veiling Consistent with the Other Rules of Discipline Observed by Virgins and Women in General.
Let us now see whether, as we have shown the arguments drawn from nature and the matter itself to be applicable to the virgin as well (as to other females), so likewise the precepts of ecclesiastical discipline concerning women have an eye to the virgin.
It is not permitted to a woman to speak in the church;33 1 Cor. xiv. 34, 35; 1 Tim. ii. 11, 12. but neither (is it permitted her) to teach, nor to baptize, nor to offer, nor to claim to herself a lot in any manly function, not to say (in any) sacerdotal office. Let us inquire whether any of these be lawful to a virgin. If it is not lawful to a virgin, but she is subjected on the self-same terms (as the woman), and the necessity for humility is assigned her together with the woman, whence will this one thing be lawful to her which is not lawful to any and every female? If any is a virgin, and has proposed to sanctify her flesh, what prerogative does she (thereby) earn adverse to her own condition? Is the reason why it is granted her to dispense with the veil, that she may be notable and marked as she enters the church? that she may display the honour of sanctity in the liberty of her head? More worthy distinction could have been conferred on her by according her some prerogative of manly rank or office! I know plainly, that in a certain place a virgin of less than twenty years of age has been placed in the order of widows! whereas if the bishop had been bound to accord her any relief, he might, of course, have done it in some other way without detriment to the respect due to discipline; that such a miracle, not to say monster, should not be pointed at in the church, a virgin-widow! the more portentous indeed, that not even as a widow did she veil her head; denying herself either way; both as virgin, in that she is counted a widow, and as widow, in that she is styled a virgin. But the authority which licenses her sitting in that seat uncovered is the same which allows her to sit there as a virgin: a seat to which (besides the “sixty years”34 1 Tim. v. 9. not merely “single-husbanded” (women)—that is, married women—are at length elected, but “mothers” to boot, yes, and “educators of children;” in order, forsooth, that their experimental training in all the affections may, on the one hand, have rendered them capable of readily aiding all others with counsel and comfort, and that, on the other, they may none the less have travelled down the whole course of probation whereby a female can be tested. So true is it, that, on the ground of her position, nothing in the way of public honour is permitted to a virgin.
CAPUT IX.
Videamus nunc, an, sicut naturae et caussae argumenta virgini quoque competere monstravimus, ita etiam disciplinae ecclesiasticae praescripta de muliere in virginem spectent . Non permittitur mulieri 0902A in ecclesia loqui (I Cor. XIV, 34; I Tim. II, 12), sed nec docere, nec tinguere, nec offerre, nec ullius virilis muneris, nedum sacerdotalis officii sortem vindicare. Quaeramus an aliquid horum virgini liceat. Si virgini non licet , sed in omnibus eadem conditione subjicitur, et necessitas humilitatis cum muliere censetur, unde illi unum hoc licebit, quod omni foeminae non licet? Quid praerogativae meretur adversus conditionem suam, si qua virgo est, et carnem suam sanctificare proposuit? Idcirco velaminis venia fit illi, ut in ecclesiam notabilis et insignis introeat, ut honorem sanctitatis in libertate capitis ostendat? Potuit dignius honorari aliqua praerogativa virilis aut gradus, aut officii. Plane scio alicubi virginem in viduatu ab annis nondum viginti 0902B collocatam. Cui si quid refrigerii debuerat episcopus, aliter utique salvo respectu disciplinae praestare potuisset, ne tale nunc miraculum, ne dixerim monstrum, in Ecclesia denotaretur: virgo vidua, hoc quidem portentuosior, quod nec qua vidua caput texit: utrumque se negans, et virginem, quae vidua deputetur, et viduam, quae virgo dicatur. Sed ea auctoritate illic sedet intecta , qua et virgo. Ad quam sedem praeter annos sexaginta (I Tim. V, 9) non tantum univirae, id est nuptae, aliquando eliguntur, sed et matres, et quidem educatrices filiorum, scilicet, ut experimentis omnium affectuum 0903A structae, facile norint caeteras et consilio et solatio juvare, et ut nihilominus ea decucurrerint, per quae foemina probari potest. Adeo nihil virgini ad honorem de loco permissum est.