LETTER I (circa 1120)To the Canons Regular of Horricourt[1]
LETTER II (A.D. 1126)To the Monk Adam[1]
LETTER III (A.D. 1131)To Bruno,[1] Archbishop Elect of Cologne
LETTER IVTo the Prior and Monks of the Grand Chartreuse
LETTER V (circa A.D. 1127)To Peter, Cardinal Deacon
LETTER VI (circa A. D. 1127)To the Same
LETTER VII (towards the end of A.D. 1127)To Matthew, the Legate
LETTER VIII (circa A.D. 1130)To Gilbert, Bishop of London, Universal Doctor
LETTER IX (circa A.D. 1135)To Ardutio (or Ardutius, Bishop Elect of Geneva
LETTER X (in the Same Year)The Same, When Bishop
LETTER XI (circa A.D. 1120)The Abbot of Saint Nicasius at Rheims
LETTER XII (A.D. 1127)To Louis, King of France[1]
LETTER XIII (A.D. 1127)To the Same Pope, in the Name of Geoffrey,Bishop of Chartres.
LETTER XIV (circa A.D. 1129)To Alexander,[1] Bishop of Lincoln
LETTER XV (circa A.D. 1129)To Alvisus, Abbot of Anchin
LETTER XVI To Rainald, Abbot of Foigny
LETTER XIX (A.D. 1127)To Suger, Abbot of S. Denis
LETTER XX (circa A.D. 1130)To Guy, Abbot of Molêsmes
LETTER XXI (circa A.D. 1128)To the Abbot of S. John at Chartres
LETTER XXII (circa A.D. 1129)To Simon, Abbot of S. Nicholas
Letter XXIII (circa A.D. 1130)To the Same
LETTER XXIV (circa A.D. 1126)To Oger, Regular Canon [1]
LETTER XXV. (circa A.D. 1127)To the Same
LETTER XXVI. (circa A.D. 1127)To the Same
LETTER XXVII (circa A.D. 1127)To the Same
LETTER XXVIII (circa A.D. 1130)To the Abbots Assembled at Soissons [1]
LETTER XXIX (A.D. 1132)To Henry, King of England
LETTER XXX (circa A.D. 1132)To Henry, [1] Bishop of Winchester
LETTER XXXII (A.D. 1132)To Thurstan, Archbishop of York
LETTER XXXIV (circa A.D. 1130)Hildebert, Archbishop of Tours, to the Abbot Bernard. [1]
LETTER XXXV (circa A.D. 1130)Reply of the Abbot Bernard to Hildebert, Archbishop of Tours.
LETTER XXXVII (circa A.D. 1131)To Magister Geoffrey, of Loretto. [1]
LETTER XXXVIII (circa A.D. 1135)To His Monks of Clairvaux.
LETTER XXXIX (A.D. 1137)To the Same.
LETTER XLTo Thomas, Prior of Beverley
LETTER XLITo Thomas of St. Omer, After He Had Broken His Promise of Adopting a Change of Life.
LETTER XLIITo the Illustrious Youth, Geoffrey de Perrone, and His Comrades.
LETTER XLIIIA Consolatory Letter to the Parents of Geoffrey.
LETTER XLIVConcerning the Maccabees But to Whom Written is Unknown. [1]
LETTER XLV (circa A.D. 1120)To a Youth Named Fulk, Who Afterwards Was Archdeacon of Langres
LETTER XLVI (circa A.D. 1125)To Guigues, the Prior, And to the Other Monks of the Grand Chartreuse
LETTER XLVIITo the Brother of William, a Monk of Clairvaux. [1]
LETTER XLVIIITo Magister [1] Walter de Chaumont.
LETTER XLIXTo Romanus, Sub-Deacon of the Roman Curia.
LETTER LIITo Another Holy Virgin.
LETTER LIIITo Another Holy Virgin of the Convent of S. Mary of Troyes [1]
LETTER LIVTo Ermengarde, Formerly Countess of Brittany [1]
LETTER LVITo Beatrice, a Noble and Religious Lady
LETTER LVIITo the Duke and Duchess of Lorraine [1]
LETTER LVIIITo the Duchess of Lorraine
LETTER LIXTo the Duchess of Burgundy [1]
LETTER LX (A.D. 1140)To the Same, Against Certain Heads of Abaelard’s Heresies.
LETTER LXI (A.D. 1138)To Louis the Younger, King of the French.
LETTER LXII (A.D. 1139)To Pope Innocent.
LETTER LXIII (A.D. 1139)To the Same, in the Name of Godfrey, Bishop of Langres.
LETTER LXIV (A.D. 1139)To the Above-Named Falco.
LETTER XLV (circa A.D. 1140)To the Canons of Lyons, on the Conception of S. Mary.
He explains to the Pontiff the cause why the Bishop of Paris was unjustly oppressed by King Louis. The interdict of the bishops of France had put pressure upon him, and he had promised to make restitution, when the absolution of Honorius rendered him contumacious, and prevented his fulfilling his promise.
It is superfluous to recall to you, very holy Father, the cause and order of a very afflicting history, and to linger over what you have already heard from the pious Bishop of Paris, and which must have profoundly affected your paternal heart. Yet my testimony also ought not to be wanting to my brother and co-bishop; what I have seen and heard respecting this matter, this I have undertaken to make you acquainted with in few words. When the before-mentioned Bishop had brought forward his complaint, which he did with great moderation, in our provincial assembly, where had gathered with our venerable metropolitan the Archbishop of Sens, all the bishops of the province, and certain religious also whom we had summoned, we determined to represent to the King, with all becoming humility, his unjust proceeding, and to beg that he would restore to the Bishop unjustly maltreated what had been taken from him; but we obtained no satisfaction from him. Understanding, at length, that in 53order to defend the Church we had decided to have recourse to the weapons of the Church, he was afraid, and promised the restitution demanded. But almost in the same hour arrived your letter, ordering that the interdict over the royal domains should be raised, thus, unfortunately, strengthening the King in his evil doings, so that he did not perform at all what he had promised. Nevertheless, as he had given a fresh promise that he would do what we required, we presented ourselves on the day appointed. We laboured for peace, and it did not come; but instead of it worse confusion. Thus the effect of your letter has been that the goods unjustly seized are more unjustly retained, and those which remain are seized day by day, and that so much more securely, as he is assured of entire impunity in retaining them. The just (as we consider) interdict of the Bishop has been raised by your order, and as the fear of displeasing you has made us suspend that which we proposed to send forth by our own authority, and by which we hoped to obtain peace, we are made in the meantime the derision of our neighbours. How long is this to be? Let the compassion of your piety be exercised in our behalf.