11

a rational soul. For that which is born is not yet permitted to approach the temple of God, being defined as unclean by the law. So that, consequently, one might reasonably suppose that until the completion of the days of purification, the one being born does not have a logical and rational soul, but, as I said a little earlier, that of some plant or irrational animal, of those reckoned among existing things. But if the pretext for such an argument for you 14Ε_050 has become what the great Moses wrote, that a penalty is not required of one who strikes a pregnant woman, if before forty days it should happen through the blow that she miscarries the embryo, it must be known that the wise Moses was not indicating the entrance of the rational soul into the body at that time, but was declaring that the perfect formation of what was conceived is then completed, 1341 so for now he wrote this according to the plain sense.

In addition to all these things, I fear to accept such an argument, lest the order of the argument, proceeding in sequence, should justly make me liable to terrible accusations, which it is not right to say, inasmuch as the consequence of the argument forces me to say of our Lord and God, if indeed he truly deigned to become man as we are, without sin, that at his conception he became a soulless and mindless man, and that he remained so for forty days, when our holy Fathers and teachers cry out explicitly, or rather the truth that speaks and is spoken through them, that at the same time as the descent of God the Word at the conception, the Lord himself and God the Word was timelessly united to the flesh through a rational soul, and not that through soulless flesh he received a rational soul that was added to it, and that he did not assume a body that was completely soulless or a soul that was mindless and irrational, but that he ineffably united to himself hypostatically the perfect, undiminished nature which consists of a rational soul and a body at the same time. For this reason I especially hold to the doctrine of co-existence, appropriately dismissing those on either side who are opposed to each other and to the middle way, having the very author of nature as an irrefutable advocate and teacher of such a doctrine through the mystery of his own incarnation, who truly became man, and who confirmed through himself that nature, being perfect, subsists at the same time as it comes into being at its generation, 14Ε_052 and who innovated only in the innovation of nature, I mean conception by seed and birth by corruption, which nature drew upon itself after the transgression, having fallen away from the divine and spiritual increase in multitude, but not the principle of nature, according to which it both is and is naturally constituted at the same time as it exists, subsisting from a rational soul and a body.

RIA (111). CONCERNING HOW AN INNOVATION OCCURS IN THINGS BEING INNOVATED

THINGS ... Concerning how an innovation occurs in things being innovated

while they remain unchanged according to nature. For every innovation, to speak generally, naturally pertains to the mode of the thing being innovated, and not to the principle of its nature, which is why the principle, when innovated, destroys the nature, as it does not have the principle according to which it exists as something easily fashioned; but the mode, when innovated, while the principle according to nature is obviously preserved, displays the power of a miracle, as it evidently shows nature both being acted upon and acting beyond its own law. And the principle of human nature is for the nature to be soul and body and from a rational soul and a body, while the mode is the order in acting and being acted upon naturally,

11

νοεράν ψυχήν. Οὐ γάρ προσιτόν τῷ ναῷ τοῦ Θεοῦ τέως ἐστί τό τεχθέν, ὡς ἀκάθαρτον τῷ νόμῳ διοριζόμενον. Ὡς λοιπόν μέχρι τῆς τῶν ἡμερῶν τοῦ καθαρισμοῦ συμπληρώσεως μή ἔχειν τό τικτόμενον τήν λογικήν τε καί νοεράν ψυχήν κατά τόν εἰκότα λόγον ὑπονοεῖν, ἀλλά τινος, ὡς ἔφην μικρῷ πρόσθεν, φυτοῦ ἤ ζώου ἀλόγου τῶν ἐν τοῖς οὖσι διειλημμένων. Εἰ δέ πρόφασις ὑμῖν τοῦ τοιούτου λόγου 14Ε_050 καθέστηκε τό γεγραφέναι τόν μέγαν Μωϋσῆν, δίκας μή ἀπαιτεῖσθαι τόν πλήξαντα τήν κυοφοροῦσαν γυναῖκα, πρό τεσσαράκοντα ἡμερῶν εἰ συμβαίη διά τῆς πληγῆς αὐτήν παρά τόν καιρόν ἀποθέσθαι τό ἔμβρυον, ἰστέον ὡς οὐ τήν εἰς τό σῶμα τότε τῆς λογικῆς ψυχῆς γινομένην εἴσοδον ἐμφαίνων ὁ σοφός Μωϋσῆς, ἀλλά τόν τέλειον τοῦ καταβληθέντος ἐξεικονισμόν ἀπαρτίζεσαι τότε δηλῶν, 1341 τέως κατά τόν πρόχειρον νοῦν τοῦτο γέγραφε.

