7. A . Behold I have prayed to God. R A R A R A R A R A R A R A R A R A
13. When therefore the mind has come to have sound eyes, what next? A. That she look. R.
21. R. We have pain of body left, which perhaps moves thee of its proper force. A. R.
7. R. Give now still greater heed. A. R. A. R. A. R. A.
8. R. Define therefore the True. A. R. A. R. A. R. A.
19. R. What then think you? Is the science of debate true, or false? A. R. A. R. A. R. A.
22. R. Attend therefore to the few things that remain. A. R. A. R. A.
24. R. Groan not, the human mind is immortal. A. R. A. R. A. R.
32. R. What sayest thou concerning the rest? A. R. A R. A. R. A. R. A. R. A.
10. R. It is then plain to you that a line cannot possibly be longitudinally divided into two? A. Plainly so. R. What of a cross-section? A. This, of course, is possible to infinity. R. But is it equally apparent that if, beginning with the centre, you make any sections you please of a sphere, no two resulting circles will be equal? A. It is equally apparent. R. What are a line and a sphere? Do they seem to you to be identical, or somewhat different? A. Who does not see that they differ very much? R. If then you know this and that equally well, while yet, as you acknowledge, they differ widely from each other, there must be an indifferent knowledge of different things. A. Who ever disputed it? R. You, a little while ago. For when I asked thee what way of knowing God was in thy desire, such that thou couldst say, It is enough, thou didst answer that thou couldst not explain this, because thou hadst no perception held in such a way as that in which thou didst desire to perceive God, for that thou didst know nothing like God. What then? Are a line and sphere alike? A. Absurd. R. But I had asked, not what you knew such as God, but what you knew so as you desire to know God. For you know a line in such wise as you know a sphere, although the properties of a line are not those of a sphere. Wherefore answer whether it would suffice you to know God in such wise as you know that geometrical ball; that is, to be equally without doubt concerning God as concerning that.
10. R. Ergo lineam in duas lineas per longum scindi, manifestum tibi est nullo modo posse? A. Manifestum. R. Quid, transversim? A. Quid, nisi infinite secari posse? R. Quid, sphaeram ex una qualibet parte a medio, ne duos quidem pares circulos habere posse pariter lucet? A. Pariter omnino. R. Quid linea et sphaera? unumne aliquid tibi videntur esse, an quidquam inter se differunt? A. Quis non videat differre plurimum? R. At si aeque illud atque hoc nosti, et tamen inter se, ut fateris, plurimum differunt, est ergo differentium rerum scientia indifferens? A. Quis enim negavit? R. Tu paulo ante. Nam cum te rogassem 0875 quomodo velis Deum nosse, ut possis dicere, Satis est; respondisti te ideo nequire hoc explicare, quia nihil haberes perceptum, similiter atque Deum cupis percipere, nihil enim te scire Deo simile. Quid ergo nunc? linea vel sphaera similes sunt? A. Quis hoc dixerit? R. Sed ego quaesiveram, non quid tale scires, sed quid scires sic, quomodo Deum scire desideras. Sic enim nosti lineam ut nosti sphaeram, cum se non sic habeat linea ut se habet sphaera. Quamobrem responde utrum tibi satis sit sic Deum nosse, ut pilam illam geometricam nosti; hoc est, ita de Deo nihil, ut de illa, dubitare.