Προσεπιτούτοις δέ πᾶσι, δέδοικα τόν τοιοῦτον προσδέξασθαι λόγον, μήπως ἡ τοῦ λόγου καθ᾿ εἱρμόν προβαίνουσα τάξις φοβερῶν ποιήσῃ με δικαίως ἐγκλημάτων ὑπεύθυνον, ὅπερ μή θέμις εἰπεῖν ὅσον ἐκ τῆς ἀκολουθίας τοῦ λόγου με βιαζομένη τόν Κύριον ἡμῶν καί Θεόν λέγειν, εἴπερ ἀληθῶς καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς γενέσθαι κατηξίωσεως ἄνθρωπος χωρίς ἁμαρτίας, κατά τήν σύλληψιν ἄψυχον καί ἄνουν ἄνθρωπον γεγονέναι, καί τάς τεσσαράκοντα ἡμέρας οὕτως ἔχοντα μεμενηκέναι, τῶν ἁγίων Πατέρων ἡμῶν καί διδασκάλων διαῤῥήδην βοώντων, μᾶλλον δέ τῆς δι' αὐτῶν λαλούσης τε καί λαλουμένης ἀληθείας, ἅμα τῇ καθόδῳ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγου κατά τήν σύλληψιν ἀχρόνως διά μέσης ψυχῆς λογικῆς ἑνωθῆναι σαρκί τόν Κύριον αὐτόν καί Θεόν Λόγον, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ διά μέσης σαρκός ἀψύχου λογικήν ψυχήν προσδέξασθαι προσγινομένην, καί οὐκ ἄψυχον σῶμα παντελῶς ἤ ἄνουν ψυχήν καί ἄλογον ἐνειληφέναι, ἀλλά τελείαν ἀνελλιπῶς τήν φύσιν τήν ἐκ ψυχῆς λογικῆς ἅμα καί σώματος συνισταμένην ἑαυτῷ καθ᾿ ὑπόστασιν ἀῤῥήτως ἑνῶσαι. ∆ιό μάλιστα περιέχομαι τοῦ τῆς συνυπάρξεως λόγου, τούς ἐφ᾿ ἑκάτερα δι᾿ ἐναντίας ὄντας ἀλλήλοις τε καί τῇ μεσότητι προσφυῶς ἀποπεμπόμενος, αὐτόν τόν τῆς φύσεως ποιητήν ἔχων τῷ καθ᾿ ἑαυτόν μυστηρίῳ τῆς ἐνσωματώσεως τοῦ τοιούτου λόγου συνήγορόν τε καί διδάσκαλον ἀπαραλόγιστον, τόν γενόμενον ἀληθῶς ἄνθρωπον, καί τήν φύσιν τελείως ἔχουσαν ἅμα τῷ εἶναι κατά τήν γένεσιν ὑφίστασθαι 14Ε_052 δι᾿ ἑαυτοῦ βεβαιωσάμενον, καί μόνην καινοτομήσαντα τήν καινοτομίαν τῆς φύσεως λέγω δή τήν διά σπορᾶς σύλληψιν καί τήν διά φθορᾶς γέννησιν, ἅσπερ ἡ φύσις μετά τήν παράβασιν ἐπεσπάσατο, τῆς θείας ἀποπεσοῦσα καί πνευματικῆς εἰς πλῆθος αὐξήσεως, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ τόν λόγον τῆς φύσεως καθ᾿ ὅν ἔστι τε καί γίνεσθαι πέφυκεν ἅμα τῷ εἶναι ἐκ ψυχῆς λογικῆς ὑφισταμένη καί σώματος.

ΡΙΑ (111). ΠΕΡΙ ΤΟΥ ΠΩΣ ΚΑΙΝΟΤΟΜΙΑ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΙΝΟΤΟΜΟΥΜΕΝΩΝ

ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΩΝ ... Περί τοῦ πῶς καινοτομία γίνεται τῶν καινοτομουμένων πραγμάτων

μενόντων ἀτρέπτων κατά τήν φύσιν. Πᾶσα γάρ καθόλου φάναι καινοτομία περί τόν τρόπον τοῦ καινοτομουμένου

πράγματος πέφυκεν, ἀλλ᾿ οὐ περί τόν λόγον τῆς φύσεως γίνεσθαι, διόπερ ὁ μέν λόγος καινοτομούμενος φθείρει τήν φύσιν, οὐκ ἔχουσαν τόν καθ᾿ ὅν ἐστι λόγον ἀρᾳδιούργητον, ὁ δέ τρόπος καινοτομούμενος φυλαττομένου δηλαδή τοῦ κατά φύσιν λόγου θαύματος ἐνδείκνυται δύναμιν, ὡς τήν φύσιν ἐνεργουμένην τε καί ἐνεργοῦσαν ὑπέρ τόν ἑαυτῆς ἀποδεικνύς δηλονότι θεσμόν. Λόγος δέ φύσεως ἀνθρωπίνης ἐστί τό ψυχήν καί σῶμα καί ἐκ ψυχῆς λογικῆς εἶναι τήν φύσιν καί σώματος, τρόπος δέ ἡ ἐν τῷ ἐνεργεῖν καί ἐνεργεῖσθαι φυσικῶς τάξις ἐστίν,